Long V-Y advancement technique for large nipple reconstruction in Asian women

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Previously reported nipple-areolar complex reconstruction (NAR) methods involve multiple incisions and wide skin redraping, which increase retraction forces and heighten the risk of nipple-areolar complex (NAC) flattening. We introduce a NAR method using the long V-Y advancement technique that can overcome these disadvantages. A V-shaped flap is designed with the width of the flap base 4–5 mm larger than the diameter of the normal nipple. The flap length is designed to be at least 2.5 times its width. Dissection is performed to the top of the artificial dermal matrix or muscle layer. The nipple is constructed with the same projection as the contralateral side by folding the elevated flap. The tip of the elevated flap is apposed in the middle of the donor defect to minimize the deformity during donor site closure. A 3-point skin suture is applied to the upper third of the folded flap to mold its shape. Using this long V-Y advancement technique, we successfully decreased skin tension in NAC flaps and improved the maintenance of reconstructed nipple projection. The long V-Y advancement technique provides an easy, simple NAR method, effectively maintaining longer nipple projections and reducing breast deformities, especially in Asian women with relatively large nipples.

Publication History

Received: 29 April 2020

Accepted: 12 August 2020

Article published online:
20 March 2022

© 2021. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• REFERENCES

• 1 Shestak KC, Gabriel A, Landecker A. et al. Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 780-6
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Banducci DR, Le TK, Hughes KC. Long-term follow-up of a modified Anton-Hartrampf nipple reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1999; 43: 467-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Losken A, Mackay GJ, Bostwick 3rd J. Nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique: a long-term evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 361-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Eng JS. Bell flap nipple reconstruction: a new wrinkle. Ann Plast Surg 1996; 36: 485-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Bramhall RJ, Thiruchelvam PTR, Concepcion M. et al. Use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in nipple reconstruction: the ‘central-pillar technique’. Gland Surg 2017; 6: 394-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Bosch G, Ramirez M. Reconstruction of the nipple: a new technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73: 977-81
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Collis N, Garrido A. Maintenance of nipple projection using auricular cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105: 2276-7
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Kroll SS. Integrated breast mound reduction and nipple reconstruction with the wraparound flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 687-93
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Braun Jr M, Cook J. The island pedicle flap. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31(8 Pt 2): 995-1005
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Riccio CA, Zeiderman MR, Chowdhry S. et al. Review of nipple reconstruction techniques and introduction of v to y technique in a bilateral wise pattern mastectomy or reduction mammaplasty. Eplasty 2015; 15: e11
  PubMedGoogle Scholar