Skip to main content
main-content

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

Erschienen in: European Surgery 3/2019

02.04.2019 | main topic

Technical aspects of pancreatic anastomosis

verfasst von: Helwig Wundsam, Christiane S. Rösch, Ines Fischer, Reinhold Függer

Erschienen in: European Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
share
TEILEN

Summary

Background

Despite the significant improvement concerning perioperative mortality, pancreatoduodenectomy is still a challenging procedure. Pancreatic fistula is the most common complication underlying 30-day mortality. More than 61 surgical techniques of pancreatic anastomosis with a vast number of variations have been published. Moreover, various risk factors favoring the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas have been identified.

Methods

This review article presents an outline of ways to achieve the optimal pancreatic anastomosis, concentrating on technical aspects. The following parameters were assessed in this question: pancreatojejunostomy, pancreaticogastrostomy, stents, tissue patches and sealants, surgical experience, and center-specific technique.

Results

With regard to current literature, there is no scientific evidence of an optimal pancreatic anastomotic technique. A distinct inhomogeneity among the trials concerning definitions, patient selection, anastomotic technique, and patient management is important to mention.

Conclusion

The best strategy for reducing pancreatic fistula rate includes a standardized institutional concept of pancreatic anastomosis, documentation of surgical quality, and continuous enhancement by benchmarking.

Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Abo für kostenpflichtige Inhalte

Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Arnold MA, Chang DC, Coleman J, et al. 1423 Pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(9):1199–1210; discussion 1210-1. CrossRef Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Arnold MA, Chang DC, Coleman J, et al. 1423 Pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(9):1199–1210; discussion 1210-1. CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138(1):8–13 CrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138(1):8–13 CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cattell R. Resection of the pancreas, discussion of special problems. Surg Clin North Am. 1943;23:753–66. Cattell R. Resection of the pancreas, discussion of special problems. Surg Clin North Am. 1943;23:753–66.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Mantovani W, Butturini G, Gumbs AA, et al. Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery. 2003;134(5):766–71 CrossRef Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Mantovani W, Butturini G, Gumbs AA, et al. Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery. 2003;134(5):766–71 CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Langrehr JM, Bahra M, Jacob D, Glanemann M, Neuhaus P. Prospective randomized comparison between a new mattress technique and Cattell (duct-to-mucosa) pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreatic resection. World J Surg. 2005;29(9):1111–9, discussion 1120-1 CrossRef Langrehr JM, Bahra M, Jacob D, Glanemann M, Neuhaus P. Prospective randomized comparison between a new mattress technique and Cattell (duct-to-mucosa) pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreatic resection. World J Surg. 2005;29(9):1111–9, discussion 1120-1 CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Peng SY, Wang JW, Lau WY, Cai XJ, Mou YP, Bin Liu Y, et al. Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):692–8 CrossRef Peng SY, Wang JW, Lau WY, Cai XJ, Mou YP, Bin Liu Y, et al. Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):692–8 CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1995;222(4):580–8; discussion 588–92. CrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1995;222(4):580–8; discussion 588–92. CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tittelbach-Helmrich D, Keck T, Wellner UF. Pancreaticogastrostomy: when and how?. Pankreatogastrostomie wann und wie? 2017. Tittelbach-Helmrich D, Keck T, Wellner UF. Pancreaticogastrostomy: when and how?. Pankreatogastrostomie wann und wie? 2017.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Enkner U, Fröschl U, Gangl O, Függer R. Blood, toil, tears and sweat: Flexibel-endoskopische Interventionen am operierten Pankreas. Eur Surg Aca Chir. 2015;47(2):S302. Enkner U, Fröschl U, Gangl O, Függer R. Blood, toil, tears and sweat: Flexibel-endoskopische Interventionen am operierten Pankreas. Eur Surg Aca Chir. 2015;47(2):S302.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon RTP, Fan ST, Lo CM, Ng KK, Yuen WK, Yeung C, et al. EXternal drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(3):425–33; discussion 433–5 CrossRef Poon RTP, Fan ST, Lo CM, Ng KK, Yuen WK, Yeung C, et al. EXternal drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(3):425–33; discussion 433–5 CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Chang DC, Riall TS, Schulick RD, et al. Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(9):1280–90; discussion 1290 CrossRef Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Chang DC, Riall TS, Schulick RD, et al. Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(9):1280–90; discussion 1290 CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P‑A. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13 CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P‑A. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13 CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Technical aspects of pancreatic anastomosis
verfasst von
Helwig Wundsam
Christiane S. Rösch
Ines Fischer
Reinhold Függer
Publikationsdatum
02.04.2019
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
European Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1682-8631
Elektronische ISSN: 1682-4016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-019-0579-8