Skip to main content
Log in

Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for all pancreatic body and tail tumors: rationale and results

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) has been propagated as the standard of care for pancreatic cancers involving the body and tail of the pancreas. This procedure has been shown to have promising results in enhancing the microscopically negative tangential resection margins as well as the lymph node yield.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database on the resections performed for all pancreatic body and tail tumors at Tata Memorial Centre.

Results

Sixty-five patients underwent RAMPS without any perioperative mortality. The various pathologies comprised of adenocarcinoma (41.5%), neuroendocrine tumors (12.3%), solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm (15.3%), cystic neoplasms (15.2%), etc. The R0 resection rate was 87.7%. Among this cohort, 27 patients had pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The 3-year OS and DFS for distal pancreatic cancers were 56% and 38%, respectively, but 3-year OS and DFS for other distal pancreatic tumors were 97% and 73%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, R0 resection significantly improved disease-free survival (p = 0.023) for pancreatic cancer.

Conclusion

RAMPS procedure aids to achieve high negative tangential margins for all tumors involving the body and tail of the pancreas and not just pancreatic cancer in isolation. Since preoperative histologic diagnosis is not routinely indicated and also a number of other distal pancreatic tumors carry a relatively better prognosis compared with pancreatic cancer, our results provide further evidence that RAMPS should be considered as the procedure of choice for all operable tumors involving body and tail of the pancreas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D (2003) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery 133:521–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitchem JB, Hamilton N, Gao F, Hawkins WG, Linehan DC, Strasberg SM (2012) Long-term results of resection of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure. J Am Coll Surg 214:46–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Morchoe CC (1997) Lymphatic system of the pancreas. Microsc Res Tech 37:456–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M (2017) The 2016 update of the international study group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barreto SG, Shukla PJ, Shrikhande SV (2010) Tumors of the pancreatic body and tail. World J Oncol 1:52–65

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Brennan MF, Moccia RD, Klimstra D (1996) Management of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Ann Surg 223:506–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sperti C, Pasquali C, Pedrazzoli S (1997) Ductal adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. J Am Coll Surg 185:255–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shrikhande SV, Sivasanker M, Vollmer CM, Friess H, Besselink MG, Fingerhut A, Yeo CJ, Fernandez-delCastillo C, Dervenis C, Halloran C, Gouma DJ, Radenkovic D, Asbun HJ, Neoptolemos JP, Izbicki JR, Lillemoe KD, Conlon KC, Fernandez-Cruz L, Montorsi M, Bockhorn M, Adham M, Charnley R, Carter R, Hackert T, Hartwig W, Miao Y, Sarr M, Bassi C, Büchler MW (2017) Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: a position statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 161:1221–1234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Strasberg SM, Fields R (2012) Left-sided pancreatic cancer: distal pancreatectomy and its variants: radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy and distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection. Cancer J 18:562–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2007) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg 204:244–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Sano T, Kosuge T (2006) Prognostic factors after distal pancreatectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for invasive pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail. Surgery 139:288–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Christein JD, Kendrick ML, Iqbal CW, Nagorney DM, Farnell MB (2005) Distal pancreatectomy for resectable adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 9:922–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kooby DA, Hawkins WG, Schmidt CM, Weber SM, Bentrem DJ, Gillespie TW et al (2010) A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate? J Am Coll Surg 210(779–85):786–787

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kanda M, Fujii T, Sahin TT, Kanzaki A, Nagai S, Yamada S et al (2010) Invasion of the splenic artery is a crucial prognostic factor in carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Ann Surg 251:483–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamamoto J, Saiura A, Koga R, Seki M, Katori M, Kato Y, Sakamoto Y, Kokudo N, Yamaguchi T (2010) Improved survival of left-sided pancreas cancer after surgery. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40:530–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fujita T, Nakagohri T, Gotohda N, Takahashi S, Konishi M, Kojima M, Kinoshita T (2010) Evaluation of the prognostic factors and significance of lymph node status in invasive ductal carcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas. Pancreas 39:e48–e54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu X, Tao R, Lei R, Han B, Cheng D, Shen B, Peng C (2010) Distal pancreatectomy combined with celiac axis resection in treatment of carcinoma of the body/tail of the pancreas: a single-center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1359–1366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ (2010) Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 24:1533–1541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosso E, Langella S, Addeo P, Nobili C, Oussoultzoglou E, Jaeck D, Bachellier P (2013) A safe technique for radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with venous resection for pancreatic cancer. J Am Coll Surg 217:e35–e39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kitagawa H, Tajima H, Nakagawara H, Makino I, Miyashita T, Terakawa H, Nakanuma S, Hayashi H, Takamura H, Ohta T (2014) A modification of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the left pancreas: significance of en bloc resection including the anterior renal fascia. World J Surg 38:2448–2454

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Trottman P, Swett K, Shen P, Sirintrapun J (2014) Comparison of standard distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Am Surg 80:295–300

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Murakawa M, Aoyama T, Asari M, Katayama Y, Yamaoku K, Kanazawa A, Higuchi A, Shiozawa M, Kobayashi S, Ueno M, Morimoto M, Yamamoto N, Yoshikawa T, Rino Y, Masuda M, Morinaga S (2015) The short- and long-term outcomes of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. BMC Surg 15:120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Grossman JG, Fields RC, Hawkins WG, Strasberg SM (2016) Single institution results of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas in 78 patients. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 23:432–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hartwig W, Schneider L, Diener MK, Bergmann F, Büchler MW, Werner J (2009) Preoperative tissue diagnosis for tumours of the pancreas. Br J Surg 96:5–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cooper M, Newman NA, Ibrahim AM, Lam E, Herman JM, Singh VK et al (2013) Unnecessary tests and procedures in patients presenting with solid tumors of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1218–1223

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Abe T, Ohuchida K, Miyasaka Y, Ohtsuka T, Oda Y, Nakamura M (2016) Comparison of surgical outcomes between radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for left-sided pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 40:2267–2275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sierzega M, Bobrzyński Ł, Matyja A, Kulig J (2016) Factors predicting adequate lymph node yield in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for malignancy. World J Surg Oncol 14(1):248

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Neoptolemos JP, Palmer DH, Ghaneh P, Psarelli EE, Valle JW, Halloran CM, Faluyi O, O'Reilly DA, Cunningham D, Wadsley J, Darby S, Meyer T, Gillmore R, Anthoney A, Lind P, Glimelius B, Falk S, Izbicki JR, Middleton GW, Cummins S, Ross PJ, Wasan H, McDonald A, Crosby T, Ma YT, Patel K, Sherriff D, Soomal R, Borg D, Sothi S, Hammel P, Hackert T, Jackson R, Büchler MW (2017) Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 389(10073):1011–1024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fernández-Cruz L, Poves I, Pelegrina A, Burdío F, Sánchez-Cabus S, Grande L (2016) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic tumors: does size matter? Dig Surg 33:290–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee SH, Kang CM, Hwang HK, Choi SH, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2014) Minimally invasive RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer within Yonsei criteria: long-term (>median 3 years) oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 28:2848–2855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concept and design: MS, MG, and SVS. Acquisition of data: MS, AD, MB, and VC. Analysis and interpretation of data: MS, VC, and SVS. Drafting of the manuscript: MS and SVS. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: VC and SVS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shailesh V. Shrikhande.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The data of the present study were collected in the course of common clinical practice and accordingly, the signed informed consent was obtained from each patient for any clinical procedure as well as for clinical data procurement. The study protocol was in accordance with ethical standards of the institutional research committee and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Since this was a retrospective study, formal consent for this study is not required and no approval of the institutional research committee was needed.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sivasanker, M., Desouza, A., Bhandare, M. et al. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for all pancreatic body and tail tumors: rationale and results. Langenbecks Arch Surg 404, 183–190 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01763-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01763-4

Keywords

Navigation