A novel subdermal anchoring technique for the effective treatment of congenital melanocytic nevus using de-epithelialized dermal flaps

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Background In patients with congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN), single-stage removal of large lesions can be difficult because the high tension created by excising and repairing a large lesion may result in scar widening. Herein, we introduce a method to effectively excise lesions while minimizing scarring and compare its outcomes to those of existing surgical methods.

Methods We compared patients who underwent surgery using the anchoring technique (n=42) or the conventional elliptical technique (n=36). One side of the lesion was removed via en bloc resection up to the superficial fascia. The other side of the lesion was removed via de-epithelialization. The de-epithelialized dermal flap was then fixed by suturing it to the superficial fascia on the opposite side. The length of the lesion’s long axis and amount of scar widening were measured immediately after surgery and at 2, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. At 12 months, patients were assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.

Results The lesion locations included the face, arms, legs, back, and abdomen. The anchoring method resulted in shorter and smaller scars than the conventional method. There were no cases of postoperative hematoma or wound dehiscence. Significant differences in postoperative scar widening were found in the arm and leg areas (P<0.05).

Conclusions The anchoring method introduced in this study can provide much better outcomes than the conventional method. The anchoring method is particularly useful for the removal of CMN around the joints or extremities, where the surgical site is subjected to high tension.

Publication History

Received: 19 March 2020

Accepted: 16 October 2020

Article published online:
20 March 2022

© 2021. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• REFERENCES

• 1 Michel JL, Chalencon F, Gentil-Perret A. et al. Congenital pigmented nevus: prognosis and therapeutic possibilities. Arch Pediatr 1999; 6: 211-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Hassanein AH, Rogers GF, Greene AK. Management of challenging congenital melanocytic nevi: outcomes study of serial excision. J Pediatr Surg 2015; 50: 613-6
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Arneja JS, Gosain AK. Giant congenital melanocytic nevi of the trunk and an algorithm for treatment. J Craniofac Surg 2005; 16: 886-93
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Mutti LA, Mascarenhas MR, Paiva JM. et al. Giant congenital melanocytic nevi: 40 years of experience with the serial excision technique. An Bras Dermatol 2017; 92: 256-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Hudson-Peacock MJ, Matthews JN, Lawrence CM. Relation between size of skin excision, wound, and specimen. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 32: 1010-5
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Arneja JS, Gosain AK. Giant congenital melanocytic nevi. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120: 26e-40e
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Bayat A, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MW. Skin scarring. BMJ 2003; 326: 88-92
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar