The Role of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Latissimus Dorsi Flap Donor Site Seroma Prevention: A Cohort Study

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Background Donor site seroma is the most common complication after latissimus dorsi (LD) flap harvest. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in preventing donor site seroma formation after the harvest of an LD flap for breast reconstruction.

Methods In this prospective matched-pair study, 40 patients in whom an LD flap was harvested for breast reconstruction were enrolled. NPWT was used in 20 patients, and in a control group composed of another 20 patients, the conventional donor site dressing technique was used. Information was collected regarding postoperative complications, the incidence of seroma, total drainage volume, the number of percutaneous seroma aspirations, and the volume aspirated.

Results In the NPWT group, the incidence of seroma formation after drain removal was significantly lower than in the control group (15% vs. 70%; odds ratio=0.07; relative risk, 0.24). Both the mean percutaneous aspirated volume (P=0.004) and the number of percutaneous aspirations (P=0.001) were also significantly lower in the NPWT group. There were no significant differences in the total drainage volume or the duration of wound drainage between the NPWT dressing group and the control group (P>0.05).

Conclusions This study showed that NPWT is a promising tool for reducing the incidence of seroma formation after removing the drain at the donor site after LD flap harvesting. It is a simple and safe technique.

Publication History

Received: 25 January 2017

Accepted: 26 May 2017

Article published online:
20 April 2022

© 2017. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• REFERENCES

• 1 Rios JL, Pollock T, Adams Jr WP. Progressive tension sutures to prevent seroma formation after latissimus dorsi harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112: 1779-83
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Menke H, Erkens M, Olbrisch RR. Evolving concepts in breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flaps: results and follow-up of 121 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 47: 107-14
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Delay E, Gounot N, Bouillot A. et al. Autologous latissimus breast reconstruction: a 3-year clinical experience with 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 1461-78
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Daltrey I, Thomson H, Hussien M. et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of quilting latissimus dorsi flap donor site on seroma formation. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 825-30
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Schwabegger A, Ninkovic M, Brenner E. et al. Seroma as a common donor site morbidity after harvesting the latissimus dorsi flap: observations on cause and prevention. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38: 594-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Titley OG, Spyrou GE, Fatah MF. Preventing seroma in the latissimus dorsi flap donor site. Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50: 106-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Porter KA, O’Connor S, Rimm E. et al. Electrocautery as a factor in seroma formation following mastectomy. Am J Surg 1998; 176: 8-11
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Weinrach JC, Cronin ED, Smith BK. et al. Preventing seroma in the latissimus dorsi flap donor site with fibrin sealant. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53: 12-6
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Lin CH, Wei FC, Levin LS. et al. Donor-site morbidity comparison between endoscopically assisted and traditional harvest of free latissimus dorsi muscle flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 1070-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Zide BM. To reduce your seroma rate. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 1098-9
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Schneider AM, Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC. A new and reliable method of securing skin grafts to the difficult recipient bed. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 1195-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Blackburn 2nd JH, Boemi L, Hall WW. et al. Negative-pressure dressings as a bolster for skin grafts. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 40: 453-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M. et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 2014; 12: 1495-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Sajid MS, Betal D, Akhter N. et al. Prevention of postoperative seroma-related morbidity by quilting of latissimus dorsi flap donor site: a systematic review. Clin Breast Cancer 2011; 11: 357-63
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Dancey AL, Cheema M, Thomas SS. A prospective randomized trial of the efficacy of marginal quilting sutures and fibrin sealant in reducing the incidence of seromas in the extended latissimus dorsi donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 1309-17
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Ali SN, Gill P, Oikonomou D. et al. The combination of fibrin glue and quilting reduces drainage in the extended latissimus dorsi flap donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 1615-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Gisquet H, Delay E, Paradol PO. et al. Prevention of seroma by quilting suture after harvesting latissimus dorsi flap: the “Chippendale” technic. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2010; 55: 97-103
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar