Skip to main content
main-content

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

01.12.2015 | original article | Ausgabe 4/2015

neuropsychiatrie 4/2015

Using Rasch-models to compare the 30-, 20-, and 12-items version of the general health questionnaire taking four recoding schemes into account

Zeitschrift:
neuropsychiatrie > Ausgabe 4/2015
Autoren:
PhD Ao.Univ.Prof. Mag.Dr. Rainer W. Alexandrowicz, MD Fabian Friedrich, MD Rebecca Jahn, MD Nathalie Soulier
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s40211-015-0160-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Summary

Background

The present study compares the 30-, 20-, and 12-items versions of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) in the original coding and four different recoding schemes (Bimodal, Chronic, Modified Likert and a newly proposed Modified Chronic) with respect to their psychometric qualities.

Methods

The dichotomized versions (i.e. Bimodal, Chronic and Modified Chronic) were evaluated with the Rasch-Model and the polytomous original version and the Modified Likert version were evaluated with the Partial Credit Model.

Results

In general, the versions under consideration showed agreement with the model assumption. However, the recoded versions exhibited some deficits with respect to the Outfit index.

Conclusions

Because of the item deficits and for theoretical reasons we argue in favor of using the any of the three length versions with the original four-categorical coding scheme. Nevertheless, any of the versions appears apt for clinical use from a psychometric perspective.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Zusatzmaterial
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

neuropsychiatrie 4/2015 Zur Ausgabe

bericht aus dem ögpp-vorstand

Bericht aus dem Vorstand

bericht aus dem ögkjp-vorstand

Bericht des Präsidiums