Abstract
The past decade has been a period of rapid growth in the representation of social sciences in the curriculum of medical education. The social ferment of the 1960’s precipitated an enormous interest in the health of disadvantaged individuals and social groups. Awareness of the importance of social and economic factors as determinants of the health levels of individuals and groups became acute. Further, the discrepancies of access to health care associated with social, economic and cultural factors became clear. Students were outraged that these injustices had not been previously recognized and corrected. Curriculum “reform” became the by-word of the day and an important part of the reform was to consist of enhancement of the role of social, especially behavioral, sciences in medical teaching and practice. New faculty members were recruited, new courses were developed, and whole new departments sprang into being. Students and faculty alike were urged to view the patient as a “whole person” and terms such as holistic medicine, comprehensive care, continuity of services began to appear frequently in medical literature. Simultaneous with the increased awareness of social factors as determinants of health in disadvantaged groups came an awareness of many unsatisfactory aspects of the health care system for all segments of society. Increased specialization and fragmentation of medical care as it was delivered by many specialists and sub-specialists to a single individual led to the conviction that no one was keeping an overall eye on the health problems of any one person. The concept of a new type of health care provider, the family physician, grew rapidly; (s)he was to be a felicitous combination of the attributes of the old general practitioner and the skills of the most common aspects of internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics-gynecology, and psychiatry. Great emphasis was placed on the physician’s understanding of individual and family behavior. Increased recognition was given to the restoration or maintenance of individual and family function as a legitimate product of the process of medical care.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, F. H. 1934 The J-curve Hypothesis of Conforming Behavior. Journal of Social Behavior 141: 183.
Bergner, M., et al. 1976a The Sickness Impact Profile: Validation of a Health Status Measure. Medical Care 14–57
1976b The Sickness Impact Profile: Conceptual Formulation and Methodology for the Development of a Health Status Measure. International Journal of Health Services 6:393.
Bobbitt, R. A., et al. 1966 Development and Application of an Observational Method: Continuing Reliability Testing. Journal of Psychiatry 63:83.
Campbell, D. T., and D. W. Fiske 1959 Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-multimethod Matrix. Psychology Bulletin 56:81.
Carter, W. B., et al. 1976 The Validation of an Interval Scaling: The Sickness Impact Profile. Health Services Research. Winter 1976:516–528.
Cronbach, L. J. 1951 Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika 16:297.
Cronbach, L. J. and G. C. Gleser 1953 Assessing Similarity Between Profiles. Psychology Bulletin 50:456.
Ekwall, B. 1960 Method for Evaluating Indications for Rehabilitation in Chronic Hemiplegia. Acta Medica Scandinavica, Suppl 450.
Flexner, A. 1910 Medical Education in the United States and Canada; A Report to Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Bulletin Number Four. New York.
Gilson, B. S.,et al. 1972–73 Development and Application of the Sickness Impact Profile: A Pilot Study. Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, xerox.
1973–74 Revision and Test of the Sickness Impact Profile, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, xerox.
1974–75 Further Tests and Revision of the Sickness Impact Profile, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, xerox.
1975 The Sickness Impact Profile: Development of an Outcome Measure of Health Care. American Journal of Public Health 65:1304.
Gillo, M. W. and M. W. Shelly 1974 Predictive Modeling of Multivariable and Multivariate Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, September 646–653.
Gleser, G. C. Undated Quantifying Similarity Between People. In The Role and Methodology of Classification in Psychiatry and Psychopathology, USDHEW, PHS.
Haataja, M. 1975 Evaluation of the Activity of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Scand. J. Rheum. 4:Supp. 7.
Harris, W. H. 1973 Preliminary Report of Results of Harris Total Hip Replacement. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research 95:168.
Katz, S., et al. 1963 Studies of Illness in the Aged: The Index of A.D.L. Journal of the American Medical Association 185:914.
Meltzer, J. W. and J. R. Hochstim 1970 Reliability and Validity of Survey Data of Physical Health. Public Health Reports 85:1075.
Phillips, T. J., et al. In Progress. “The Value of Functional Health Assessment in Patient Management by the Family Physician.”
Pollard, W. E., et al. 1976 The Sickness Impact Profile: Reliability of a Health Status Measure. Medical Care 14:146.
1978 Examination of Variable Errors of Measurement in a Survey-based Social Indicator. Social Indicators Research 5:279.
Sokal, R. R. and P. H. A. Sneath 1963 Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Company.
Tryon, R. C. and D. E. Bailey 1970 Cluster Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare 1972 Interviewing Methods in the Health Interview Survey. Vital and Health Statistics: Series 2, No. 48.
1975 Publication No. (HRA) 76-1776.
1976 Publication No. (HRA) 77-1539.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bergner, M., Gilson, B.S. (1981). The Sickness Impact Profile: The Relevance of Social Science to Medicine. In: Eisenberg, L., Kleinman, A. (eds) The Relevance of Social Science for Medicine. Culture, Illness, and Healing, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8379-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8379-3_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1185-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8379-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive