Biomechanical Analysis of the Breaststroke Start

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the kinematics and coordination of the breaststroke start as regards to skill level using a video device. Ten national swimmers were compared with an international swimmer. All swimmers simulated the 100-m pace for 25 m after a grab start. The kinematical analysis assessed the durations of leave block, flight, entry and glide, pull-out, and the swim up to the 15-m mark phases. The coordination analysis assessed the durations of the time spent with the arms close to the thighs after a complete arm pull-push, the time gap between the end of the arm recovery and the beginning of the leg propulsion during the pull-out phase and at the first swim stroke, and the time gap between the end of leg propulsion and the beginning of arm propulsion. The international swimmer had a shorter 15-m start time than the national swimmers due to shorter times in the swim phase, longer times in the underwater phase, longer times spent with the arms close to the thighs and in glide with the body in extension. The whole population showed a negative superposition of leg propulsion with arm recovery at the pull-out phase, which disappeared at the first swim stroke.

References

• 1 Arellano R, Moreno F J, Martinez M, Ona A. A device for quantitative measurement of starting time in swimming. Troup JP, Hollander AP, Strass D, Trappe SW, Cappaert JM, Trappe TA Swimming Science VII. London; E & FN Spo 1996: 195-200
  Google Scholar
• 2 Ayalon A, Gheluwe B, Kanitz M. A comparison of four styles of racing in swimming. Clarys JP, Lewillie L Swimming Science II. Baltimore; University Park Press 1975: 233-240
  Google Scholar
• 3 Breed R VP, McElroy G K. A biomechanical comparison of the grab, swing and track starts in swimming.  J Hum Mov Studies. 2000;  39 277-293
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Breed R VP, Young W B. The effect of a resistance training programme on the grab, track and swing starts in swimming.  J Sports Sci. 2003;  21 213-220
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Chollet D, Seifert L, Leblanc H, Boulesteix L, Carter M. Evaluation of the arm-leg coordination in flat breaststroke.  Int J Sports Med. 2004;  25 486-495
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Cossor J M, Mason B R. Swim start performances at the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. Blackwell JR, Sanders RH XIX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. San Francisco; ISBS 2001: 70-73
  Google Scholar
• 7 Costill D L, Lee G, D'Acquisto L J. Video-Computer assisted analysis of swimming technique.  J Swim Research. 1987;  3 5-9
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 D'Acquisto L J, Costill D L, Gehlsen G M, Young W T, Lee G. Breaststroke economy, skill, and performance: study of breaststroke mechanics using a computer based “velocity-video” system.  Swim Res. 1988;  4 9-13
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 De la Fuente B, Garcia F, Arellano R. Are the forces applied in the vertical countermovement jump related to the forces applied during the swimming start. Chatard JC Swimming Science IX. Saint Etienne, France; University of Saint Etienne 2003: 207-210
  Google Scholar
• 10 Guimarães A CS, Hay J G. A mechanical analysis of the grab starting technique in swimming.  Int J Sports Biomech. 1985;  1 25-35
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Havriluk R, Ward T. A cinematographic analysis of three grab starts.  Swim Techn. 1979;  16 50-52
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Howell D C. Statistical Methods for Psychology. Fifth edition. Pacific Grove, CA; Duxbury, Wadsworth Group 2001
  Google Scholar
• 13 Hüellhorst U, Ungerechts B E, Willimczik K. Displacement and speed characteristics of the breaststroke turn - a cinematographic analysis. Ungerechts BE, Wilke K, Reischle K Swimming Science V. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics Publishers 1988: 93-98
  Google Scholar
• 14 Issurin V, Verbitsky O. Track start versus grab start: evidence from the Sydney Olympic Games. Chatard JC Swimming Science IX. Saint Etienne, France; University of Saint Etienne 2003: 213-217
  Google Scholar
• 15 Klauck J. Swimming speed estimation based on forward dynamics model. Chatard JC Swimming Science IX. Saint Etienne, France; University of Saint Etienne 2003: 75-80
  Google Scholar
• 16 Krüger T, Wick D, Hohmann A, El-Bahrawi M, Koth A. Biomechanics of the grab and track start technique. Chatard JC Swimming Science IX. Saint Etienne, France; University of Saint Etienne 2003: 219-223
  Google Scholar
• 17 Leblanc H, Seifert L, Baudry L, Chollet D. Arm-leg coordination in flat breaststroke: a comparative study between elite and non-elite swimmers.  Int J Sports Med. 2005;  26 787-797
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Leblanc H, Seifert L, Tourny-Chollet C, Chollet D. Velocity variations in breaststroke swimmers of different competitive levels.  Int J Sports Med. 2007;  28 140-147
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Lee C W, Huang C, Wang L I, Lin D C. Comparison of the dynamics of the swimming grab start, squat jump, and countermovement jump of the lower extremity. Blackwell JR, Sanders RH XIX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. San Francisco; ISBS 2001: 143-146
  Google Scholar
• 20 Lejeune L, Thouvarecq R, Anderson D I, Jouen F. Kinesthetic estimation of the main orientations from the upright and supine positions.  Acta Psychol. 2004;  117 13-28
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Lyttle A D, Blanksby B A, Elliott B C, Lloyd D G. Net forces during tethered simulation of underwater streamlined gliding and kicking techniques of the freestyle turn.  J Sports Sci. 2000;  18 801-807
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Mason B R, Cossor J M. What can we learn from competition analysis at the 1999 Pan Pacific swimming championships?. Sanders RH, Hong Y Proceedings of XVIII International Symposium on Biomechnics in Sports: Swimming. Hong-Kong; Chinese University Press 2000: 75-82
  Google Scholar
• 23 Miller M, Allen D, Pein R. A kinetic and kinematic comparison of the grab and track starts in swimming. Chatard JC Swimming Science IX. Saint Etienne, France; University of Saint Etienne 2003: 231-235
  Google Scholar
• 24 Mills B D, Gehlsen G. A multidisciplinary investigation of the relation of state sport confidence with preference and velocity of swimming starts.  Percept Mot Skills. 1996;  83 207-210
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Sanders R H. Start technique - recent findings. Available: http://www.education.ed.ac.uk/cis/swim/papers4/rs5.html
  Google Scholar
• 26 Sanders R H, Byatt-Smith J. Improving feedback on swimming turns and starts exponentially. Blackwell JR, Sanders RH XIX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. San Francisco; ISBS 2001: 91-94
  Google Scholar
• 27 Seifert L, Chollet D. A new index of flat breaststroke propulsion: comparison between elite men and elite women.  J Sports Sci. 2005;  23 309-320
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Thayer A L, Hay J G. Motivating start and turn improvement.  Swim Tech. 1984;  20 17-20
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Tourny-Chollet C, Chollet D, Hogie S, Papparodopoulos C. Kinematic analysis of butterfly turns of international and national swimmers.  J Sports Sci. 2002;  20 383-390
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Vilas-Boas J P, Cruz M J, Sousa F, Conceiçao F, Fernandes R, Carvalho J. Biomechanical analysis of ventral swimming starts: comparison of the grab start with two track start techniques. Chatard JC Swimming Science IX. Saint Etienne, France; University of Saint Etienne 2003: 249-253
  Google Scholar
• 31 Zatsiorsky V M, Bulgakova N Z, Chaplinsky N M. Biomechanical analysis of starting techniques in swimming. Terauds J, Bedingfield EW Swimming Science III. Baltimore; University Park Press 1979: 199-206
  Google Scholar

Dr. Ludovic Seifert

Faculty of Sport Sciences
CETAPS UPRES EA 3832

Boulevard Siegfried

76821 Mont Saint Aignan

France

Phone: + 33 232 10 77 84

Fax: + 33 232 10 77 93

Email: ludovic.seifert@univ-rouen.fr