Endoscopy 2008; 40(8): 670-674
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1077341
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, but not esophagogastroduodenoscopy or colonoscopy, significantly increases portal venous pressure: direct portal pressure measurements through endoscopic ultrasound-guided cannulation

J.  M.  Buscaglia1 , E.  J.  Shin1 , J.  O.  Clarke1 , S.  A.  Giday1 , C.  W.  Ko2,  3 , P.  J.  Thuluvath1 , P.  Magno1,  4 , X.  Dray1,  5 , S.  V.  Kantsevoy1
  • 1Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • 2Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 4University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
  • 5Department of Digestive Diseases, Hôpital Lariboisière, APHP, University Paris 7, Paris, France
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 17 February 2008

accepted after revision 5 May 2008

Publication Date:
18 June 2008 (online)

Background and study aims: Changes in portal pressure during endoscopy have not been previously evaluated. The aims of this study were to assess the effect of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), colonoscopy, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on portal vein, inferior vena cava (IVC), and systemic pressures.

Patients and methods: Five acute experiments were performed on 50-kg pigs utilizing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided catheterization of the portal vein and IVC. Systemic, intra-abdominal, IVC, and portal vein pressures were monitored during colonoscopy, EGD, and ERCP with endoscopic sphincterotomy. After endoscopy the animals were sacrificed for necropsy. The main outcome measure was pressure change during each type of endoscopic procedure.

Results: There were no significant changes in heart rate or systemic pressure during all endoscopic procedures. Intra-abdominal pressure increased during colonoscopy (P = 0.02) and ERCP (P = 0.007). However, mean portal venous pressure was significantly elevated only after the injection of contrast into the common bile duct, reaching its peak value at the time of biliary sphincterotomy (39.0 ± 15.2 mm Hg vs. 13.4 ± 3.6 mm Hg at baseline, P = 0.006). Mean peak IVC pressure was also elevated during ERCP, but it did not reach statistical significance (24.0 ± 10.7 mm Hg vs. 12.6 ± 4.1 mm Hg at baseline, P = 0.06).

Conclusion: EGD and colonoscopy did not cause significant changes in portal vein, IVC, or systemic pressures. ERCP with biliary sphincterotomy increased portal pressure with only limited effect on IVC and systemic pressures. These new data indicate a possible connection between ERCP with sphincterotomy and portal pressure, and may be clinically important for patients with liver disease and other causes of portal hypertension who undergo this procedure.

References

  • 1 Tzelepis G E, Nasiff L, McCool F D, Hammond J. Transmission of pressure within the abdomen.  J Appl Physiol. 1996;  57 734-736
  • 2 Kashtan J, Green J F, Parsons E Q, Holcroft J W. Hemodynamic effect of increased abdominal pressure.  J Surg Res. 1981;  30 249-255
  • 3 Rosin D, Rosenthal R J. Adverse hemodynamic effects of intraabdominal pressure: is it all in the head?.  Int J Surg Investig. 2001;  2 335-345
  • 4 Avital S, Brasesco O, Basu A. et al . Effects of colonoscopy on intracranial pressure: observation in a large animal model.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 997-1000
  • 5 von Delius S, Huber W, Feussner H. et al . Effect of pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamics and inspiratory pressures during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): an experimental, controlled study in an acute porcine model.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 854-859
  • 6 Escorsell A, Bordas J M, Castaneda B. et al . Predictive value of the variceal pressure response to continued pharmacological therapy in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.  Hepatology. 2000;  31 1061-1067
  • 7 Lai L, Poneros J, Santilli J, Brugge W. EUS-guided portal vein catheterization and pressure measurement in an animal model: a pilot study and feasibility.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 280-283
  • 8 Zhou Y, Qiao L, Wu J. et al . Comparison of the efficacy of octreotide, vasopressin, and omeprazole in the control of acute bleeding in patients with portal hypertensive gastropathy: a controlled study.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;  17 973-979
  • 9 Yoshie K, Fujita Y, Moriya A. et al . Octreotide for severe acute bleeding from portal hypertensive colopathy: a case report.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;  13 1111-1113
  • 10 Williams C B, Lane R H, Sakai Y. Colonoscopy: an air-pressure hazard.  Lancet. 1973;  ii 729
  • 11 Magno P, Ko C W, Buscaglia J M. et al . EUS-guided angiography: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the vascular system.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 587-591
  • 12 Giday S A, Clarke J O, Buscaglia J M. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided portal vein catheterization: a novel promising approach for portal angiography and portal vein pressure measurements.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 338-342
  • 13 von Delius S, Karagianni A, Henke J. et al . Changes in intra-abdominal pressure, hemodynamics, and peak inspiratory pressure during gastroscopy in a porcine model.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 962-968

S. V. Kantsevoy, MD, PhD 

Johns Hopkins Hospital
Division of Gastroenterology

1830 East Monument Street Room 423
Baltimore, MD 21205
USA

Fax: +1-410-614-2490

Email: svkan@jhmi.edu

    >