nach oben

Erschienen in:

10.04.2019 | Anästhesie & Intensivmedizin

S3-Leitlinie zur intensivmedizinischen Versorgung herzchirurgischer Patienten

Hämodynamisches Monitoring und Herz‑Kreislauf – ein Update

verfasst von: Dr. Marit Habicher, Dr. Thomas Simon Zajonz, Prof. Dr. Matthias Heringlake, Prof. Dr. Andreas Böning, Prof. Dr. Sascha Treskatsch, Prof. Dr. Uwe Schirmer, Prof. Dr. Andreas Markewitz, Prof. Dr. Michael Sander

Erschienen in: Wiener klinisches Magazin | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Im Januar dieses Jahres wurde ein Update der „S3-Leitlinie zur intensivmedizinischen Versorgung herzchirurgischer Patienten – Hämodynamisches Monitoring und Herz-Kreislauf“ durch die AWMF veröffentlicht. Das Update ist eine Weiterentwicklung der Leitlinien aus den Jahren 2006 und 2011. Die Leitlinie umfasst 9 Kapitel, die sich neben den verschiedenen Monitoring-Verfahren auch mit den Fragen nach der Volumentherapie und vasoaktiven und inotropen Substanzen beschäftigt und Zielparameter der Herz-Kreislauf-Therapie definiert. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die wichtigsten Neuerungen der umfangreichen Leitlinie dargestellt.

Vorheriger Artikel Übertherapie in der Intensivmedizin

Nächster Artikel Augenmerk auf Ernährung und Infektionen

Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag GmbH (2014) Querschnittsleitlinien zur Therapie mit Blutkomponenten und Plasmaderivaten.Herausgegeben vom Vorstand der Bundesärztekammer auf Empfehlung des Wissenschaftlichen Beirats

American Society of Anesthesiologists and Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force on Transesophageal Echocardiography (2010) Practice guidelines for perioperative transesophageal echocardiography. An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force on Transesophageal Echocardiography. Anesthesiology 112:1084–1096

Annane D, Siami S, Jaber S et al (2013) Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial. JAMA 310:1809–1817CrossRef

Aya HD, Cecconi M, Hamilton M, Rhodes A (2013) Goal-directed therapy in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 110:510–517CrossRef

Bein B, Worthmann F, Tonner PH et al (2004) Comparison of esophageal Doppler, pulse contour analysis, and real-time pulmonary artery thermodilution for the continuous measurement of cardiac output. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 18:185–189CrossRef

Chen Q‑H, Zheng R‑Q, Lin H et al (2017) Effect of levosimendan on prognosis in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care 21(1):253. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1848-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cholley B, Caruba T, Grosjean S et al (2017) Effect of levosimendan on low cardiac output syndrome in patients with low ejection fraction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass. JAMA 318:548–549CrossRef

Denault A, Lamarche Y, Rochon A et al (2014) Innovative approaches in the perioperative care of the cardiac surgical patient in the operating room and intensive care unit. Can J Cardiol 30:459–477CrossRef

Erb J, Beutlhauser T, Feldheiser A et al (2014) Influence of levosimendan on organ dysfunction in patients with severely reduced left ventricular function undergoing cardiac surgery. J Int Med Res 42:750–764CrossRef

10.

Funcke S, Sander M, Goepfert MS et al (2016) Practice of hemodynamic monitoring and management in German, Austrian, and Swiss intensive care units: the multicenter cross-sectional ICU-CardioMan Study. Ann Intensive Care 6:49CrossRef

11.

Geerts B, de Wilde R, Aarts L, Jansen J (2011) Pulse contour analysis to assess hemodynamic response to passive leg raising. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 25:48–52. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2010.09.013 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Gillies MA, Habicher M, Jhanji S et al (2014) Incidence of postoperative death and acute kidney injury associated with i. v. 6 % hydroxyethyl starch use: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 112:25–34CrossRef

13.

Goepfert MS, Richter HP, Zu Eulenburg C et al (2013) Individually optimized hemodynamic therapy reduces complications and length of stay in the intensive care unit: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 119:824–836CrossRef

14.

Guarracino F, Heringlake M, Cholley B et al (2017) The use of levosimendan in cardiac surgery. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1097/fjc.0000000000000551 CrossRefPubMedCentral

15.

Hajjar LA, Vincent J‑L, Barbosa Gomes Galas FR et al (2017) Vasopressin versus norepinephrine in patients with vasoplegic shock after cardiac surgery: the VANCS randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 126:85–93CrossRef

16.

Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A (2011) A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 112:1392–1402CrossRef

17.

Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL et al (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:2584–2614CrossRef

18.

Holm J, Håkanson E, Vánky F, Svedjeholm R (2011) Mixed venous oxygen saturation predicts short- and long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis. Br J Anaesth 107:344–350CrossRef

19.

Hu BY, Laine GA, Wang S, Solis RT (2012) Combined central venous oxygen saturation and lactate as markers of occult hypoperfusion and outcome following cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 26:52–57CrossRef

20.

Kim J‑Y, Joung K‑W, Kim K‑M et al (2015) Relationship between a perioperative intravenous fluid administration strategy and acute kidney injury following off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: an observational study. Crit Care 19:350CrossRef

21.

Laine GA, Hu BY, Wang S et al (2013) Isolated high lactate or low central venous oxygen saturation after cardiac surgery and association with outcome. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 27:1271–1276CrossRef

22.

Landoni G, Lomivorotov VV, Alvaro G et al (2017) Levosimendan for hemodynamic support after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 376:2021–2031CrossRef

23.

Levin RL, Degrange MA, Porcile R et al (2008) The calcium sensitizer levosimendan gives superior results to dobutamine in postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. Rev Esp Cardiol 61:471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1885-5857(08)60160-7 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B (2008) Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness?: a systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 134:172–178CrossRef

25.

Marik PE, Cavallazzi R (2013) Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med 41:1774–1781CrossRef

26.

Mehta RH, Leimberger JD, van Diepen S et al (2017) Levosimendan in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 376:2032–2042CrossRef

27.

Neto AS, Júnior APN, Cardoso SO et al (2012) Vasopressin and terlipressin in adult vasodilatory shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials. Crit Care 16:R154CrossRef

28.

Nogueira PM, Mendonça-Filho HT, Campos LA et al (2010) Central venous saturation: a prognostic tool in cardiac surgery patients. J Intensive Care Med 25:111–116CrossRef

29.

Pedersen T, Møller AM (2001) How to use evidence-based medicine in anaesthesiology. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 45:267–274CrossRef

30.

Perz S, Uhlig T, Kohl M et al (2011) Low and „supranormal“ central venous oxygen saturation and markers of tissue hypoxia in cardiac surgery patients: a prospective observational study. Intensive Care Med 37:52–59CrossRef

31.

Polito A, Parisini E, Ricci Z et al (2011) Vasopressin for treatment of vasodilatory shock: an ESICM systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 38:9–19CrossRef

32.

Putzu A, Clivio S, Belletti A, Cassina T (2017) Perioperative levosimendan in cardiac surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Int J Cardiol 251:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.077 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Sanfilippo F, Knight JB, Scolletta S et al (2017) Levosimendan for patients with severely reduced left ventricular systolic function and/or low cardiac output syndrome undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 21(1):252. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1849-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Saw MM, Chandler B, Ho KM (2012) Benefits and risks of using gelatin solution as a plasma expander for perioperative and critically ill patients: a meta-analysis. Anaesth Intensive Care 40:17–32CrossRef

35.

Smolle K‑H, Schmid M, Prettenthaler H, Weger C (2015) The accuracy of the CNAP®Device compared with invasive radial artery measurements for providing continuous noninvasive arterial blood pressure readings at a medical intensive care unit. Anesth Analg 121:1508–1516CrossRef

36.

Treskatsch S, Balzer F, Geyer T et al (2015) Early levosimendan administration is associated with decreased mortality after cardiac surgery. J Crit Care 30:859.e1–859.e6CrossRef

37.

Trof RJ, Danad I, Reilingh MW et al (2011) Cardiac filling volumes versus pressures for predicting fluid responsiveness after cardiovascular surgery: the role of systolic cardiac function. Crit Care 15:R73CrossRef

38.

Wagner JY, Negulescu I, Schöfthaler M et al (2015) Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurement using the volume clamp method: an evaluation of the CNAP device in intensive care unit patients. J Clin Monit Comput 29:807–813CrossRef

39.

Williams JB, Peterson ED, Wojdyla D et al (2014) Central venous pressure after coronary artery bypass surgery: does it predict postoperative mortality or renal failure? J Crit Care 29:1006–1010CrossRef

40.

Winterhalter M, Antoniou T, Loukanov T (2010) Management of adult patients with perioperative pulmonary hypertension: technical aspects and therapeutic options. Cardiology 116:3–9CrossRef

41.

Yazigi A, Khoury E, Hlais S et al (2012) Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 26:387–390CrossRef

42.

Zhang Z, Xu X, Ye S, Xu L (2014) Ultrasonographic measurement of the respiratory variation in the inferior vena cava diameter is predictive of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 40:845–853CrossRef

Titel: S3-Leitlinie zur intensivmedizinischen Versorgung herzchirurgischer Patienten
Hämodynamisches Monitoring und Herz‑Kreislauf – ein Update
verfasst von: Dr. Marit Habicher
Dr. Thomas Simon Zajonz
Prof. Dr. Matthias Heringlake
Prof. Dr. Andreas Böning
Prof. Dr. Sascha Treskatsch
Prof. Dr. Uwe Schirmer
Prof. Dr. Andreas Markewitz
Prof. Dr. Michael Sander
Publikationsdatum: 10.04.2019
Verlag: Springer Vienna
Erschienen in: Wiener klinisches Magazin / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1869-1757
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-7817
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00740-019-0283-0

Springer Medizin Österreich

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Kardiales Pumpversagen: Herzunterstützungssysteme und Herztransplantation

Augenmerk auf Ernährung und Infektionen

Panorama

Eine Frage der Ethik und der Vernunft

Erkrankungen des Gastrointestinaltrakts unter medikamentöser Immunmodulation

Subgruppen erschweren Therapiestandards