Abstract
Objectives
Wound infections after abdominal surgery are still frequent types of nosocomial infections. Suture materials might serve as a vehicle for mechanical transport of bacteria into the surgical wound. To reduce bacterial adherence to surgical sutures, triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 suture materials with antiseptic activity (Vicryl plus®) were developed. The aim of this prospective non-randomized clinical pathway driven study was to ascertain if the use of Vicryl plus® reduced the number of wound infections after transverse laparotomy.
Patients and methods
Between October 2003 and October 2007, 839 operations were performed using a transverse abdominal incision. In the first time period, a PDSII® loop suture was used for abdominal wall closure. In the second time period, we used Vicryl plus®. Risk factors were collected prospectively to compare the two groups.
Results
Using a PDSII® loop suture for abdominal wall closure in the first time period, 9.2% of the patients developed wound infections. In the second time period, using Vicryl plus®, the number of wound infections decreased to 4.3% (p < 0,005). Both groups were comparable regarding risk factors despite no other changes in protocols of patient care.
Conclusion
Antiseptic-coated loop Vicryl suture for abdominal wall closure can be superior to PDSII sutures in respect to the development of wound infections after a two-layered closure of transverse laparotomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson M et al (1999) The Hospital Infection Control Practice Advisory Commitee. Guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections. Am J Infect Control 27:97–132
Engemann JJ, Carmeli Y, Cosgrove SE et al (2003) Adverse and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection. Clin Infect Dis 36:592–598
National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (2004) National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report. Data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 32:470–485
Edmiston CE (2001) Surgical site infection control in the critical care environment. In: Rello J, Vanes J, Kollef M (eds) Critical care infectious disease, 1st edn. Kluwer, Boston, pp 817–831
Alexander JW, Kaplan JZ, Altemeier WA (1967) Role of suture materials in the development of wound infection. Ann Surg 165:192–199
Katz S, Izhar M, Mirelman D (1981) Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures. A possible factor in suture induced infection. Ann Surg 194:235
Edlich RF, Panek PH, Rodeheaver GT et al (1973) Physical and chemical configuration of sutures in the development of surgical infection. Ann Surg 177:679–687
Uff CR, Scott AD, Pockley AG et al (1995) Influence of soluble suture factors on in vitro macrophage function. Biomaterials 16:335–360
Edmiston CE, Seabrook GR, Goheen MP et al (2006) Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination? J Am Coll Surg 203:481–498
Rothenburger S, Spangler D, Bhende S et al (2002) In vitro antimicrobial evaluation of coated VICRYL* Plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 with triclosan) using zone of inhibition assays. Surg Infect 1:79–87
Justinger C, Moussavian MR, Schlueter C et al (2009) Antibiotic coating of abdominal closure sutures and wound infection. Surgery 145(3):330–334
Seiler CM, Bruckner T, Diener MK et al (2009) Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541). Ann Surg 249(4):576–582
Krukowski ZH, Cusick EL, Engeset J et al (1987) Polydioxanone or polypropylene for closure of midline abdominal incisions: a prospective comparative clinical trial. Br J Surg 74:828–830
Cameron AE, Parker CJ, Field ES et al (1987) A randomised comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polypropylene (Prolene) for abdominal wound closure. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 69:113–115
Weiland DE, Bay RC, Del SS (1998) Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis. Am J Surg 176:666–670
Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K et al (2010) Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 251(5):843–856
Bolli M, Schilling MK (2006) Incision and closure of the abdominal wall. Chirurg 77(5):408–413
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) (1963) New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 24:111
Zhan C, Miller MR (2003) Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization. JAMA 290:1868–1874
Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T (2000) The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 231(3):436–442
Weber WP, Marti WR, Zwahlen M et al (2008) The timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. Ann Surg 247(6):918–926
Rodeheaver GT, Kurtz LD, Belamy WT et al (1983) Biocidal braided sutures. Arch Surg 118:322–327
Elek SD, Conen PE (1957) The virulence of S. pyogenes for man. A study of the problems of wound infection. Br J Exp Pathol 38:573–586
Howe CW, Marston AT (1962) A study on sources of postoperative staphylococcal infection. Surg Gynecol Obstet 115:266
Pratten J, Nazhat SN, Blaker JJ et al (2004) In-vitro attachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis to surgical sutures with and without Ag-containing bioactive glass coating. J Biomater Appl 19:47–57
Singhal JP, Singh J, Ray AR et al (1991) Antibacterial multifilament nylon sutures. Biomater Artif Cells Immobil Biotechnol 19:631–648
Storch ML, Rothenburger SJ, Jacinto G (2004) Experimental efficacy study of coated Vicryl Plus antibacterial suture in guinea pigs challenged with Staphylococcus aureus. Surg Infect 5:281–288
Gómez-Alonso A, García-Criado FJ, Parreño-Manchado FC et al (2007) Study of the efficacy of Coated VICRYL Plus antibacterial suture (coated Polyglactin 910 suture with Triclosan) in two animal models of general surgery. J Infect 54:82–88
Graeber S, Richter S, Folz J et al (2007) Clinical pathways in general surgery. Development, implementation, and evaluation. Methods Inf Med 46(5):574–579
Schuld J, Richter S, Folz J et al (2008) Influence of IT-supported clinical pathways on patient satisfaction at a surgical department of a university hospital. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 133(23):1235–1239
Acknowledgement
The authors are grateful to Mrs. T. Serrano Contreras and Mrs. B. Kopp for their statistical assistance.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This prospective non-randomized clinical pathway driven study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov–ID: NCT00932503.
Christoph Justinger and Jochen Schuld contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Justinger, C., Schuld, J., Sperling, J. et al. Triclosan-coated sutures reduce wound infections after hepatobiliary surgery—a prospective non-randomized clinical pathway driven study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396, 845–850 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0786-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0786-7