Abstract
Background
The totally laparoscopic approach to partial gastrectomy had not been compared previously with results of the open technique. This study compares the results of a series of laparoscopic cases with matched open cases.
Methods
A retrospective case-matched study was performed in 36 patients (18 laparoscopic surgeries, 18 open surgeries). Each laparoscopic case was matched for patient age and indication for surgery. The intraoperative and postoperative details of the two groups were compared.
Results
Laparoscopic surgery resulted in less blood loss, although operative time was increased. Nasogastric tubes were less likely to be used after laparoscopic surgery, and patients in the laparoscopic group had an earlier return to normal bowel function than those in the open group. Length of hospital stay was 2 days shorter in the laparoscopic group.
Conclusions
The totally laparoscopic approach to partial gastrectomy is an excellent alternative to the more traditional open approach. It results in a more rapid return of intestinal function and a shorter hospital stay.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adachi Y, Shirashi N, Shiromizu A, Bandoh T, Aramaki M, Kitano S (2000) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Arch Surg 135: 806–810
Asencio F, Aguilo J, Salvador L, Villar A, De la Morena E, Ahamad M, Escrig J, Puche J, Viciano V, Sanmiguel G, Ruiz J (1997) Video-laparoscopic staging of gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 11: 1153–1158
Azagra JS, Goergen M, De Simone P, Ibanez-Aguirre J (1999) The current role of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of benign gastroduodenal diseases. Hepatogastroenterology 46: 1522–1526
Ballesta-Lopez C, Bastida-Vila X, Catarci M, Mato R, Ruggiero R (1996) Laparoscopic Billroth II subtotal gastrectomy with gastric stump suspension for gastric malignancies. Am J Surg 171: 289–292
Burke EC, Karphen MS, Conlon KC, Brennan MF (1997) Laparoscopy in the management of gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 225: 262–267
Buyske J, McDonald M, Fernandez C, Munson JL, Sanders LE, Tsao J, Birkett DH (1997) Minimally invasive management of low-grade benign gastric tumors. Surg Endosc 11: 1084–1087
Geis WP, Baxt R, Kim HC (1996) Benign tumors: minimally invasive approach. Surg Endosc 10: 407–410
Goh P, Tekant Y, Isaac J, Kum CK, Ngoi SS (1992) The technique of laparoscopic Billroth II gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 2: 258–260
Huscher CGS, Anastasi A, Crafa F, Recher A, Lirici MM (2000) Laparoscopic gastric resections. Semin Laparosc Surg 7: 26–54
Kitano S, Shimoda K, Miyahara M, Shiraishi N, Bandoh T, Yoshida T, Shuto K, Kobayashi M (1995) Laparoscopic approaches in the management of patients with early gastric carcinomas. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5: 359–362
Marcello PW, Milsom JW, Wong SK, Hammerhofer KA, Goormastic M, Church JM, Fazio VW (2000) Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 604–608
Naitoh T, Gagner M, Garcia-Ruiz A, Heniford BT, Ise H, Matsuno S (1999) Hand-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery provides safety and tactile sensation for malignancy or obesity. Surg Endosc 13: 157–160
Scott TR, Zucker KA, Bailey RW (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 12,397 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 2: 191–198
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Online publication: 5 July 2001
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reyes, C.D., Weber, K.J., Gagner, M. et al. Laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 15, 928–931 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080185
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080185