Skip to main content
Log in

Risk assessment after hip fracture

Check the “healthy” leg!

Risikoassessment nach Hüftfraktur

Prüfen Sie die „gesunde“ Seite!

  • Beiträge zum Themenschwerpunkt
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aim

Functional deficits may increase the risk for further falls after hip fracture. The aim of this study was to elucidate function and range of movement (ROM)-related risk factors.

Methods

The consecutive, prospective study included all patients admitted to the rehabilitation unit. The geriatric assessment was performed after admission and before discharge; ROM was measured using the neutral zero method. Falls, defined as unintentionally coming to rest on the floor, were documented. Patients’ functions were analyzed comparing fallers to nonfallers.

Results

A total of 1,497 patients with a mean age of 81.1 ± 8.2 years were included. The incidence of falls during rehabilitation was 9.6 per 1,000 patient–days and was related to patients’ age: patients younger than 75 years had an incidence of falls of 5.0, those between 75–84 years had an incidence of 9.5, and those >84  years had an incidence of 12.0, respectively. Fallers showed significantly more functional deficits both in the operated and on the nonoperated leg. Using logistic regression models, especially ROM measured in the frontal plane (hip adduction and abduction) of the nonoperated hip was significantly associated with an increased risk of falling (OR 0.986, 95% CI 0.973–0.999, p = 0.037).

Conclusion

Patients are at high risk for falls after hip fracture, with age itself being one of the most dominant risk factors. In addition to previously identified gait and mobility disorders, the physical limitations of arthritis of the “healthy” hip seem to be responsible for the functional decline. Therefore, it would be of interest to include the examination of the hips into a falls risk assessment battery.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund und Ziel

Funktionelle Einschränkungen führen zu einem erhöhten Sturzrisiko nach proximaler Femurfraktur. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war es, den Zusammenhang zwischen Funktionsdefiziten und Gelenkbeweglichkeit („range of movement“) zu erfassen.

Patienten und Methode

In die konsekutive, prospektive Studie wurden alle in der Abteilung für Akutgeriatrie und Remobilisation betreuten Patienten eingeschlossen. Nach der Aufnahme und vor der Entlassung wurde das geriatrische Assessment durchgeführt und die Gelenkbeweglichkeit mittels Neutral-Null-Methode gemessen. Stürze wurden dokumentiert. Die Funktionsparameter wurden zwischen Stürzern und Nichtstürzern verglichen.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt wurden 1497 Patienten mit einem Durchschnittsalter von 81,1 ± 8,2 Jahren eingeschlossen. Die Sturzinzidenz lag bei 9,6 für 1000 Patiententage und korrelierte mit dem Patientenalter: Patienten unter 75 Jahren hatten eine Sturzinzidenz von 5, die zwischen 75 und 84 Jahren zeigten eine Inzidenz von 9,5 und jene älter als 84 Jahre eine Inzidenz von 12,0. Stürzer wiesen signifikant mehr funktionelle Defizite sowie Einschränkungen der Gelenkbeweglichkeit beider Hüften auf. In der Regressionsanalyse erwies sich die Einschränkung der Hüftadduktion und -abduktion als relevant.

Zusammenfassung

Patienten haben nach Hüftfraktur ein erhöhtes Risiko für weitere Stürze. Das Alter per se ist einer der wichtigsten Sturzrisikofaktoren. Neben den bereits früher identifizierten Gehstörungen und Mobilitätseinschränkungen scheinen die klinischen Zeichen der Koxarthrose auf der „gesunden“ Seite für das Sturzrisiko verantwortlich zu sein. Deshalb wäre es von Interesse, die Untersuchung beider Hüftgelenke in Sturzrisikoassessmentbatterien aufzunehmen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bendall MJ, Bassey EJ, Pearson MB (1989) Factors affecting walking speed of elderly people. Age Ageing 18(5):327–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell AJ, Borrie MJ, Spears GF et al (1990) Circumstances and consequences of falls experienced by a community population 70 years and over during a prospective study. Age Ageing 19:136–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cole TM, Tobis JS (1990) Measurement of musculoskeletal function. In: Kottke FJ, Lehmann JF (eds) Krusen’s handbook of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 4th edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 20–71

  4. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG (1993) Muscles: testing and function, 4th edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD

  6. Kim HJ, Chun HJ, Han CD et al (2011) The risk assessment of a fall in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 36(9):588–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Larsson L, Grimby G, Karlsson J (1979) Muscle strength and speed of movement in relation to age and muscle morphology. J Appl Physiol 46:451–456

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lexell J (1995) Human aging, muscle mass, and fiber type composition. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 50(Spec No):11–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marschollek M, Nemitz G, Gietzelt M et al (2009) Predicting in-patient falls in a geriatric clinic. Z Gerontol Geriatr 42:317–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Melton LJ 3rd (1996) Epidemiology of hip fractures: implications of the exponential increase with age. Bone 18:121–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nigg BM, Fisher V, Allinger TL et al (2002) Range of motion of the foot as a function of age. Foot ankle13:336–343

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pils K, Neumann F, Meisner W et al (2003) Predictors of falls in elderly people during rehabilitation after hip fracture – who is at risk of a second one? Z Gerontol Geriatr 36(1):16–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Province MA, Hadley EC, Hornbrook MC et al (2005) The effects of exercise on falls in elderly patients. A preplanned meta-analysis of the FISCIT Trials. Frailty and Injuries: Cooperative Studies of Intervention Techniques. JAMA 273:1381–1383

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rapp K, Becker C, Lamb SE et al (2008) Hip fractures in institutionalized elderly people: incidence rates and excess mortality. J Bone Miner Res 23:1825–1831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Renteln-Kruse WV, Kraus T (2004) Sturzereignisse stationärer geriatrischer Patienten – Ergebnisse einer 3-jährigen prospektiven Erfassung. Z Gerontol Geriatr 37:9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roach KE, Miles TP (1991) Normal hip and knee active range of motion: the relationship to age. Phys Ther 71(9):656–665

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR, Osterweil D (1996) Falls and fall prevention in the nursing home. Clin Geriatr Med 12:881–902

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sato Y, Inose M, Higuchi I et al (2002) Changes in the supporting muscles of the fractured hip in elderly women. Bone 30:325–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Speechley M, Tinetti M (1991) Falls and injuries in frail and vigorous community elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 29:46–52

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stillwell GK, Lateur BJ de, Fordyce WE et al (1986) Physiatric therapeutics, 2nd edn. American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chicago, IL

  21. Tiedemann A, Shimada H, Sherrington C et al (2008) The comparative ability of eight functional mobility tests for predicting falls in community-dwelling older people. Age Ageing 37:430–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF (1988) Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med 319:1701–1707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tromp AM, Pluijm SM, Smit JH et al (2001) Fall-risk screening test: a prospective study on predictors for falls in community-dwelling elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 54:837–844

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Helden S van, Wyers CE, Dagnelie PC et al (2007) Risk of falling in patients with a recent fracture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vasallo M, Poynter L, Sharma JC et al (2008) Fall risk-assessment tools compared with clinical judgment: an evaluation in a rehabilitation ward. Age Ageing 37:277–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yesavage JA (1988) Geriatric Depression Scale. Psychopharmacol Bull 24:709–711

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Pils MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pils, K., Meisner, W., Haas, W. et al. Risk assessment after hip fracture. Z Gerontol Geriat 44, 375–380 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-011-0256-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-011-0256-4

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation