Abstract
Background:
Since the 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, federal and state funding, primarily from the National Bioterrorism Hospital Preparedness Program, has resulted in a surge of hospital activity to prepare for future natural or human-caused catastrophes. Trauma centers were integrally involved in the response to the 2001 attacks as first receivers of patients, communication hubs, and as convergence sites for families, the worried well, volunteers, and donors. After the Madrid train station terrorist attack, Congress identified the need to study trauma center preparedness as an essential part of the nation’s emergency management system.
Methods:
The NFTC received a one-year grant funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC/NCIPC) to survey the capability and capacity of trauma centers to respond successfully to mass casualty incidents, particularly those brought about by acts of terrorism. This report summarizes responses to a US CDC/NCIPC-funded survey, R 49 CE000792-01, sent to all designated or verified Level I and II trauma centers in the US, to which 33% or 175 trauma centers replied.
Results:
The results are categorized by preparedness scoring, vulnerability, threats, and funding. Planning communication, surge capacity, diversion, sustainability, special populations, and finance represent additional categories examined in the survey.
Conclusions:
Trauma centers are a major resource in disaster management. One-hundred and seventy-five centers candidly reported their resources and vulnerabilities. This inventory should be expanded to all trauma centers and recommendations for change as discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
US Department of State. Patterns of global terrorism. Washington: US Department of State, 2003. Available at http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2003/c12153.htm. Updated 22 June 2004.
Ciraulo DL, Barie PS, Briggs SM, et al. An update on the surgeons scope and depth of practice to all hazards emergency response. J Trauma 2006;60:1267–1274.
IOM. Hospital-based emergency care: at the breaking point (pre-publication copy). Washington: Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, 2006: 201–224, 275–282.
Auf der Heide E. The importance of evidence-based disaster planning. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 47:34–49.
Auf der Heide E. Principles of hospital disaster planning. In: Hogan D, Burstein JL, eds. Disaster Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002: 57–89.
Nathens AB, Jurkovich GJ, Rivara FP, Maier RV. Effectiveness of state trauma systems in reducing injury-related mortality: a national evaluation. J Trauma 2000; 48:25–31.
West JG, Gazzaniga AB, Cales RH. Trauma care systems: clinical, financial, and political considerations. New York: Praeger, 1983.
Committee on Trauma. Hospital and prehospital resources for the injured patient. Bull Am Coll Surg 1986; 71:4–12.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA best practices for hospital-based first receivers of victims from mass casualty incidents involving release of hazardous substances. Washington: OHSA, 2005. http://www.ohsa.gov.
Auf der Heide E. Common misperceptions about disasters: panic, the “Disaster Syndrome” and looting. O’Leary M, ed. The first 72 hours: a community approach to disaster preparedness. Lincoln: iUniverse, 2004: 340–80.
Minutaglio B. City on fire. New York: HarperCollins, 2003.
Fritz CE, Mathewson JH. Convergence behavior in disasters: a problem in social control, disaster study (No. 9, Publication No. 476). Washington: Committee on Disaster Studies, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, 1957.
Medalia J. Terrorist “dirty bombs”: a brief primer (RS21528). Washington: Congressional Research Service, 2004. Available at: http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/crs/RS21528.pdf.
Burgess M. Pascal’s new wager: the dirty bomb threat heightens. Washington: Center For Defense Information, 2003. Available at: http://www.cdi.org/terrorism/dirty-bomb-pr.cfm.
Ackerman MG (2004) Trauma and terror response: the funding connection. forging excellence in trauma. Arlington: National Foundation for Trauma Care 9th Annual Trauma Center Management Conference & System Management Course, 2 Oct 2004: 1–23.
Mayer-Schoenberger V. Emergency communications: the quest for interoperability in the United States and Europe (BCSIA discussion paper 2002-7, ESDP discussion paper ESDP-2002-03). Cambridge: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2002. Available at: http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/2798/emergency_communications.html. Last accessed 21 Jan 2008.
Page D. Internet protocol may solve communications interoperability. Fire Chief (online), 2006. Available at: http://www.firechief.com/communications/firefighting_internet_protocol_may/index.html.
Linderman D. The state of interoperable communications: perspectives from the field, 2005.
NFTC. US trauma center crisis: lost in the scramble for terror resources. Irvine: National Foundation for Trauma Care, 2004.
O’Conner C. Hurricane Katrina. In: Ciraulo DL, mod. Disaster Management Workshop: Lessons Learned From Hurricane Katrina. Orlando: The 20th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, 10-14 January 2006.
MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Frey KP, Egleston BL, Salkever DS, Scharfstein DO. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. NEJM 2006; 354:366–78.
Kirschenbaum L, Keene A, O’Neill P, Westfal R, Astiz ME. The experience at St. Vincent’s Hospital, Manhattan, on 11 September 2001. Preparedness, response, and lessons learned. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:S48–S52.
Vogt BM, Sorensen JH. How clean is safe? Improving the effectiveness of decontamination of structures and people following chemical and biological incidents (ORNL/TM-2002/1 78). Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2002.
Auf der Heide E. Disaster response: principles of preparation and coordination. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1989. Available at: http://orgmail2.coe-dmha.org/dr/index.htm.
Mattox KL. Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: role of individuals and collaborative networks in mobilizing/coordinating societal and professional resources for major disasters. Crit Care Med 2005; 10:205.
Berggren R. Unexpected necessities — inside charity hospital. NEJM 2005; 353:1550–3.
Henderson GS. Finding supplies. NEJM 2005; 353:1542.
Schultz CH, Koenig KL, Lewis RJ. Implications of hospital evacuation after the Northridge, California, Earthquake. NEJM 2003; 348:1349–55.
Cocannour CS, Allen SJ, Mazabob J, Sparks JW, Fischer CP, Romans J, Lally KP. Lessons learned from the evacuation of an urban teaching hospital. Arch Surg 2002; 137:1141–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trunkey, D.D. US Trauma Center Preparation for a Terrorist Attack in the Community. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 35, 244–264 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-009-9901-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-009-9901-7