Functional Disorders: Rectoanal Intussusception

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Rectoanal intussusception (RI) is a telescoping of the rectal wall during defecation. RI is an easily recognizable physiologic phenomenon on defecography. The management, however, is much more controversial. Two predominant hypotheses exist regarding the etiology of RI: RI as a primary disorder, and RI as a secondary phenomenon. The diagnosis may be suspected based on clinical symptoms of obstructive defecation. Diagnostic modalities include defecography as the gold standard. Dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (DPMRI) and transperineal ultrasound are attractive alternatives to defecography; however, their sensitivity is poor in comparison to the gold standard at this time. Management strategies including conservative measures such as biofeedback and surgical procedures including mucosal proctectomy (Delorme), rectopexy, and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures have varied degrees of efficacy.

REFERENCES

• 1 Choi J S, Hwang Y H, Salum M R et al.. Outcome and management of patients with large rectoanal intussusception.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 740-744
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Hwang Y H, Person B, Choi J S et al.. Biofeedback therapy for rectal intussusception.  Tech Coloproctol. 2006;  10 11-16
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Fleshman J W, Kodner I J, Fry R D. Internal intussusception of the rectum: a changing perspective.  Neth J Surg. 1989;  41 145-148
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Metcalf A M, Loening B V. Anorectal function and defecation dynamics in patients with rectal prolapse.  Am J Surg. 1988;  155 206-221
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Mellgren A, Schultz I, Johansson C, Dolk A. Internal rectal intussusception seldom develops into total rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 817-820
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Christiansen J, Zhu B W, Rasmussen O O, Sorensen M. Internal rectal intussusception: results of surgical repair.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 1026-1029
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Dvorkin L S, Knowles C H, Scott M S, Williams N S, Lunniss P J. Rectal intussusception: characterization of symptomatology.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 824-831
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Dvorkin L S, Gladman M A, Scott S M, Williams N S, Lunniss P J. Rectal intussusception: a study of rectal biomechanics and visceroperception.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 1578-1585
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Shorvon P J, McHugh S, Diamant N E, Somers S, Stevenson G W. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications.  Gut. 1989;  30(12) 1737-1749
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Broden B, Snellman B. Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography. A contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1968;  11(5) 330-347
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Karlbom U, Graf W, Nilsson S, Pahlman L. The accuracy of clinical examination in the diagnosis of rectal intussusception.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;  47(9) 1533-1538
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Jorge J MN, Habr-Gama A, Wexner S D. Clinical applications and techniques of cinedefecography.  Am J Surg. 2001;  182 93-101
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Siproudhis L, Ropert A, Vilotte J et al.. How accurate is clinical examination in diagnosing and quantifying pelvirectal disorders? A prospective study in a group of 50 patients complaining of defecatory difficulties.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;  36(5) 430-438
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Matsuoka H, Wexner S D, Desai M B et al.. A comparison between dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and videoproctography in patients with constipation.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 571-576
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Schechtman E, Zbar A P. Dynamic transperineal ultrasound vs. defecography in patients with evacuatory difficulty: a pilot study.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004;  19 60-67
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Hoffman M J, Kodner I J, Fry R D. Internal intussusception of the rectum: diagnosis and surgical management.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;  27 435-441
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Delorme E. Sur le traitement des prolapsus du rectum totaux pour l'excision de la muqueuse rectale ou recto colique.  Bull Mem Soc Chir Paris. 1900;  26 499-578
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Berman I R, Harris M S, Rabeler M D. Delorme's transrectal excision for internal rectal prolapse: patient selection, technique, and three year follow up.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;  33 573-580
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Graf W, Karlbom U, Pahlman L, Nilsson S, Ejerblad S. Functional results after abdominal suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse or intussusception.  Eur J Surg. 1996;  162 905-911
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Briel J W, Schouten W R, Boerma M O. Long-term results of suture rectopexy in patients with fecal incontinence associated with incomplete rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 1228-1232
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Wells C. New operation for rectal prolapse.  Proc R Soc Med. 1959;  52 602-603
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Douard R, Tiret E. Surgical treatment of total rectal prolapse with rectal fixation (Orr-Loygue technique).  J Chir (Paris). 2002;  139 89-91
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Tsiaoussis J, Chrysos E, Athanasakis E et al.. Rectoanal intussusception: presentation of the disorder and late results of resection rectopexy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 838-844
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Ripstein C B. Treatment of massive rectal prolapse.  Am J Surg. 1952;  83 68-71
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Williams N S, Dvorkin L S, Giordano P et al.. External pelvic rectal suspension (express procedure) for rectal intussusception, with and without rectocele repair.  Br J Surg. 2005;  92 598-604
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 McCue J L, Thomson J PS. Rectopexy for internal rectal intussusception.  Br J Surg. 1990;  77 632-634
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Orrom W J, Bartolo D CC, Miller R, Mortensen N JM, Roe A M. Rectopexy is an ineffective treatment for obstructed defecation.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;  34 41-46
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Ihre T, Seligson U. Intussusception of the rectum-internal procidentia: treatment and results in 90 patients.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1975;  18 391-396
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosal and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Paper presented at: 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery May 31-June 5, 1998 Rome, Italy;
  Google Scholar
• 30 Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A et al.. Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction: a prospective, multicenter trial.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;  47 1285-1297
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Dodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G, Binda G, Pescatori M. Bleeding, incontinence, pain and constipation after STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation.  Tech Coloproctol. 2003;  7 148-153
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Ommer A, Albrecht K, Wenger F, Walz M K. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR): a new option in the treatment of obstructive defecation syndrome.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006;  391 32-37
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Renzi A, Izzo D, Di Sarno G, Izzo G, Di Martino N. Stapled transanal rectal resection to treat obstructed defecation caused by rectal intussusception and rectocele.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;  21 661-667
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Eric G WeissM.D. 

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida

2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL 33331

Email: weisse@ccf.org