nach oben

Erschienen in:

Open Access 11.11.2022 | original article

The impact of COVID-19 on liver transplantation programs in Austria

verfasst von: Lukas Hartl, MD, Elisabeth Tatscher, MD, Melanie Weiss, Lorenz Balcar, MD, Robert Strassl, MD, Mathias Jachs, MD, Mattias Mandorfer, MD PhD, Thomas Soliman, MD, Vanessa Stadlbauer, MD, Peter Schemmer, MD, Gabriela Berlakovich, MD, Herbert Tilg, MD, Stefan Schneeberger, MD, Michael Trauner, MD, Peter Fickert, MD, Assoc.-Prof. PD Dr. Thomas Reiberger, MD, Prim. Univ. Prof. Dr. Ivo Graziadei, MD

Erschienen in: Wiener klinische Wochenschrift | Ausgabe 23-24/2022

Summary

Background

Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) has affected liver disease management. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Austrian orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) programs, however, has not been systematically investigated.

Methods

All patients listed for OLT in Austria during 2020–2021 were studied. Data on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing, vaccinations, infections, mortality and the overall number of OLTs (vs. pre-COVID-19: 2015–2019) were analyzed.

Results

Overall, 490 patients (median age: 58.0 years, 70.4% men, hepatocellular carcinoma: 27.3%) were listed for OLT in Austria in 2020–2021. Alcohol-related cirrhosis (35.3%), cholestatic (16.7%) and viral liver disease (13.9%) were the main etiologies. Of the patients 61.2% underwent OLT and 8.8% died while on the waiting list.

The number of OLTs performed during COVID-19 (2020: n = 150; 2021: n = 150) remained unchanged compared to pre-COVID-19 (median: n = 152).

Among waiting list patients, 7.7% (n = 31/401) were diagnosed with COVID-19 and 7 (22.6%) of these patients died.

By the end of 2021, 45.1% (n = 176/390; 82.8% mRNA vaccinations) and 28.8% (105/365) of patients received 2 and 3 SARS-CoV‑2 vaccinations, respectively. After two SARS-CoV‑2 vaccinations, antibodies more often remained undetectable in patients vaccinated post-OLT (25.6% vs. 6.5% in patients vaccinated pre-OLT; p = 0.034). Patients with three vaccinations after OLT had lower antibody titers than patients vaccinated pre-OLT (post-OLT: 513.5, IQR 44.4–2500.0 vs. pre-OLT: 2500.0, IQR 1462.0–2500.0 BAU/mL; p = 0.020).

Conclusion

The number of OLTs in Austria remained unchanged during COVID-19. SARS-CoV‑2 infections were rare but associated with high mortality in patients on the Austrian OLT waiting lists. SARS-CoV‑2 vaccination rates at the end of 2021 were suboptimal, while serological response was better in patients vaccinated pre-OLT vs. post-OLT.

The authors Lukas Hartl and Elisabeth Tatscher contributed equally to the manuscript and share first authorship.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ACLD

Advanced chronic liver disease

ALD

Alcoholic liver disease

BAU/mL

Binding Antibody Units/milliliter

COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019

Ethics committee

HCC

Hepatocellular carcinoma

IQR

Interquartile range

MELD

Model for end-stage liver disease

MRNA

Messenger ribonucleic acid

NASH

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

OLT

Orthotopic liver transplantation

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

SARS-CoV‑2

Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2

Introduction

The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which originated in Wuhan, China in late 2019 [1, 2], causes considerable morbidity and mortality due to the continuous spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [3, 4]. COVID-19 reached Europe in early 2020, necessitating drastic measures to limit the spread of the virus [5]. These included the implementation of protective equipment, banning of large gatherings, travel restrictions, as well as physical distancing, also leading to a temporarily significant downscaling of in-hospital care for chronically ill patients, particularly in outpatient clinics and reduction of face-to-face visits [5‐9].

Advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) patients are susceptible to severe courses of COVID-19 and may experience hepatic decompensation during or after SARS-CoV‑2 infections [4, 10‐15]. Moreover, some studies have also reported worse outcomes among patients after solid organ transplantation compared to the general public [16, 17]. Thus, international societies rapidly published consensus statements for management of ACLD patients and patients after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) during the COVID-19 pandemic [6, 7, 18], emphasizing the need for guideline-conform treatment, but also recommending a decrease of face-to-face visits and outsourcing of laboratory testing to local laboratories [6, 18].

Even in the early phase of the pandemic, grave effects of COVID-19 on OLT concerning utilization of healthcare resources, SARS-CoV‑2 infections of organ donors or recipients, increased OLT waiting list morbidity and increased liver-related mortality were expected [19‐21].

Indeed, the OLT program was temporarily suspended by many transplant centers in the USA in early 2020 [22] and, organ availability significantly decreased in Italy [23]. In line, a global web-based survey found that the number of OLT candidates was significantly decreased early during the pandemic [24]. Later, the OLT frequency returned to normality and some centers even reported increased numbers of OLTs from deceased donors with a particular increase of alcoholic liver disease (ALD) as a reason for OLT during the pandemic [25‐27].

Moreover, ACLD patients and particularly patients after OLT have poor antibody responses to SARS-CoV‑2 vaccines [28, 29], potentially leading to insufficient protection against COVID-19 in a significant number of patients.

The aims of this study were to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on OLT in Austria by assessing (i) the number of OLTs performed prior to and during COVID-19, (ii) the prevalence and outcome of SARS-CoV‑2 infections of patients on the OLT waiting list and (iii) the prevalence of SARS-CoV‑2 vaccination and antibody titer response among patients on the OLT waiting list during COVID-19.

Material and methods

Study population

This retrospective study included all patients on the OLT waiting list in the three Austrian OLT centers (Innsbruck, Vienna and Graz) during COVID-19 (i.e. 2020 and 2021). Clinical and laboratory parameters, including age, sex, date of listing for OLT, etiology of ACLD, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), model for end-stage liver disease score (MELD) at the time of listing for OLT, SARS-CoV‑2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests performed at the OLT center, SARS-CoV‑2 infection, SARS-CoV‑2 vaccination (2 or 3 times), type of SARS-CoV‑2 vaccine, SARS-CoV‑2 antibody titer response, OLT, death and COVID-19-related death were assessed by chart review. COVID-19-related death was defined as death due to respiratory, inflammatory, thromboembolic or hemodynamic complications after SARS-CoV‑2 infection. Notably, not all parameters were available for every patient due to the retrospective study design. Moreover, the number of OLTs performed in the years 2015–2019 (pre-COVID-19) was recorded.

Laboratory parameters

All parameters were assessed by standard laboratory assays. Reverse transcriptase-PCR systems were used for SARS-CoV‑2 PCR testing [30]. For measurement of SARS-CoV‑2 antibody titers, the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV‑2 S immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics International Ltd, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) [31, 32] was used, quantifying antibodies to the receptor-binding domain of the viral spike protein of SARS-CoV‑2 with a detection range between 0.4 and 2500.0 binding antibody units per mL (BAU/mL). In line with previous studies [33], antibody concentrations of more than 0.8 BAU/mL were considered as positive SARS-CoV‑2 antibodies. Humoral immune response to vaccination was defined as presence of positive SARS-CoV‑2 spike protein-specific antibodies at least 4 weeks after the second or third standard vaccination.

Statistical analysis

Number (n) and proportion (%) of patients exhibiting the parameter of interest were reported for categorical variables. Where appropriate, the total number of available values (total n) was added. Median with interquartile range (IQR) was used to report continuous data. To test for normal distribution, D’Agostino and Pearson and Shapiro-Wilk normality tests were implemented. Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous variables between two groups. Pearson’s χ²-testor Fisher’s exact test was used for group comparisons of categorical variables as appropriate. GraphPad Prism 8 (Graphpad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) and IBM SPSS 25.0 statistic software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) were implemented for statistical analysis. A two-sided p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethics

The study was approved by the ethics committees (EC) of the Medical University of Vienna, Graz and Innsbruck (EK 1461/2020; EK 1326/2021; EK 1336/2021). It was performed according to the current version of the Helsinki Declaration. Due to the retrospective study design, the need for informed consent was waived by the EC.

Results

Patient characteristics and outcomes (Table 1)

In total, 490 ACLD patients who were listed for OLT in Austria during the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e. in 2020 and 2021) were included in this study. The median age at listing for OLT was 58.0 years and 70.4% of patients were male. The most common ACLD etiologies were ALD (35.3%; n = 173), followed by cholestatic (16.7%; n = 82), viral liver disease (13.9%; n = 68) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH; 8.2%; n = 40). 27.3% (n = 134) of patients had HCC. Median MELD at the time of listing for OLT was 15.0 points, 61.2% (n = 300) of ACLD patients listed for OLT during COVID-19 were transplanted until the end of 2021 and 8.8% (n = 43) died on the waiting list.

Table 1

Characteristics of patients listed for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in Austria during COVID-19 (i.e. in 2020 and 2021)

Patient characteristics	Patients listed for OLT n = 490
Sex, male/female (% male)	345/145 (70.4)
Age, years (IQR)	58.0 (16.0)
Main etiology of ACLD
ALD, n (%)	173 (35.3)
Viral, n (%)	68 (13.9)
NASH, n (%)	40 (8.2)
Cholestatic, n (%)	82 (16.7)
AIH	21 (4.3)
Cryptogenic, n (%)	23 (4.7)
Other, n (%)	83 (16.9)
MELD, median (IQR)^a	15.0 (10.0)
Hepatocellular carcinoma, n (%)	134 (27.3)
Orthotopic liver transplantation, n (%)	300 (61.2)
Death on the waiting list, n (%)	43 (8.8)

ACLD advanced chronic liver disease; AIH autoimmune hepatitis; ALD alcoholic liver disease; MELD model for end-stage liver disease; NASH non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; IQR interquartile range

^aAt the time when the patient was listed for OLT

Number of patients undergoing OLT in Austria prior to and during COVID-19 (Fig. 1)

A total of 150 ACLD patients underwent OLT in 2020 and in 2021, which was approximately equal compared to the pre-COVID-19 period (2015–2019: median n = 152, IQR 26.5 patients), as detailed in Fig. 1. Interestingly, compared to the first half, 23.9% more patients were transplanted in the second half of 2020 (January–June/2020: n = 67 vs. July–December/2020: n = 83). Conversely, 38.1% more patients underwent OLT in the first half year of 2021 compared to the second half of the year (January–June/2021: n = 87 vs. July–December/2021: n = 63).

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing, SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19-related deaths among patients on the OLT list during COVID-19 (Table 2; Fig. 2)

Of the ACLD patients listed for OLT during COVID-19, 81.8% (n = 401/490) were tested for SARS-CoV‑2 by PCR test at the OLT centers at least once, 7.7% (n = 31) of patients with available SARS-CoV‑2 PCR test were infected with SARS-CoV‑2, 7 patients with SARS-CoV‑2 infection died and all of these deaths were COVID-19-related. Thus, 1.4% of ACLD patients listed for OLT during COVID-19 had COVID-19-related death, which was equivalent to 22.6% of ACLD patient listed for OLT with SARS-CoV‑2 infection.

Table 2

Prevalence of SARS-CoV‑2 infections and outcomes of patients listed for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in Austria during COVID-19 (i.e. in 2020 and 2021)

Parameters	Patients listed for OLT n = 490
SARS-CoV‑2 PCR available, n (%)	401 (81.8)
SARS-CoV‑2 positive, n/total n (%)	31/401 (7.7)
COVID-19-related death, n/total n (%)	7/31 (22.6)

COVID-19 coronavirus disease of 2019; PCR polymerase chain reaction; SARS-CoV‑2 severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus‑2

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among patients on the OLT list during COVID-19 (Table 3; Fig. 3)

Of all patients with available information concerning SARS-CoV‑2 vaccination (n = 390/490), 45.1% (n = 176/390) were vaccinated at least twice at the end of 2021 and 82.8% (n = 125) of ACLD patients listed for OLT with at least 2 SARS-CoV‑2 vaccinations received an mRNA vaccination.

Table 3

Prevalence of vaccination and SARS-CoV‑2 titer response in patients listed for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in Austria during COVID-19 (i.e. in 2020 and 2021)

Parameters	Number of patients listed for OLT
2 × SARS-CoV‑2 vaccinated, n/Total n (%)¹	176/390 (45.1)
mRNA vaccination, n/Total n (%)²	125/151 (82.8)
SARS-CoV‑2 antibody titer assessed, n/Total n (%)	70/176 (39.8)
SARS-CoV‑2 antibody titer after 2 vaccinations
Vaccinated prior to OLT (n = 31), BAU/mL (IQR)	575.0 (2359.0)	p = 0.630
Vaccinated after OLT (n = 39), BAU/mL (IQR)	350.0 (2499.5)	p = 0.630
SARS-CoV‑2 antibody titer not detectable after 2 vaccinations
Vaccinated prior to OLT, n/Total n (%)	2 (6.5)	p = 0.034
Vaccinated after OLT, n/Total n (%)	10 (25.6)	p = 0.034
3 × SARS-CoV‑2 vaccinated, n/Total n (%)³	105/365 (28.8)
SARS-CoV‑2 antibody titer assessed, n/Total n (%)	46/105 (43.8)
SARS-CoV‑2 antibody titer after 3 vaccinations
Vaccinated prior to OLT (n = 28), BAU/mL (IQR)	2500.0 (1038.0)	p = 0.020
Vaccinated after OLT (n = 18), BAU/mL (IQR)	513.5 (2455.6)	p = 0.020
SARS-CoV‑2 antibody titer not detectable after 3 vaccinations
Vaccinated prior to OLT, n/Total n (%)	0 (0.0)	p = 0.207
Vaccinated after OLT, n/Total n (%)	1 (5.6)	p = 0.207

SARS-CoV‑2 severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus‑2

^anumber of patients with available information on at least 2 previous SARS-CoV‑2 vaccinations: n = 390/490 (79.6%)

^bnumber of patients with available information on the type of received vaccination (mRNA vs. vector): n = 151/176 (85.8%)

^cnumber of patients with available information on 3 previous SARS-CoV‑2 vaccinations: n = 365/490 (74.5%)

Information on presence of three SARS-CoV‑2 vaccinations was available in 365 patients, 28.8% (n = 105) of these patients were 3 times SARS-CoV‑2 vaccinated, which was equivalent to 59.7% of patients with at least 2 SARS-CoV‑2 vaccinations.

SARS-CoV-2 antibody response to vaccination in patients on the OLT list during COVID-19 (Table 3; Fig. 4 )

Out of all ACLD patients listed for OLT during COVID-19 with at least two SARS-CoV‑2 vaccinations, 39.8% (n = 70) had SARS-CoV‑2 titers determined after the second SARS-CoV‑2 vaccination. From these patients, 31 (44.3%) were vaccinated before OLT (pre-OLT) and 39 (55.7%) were vaccinated after OLT (post-OLT).

Overall, patients after three vaccinations had significantly higher SARS-CoV‑2 antibody titers (two vaccinations: 460.5 [IQR 53.7–2500.0]BAU/mL vs. three vaccinations: 2500.0 [IQR 227.0–2500.0]BAU/mL; p = 0.001).

Median SARS-CoV‑2 antibody titers were numerically lower among patients being vaccinated after OLT (pre-OLT: 575.0 [IQR 141.0–2500.0]BAU/mL vs. post-OLT: 350.0 [IQR 0.5–2500.0]BAU/mL), however, there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.630), possibly due to the low sample size. While there were patients with undetectable SARS-CoV‑2 antibodies among both groups, either vaccinated pre-OLT (n = 2; 6.5%) or post-OLT (n = 10; 25.6%), the prevalence of patients with undetectable SARS-CoV‑2 antibodies was higher in the post-OLT SARS-CoV‑2 vaccination cohort (p = 0.034).

Among patients with three SARS-CoV‑2 vaccinations, 43.8% (n = 46) had SARS-CoV‑2 antibody titers available. Antibody titers were significantly higher in patients vaccinated pre-OLT (pre-OLT: 2500.0 [IQR 1462.0–2500.0]BAU/mL vs. post-OLT: 513.5 [IQR 44.4–2500.0]BAU/mL; p = 0.020) and there was only one patient with three vaccinations post-OLT with negative SARS-CoV‑2 antibody titer (n = 1/18; 5.6%).

Discussion

In this large retrospective study, we thoroughly investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Austrian OLT scene in 2020 and 2021. We showed that despite an initial drop in OLTs, the overall number of OLTs were virtually unchanged compared to pre-COVID-19 throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the prevalence of SARS-CoV‑2 infections was low among ACLD patients listed for OLT during COVID-19, the mortality of SARS-CoV‑2 infected patients was considerable (22.6%). At the end of 2021, vaccination coverage was poor among ACLD patients listed for OLT with only 45.1% of patients being SARS-CoV‑2 vaccinated at least twice. Importantly, patients who were vaccinated pre-OLT had higher SARS-CoV‑2 antibody titers and lower prevalence of negative SARS-CoV‑2 antibodies after vaccination.

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted on patients undergoing OLT and in the postoperative phase in numerous aspects. Firstly, worldwide transplant centers reported decreased number of OLTs performed particularly during the initial stage of COVID-19 [22‐24], followed by an increase in the number of OLTs [25‐27]. In line with these findings, the number of OLTs was relatively lower during the first half year of the pandemic with a subsequent increase in OLTs, particularly during the second half year of 2020 and the first half year of 2021; however, the overall number of patients undergoing OLT in Austria during COVID-19 (2020 and 2021) was unchanged when compared to pre-COVID-19 (i.e. 2015–2019). Interestingly, the number of deceased liver donors increased in 2020–2021 in the Eurotransplant region, unlike the number of other organ donors (e.g. heart and lung donors, which decreased during this time period) [34]. Moreover, in contrast to some other European OLT centers [35, 36], the OLT program in Austria was never completely shut down during the pandemic.

While the majority of ACLD patients listed for OLT during COVID-19 underwent PCR testing for SARS-CoV‑2, the prevalence of SARS-CoV‑2 infections was low in this population (7.7% of patients tested). We can only speculate about the reasons for this fact; however, national and international societies published recommendations at the beginning and also throughout the pandemic [6, 7, 18, 37], emphasizing the need for reduction of face-to-face contacts and social distancing for ACLD patients and patients after OLT. Thus, it might be the case that ACLD patients on the OLT list were well-informed about the high risk of SARS-CoV‑2 infections [10, 15] and may have been particularly restrictive and careful with social interactions.

Among ACLD patients listed for OLT with SARS-CoV‑2 infection, mortality was very high, since almost one quarter deceased. Notably, all these deaths were COVID-19-related. This is in line with previously reported high mortality of SARS-CoV‑2 infection in ACLD patients [10, 14, 15].

Safe and efficient vaccines for SARS-CoV‑2 have been available since the end of 2020 [38‐40], which was emphasized by a statement issued by the Austrian Society for Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH) in February 2021 that also recommended SARS-CoV‑2 vaccination to all stable ACLD patients and patients after OLT [41]. Nevertheless, SARS-CoV‑2 vaccination rates were poor at the end of 2021, with only 45.1% of ACLD included patients being vaccinated at least twice and 28.8% of patients being vaccinated three times, despite information campaigns in all three centers. This might be due to high morbidity among ACLD patients on the OLT list; however, we cannot rule out that skepticism and concerns towards the vaccines may have played a role in this, as well.

In line with previous literature, antibody titer response was negative in ACLD patients and especially in patients post-OLT after two SARS-CoV‑2 vaccinations [28, 29]. Fittingly, SARS-CoV‑2 antibody titers after three vaccinations were higher in patients, who were vaccinated pre-OLT. One patient, who was vaccinated post-LT had negative SARS-CoV‑2 antibodies even after three vaccinations. This emphasizes the importance of SARS-CoV‑2 vaccination before OLT in order to be reliably sufficiently protected against severe courses of COVID-19.

Our study also has limitations: firstly, because of the retrospective study design, selection bias cannot be completely ruled out; however, we tried to minimize selection bias by including all patients who were listed for OLT during COVID-19. Moreover, not all variables were available for every single patient, which holds especially true for information on (three time) vaccination and antibody titer response. While this certainly is a limitation of the study, our results are well in line with previous publications and represent a real-life situation. Furthermore, the number of patients who received a single dose of SARS-CoV‑2 vaccine was not evaluated. Moreover, as we did not assess etiology of liver disease in patients undergoing OLT pre-COVID-19, we cannot analyze, whether there was a change in liver disease etiology in patients undergoing OLT during COVID-19; however, an increase in ALD during the pandemic has been reported in other studies [25‐27] and progressive cholestasis, as well as secondary sclerosing cholangitis after COVID-19 are also relevant for OLT during COVID-19 [14].

In conclusion, we were able to show that the COVID-19 pandemic had diverse effects on ACLD patients on the OLT list, as well as on patients after OLT in Austria. Overall, the numbers of OLTs performed in Austria were stable compared to pre-COVID-19 (i.e. 2019); however, new challenges, including the need for testing for SARS-CoV‑2, arose. The prevalence of SARS-CoV‑2 infections of patients on the OLT list was low but linked to considerable mortality. At the end of 2021, less than half of ACLD patients on the OLT list during COVID-19 were SARS-CoV‑2 vaccinated at least twice and less than one third were vaccinated three times. Assessed by SARS-CoV‑2 antibody titers, patients who were vaccinated pre-OLT responded better with lower rates of negative SARS-CoV‑2 antibodies.

Conflict of interest

M. Mandorfer served as a speaker and/or consultant and/or advisory board member for AbbVie, Collective Acumen, Gilead and W. L. Gore & Associates and received travel support from AbbVie and Gilead. M. Trauner received grant support from Albireo, Alnylam, Cymabay, Falk, Gilead, Intercept, MSD, Takeda and Ultragenyx, honoraria for consulting from Albireo, Boehringer Ingelheim, BiomX, Falk, Genfit, Gilead, Intercept, MSD, Novartis, Phenex, Regulus and Shire, speaker fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Falk, Gilead, Intercept and MSD, as well as travel support from AbbVie, Falk, Gilead and Intercept and is the co-inventor of patents on the medical use of 24-norursodesoxycholic acid. T. Reiberger received grant support from AbbVie, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Gilead, MSD, Philips Healthcare, Gore; speaking honoraria from AbbVie, Gilead, Gore, Intercept, Roche, MSD; consulting/advisory board fee from AbbVie, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Gilead, Intercept, MSD, Siemens; and travel support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Gilead and Roche. L. Hartl, E. Tatscher, M. Weiss, L. Balcar, R. Strassl,M. Jachs, T. Soliman, V. Stadlbauer, P. Schemmer, G. Berlakovich, H. Tilg, S. Schneeberger, , P. Fickert and I. Graziadei declare that they have no competing interests.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Vorheriger Artikel Impact of COVID-19 on elective, emergency and oncological surgery during the first and the second wave in a tertiary university hospital

Nächster Artikel Early administration of remdesivir may reduce mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Abo für kostenpflichtige Inhalte

Jetzt informieren

Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497–506.CrossRef

Atzrodt CL, Maknojia I, McCarthy RDP, Oldfield TM, Po J, Ta KTL, et al. A Guide to COVID-19: a global pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV‑2. FEBS J. 2020;287(17):3633–50.CrossRef

Li H, Liu SM, Yu XH, Tang SL, Tang CK. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): current status and future perspectives. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55(5):105951.CrossRef

Hartl L, Haslinger K, Angerer M, Jachs M, Simbrunner B, Bauer DJM, et al. Age-adjusted mortality and predictive value of liver chemistries in a Viennese cohort of COVID-19 patients. Liver Int. 2022;42(6):1297–307.CrossRef

Hartl L, Semmler G, Hofer BS, Schirwani N, Jachs M, Simbrunner B, et al. COVID-19-related downscaling of in-hospital liver care decreased patient satisfaction and increased liver-related mortality. Hepatol Comm. 2021;5(10):1660–75.CrossRef

Boettler T, Newsome PN, Mondelli MU, Maticic M, Cordero E, Cornberg M, et al. Care of patients with liver disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: EASL-ESCMID position paper. JHEP Rep. 2020;2(3):100113.CrossRef

Boettler T, Marjot T, Newsome PN, Mondelli MU, Maticic M, Cordero E, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on the care of patients with liver disease: EASL-ESCMID position paper after 6 months of the pandemic. JHEP Rep. 2020;2(5):100169.CrossRef

Chu DK, Akl EA, Duda S, Solo K, Yaacoub S, Schünemann HJ. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV‑2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2020;395(10242):1973–87.CrossRef

Lai CC, Wang CY, Wang YH, Hsueh SC, Ko WC, Hsueh PR. Global epidemiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): disease incidence, daily cumulative index, mortality, and their association with country healthcare resources and economic status. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55(4):105946.CrossRef

10.

Iavarone M, D’Ambrosio R, Soria A, Triolo M, Pugliese N, Del Poggio P, et al. High rates of 30-day mortality in patients with cirrhosis and COVID-19. J Hepatol. 2020;73(5):1063–71.CrossRef

11.

Moon AM, Webb GJ, Aloman C, Armstrong MJ, Cargill T, Dhanasekaran R, et al. High mortality rates for SARS-CoV‑2 infection in patients with pre-existing chronic liver disease and cirrhosis: Preliminary results from an international registry. J Hepatol. 2020;73(3):705–8.CrossRef

12.

Singh S, Khan A. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Coronavirus disease 2019 among patients with preexisting liver disease in the United States: a multicenter research network study. Gastroenterology. 2020;159(2):768–771.e3.CrossRef

13.

Hartl L, Jachs M, Simbrunner B, Bauer DJM, Semmler G, Gompelmann D, et al. Cirrhosis-associated RAS-inflammation-coagulation axis anomalies: parallels to severe COVID-19. J Pers Med. 2021;11(12):1264. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11121264.CrossRef

14.

Hartl L, Haslinger K, Angerer M, Semmler G, Schneeweiss-Gleixner M, Jachs M, et al. Progressive cholestasis and associated sclerosing cholangitis are frequent complications of COVID-19 in chronic liver disease patients. Hepatology. 2022;10.1002/hep.32582. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.32582.CrossRef

15.

Marjot T, Moon AM, Cook JA, Abd-Elsalam S, Aloman C, Armstrong MJ, et al. Outcomes following SARS-CoV‑2 infection in patients with chronic liver disease: An international registry study. J Hepatol. 2021;74(3):567–77.CrossRef

16.

Dumortier J, Duvoux C, Roux O, Altieri M, Barraud H, Besch C, et al. Covid-19 in liver transplant recipients: the French SOT COVID registry. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021;45(4):101639.CrossRef

17.

Hadi YB, Naqvi SFZ, Kupec JT, Sofka S, Sarwari A. Outcomes of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: a propensity-matched analysis of a large research network. Transplantation. 2021;105(6):1365–71.CrossRef

18.

Fix OK, Hameed B, Fontana RJ, Kwok RM, McGuire BM, Mulligan DC, et al. Clinical best practice advice for hepatology and liver transplant providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: aASLD expert panel consensus statement. Hepatology. 2020;72(1):287–304.CrossRef

19.

Tapper EB, Asrani SK. The COVID-19 pandemic will have a long-lasting impact on the quality of cirrhosis care. J Hepatol. 2020;73(2):441–5.CrossRef

20.

Pawlotsky JM. COVID-19 and the liver-related deaths to come. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(9):523–5.CrossRef

21.

Di Maira T, Berenguer M. COVID-19 and liver transplantation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(9):526–8.CrossRef

22.

Boyarsky BJ, Chiang P‑YT, Werbel WA, Durand CM, Avery RK, Getsin SN, et al. Early impact of COVID-19 on transplant center practices and policies in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2020;20(7):1809–18.CrossRef

23.

Angelico R, Trapani S, Manzia TM, Lombardini L, Tisone G, Cardillo M. The COVID-19 outbreak in Italy: Initial implications for organ transplantation programs. Am J Transplant. 2020;20(7):1780–4.CrossRef

24.

Russo FP, Izzy M, Rammohan A, Kirchner VA, Di Maira T, Belli LS, et al. Global impact of the first wave of COVID-19 on liver transplant centers: A multi-society survey (EASL-ESOT/ELITA-ILTS). J Hepatol. 2022;76(2):364–70.CrossRef

25.

Nobel YR, Phipps M, Verna EC. COVID-19 and effect on liver transplant. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2021;19(3):483–99.CrossRef

26.

Bittermann T, Mahmud N, Abt P. Trends in liver transplantation for acute alcohol-associated hepatitis during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(7):e2118713.CrossRef

27.

Cholankeril G, Goli K, Rana A, Hernaez R, Podboy A, Jalal P, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on liver transplantation and alcohol-associated liver disease in the USA. Hepatology. 2021;74(6):3316–29.CrossRef

28.

Thuluvath PJ, Robarts P, Chauhan M. Analysis of antibody responses after COVID-19 vaccination in liver transplant recipients and those with chronic liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2021;75(6):1434–9.CrossRef

29.

Rabinowich L, Grupper A, Baruch R, Ben-Yehoyada M, Halperin T, Turner D, et al. Low immunogenicity to SARS-CoV‑2 vaccination among liver transplant recipients. J Hepatol. 2021;75(2):435–8.CrossRef

30.

WHO. Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV‑2. 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/diagnostic-testing-for-sars-cov-2. Accessed 29 Apr 2022.

31.

Perkmann T, Perkmann-Nagele N, Koller T, Mucher P, Radakovics A, Marculescu R, et al. Anti-spike protein assays to determine SARS-coV‑2 antibody levels: a head-to-head comparison of five quantitative assays. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9(1):e24721.CrossRef

32.

Higgins V, Fabros A, Kulasingam V. Quantitative measurement of anti-SARS-coV‑2 antibodies: analytical and clinical evaluation. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59(4):e03149–20. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03149-20.CrossRef

33.

Mrak D, Sieghart D, Simader E, Tobudic S, Radner H, Mandl P, et al. Heterologous versus homologous booster vaccination in non-seroconverted immunosuppressed patients after primary mRNA vaccination: a randomized controlled trial. unpublished. 2022.

34.

Eurotransplant International Foundation. Annual Report 2021. 2022. https://www.eurotransplant.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Annual-Report-2021_LR.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2022.

35.

Lembach H, Hann A, McKay SC, Hartog H, Vasanth S, El-Dalil P, et al. Resuming liver transplantation amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(8):725–6.CrossRef

36.

Danziger-Isakov L, Blumberg EA, Manuel O, Sester M. Impact of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2021;21(3):925–37.CrossRef

37.

ÖGGH. Informationen für immunsupprimierte PatientInnen nach Lebertransplantation anlässlich der Pandemie mit dem neuen Coronavirus SARS-CoV‑2. 2020. http://www.oeggh.at/files/info_patientinnen_lebertransplantation_coronavirus_sars-cov-2.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2022.

38.

Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2603–15.CrossRef

39.

Anderson EJ, Rouphael NG, Widge AT, Jackson LA, Roberts PC, Makhene M, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-coV‑2 mRNA-1273 vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(25):2427–38.CrossRef

40.

Ramasamy MN, Minassian AM, Ewer KJ, Flaxman AL, Folegatti PM, Owens DR, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine administered in a prime-boost regimen in young and old adults (COV002): a single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2021;396(10267):1979–93.CrossRef

41.

ÖGGH. Update der ÖGGH Stellungnahme zur COVID-19 Impfung bei Lebererkrankungen und unter Immunsuppression nach Lebertransplantation. 2021. http://www.oeggh.at/files/oeggh_leber_covid_impfung_statement_21.02.24.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2022.

Titel: The impact of COVID-19 on liver transplantation programs in Austria
verfasst von: Lukas Hartl, MD
Elisabeth Tatscher, MD
Melanie Weiss
Lorenz Balcar, MD
Robert Strassl, MD
Mathias Jachs, MD
Mattias Mandorfer, MD PhD
Thomas Soliman, MD
Vanessa Stadlbauer, MD
Peter Schemmer, MD
Gabriela Berlakovich, MD
Herbert Tilg, MD
Stefan Schneeberger, MD
Michael Trauner, MD
Peter Fickert, MD
Assoc.-Prof. PD Dr. Thomas Reiberger, MD
Prim. Univ. Prof. Dr. Ivo Graziadei, MD
Publikationsdatum: 11.11.2022
Verlag: Springer Vienna
Erschienen in: Wiener klinische Wochenschrift / Ausgabe 23-24/2022
Print ISSN: 0043-5325
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-7671
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-022-02105-z

Springer Medizin Österreich

Summary

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publisher’s Note

Introduction

Material and methods

Study population

Laboratory parameters

Statistical analysis

Ethics

Results

Patient characteristics and outcomes (Table 1)

Number of patients undergoing OLT in Austria prior to and during COVID-19 (Fig. 1)

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing, SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19-related deaths among patients on the OLT list during COVID-19 (Table 2; Fig. 2)

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among patients on the OLT list during COVID-19 (Table 3; Fig. 3)

SARS-CoV-2 antibody response to vaccination in patients on the OLT list during COVID-19 (Table 3; Fig. 4 )

Discussion

Conflict of interest

Publisher’s Note

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Abo für kostenpflichtige Inhalte

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 23-24/2022

Editorial

Early administration of remdesivir may reduce mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

Humoral response after a third and fourth dose of mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in previously seronegative kidney transplant recipients

Comparison of clinical characteristics among patients infected with alpha vs. delta SARS-CoV-2 variants

Comorbidities and COVID-19 hospitalization, ICU admission and hospital mortality in Austria

Nachwuchsförderung: Verleihung des dritten Dora Brücke-Teleky Awards