Download PDF
Z Gastroenterol 2007; 45(9): 971-1001
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963437
Leitlinien

© Karl Demeter Verlag im Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

S3-Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Viszeralchirurgie zur Diagnostik und Behandlung von Gallensteinen

AWMF-Register-Nr. 021 / 008S3-Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Gallstones. German Society for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases and German Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. AWMF Registry 021/008F. Lammert1 , M. W. Neubrand2 , R. Bittner3 , H. Feussner4 , L. Greiner5 , F. Hagenmüller6 , K. H. Kiehne7 , K. Ludwig8 , H. Neuhaus9 , G. Paumgartner10 , J. F. Riemann11 , T. Sauerbruch1 für die Teilnehmer der Konsensuskonferenz[*] 1
  • 1Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
  • 2Innere Abteilung, Krankenhaus Maria Stern Remagen
  • 3Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Marienhospital Stuttgart
  • 4Chirurgische Universitätsklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
  • 5Medizinische Klinik 2, Helios Klinikum Wuppertal
  • 61. Medizinische Abteilung - Gastroenterologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona
  • 7I. Medizinische Klinik, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel
  • 8Klinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock
  • 9Medizinische Klinik, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
  • 10Klinikum Großhadern der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
  • 11Medizinische Klinik C, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein
Further Information

Publication History

Manuskript eingetroffen: 26.3.2007

Manuskript akzeptiert: 16.7.2007

Publication Date:
17 September 2007 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die Leitlinie zur Diagnostik und Therapie von Gallensteinen aktualisiert die Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten aus dem Jahr 2000. Die Leitlinie wurde interdisziplinär von Gastroenterologen und Chirurgen erstellt. Sie basiert auf den Empfehlungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften für eine systematische evidenzbasierte Konsensus-Leitlinie der Entwicklungsstufe S3 und berücksichtigt die klinische Anwendbarkeit der Studienergebnisse. Zudem werden Präventionsmöglichkeiten beschrieben, Qualitätsindikatoren definiert, ökonomische Auswirkungen berücksichtigt und Vorschläge zur Verzahnung der ambulanten und stationären Versorgung von Patienten mit Gallensteinerkrankungen formuliert.

Schlüsselwörter

Gallenblasensteine - Gallengangssteine - Cholelithiasis - Cholezystektomie

Literatur

3 * siehe Addendum A für vollständige Teilnehmerliste.

  • 1 Berndt H, Nürnberg D, Pannwitz H. Prävalenz der Cholelithiasis. Ergebnisse einer epidemiologischen Studie mittels Sonografie in der DDR.  Z Gastroenterol. 1989;  27 662-666
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Kratzer W, Mason R A, Kachele V. Prevalence of gallstones in sonographic surveys worldwide.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1999;  27 1-7
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Lammert F, Sauerbruch T. Mechanisms of disease: the genetic epidemiology of gallbladder stones.  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  2 423-433
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Völzke H, Baumeister S E, Alte D. et al . Independent risk factors for gallstone formation in a region with high cholelithiasis prevalence.  Digestion. 2005;  71 97-105
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Statistisches Bundesamt .Fallpauschalenbezogene Krankenhausstatistik (DRG-Statistik), Diagnosen und Prozeduren der vollstationären Patienten und Patientinnen in Krankenhäusern 2005. Fachserie 12, Reihe 6.4. Wiesbaden; Statistisches Bundesamt 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Sandler R S, Everhart J E, Donowitz M. et al . The burden of selected digestive diseases in the United States.  Gastroenterology. 2002;  122 1500-1511
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Neubrand M, Sackmann M, Caspary W. et al . Leitlinien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten zur Behandlung von Gallensteinen.  Z Gastroenterol. 2000;  38 449-468
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Lorenz W, Ollenschläger G, Geraedts M. et al . Das Leitlinien-Manual. Entwicklung und Implementierung von Leitlinien in der Medizin.  Z Ärztl Fortbild Qual Gesundheitswes. 2001;  95 (Suppl I) 1-84
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Beyer M, Geraedts M, Gerlach F M. et al . Deutsches Instrument zur methodischen Leitlinien-Bewertung (DELBI).  Z Ärztl Fortbild Qual Gesundheitswes. 2006;  99 468-492
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Hoffmann J C, Fischer I, Hohne W. et al . Methodische Basis für die Entwicklung von Konsensusempfehlungen.  Z Gastroenterol. 2004;  42 984-986
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Ollenschläger G, Kirchner H, Berenbeck C. et al . Aktuelle Initiativen zur Realisierung nationaler Leitlinien in Deutschland - eine Übersicht.  Gesundheitswesen. 2002;  64 513-520
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Kirchner H, Fiene M, Ollenschläger G. Bewertung und Implementierung von Leitlinien.  Rehabilitation. 2003;  42 74-82
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Breidenbach S. Transparenz von Recht durch knowledgeTools.  Versicherungswissenschaftliche Studien. 2003;  24 131-136
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Leese T, Neoptolemos J P, Baker A R. et al . Management of acute cholangitis and the impact of endoscopic sphincterotomy.  Br J Surg. 1986;  73 988-992
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Lai E C, Mok F P, Tan E S. et al . Endoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis.  N Engl J Med. 1992;  326 1582-1586
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Leung J W, Ling T K, Chan R C. et al . Antibiotics, biliary sepsis, and bile duct stones.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 716-721
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Sharma B C, Agarwal D K, Baijal S S. et al . Endoscopic management of acute calculous cholangitis.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997;  12 874-876
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Shea J A, Berlin J A, Escarce J J. et al . Revised estimates of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in suspected biliary tract disease.  Arch Intern Med. 1994;  154 2573-2581
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Trowbridge R L, Rutkowski N K, Shojania K G. Does this patient have acute cholecystitis?.  JAMA. 2003;  289 80-86
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Tenner S, Dubner H, Steinberg W. Predicting gallstone pancreatitis with laboratory parameters: a meta-analysis.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 1863-1866
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Ammori B J, Boreham B, Lewis P. et al . The biochemical detection of biliary etiology of acute pancreatitis on admission: a revisit in the modern era of biliary imaging.  Pancreas. 2003;  26 e32-e35
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Lévy P, Boruchowicz A, Hastier P. et al . Diagnostic criteria in predicting a biliary origin of acute pancreatitis in the era of endoscopic ultrasound: multicentre prospective evaluation of 213 patients.  Pancreatology. 2005;  5 450-456
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Liu C L, Fan S T, Lo C M. et al . Clinico-biochemical prediction of biliary cause of acute pancreatitis in the era of endoscopic ultrasonography.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;  22 423-431
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Sackmann M. Behandlung der biliären Kolik.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1998;  123 945-947
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Festi D, Sottili S, Colecchia A. et al . Clinical manifestations of gallstone disease: evidence from the multicenter Italian study on cholelithiasis (MICOL).  Hepatology. 1999;  30 839-846
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Rünzi M, Layer P, Büchler M W. et al . Therapie der akuten Pankreatitis. Gemeinsame Leitlinien.  Z Gastroenterol. 2000;  38 571-581
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Berger M Y, Velden J J, Lijmer J G. et al . Abdominal symptoms: do they predict gallstones? A systematic review.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;  35 70-76
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Jørgensen van der T. Abdominal symptoms and gallstone disease: an epidemiological investigation.  Hepatology. 1989;  9 856-860
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Berhane T, Vetrhus M, Hausken T. et al . Pain attacks in non-complicated and complicated gallstone disease have a characteristic pattern and are accompanied by dyspepsia in most patients: the results of a prospective study.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;  41 93-101
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Glambek I, Arnesjo B, Soreide O. Correlation between gallstones and abdominal symptoms in a random population. Results from a screening study.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1989;  24 277-281
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Kennedy T M, Jones R H. Epidemiology of cholecystectomy and irritable bowel syndrome in a UK population.  Br J Surg. 2000;  87 1658-1663
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Weinert C R, Arnett D, Jacobs D. et al . Relationship between persistence of abdominal symptomes and successful outcome after cholecystectomy.  Arch Intern Med. 2000;  160 989-995
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Thistle J L, Cleary P A, Lachin J M. et al . The natural history of cholelithiasis: the National Cooperative Gallstone Study.  Ann Intern Med. 1984;  101 171-175
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Friedman G D, Raviola C A, Fireman B. Prognosis of gallstones with mild or no symptoms: 25 years of follow-up in a health maintenance organization.  J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;  42 127-136
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Ransohoff D F, Gracie W A. Treatment of gallstones.  Ann Intern Med. 1993;  119 606-619
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Attili A F, De Santis A, Capri R. et al . The natural history of gallstones: the GREPCO experience.  Hepatology. 1995;  21 655-660
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Gebel M. Die Sonografie beim Gallensteinleiden.  Chir Gastroenterol. 1989;  5 469-476
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Macheiner P, Gritzmann N. Sonografie der Streßcholezystitis - Diagnose und Differentialdiagnose.  Z Gastroenterol. 1996;  34 21-26
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Ralls P W, Colletti P M, Lapin S A. et al . Real-time sonography in suspected acute cholecystitis. Prospective evaluation of primary and secondary signs.  Radiology. 1985;  155 767-771
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Angelico M, Gandin C, Canuzzi P. et al . Gallstones in cystic fibrosis: a critical reappraisal.  Hepatology. 1991;  14 768-775
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Duggirala R, Mitchell B D, Blangero J. et al . Genetic determinants of variation in gallbladder disease in the Mexican-American population.  Genet Epidemiol. 1999;  16 191-204
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Nakeeb A, Comuzzie A G, Martin L. et al . Gallstones: genetics versus environment.  Ann Surg. 2002;  235 842-849
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Katsika D, Grjibovski A, Einarsson C. et al . Genetic and environmental influences on symptomatic gallstone disease: a Swedish study of 43,141 twin pairs.  Hepatology. 2005;  41 1138-1143
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Puppala S, Dodd G D, Fowler S. et al . A genomewide search finds major susceptibility loci for gallbladder disease on chromosome 1 in Mexican Americans.  Am J Hum Genet. 2006;  78 377-392
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Rosmorduc O, Hermelin B, Poupon R. MDR3 gene defect in adults with symptomatic intrahepatic and gallbladder cholesterol cholelithiasis.  Gastroenterology. 2001;  120 1459-1467
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Rosmorduc O, Hermelin B, Boelle P Y. et al . ABCB4 gene mutation-associated cholelithiasis in adults.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  125 452-459
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Fracchia M, Pellegrino S, Secreto P. et al . Biliary lipid composition in cholesterol microlithiasis.  Gut. 2001;  48 702-706
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Buch S, Schafmayer C, Völzke H. et al . A genome-wide association scan identifies the hepatic cholesterol transporter ABCG8 as a susceptibility factor for human gallstone disease.  Nat Genet. 2007;  46 995-999
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Grünhage F, Acalovschi M, Tirziu S. et al . Increased gallstone risk in humans conferred by common variant of hepatic ATP binding cassette transporter for cholesterol.  Hepatology. 2007;  46 epub
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Van Mil S W, Woerd W L, Brugge van der G. et al . Benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis type 2 is caused by mutations in ABCB11.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  127 379-384
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Venneman van der N G, Besselink M G, Keulemans Y C. et al . Ursodeoxycholic acid exerts no beneficial effect in patients with symptomatic gallstones awaiting cholecystectomy.  Hepatology. 2006;  43 1276-1283
    Google Scholar
  • 52 McSherry C K, Ferstenberg H, Calhoun W F. et al . The natural history of diagnosed gallstone disease in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.  Ann Surg. 1985;  202 59-63
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Ransohoff D F, Gracie W A. Management of patients with symptomatic gallstones: a quantitative analysis.  Am J Med. 1990;  88 154-160
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Bates T, Ebbs S R, Harrison M. et al . Influence of cholecystectomy on symptoms.  Br J Surg. 1991;  78 964-967
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Qureshi M A, Burke P E, Brindley N M. et al . Post-cholecystectomy symptoms after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993;  75 349-353
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Plaisier P W, Hul R L, Nijs H G. et al . The course of biliary and gastrointestinal symptoms after treatment of uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: results of a randomized study comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with conventional cholecystectomy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 739-744
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Lublin van der M, Crawford D L, Hiatt J R. et al . Symptoms before and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstones.  Am Surg. 2004;  70 863-866
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Vetrhus M, Berhane T, Soreide O. et al . Pain persists in many patients five years after removal of the gallbladder: observations from two randomized controlled trials of symptomatic, noncomplicated gallstone disease and acute cholecystitis.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;  9 826-831
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Gracie W A, Ransohoff D F. The natural history of silent gallstones: the innocent gallstone is not a myth.  N Engl J Med. 1982;  307 798-800
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Friedman G D. Natural history of asymptomatic and symptomatic gallstones.  Am J Surg. 1993;  165 399-404
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Ransohoff D F, Gracie W A, Wolfenson L B. et al . Prophylactic cholecystectomy or expectant management for silent gallstones. A decision analysis to assess survival.  Ann Intern Med. 1983;  99 199-204
    Google Scholar
  • 62 Sonnenberg A, Derfus G A, Soergel K H. Lithotripsy versus cholecystectomy for management of gallstones. A decision analysis by Markov process.  Dig Dis Sci. 1991;  36 949-956
    Google Scholar
  • 63 Randi G, Franceschi S, LaVecchia C. Gallbladder cancer worldwide: geographical distribution and risk factors.  Int J Cancer. 2006;  118 1591-1602
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Maringhini A, Moreau J A, Melton L J. et al . Gallstones, gallbladder cancer, and other gastrointestinal malignancies. An epidemiologic study in Rochester, Minnesota.  Ann Intern Med. 1987;  107 30-35
    Google Scholar
  • 65 Sheth S, Bedford A, Chopra S. Primary gallbladder cancer: recognition of risk factors and the role of prophylactic cholecystectomy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 1402-1410
    Google Scholar
  • 66 Aucott J N, Cooper G S, Bloom A D. et al . Management of gallstones in diabetic patients.  Arch Intern Med. 1993;  153 1053-1058
    Google Scholar
  • 67 Law C HL, McKay D, Tandan V R. Gallstone disease. McDonald JWD, Burroughs A, Feagan BG Evidence-based Gastroenterology and Child Health Oxford; Blackwell Publishing 2004: 311-320
    Google Scholar
  • 68 Ashur H, Siegal B, Oland Y. et al . Calcified gallbladder (porcelain gallbladder).  Arch Surg. 1978;  113 594-596
    Google Scholar
  • 69 Towfigh S, McFadden D W, Cortina G R. et al . Porcelain gallbladder is not associated with gallbladder carcinoma.  Am Surg. 2001;  67 7-10
    Google Scholar
  • 70 Stephen A E, Berger D L. Carcinoma in the porcelain gallbladder: a relationship revisited.  Surgery. 2001;  129 699-703
    Google Scholar
  • 71 Diehl A K. Gallstone size and the risk of gallbladder cancer.  JAMA. 1983;  250 2323-2326
    Google Scholar
  • 72 Lowenfels A B, Walker A M, Althaus D P. et al . Gallstone growth, size, and risk of gallbladder cancer: an interracial study.  Int J Epidemiol. 1989;  18 50-54
    Google Scholar
  • 73 Lowenfels A B, Lindstrom C G, Conway M J. et al . Gallstones and risk of gallbladder cancer.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985;  75 77-80
    Google Scholar
  • 74 Jørgensen T, Jensen K H. Polyps in the gallbladder. A prevalence study.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1990;  25 281-286
    Google Scholar
  • 75 Chen C Y, Lu C L, Chang F Y. et al . Risk factors for gallbladder polyps in the Chinese population.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;  92 2066-2068
    Google Scholar
  • 76 Okamoto M, Okamoto H, Kitahara F. et al . Ultrasonographic evidence of association of polyps and stones with gallbladder cancer.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 446-450
    Google Scholar
  • 77 Myers R P, Shaffer E A, Beck P L. Gallbladder polyps: epidemiology, natural history and management.  Can J Gastroenterol. 2002;  16 187-194
    Google Scholar
  • 78 Heyder N, Gunter E, Giedl J. et al . Polypoide Läsionen der Gallenblase.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1990;  115 243-247
    Google Scholar
  • 79 Persley K M. Gallbladder polyps.  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2005;  8 105-108
    Google Scholar
  • 80 Yang H L, Sun Y G, Wang Z. Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: diagnosis and indications for surgery.  Br J Surg. 1992;  79 227-229
    Google Scholar
  • 81 Mainprize K S, Gould S W, Gilbert J M. Surgical management of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder.  Br J Surg. 2000;  87 414-417
    Google Scholar
  • 82 Terzi C, Sokmen S, Seckin S. et al . Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: report of 100 cases with special reference to operative indications.  Surgery. 2000;  127 622-627
    Google Scholar
  • 83 Lee K F, Wong J, Li J C. et al . Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder.  Am J Surg. 2004;  188 186-190
    Google Scholar
  • 84 Moriguchi H, Tazawa J, Hayashi Y. et al . Natural history of polypoid lesions in the gall bladder.  Gut. 1996;  39 860-862
    Google Scholar
  • 85 Csendes A, Burgos A M, Csendes P. et al . Late follow-up of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder smaller than 10 mm.  Ann Surg. 2001;  234 657-660
    Google Scholar
  • 86 Koga A, Watanabe H, Fukuyama T. Diagnosis and operative indication for polypoid lesions of the gallbladder.  Arch Surg. 1988;  123 26-29
    Google Scholar
  • 87 Kubota K, Bandai Y, Noie T. et al . How should polypoid lesions of the gallbladder be treated in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy?.  Surgery. 1995;  117 481-487
    Google Scholar
  • 88 Nürnberg D, Ignee A, Dietrich C F. Aktueller Stand der Sonografie in der Gastroenterologie. Biliopankreatisches System.  Med Klinik. 2007;  102 112-126
    Google Scholar
  • 89 Azuma T, Yoshikawa T, Araida T. et al . Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder by endoscopic ultrasonography.  Am J Surg. 2001;  181 65-70
    Google Scholar
  • 90 Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Yamato T. Endoscopic ultrasonography for differential diagnosis of polypoid gall bladder lesions: analysis in surgical and follow up series.  Gut. 2000;  46 250-254
    Google Scholar
  • 91 O’Brien P E, Dixon J B. A rational approach to cholelithiasis in bariatric surgery: its application to the laparoscopically placed adjustable gastric band.  Arch Surg. 2003;  138 908-912
    Google Scholar
  • 92 Swartz D E, Felix E L. Elective cholecystectomy after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: why should asymptomatic gallstones be treated differently in morbidly obese patients?.  Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;  1 555-560
    Google Scholar
  • 93 Lapidus A, Bangstad M, Astrom M. et al . The prevalence of gallstone disease in a defined cohort of patients with Crohn’s disease.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 1261-1266
    Google Scholar
  • 94 Fraquelli M, Losco A, Visentin S. et al . Gallstone disease and related risk factors in patients with Crohn disease: analysis of 330 consecutive cases.  Arch Intern Med. 2001;  161 2201-2204
    Google Scholar
  • 95 Lindner H, Bauer H. Untersuchungen zur Gallenblasenmotilität nach totaler Gastrektomie.  Viszeralchirurgie. 2002;  327 299-304
    Google Scholar
  • 96 Kobayashi T, Hisanaga M, Kanehiro H. et al . Analysis of risk factors for the development of gallstones after gastrectomy.  Br J Surg. 2005;  92 1399-1403
    Google Scholar
  • 97 Chew S S, Ngo T Q, Douglas P R. et al . Cholecystectomy in patients with Crohn’s ileitis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 1484-1488
    Google Scholar
  • 98 Thompson J S. The role of prophylactic cholecystectomy in the short-bowel syndrome.  Arch Surg. 1996;  131 556-559
    Google Scholar
  • 99 Greenstein S M, Katz S, Sun S. et al . Prevalence of asymptomatic cholelithiasis and risk of acute cholecystitis after kidney transplantation.  Transplantation. 1997;  63 1030-1032
    Google Scholar
  • 100 Melvin W S, Meier D J, Elkhammas E A. et al . Prophylactic cholecystectomy is not indicated following renal transplantation.  Am J Surg. 1998;  175 317-319
    Google Scholar
  • 101 Jackson T, Treleaven D, Arlen D. et al . Management of asymptomatic cholelithiasis for patients awaiting renal transplantation.  Surg Endosc. 2005;  19 510-513
    Google Scholar
  • 102 Kao L S, Flowers C, Flum D R. Prophylactic cholecystectomy in transplant patients: a decision analysis.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;  9 965-972
    Google Scholar
  • 103 Milas M, Ricketts R R, Amerson J R. et al . Management of biliary tract stones in heart transplant patients.  Ann Surg. 1996;  223 747-753
    Google Scholar
  • 104 Hüttl T P, Hrdina C, Krämling H J. et al . Gallstone surgery in German university hospitals. Development, complications and changing strategies.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001;  386 410-417
    Google Scholar
  • 105 Gleisberg C, Seidel J H, Bauer H. et al .Cholezystektomie. Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung Qualität sichtbar machen BQS-Qualitätsbericht 2001 Düsseldorf; 2002: 47-53
    Google Scholar
  • 106 Ludwig K, Köckerling F, Hohenberger W. et al . Die chirurgische Therapie der Cholecysto-/Choledocholithiasis. Ergebnisse einer deutschlandweiten Umfrage an 859 Kliniken mit 123 090 Cholecystektomien.  Chirurg. 2001;  72 1171-1178
    Google Scholar
  • 107 Velanovich V, Morton J M, McDonald M. et al . Analysis of the SAGES outcomes initiative cholecystectomy registry.  Surg Endosc. 2006;  20 43-50
    Google Scholar
  • 108 Keus F, Jong J A, Gooszen H G. et al . Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;  CD006231
    Google Scholar
  • 109 Putensen-Himmer de G, Putensen C, Lammer H. et al . Comparison of postoperative respiratory function after laparoscopy or open laparotomy for cholecystectomy.  Anesthesiology. 1992;  77 675-680
    Google Scholar
  • 110 Agnifili A, Verzaro R, Colangeli A. et al . Perioperative pulmonary-function, pain and stress-response after cholecystectomy performed via laparotomy or laparoscopy - comparison between laparoscopy and laparotomy.  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 1993;  2 283-288
    Google Scholar
  • 111 Coelho J C, Araujo R P, Marchesini J B. et al . Pulmonary function after cholecystectomy performed through Kocher’s incision, a mini-incision, and laparoscopy.  World J Surg. 1993;  17 544-546
    Google Scholar
  • 112 Garcia-Caballero de M, Vara-Thorbeck C. The evolution of postoperative ileus after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A comparative study with conventional cholecystectomy and sympathetic blockade treatment.  Surg Endosc. 1993;  7 416-419
    Google Scholar
  • 113 Trondsen E, Reiertsen O, Andersen O K. et al . Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study.  Eur J Surg. 1993;  159 217-221
    Google Scholar
  • 114 Berggren U, Gordh T, Grama D. et al . Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 1362-1365
    Google Scholar
  • 115 Dionigi R, Dominioni L, Benevento A. et al . Effects of surgical trauma of laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1994;  41 471-476
    Google Scholar
  • 116 Kjaersgaard P, Reiertsen O, Trondsen E. et al . Comparison of sequential and fixed-sample designs in a controlled clinical trial with laparoscopic versus conventional cholecystectomy.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994;  29 854-858
    Google Scholar
  • 117 Milheiro A, Sousa F C, Manso E C. et al . Metabolic responses to cholecystectomy: open vs. laparoscopic approach.  J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994;  4 311-317
    Google Scholar
  • 118 Dauleh M I, Rahman S, Townell N H. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison of postoperative temperature.  J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1995;  40 116-118
    Google Scholar
  • 119 Essen P, Thorell A, McNurlan M A. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prevent the postoperative protein catabolic response in muscle.  Ann Surg. 1995;  222 36-42
    Google Scholar
  • 120 Huang S M, Wu C W, Lui W Y. et al . A prospective randomised study of laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy in aged patients with cholecystolithiasis.  S Afr J Surg. 1996;  34 177-179
    Google Scholar
  • 121 Koprulu G, Esen F, Pembeci K. et al . Pulmonary mechanics during laparoscopic surgery.  Adv Exp Med Biol. 1996;  388 643-646
    Google Scholar
  • 122 Ortega A E, Peters J H, Incarbone R. et al . A prospective randomized comparison of the metabolic and stress hormonal responses of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.  J Am Coll Surg. 1996;  183 249-256
    Google Scholar
  • 123 Rovina N, Bouros D, Tzanakis N. et al . Effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on global respiratory muscle strength.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;  153 458-461
    Google Scholar
  • 124 Gal I, Roth E, Lantos J. et al . Inflammatory mediators and surgical trauma regarding laparoscopic access: free radical mediated reactions.  Acta Chir Hung. 1997;  36 97-99
    Google Scholar
  • 125 Karayiannakis A J, Makri G G, Mantzioka A. et al . Systemic stress response after laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a randomized trial.  Br J Surg. 1997;  84 467-471
    Google Scholar
  • 126 Bellon J M, Manzano L, Larrad A. et al . Endocrine and immune response to injury after open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Int Surg. 1998;  83 24-27
    Google Scholar
  • 127 Chumillas M S, Ponce J L, Delgado F. et al . Pulmonary function and complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Eur J Surg. 1998;  164 433-437
    Google Scholar
  • 128 Engin A, Bozkurt B S, Ersoy E. et al . Stress hyperglycemia in minimally invasive surgery.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;  8 435-437
    Google Scholar
  • 129 Lujan J A, Sanchez-Bueno F, Parrilla P. et al . Laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy in patients aged 65 and older.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;  8 208-210
    Google Scholar
  • 130 Volpino P, Cangemi V, D’Andrea N. et al . Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A comparison with traditional surgery.  Surg Endosc. 1998;  12 119-123
    Google Scholar
  • 131 Chaudhary D, Verma G R, Gupta R. et al . Comparative evaluation of the inflammatory mediators in patients undergoing laparoscopic versus conventional cholecystectomy.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1999;  69 369-372
    Google Scholar
  • 132 Lausten S B, Ibrahim T M, El-Sefi T. et al . Systemic and cell-mediated immune response after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in patients with chronic liver disease. A randomized, prospective study.  Dig Surg. 1999;  16 471-477
    Google Scholar
  • 133 LeBlanc-Louvry I, Coquerel A, Koning E. et al . Operative stress response is reduced after laparoscopic compared to open cholecystectomy: the relationship with postoperative pain and ileus.  Dig Dis Sci. 2000;  45 1703-1713
    Google Scholar
  • 134 Coskun I, Hatipoglu A R, Topaloglu A. et al . Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: effect on pulmonary function tests.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;  47 341-342
    Google Scholar
  • 135 Demirer S, Karadayi K, Simsek S. et al . Comparison of postoperative acute-phase reactants in patients who underwent laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy: a randomized study.  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2000;  10 249-252
    Google Scholar
  • 136 Hendolin H I, Paakonen M E, Alhava E M. et al . Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response.  Eur J Surg. 2000;  166 394-399
    Google Scholar
  • 137 Mimica Z, Biocic M, Bacic A. et al . Laparoscopic and laparotomic cholecystectomy: a randomized trial comparing postoperative respiratory function.  Respiration. 2000;  67 153-158
    Google Scholar
  • 138 Prisco D, De Gaudio A R, Carla R. et al . Videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy induces a hemostasis activation of lower grade than does open surgery.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 170-174
    Google Scholar
  • 139 Galizia G, Prizio G, Lieto E. et al . Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall-lifting cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 477-483
    Google Scholar
  • 140 Hasukic S, Mesic D, Dizdarevic E. et al . Pulmonary function after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 163-165
    Google Scholar
  • 141 Zulfikaroglu B, Koc M, Soran A. et al . Evaluation of oxidative stress in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Surg Today. 2002;  32 869-874
    Google Scholar
  • 142 Luo K, Li J S, Li L T. et al . Operative stress response and energy metabolism after laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to open surgery.  World J Gastroenterol. 2003;  9 847-850
    Google Scholar
  • 143 Bukan M H, Bukan N, Kaymakcioglu N. et al . Effects of open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy on oxidative stress.  Tohoku J Exp Med. 2004;  202 51-56
    Google Scholar
  • 144 Bosch F, Wehrman U, Saeger H D. et al . Laparoscopic or open conventional cholecystectomy: clinical and economic considerations.  Eur J Surg. 2002;  168 270-277
    Google Scholar
  • 145 Shea J A, Healey M J, Berlin J A. et al . Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholectystectomy. A meta-analysis.  Ann Surg. 1996;  224 609-620
    Google Scholar
  • 146 Ludwig K, Bernhardt B, Wilhelm L. et al . Gallenwegsverletzungen bei laparoskopischer Cholezystektomie.  Viszeralchirurgie. 2002;  37 61-66
    Google Scholar
  • 147 Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung .BQS-Bundesauswertung 2005 Cholezystektomie. Düsseldorf; 2006: 1-26
    Google Scholar
  • 148 Schiedeck T H, Schulte T, Gunarsson R. et al . Laparoskopische Cholezystektomie bei akuter Cholezystitis.  Minimal Invasive Chirurgie. 1997;  6 48-51
    Google Scholar
  • 149 Kiviluoto T, Siren J, Luukkonen P. et al . Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis.  Lancet. 1998;  31 321-325
    Google Scholar
  • 150 Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L. et al . Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.  Br J Surg. 2005;  92 44-49
    Google Scholar
  • 151 Puggioni A, Wong L L. A metaanalysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhosis.  J Am Coll Surg. 2003;  197 921-926
    Google Scholar
  • 152 Currò G, Iapichino G, Melita G. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Child-Pugh class C cirrhotic patients.  JSLS. 2005;  9 311-315
    Google Scholar
  • 153 Perkins L, Jeffries M, Patel T. Utility of preoperative scores for predicting morbidity after cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhosis.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  2 1123-1128
    Google Scholar
  • 154 Desai D C, Smink R D. Mirizzi syndrome type II: is laparoscopic cholecystectomy justified?.  JSLS. 1997;  1 237-239
    Google Scholar
  • 155 Yeh C N, Jan Y Y, Chen M F. Laparoscopic treatment for Mirizzi syndrome.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 1573-1578
    Google Scholar
  • 156 Barkun J S, Barkun A N, Sampalis J S. et al . Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy.  Lancet. 1992;  340 1116-1119
    Google Scholar
  • 157 Kunz R, Orth K, Vogel J. et al . Laparoskopische Cholezystektomie versus Mini-Lap-Cholezystektomie.  Chirurg. 1992;  63 291-295
    Google Scholar
  • 158 Tate J J, Lau W Y, Leung K L. et al . Laparoscopic versus mini-incision cholecystectomy.  Lancet. 1993;  341 1214-1215
    Google Scholar
  • 159 McMahon A J, Russell I T, Baxter J N. et al . Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial.  Lancet. 1994;  343 135-138
    Google Scholar
  • 160 Redmond H P, Watson R W, Houghton T. et al . Immune function in patients undergoing open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Arch Surg. 1994;  129 1240-1246
    Google Scholar
  • 161 McGinn F P, Miles A J, Uglow M. et al . Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 1374-1377
    Google Scholar
  • 162 Majeed A W, Troy G, Nicholl J P. et al . Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy.  Lancet. 1996;  347 989-994
    Google Scholar
  • 163 Bruce D M, Smith M, Walker C B. et al . Minimal access surgery for cholelithiasis induces an attenuated acute phase response.  Am J Surg. 1999;  178 232-234
    Google Scholar
  • 164 Ros A, Gustafsson L, Krook H. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.  Ann Surg. 2001;  234 741-749
    Google Scholar
  • 165 Srivastava A, Srinivas G, Misra M C. et al . Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy for gallstone disease. A randomized trial.  Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001;  17 497-502
    Google Scholar
  • 166 Grande M, Tucci G F, Adorisio O. et al . Systemic acute-phase response after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 313-316
    Google Scholar
  • 167 Keus F, Jong J A, Gooszen H G. et al . Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;  CD006229
    Google Scholar
  • 168 Schwenk de W, Neudecker J, Mall J. et al . Prospective randomized blinded trial of pulmonary function, pain, and cosmetic results after laparoscopic vs. microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 345-348
    Google Scholar
  • 169 Cheah W K, Lenzi J E, So J B. et al . Randomized trial of needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Br J Surg. 2001;  88 45-47
    Google Scholar
  • 170 Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R. et al . Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 458-464
    Google Scholar
  • 171 Huang M T, Wang W, Wei P L. et al . Minilaparoscopic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.  Arch Surg. 2003;  138 1017-1023
    Google Scholar
  • 172 Hsieh C H. Early minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis.  Am J Surg. 2003;  185 344-348
    Google Scholar
  • 173 Sarli L, Iusco D, Gobbi S. et al . Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments.  Br J Surg. 2003;  90 1345-1348
    Google Scholar
  • 174 Linden W, Sunzel H. Early versus delayed operation for acute cholecystitis. A controlled clinical trial.  Am J Surg. 1970;  120 7-13
    Google Scholar
  • 175 Lahtinen J, Alhava E M, Aukee S. Acute cholecystitis treated by early and delayed surgery. A controlled clinical trial.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1978;  13 673-678
    Google Scholar
  • 176 Jarvinen H J, Hastbacka J. Early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized study.  Ann Surg. 1980;  191 501-505
    Google Scholar
  • 177 Jaeger G, Rothenbühler J M, Famos M. et al . Wann soll die Cholecystektomie bei akuter Cholecystitis vorgenommen werden?.  Schweiz Med Wschr. 1983;  113 552-554
    Google Scholar
  • 178 Norrby S, Herlin P, Holmin T. et al . Early or delayed cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis? A clinical trial.  Br J Surg. 1983;  70 163-165
    Google Scholar
  • 179 Lo C M, Liu C L, Fan S T. et al . Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.  Ann Surg. 1998;  227 461-467
    Google Scholar
  • 180 Lai P B, Kwong K H, Leung K L. et al . Randomized trial of early versus delayed laporoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.  Br J Surg. 1998;  85 764-767
    Google Scholar
  • 181 Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A. et al . Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;  7 642-645
    Google Scholar
  • 182 Kolla S B, Aggarwal S, Kumar A. et al . Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial.  Surg Endosc. 2004;  18 1323-1327
    Google Scholar
  • 183 Gurusamy K S, Samraj K. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;  CD005440
    Google Scholar
  • 184 Papi C, Catarci M, D’Ambrosio L. et al . Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 147-155
    Google Scholar
  • 185 Dietzel M, Lippert H, Gastinger I. et al . Die „akute Galle” - laparoskopische Cholezystektomie häufig möglich. Ergebnisse einer Multizenterstudie der Ostdeutschen Arbeitsgruppe für Leistungserfassung und Qualitätssicherung in der Chirurgie.  Zentralbl Chir. 2000;  125 547-551
    Google Scholar
  • 186 Madan A K, Aliabadi-Wahle S, Tesi D. et al . How early is early laparoscopic treatment of acute cholecystitis?.  Am J Surg. 2002;  183 232-236
    Google Scholar
  • 187 Hatzidakis A A, Prassopoulos P, Petinarakis I. et al . Acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy vs conservative treatment.  Eur Radiol. 2002;  12 1778-1784
    Google Scholar
  • 188 Vetrhus M, Soreide O, Nesvik I. et al . Acute cholecystitis: delayed surgery or observation. A randomized clinical trial.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;  38 985-990
    Google Scholar
  • 189 Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y. et al . Percutaneous cholecystostomy versus gallbladder aspiration for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.  Am J Roentgenol. 2004;  183 193-196
    Google Scholar
  • 190 Akyürek N, Salman B, Yuksel O. et al . Management of acute calculous cholecystitis in high-risk patients: percutaneous cholecystotomy followed by early laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2005;  15 315-320
    Google Scholar
  • 191 Schwesinger W H, Sirinek K R, Strodel W E. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary tract emergencies: state of the art.  World J Surg. 1999;  23 334-342
    Google Scholar
  • 192 Garber S M, Korman J, Cosgrove J M. et al . Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.  Surg Endosc. 1997;  11 347-350
    Google Scholar
  • 193 Wilson R G, Macintyre I M, Nixon S J. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a safe and effective treatment for severe acute cholecystitis.  Br Med J. 1992;  305 394-396
    Google Scholar
  • 194 Bedirli A, Sakrak O, Sozuer E M. et al . Factors effecting the complications in the natural history of acute cholecystitis.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;  48 1275-1278
    Google Scholar
  • 195 Clavien P A, Richon J, Burgan S. et al . Gallstone ileus.  Br J Surg. 1990;  77 737-742
    Google Scholar
  • 196 Misawa T, Koike M, Suzuki K. et al . Ultrasonographic assessment of the risk of injury to branches of the middle hepatic vein during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Am J Surg. 1999;  178 418-421
    Google Scholar
  • 197 Kebudi A, Halefoglu A M, Yetkin G. et al . Role of preoperative color Doppler ultrasound scan in the evaluation of the risk of injury of major branches of the middle hepatic vein during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Int Surg. 2002;  87 236-239
    Google Scholar
  • 198 Shen B Y, Li H W, Chen M. et al . Color Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of the risk of injury to major branch of the middle hepatic vein during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2003;  2 126-130
    Google Scholar
  • 199 Yau H M, Lee K T, Kao E L. et al . Color Doppler ultrasound detection and classification of the tangential hepatic vein before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Surg Endosc. 2005;  19 1377-1380
    Google Scholar
  • 200 Zhang W Z, Shen J, Xie J X. et al . Color Doppler ultrasonographic examination on the relationship between the gallbladder bed and major branch of the middle hepatic vein.  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2005;  4 299-301
    Google Scholar
  • 201 Abboud P A, Malet P F, Berlin J A. et al . Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 450-455
    Google Scholar
  • 202 Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reiertsen O. et al . Prediction of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a prospective validation of a discriminant analysis function.  Arch Surg. 1998;  133 162-166
    Google Scholar
  • 203 Ritz J, Germer C, Buhr H. Preoperative routine chest x-ray: expensive and of little value.  Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997;  114 1051-1053
    Google Scholar
  • 204 Fahlke J, Ridwelski K, Manger T. et al . Diagnostic workup before laparoscopic cholecystectomy - which diagnostic tools should be used?.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;  48 59-65
    Google Scholar
  • 205 Zehetner J, Shamiyeh A, Wayanad W. Cholecystolithiasis - Update 2006. Neugebauer EA, Sauerland S, Fingerhut A, Millat B, Buess G EAES Guidelines for Endoscpic Surgery. Twelve Years Evidenced-Based Surgery in Europe Berlin, Heidelberg; Springer 2006: 291-295
    Google Scholar
  • 206 Misra S, Chaturvedi A, Misra N C. et al . Carcinoma of the gallbladder.  Lancet Oncol. 2003;  4 167-176
    Google Scholar
  • 207 Wiedmann M, Schoppmeyer K, Witzigmann H. et al . Aktuelle Diagnostik und Therapie von Gallengangs- und Gallenblasenkarzinomen.  Z Gastroenterol. 2005;  43 305-315
    Google Scholar
  • 208 Kim E K, Lee S K, Kim W W. Does laparoscopic surgery have a role in the treatment of gallbladder cancer?.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;  9 559-563
    Google Scholar
  • 209 Shimizu T, Arima Y, Yokomuro S. et al . Incidental gallbladder cancer diagnosed during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  J Nippon Med Sch. 2006;  73 136-140
    Google Scholar
  • 210 Wakai T, Shirai Y, Yokoyama N. et al . Early gallbladder carcinoma does not warrant radical resection.  Br J Surg. 2001;  88 675-678
    Google Scholar
  • 211 Ouchi K, Mikuni J, Kakugawa Y. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder carcinoma: results of a Japanese survey of 498 patients.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;  9 256-260
    Google Scholar
  • 212 Yeh C N, Jan Y Y, Chen M F. Management of unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma discovered during or following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Am Surg. 2004;  70 256-258
    Google Scholar
  • 213 Sun C D, Zhang B Y, Wu L Q. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of unexpected early-stage gallbladder cancer.  J Surg Oncol. 2005;  91 253-257
    Google Scholar
  • 214 Kraas E, Frauenschuh D, Farke S. Intraoperative suspicion of gallbladder carcinoma in laparoscopic surgery: what to do?.  Dig Surg. 2002;  19 489-493
    Google Scholar
  • 215 Wakai T, Shirai Y, Hatakeyama K. Radical second resection provides survival benefit for patients with T 2 gallbladder carcinoma first discovered after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  World J Surg. 2002;  26 867-871
    Google Scholar
  • 216 Shirai Y, Yoshida K, Tsukada K. et al . Inapparent carcinoma of the gallbladder. An appraisal of a radical second operation after simple cholecystectomy.  Ann Surg. 1992;  215 326-331
    Google Scholar
  • 217 Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, Saiki S. et al . Retrospective analysis of 70 operations for gallbladder carcinoma.  Br J Surg. 1997;  84 200-204
    Google Scholar
  • 218 Suzuki S, Yokoi Y, Kurachi K. et al . Appraisal of surgical treatment for pT2 gallbladder carcinomas.  World J Surg. 2004;  28 160-165
    Google Scholar
  • 219 Kondo S, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N. et al . Regional and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in radical surgery for advanced gallbladder carcinoma.  Br J Surg. 2000;  87 418-422
    Google Scholar
  • 220 Lundberg O, Kristoffersson A. Port site metastases from gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results of a Swedish survey and review of published reports.  Eur J Surg. 1999;  165 215-222
    Google Scholar
  • 221 Paolucci V, Schaeff B, Schneider M. et al . Tumor seeding following laparoscopy: international survey.  World J Surg. 1999;  23 989-995
    Google Scholar
  • 222 Sicklick J K, Choti M A. Controversies in the surgical management of cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer.  Semin Oncol. 2005;  32 S112-S117
    Google Scholar
  • 223 Takada T, Amano H, Yasuda H. et al . Is postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy useful for gallbladder carcinoma? A phase III multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial in patients with resected pancreaticobiliary carcinoma.  Cancer. 2002;  95 1685-1695
    Google Scholar
  • 224 Kubicka S. Cholangiozelluläres Karzinom und Gallenblasenkarzinom.  Z Gastroenterol. 2004;  42 397-402
    Google Scholar
  • 225 Ko C W, Beresford S A, Schulte S J. et al . Incidence, natural history, and risk factors for biliary sludge and stones during pregnancy.  Hepatology. 2005;  41 359-365
    Google Scholar
  • 226 Ko C W. Risk factors for gallstone-related hospitalization during pregnancy and the postpartum.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2263-2268
    Google Scholar
  • 227 Hiatt J R, Hiatt J C, Williams R A. et al . Biliary disease in pregnancy: strategy for surgical management.  Am J Surg. 1986;  151 263-265
    Google Scholar
  • 228 McKellar D P, Anderson C T, Boynton C J. et al . Cholecystectomy during pregnancy without fetal loss.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;  174 465-468
    Google Scholar
  • 229 Ghumman E, Barry M, Grace P A. Management of gallstones in pregnancy.  Br J Surg. 1997;  84 1646-1650
    Google Scholar
  • 230 Lu E J, Curet M J, El-Sayed Y Y. et al . Medical versus surgical management of biliary tract disease in pregnancy.  Am J Surg. 2004;  188 755-759
    Google Scholar
  • 231 Steinbrook R A, Brooks D C, Datta S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy during pregnancy. Review of anesthetic management, surgical considerations.  Surg Endosc. 1996;  10 511-515
    Google Scholar
  • 232 Glasgow R E, Visser B C, Harris H W. et al . Changing management of gallstone disease during pregnancy.  Surg Endosc. 1998;  12 241-246
    Google Scholar
  • 233 Cosenza C A, Saffari B, Jabbour N. et al . Surgical management of biliary gallstone disease during pregnancy.  Am J Surg. 1999;  178 545-548
    Google Scholar
  • 234 Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E A. et al .The EAES clinical practice guidelines on the pneumoperitoenum for laparoscopic surgery (2002). Neugebauer EA, Sauerland S, Fingerhut A, Millat B, Buess G EAES Guidelines for Endoscopic Surgery. Twelve Years Evidence-Based Surgery in Europe Berlin, Heidelberg; Springer 2006: 39-85
    Google Scholar
  • 235 Curet M J. Laparoscopy during pregnancy. Scott-Conner CE The SAGES Manual. Fundamentals of Laparoscopy, Thoracoscopy, and GI Endoscopy New York; Springer 2006: 84-89
    Google Scholar
  • 236 May G R, Sutherland L R, Shaffer E A. Efficacy of bile acid therapy for gallstone dissolution: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1993;  7 139-148
    Google Scholar
  • 237 Petroni M L, Jazrawi R P, Pazzi P. et al . Ursodeoxycholic acid alone or with chenodeoxycholic acid for dissolution of cholesterol gallstones: a randomized multicentre trial. The British-Italian Gallstone Study group.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;  15 123-128
    Google Scholar
  • 238 Frigerio G. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in the treatment of dyspepsia: report of a multicenter controlled trial.  Current Therapeutic Research. 1979;  26 214-223
    Google Scholar
  • 239 Inter-Hospital Clinical Research Group (G. I. R. C.) . Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) on dyspesia in patients with gallstones or other biliary tract anomalies.  Current Therapeutic Research. 1979;  26 230-233
    Google Scholar
  • 240 Tomida S, Abei M, Yamaguchi T. et al . Long-term ursodeoxycholic acid therapy is associated with reduced risk of biliary pain and acute cholecystitis in patients with gallbladder stones: a cohort analysis.  Hepatology. 1999;  30 6-13
    Google Scholar
  • 241 Paumgartner G. Strategies in the treatment of gallstone disease. Working team report.  Gastroenterology International. 1993;  6 65-75
    Google Scholar
  • 242 Pauletzki J, Sailer C, Klüppelberg U. et al . Gallbladder emptying determines early gallstone clearance after shock-wave lithotripsy.  Gastroenterology. 1994;  107 1496-1502
    Google Scholar
  • 243 Wermke W. Ultrasonic diagnosis of gallstone disease.  Z Gesamte Inn Med. 1989;  44 377-382
    Google Scholar
  • 244 Walters J R, Hood K A, Gleeson D. et al . Combination therapy with oral ursodeoxycholic and chenodeoxycholic acids: pretreatment computed tomography of the gall bladder improves gall stone dissolution efficacy.  Gut. 1992;  33 375-380
    Google Scholar
  • 245 Jazrawi R P, Pigozzi M G, Galatola G. et al . Optimum bile acid treatment for rapid gall stone dissolution.  Gut. 1992;  33 381-386
    Google Scholar
  • 246 Podda M, Zuin M, Battezzati P M. et al . Efficacy and safety of a combination of chenodeoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid for gallstone dissolution: a comparison with ursodeoxycholic acid alone.  Gastroenterology. 1989;  96 222-229
    Google Scholar
  • 247 Janssen J, Johanns W, Weickert U. et al . Long-term results after successful extracorporeal gallstone lithotripsy: outcome of the first 120 stone-free patients.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001;  36 314-317
    Google Scholar
  • 248 Lanzini A, Jazrawi R P, Kupfer R M. et al . Gallstone recurrence after medical dissolution. An overestimated threat?.  J Hepatol. 1986;  3 241-246
    Google Scholar
  • 249 Petroni M L, Jazrawi R P, Goggin P M. et al . Characteristics of recurrent gallstones following non-surgical treatment: implications for retreatment.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1991;  3 473-478
    Google Scholar
  • 250 Sackmann M, Pauletzki J, Aydemir U. et al . Efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid for dissolution of gallstone fragments: comparison with the combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid.  Hepatology. 1991;  14 1136-1141
    Google Scholar
  • 251 Sackmann M, Niller H, Klüppelberg U. et al . Gallstone recurrence after shock-wave therapy.  Gastroenterology. 1994;  106 225-230
    Google Scholar
  • 252 Pelletier G, Raymond J M, Capdeville R. et al . Gallstone recurrence after successful lithotripsy.  J Hepatol. 1995;  23 420-423
    Google Scholar
  • 253 Cesmeli E, Elewaut A E, Kerre T. et al . Gallstone recurrence after successful shock wave therapy: the magnitude of the problem and the predictive factors.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 474-479
    Google Scholar
  • 254 Tsumita R, Sugiura N, Abe A. et al . Long-term evaluation of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for cholesterol gallstones.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;  16 93-99
    Google Scholar
  • 255 Rabenstein T, Radespiel-Tröger M, Höpfner L. et al . Ten years experience with piezoelectric extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  17 629-639
    Google Scholar
  • 256 Venneman N G, Berge-Henegouwen G P, Portincasa van P. et al . Absence of apolipoprotein E 4 genotype, good gallbladder motility and presence of solitary stones delay rather than prevent gallstone recurrence after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.  J Hepatol. 2001;  35 10-16
    Google Scholar
  • 257 Carrilho-Ribeiro L, Pinto-Correia A, Velosa J. et al . A ten-year prospective study on gallbladder stone recurrence after successful extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;  41 338-342
    Google Scholar
  • 258 Pauletzki J, Althaus R, Holl J. et al . Gallbladder emptying and gallstone formation: a prospective study on gallstone recurrence.  Gastroenterology. 1996;  111 765-771
    Google Scholar
  • 259 Ochi H, Tazuma S, Kajihara T. et al . Factors affecting gallstone recurrence after successful extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;  31 230-232
    Google Scholar
  • 260 Petroni M L, Jazrawi R P, Pazzi P. et al . Risk factors for the development of gallstone recurrence following medical dissolution. The British-Italian Gallstone Study Group.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;  12 695-700
    Google Scholar
  • 261 Tazuma S, Nishioka T, Ochi H. et al . Impaired gallbladder mucosal function in aged gallstone patients suppresses gallstone recurrence after successful extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;  18 157-161
    Google Scholar
  • 262 Adamek H E, Rochlitz C, Bubnoff A C. et al . Predictions and associations of cholecystectomy in patients with cholecystolithiasis treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.  Dig Dis Sci. 2004;  49 1938-1942
    Google Scholar
  • 263 Sonnenberg von A, Benninger J, Ell C. Kostenvergleich zwischen der laparoskopischen Cholezystektomie und der extrakorporalen Stoßwellenlithotripsie in der Behandlung von Gallenblasensteinen.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1994;  119 1532-1537
    Google Scholar
  • 264 Go P M, Stolk M F, Obertop H. et al . Symptomatic gallbladder stones. Cost-effectiveness of treatment with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Surg Endosc. 1995;  9 37-41
    Google Scholar
  • 265 Neubrand M, Holl J, Sackmann M. et al . Combination of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and dissolution of gallbladder stones with methyl tert-butyl ether: a randomized study.  Hepatology. 1994;  19 133-137
    Google Scholar
  • 266 Pauletzki J, Holl J, Sackmann M. et al . Gallstone recurrence after direct contact dissolution with methyl tert-butyl ether.  Dig Dis Sci. 1995;  40 1775-1781
    Google Scholar
  • 267 Hellstern A, Leuschner U, Benjaminov A. et al . Dissolution of gallbladder stones with methyl-tert-butyl ether and stone recurrence: a European survey.  Dig Dis Sci. 1998;  43 911-920
    Google Scholar
  • 268 Maclure K M, Hayes K C, Colditz G A. et al . Weight, diet, and the risk of symptomatic gallstones in middle-aged women.  N Engl J Med. 1989;  321 563-569
    Google Scholar
  • 269 Tsai C J, Leitzmann M F, Willett W C. et al . Central adiposity, regional fat distribution, and the risk of cholecystectomy in women.  Gut. 2006;  55 708-714
    Google Scholar
  • 270 Ortega R M, Fernandez-Azuela M, Encinas-Sotillos A. et al . Differences in diet and food habits between patients with gallstones and controls.  J Am Coll Nutr. 1997;  16 88-95
    Google Scholar
  • 271 Leitzmann M F, Giovannucci E L, Rimm E B. et al . The relation of physical activity to risk for symptomatic gallstone disease in men.  Ann Intern Med. 1998;  128 417-425
    Google Scholar
  • 272 Leitzmann M F, Rimm E B, Willett W C. et al . Recreational physical activity and the risk of cholecystectomy in women.  N Engl J Med. 1999;  341 777-784
    Google Scholar
  • 273 Misciagna G, Centonze S, Leoci C. et al . Diet, physical activity, and gallstones - a population-based, case-control study in southern Italy.  Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;  69 120-126
    Google Scholar
  • 274 Broomfield P H, Chopra R, Sheinbaum R C. et al . Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid and aspirin on the formation of lithogenic bile and gallstones during loss of weight.  N Engl J Med. 1988;  319 1567-1572
    Google Scholar
  • 275 Liddle R A, Goldstein R B, Saxton J. Gallstone formation during weight-reduction dieting.  Arch Intern Med. 1989;  149 1750-1753
    Google Scholar
  • 276 Yang H, Petersen G M, Roth M P. et al . Risk factors for gallstone formation during rapid loss of weight.  Dig Dis Sci. 1992;  37 912-918
    Google Scholar
  • 277 Weinsier R L, Wilson L J, Lee J. Medically safe rate of weight loss for the treatment of obesity: a guideline based on risk of gallstone formation.  Am J Med. 1995;  98 115-117
    Google Scholar
  • 278 Syngal S, Coakley E H, Willett W C. et al . Long-term weight patterns and risk for cholecystectomy in women.  Ann Intern Med. 1999;  130 471-477
    Google Scholar
  • 279 Tsai C J, Leitzmann M F, Willett W C. et al . Weight cycling and risk of gallstone disease in men.  Arch Intern Med. 2006;  166 2369-2374
    Google Scholar
  • 280 Williams C, Gowan R, Perey B J. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid in the prevention of gallstones during weight loss after vertical banded gastroplasty.  Obes Surg. 1993;  3 257-259
    Google Scholar
  • 281 Worobetz L J, Inglis F G, Shaffer E A. The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy on gallstone formation in the morbidly obese during rapid weight loss.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;  88 1705-1710
    Google Scholar
  • 282 Shiffman M L, Kaplan G D, Brinkman-Kaplan V. et al . Prophylaxis against gallstone formation with ursodeoxycholic acid in patients participating in a very-low-calorie diet program.  Ann Intern Med. 1995;  122 899-905
    Google Scholar
  • 283 Sugerman H J, Brewer W H, Shiffman M L. et al . A multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, prospective trial of prophylactic ursodiol for the prevention of gallstone formation following gastric-bypass-induced rapid weight loss.  Am J Surg. 1995;  169 91-96
    Google Scholar
  • 284 Wudel L J, Wright J K, Debelak J P. et al . Prevention of gallstone formation in morbidly obese patients undergoing rapid weight loss: results of a randomized controlled pilot study.  J Surg Res. 2002;  102 50-56
    Google Scholar
  • 285 Miller K, Hell E, Lang B. et al . Gallstone formation prophylaxis after gastric restrictive procedures for weight loss: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.  Ann Surg. 2003;  238 697-702
    Google Scholar
  • 286 Shoheiber O, Biskupiak J E, Nash D B. Estimation of the cost savings resulting from the use of ursodiol for the prevention of gallstones in obese patients undergoing rapid weight reduction.  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1997;  21 1038-1045
    Google Scholar
  • 287 Schmieder G, Stankov G, Zerle G. et al . Observer-blind study with metamizole versus tramadol and butylscopolamine in acute biliary colic pain.  Arzneimittelforschung. 1993;  43 1216-1221
    Google Scholar
  • 288 Staritz M, Poralla T, Manns M. et al . Effect of modern analgesic drugs (tramadol, pentazocine, and buprenorphine) on the bile duct sphincter in man.  Gut. 1986;  27 567-569
    Google Scholar
  • 289 Cuer J C, Dapoigny M, Ajmi S. et al . Effects of buprenorphine on motor activity of the sphincter of Oddi in man.  Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;  36 203-204
    Google Scholar
  • 290 Wu S D, Zhang Z H, Jin J Z. et al . Effects of narcotic analgesic drugs on human Oddi’s sphincter motility.  World J Gastroenterol. 2004;  10 2901-2904
    Google Scholar
  • 291 Hassel B. Treatment of biliary colic with nitroglycerin.  Lancet. 1993;  342 1305
    Google Scholar
  • 292 Goldman G, Kahn P J, Alon R. et al . Biliary colic treatment and acute cholecystitis prevention by prostaglandin inhibitor.  Dig Dis Sci. 1989;  34 809-811
    Google Scholar
  • 293 Akriviadis E A, Hatzigavriel M, Kapnias D. et al . Treatment of biliary colic with diclofenac: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  113 225-231
    Google Scholar
  • 294 Thornell E, Jansson R, Svanvik J. Indomethacin intravenously - a new way for effective relief of biliary pain: a double-blind study in man.  Surgery. 1981;  90 468-472
    Google Scholar
  • 295 Thornell E, Nilsson B, Jansson R. et al . Effect of short-term indomethacin treatment on the clinical course of acute obstructive cholecystitis.  Eur J Surg. 1991;  157 127-130
    Google Scholar
  • 296 Kumar A, Deed J S, Bhasin B. et al . Comparison of the effect of diclofenac with hyoscine-N-butylbromide in the symptomatic treatment of acute biliary colic.  ANZ J Surg. 2004;  74 573-576
    Google Scholar
  • 297 Shim C S, Joo J H, Park C W. et al . Effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 428-432
    Google Scholar
  • 298 Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing choledocholithiasis: a prospective comparative study with ultrasonography and computed tomography.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  45 143-146
    Google Scholar
  • 299 Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Acute biliary pancreatitis: the roles of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Surgery. 1998;  124 14-21
    Google Scholar
  • 300 Chak A, Hawes R H, Cooper G S. et al . Prospective assessment of the utility of EUS in the evaluation of gallstone pancreatitis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 599-604
    Google Scholar
  • 301 Varghese J C, Liddell R P, Farrell M A. et al . The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.  Clin Radiol. 1999;  54 604-614
    Google Scholar
  • 302 Cwik G, Wallner G, Ciechanski A. et al . Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 100 patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: ultrasound evaluation.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;  50 1225-1228
    Google Scholar
  • 303 Rickes S, Treiber G, Mönkemüller K. et al . Impact of the operator’s experience on value of high-resolution transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: a prospective comparison using endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as the gold standard.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;  41 838-843
    Google Scholar
  • 304 Thornton J R, Lobo A J, Lintott D J. et al . Value of ultrasound and liver function tests in determining the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in unexplained abdominal pain.  Gut. 1992;  33 1559-1561
    Google Scholar
  • 305 Majeed A W, Ross B, Johnson A G. et al . Common duct diameter as an independent predictor of choledocholithiasis: is it useful?.  Clin Radiol. 1999;  54 170-172
    Google Scholar
  • 306 Aronson N, Flamm C R, Mark D. et al . Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Evid Rep Technol Assess. 2002;  50 1-369
    Google Scholar
  • 307 Barkun A N, Barkun J S, Fried G M. et al . Useful predictors of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. McGill Gallstone Treatment Group.  Ann Surg. 1994;  220 32-39
    Google Scholar
  • 308 Koo K P, Traverso L W. Do preoperative indicators predict the presence of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?.  Am J Surg. 1996;  171 495-499
    Google Scholar
  • 309 Onken J E, Brazer S R, Eisen G M. et al . Predicting the presence of choledocholithiasis in patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 762-767
    Google Scholar
  • 310 Santucci L, Natalini G, Sarpi L. et al . Selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and preoperative bile duct stone removal in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 1326-1330
    Google Scholar
  • 311 Alponat A, Kum C K, Rajnakova A. et al . Predictive factors for synchronous common bile duct stones in patients with cholelithiasis.  Surg Endosc. 1997;  11 928-932
    Google Scholar
  • 312 Kim K H, Kim W, Lee H I. et al . Prediction of common bile duct stones: its validation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;  44 1574-1579
    Google Scholar
  • 313 Bergamaschi R, Tuech J J, Braconier L. et al . Selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstones.  Am J Surg. 1999;  178 46-49
    Google Scholar
  • 314 Masci E, Fanti L, Mariani A. et al . Selection criteria for pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic-laparoscopic treatment of biliary stones.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;  11 781-784
    Google Scholar
  • 315 Prat F, Meduri B, Ducot B. et al . Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests.  Ann Surg. 1999;  229 362-368
    Google Scholar
  • 316 Sahai A V, Mauldin P D, Marsi V. et al . Bile duct stones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a decision analysis to assess the roles of intraoperative cholangiography, EUS, and ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 334-343
    Google Scholar
  • 317 Kama N A, Atli M, Doganay M. et al . Practical recommendations for the prediction and management of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 942-945
    Google Scholar
  • 318 Liu T H, Consorti E T, Kawashima A. et al . Patient evaluation and management with selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Ann Surg. 2001;  234 33-40
    Google Scholar
  • 319 Luman W, Chan E S. Mathematical model for predicting biliary therapeutic endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP).  Dig Liver Dis. 2003;  35 486-492
    Google Scholar
  • 320 Sarli L, Costi R, Gobbi S. et al . Scoring system to predict asymptomatic choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A matched case-control study.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 1396-1403
    Google Scholar
  • 321 Cohen S, Bacon B R, Berlin J A. et al . NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy.  NIH Consensus State Sci Statements. 2002;  19 1-26
    Google Scholar
  • 322 Palazzo L, Girollet P P, Salmeron M. et al . Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 225-231
    Google Scholar
  • 323 Liu C L, Lo C M, Chan J K. et al . Detection of choledocholithiasis by EUS in acute pancreatitis: a prospective evaluation in 100 consecutive patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 325-330
    Google Scholar
  • 324 Tseng L J, Jao Y T, Mo L R. et al . Over-the-wire US catheter probe as an adjunct to ERCP in the detection of choledocholithiasis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 720-723
    Google Scholar
  • 325 Moon J H, Cho Y D, Cha S W. et al . The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 1051-1057
    Google Scholar
  • 326 Johnson A G, Hosking S W. Appraisal of the management of bile duct stones.  Br J Surg. 1987;  74 555-560
    Google Scholar
  • 327 Murison M S, Gartell P C, McGinn F P. Does selective peroperative cholangiography result in missed common bile duct stones?.  J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1993;  38 220-224
    Google Scholar
  • 328 Dancygier H, Nattermann C. The role of endoscopic ultrasonography in biliary tract disease: obstructive jaundice.  Endoscopy. 1994;  26 800-802
    Google Scholar
  • 329 Prat F, Amouyal G, Amouyal P. et al . Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common-bileduct lithiasis.  Lancet. 1996;  347 75-79
    Google Scholar
  • 330 Norton S A, Alderson D. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the detection of bile duct stones.  Br J Surg. 1997;  84 1366-1369
    Google Scholar
  • 331 Canto M I, Chak A, Stellato T. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 439-448
    Google Scholar
  • 332 De Ledinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond J M. et al . Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 26-31
    Google Scholar
  • 333 Polkowski M, Palucki J, Regula J. et al . Helical computed tomographic cholangiography versus endosonography for suspected bile duct stones: a prospective blinded study in non-jaundiced patients.  Gut. 1999;  45 744-749
    Google Scholar
  • 334 Materne R, Beers B E, Gigot J F. et al . Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 3-9
    Google Scholar
  • 335 Scheiman J M, Carlos R C, Barnett J L. et al . Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 2900-2904
    Google Scholar
  • 336 Ainsworth A P, Rafaelsen S R, Wamberg P A. et al . Is there a difference in diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact between endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 1029-1032
    Google Scholar
  • 337 Buscarini van E, Tansini P, Vallisa D. et al . EUS for suspected choledocholithiasis: do benefits outweigh costs? A prospective, controlled study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 510-518
    Google Scholar
  • 338 Napoleon B, Dumortier J, Keriven-Souquet O. et al . Do normal findings at biliary endoscopic ultrasonography obviate the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspicion of common bile duct stone? A prospective follow-up study of 238 patients.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 411-415
    Google Scholar
  • 339 Thorboll J, Vilmann P, Jacobsen B. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonography in detection of cholelithiasis in patients with biliary pain and negative transabdominal ultrasonography.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;  39 267-269
    Google Scholar
  • 340 Tse F, Barkun J S, Barkun A N. The elective evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 437-448
    Google Scholar
  • 341 Aubé C, Delorme B, Yzet T. et al . MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study.  Am J Roentgenol. 2005;  184 55-62
    Google Scholar
  • 342 Kondo S, Isayama H, Akahane M. et al . Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography.  Eur J Radiol. 2005;  54 271-275
    Google Scholar
  • 343 Mirbagheri S A, Mohamadnejad M, Nasiri J. et al . Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of biliary microlithiasis in patients with normal transabdominal ultrasonography.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;  9 961-964
    Google Scholar
  • 344 Ney M V, Maluf-Filho F, Sakai P. et al . Echo-endoscopy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: the influence of the size of the stone and diameter of the common bile duct.  Arq Gastroenterol. 2005;  42 239-243
    Google Scholar
  • 345 Guibaud L, Bret P M, Reinhold C. et al . Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography.  Radiology. 1995;  197 109-115
    Google Scholar
  • 346 Chan Y L, Chan A C, Lam W W. et al . Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.  Radiology. 1996;  200 85-89
    Google Scholar
  • 347 Reuther G, Kiefer B, Tuchmann A. et al . MR-Cholangiopankreatikografie als Einzelschussprojektion: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse bei 200 Untersuchungen.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 1996;  165 535-543
    Google Scholar
  • 348 Pavone P, Laghi A, Lomanto D. et al . MR cholangiography (MRC) in the evaluation of CBD stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Surg Endosc. 1997;  11 982-985
    Google Scholar
  • 349 Adamek H E, Albert J, Weitz M. et al . A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction.  Gut. 1998;  43 680-683
    Google Scholar
  • 350 Holzknecht N, Gauger J, Sackmann M. et al . Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.  Radiology. 1998;  206 657-664
    Google Scholar
  • 351 Lomas D J, Bearcroft P W, Gimson A E. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP.  Eur Radiol. 1999;  9 1411-1417
    Google Scholar
  • 352 Zidi S H, Prat F, Le G uen O. et al . Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method.  Gut. 1999;  44 118-122
    Google Scholar
  • 353 Angulo P, Pearce D H, Johnson C D. et al . Magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with biliary disease: its role in primary sclerosing cholangitis.  J Hepatol. 2000;  33 520-527
    Google Scholar
  • 354 Demartines N, Eisner L, Schnabel K. et al . Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones.  Arch Surg. 2000;  135 148-152
    Google Scholar
  • 355 Soto J A, Alvarez O, Munera F. et al . Diagnosing bile duct stones: comparison of unenhanced helical CT, oral contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography, and MR cholangiography.  Am J Roentgenol. 2000;  175 1127-1134
    Google Scholar
  • 356 Soto J A, Barish M A, Alvarez O. et al . Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and single- and multisection half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences.  Radiology. 2000;  215 737-745
    Google Scholar
  • 357 Stiris M G, Tennoe B, Aadland E. et al . MR cholangiopancreaticography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones.  Acta Radiol. 2000;  41 269-272
    Google Scholar
  • 358 Laokpessi A, Bouillet P, Sautereau D. et al . Value of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the preoperative diagnosis of common bile duct stones.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 2354-2359
    Google Scholar
  • 359 Boraschi P, Gigoni R, Braccini G. et al . Detection of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Evaluation with MR cholangiography.  Acta Radiol. 2002;  43 593-598
    Google Scholar
  • 360 Calvo M M, Bujanda L, Calderon A. et al . Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.  Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;  77 422-428
    Google Scholar
  • 361 Hakansson K, Ekberg O, Hakansson H O. et al . MR and ultrasound in screening of patients with suspected biliary tract disease.  Acta Radiol. 2002;  43 80-86
    Google Scholar
  • 362 Hussein F M, Alsumait B, Aman S. et al . Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis by magnetic resonance cholangiogram.  Australas Radiol. 2002;  46 41-46
    Google Scholar
  • 363 Jendresen M B, Thorboll J E, Adamsen S. et al . Preoperative routine magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study.  Eur J Surg. 2002;  168 690-694
    Google Scholar
  • 364 Kim T K, Kim B S, Kim J H. et al . Diagnosis of intrahepatic stones: superiority of MR cholangiopancreatography over endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Am J Roentgenol. 2002;  179 429-434
    Google Scholar
  • 365 Kim J H, Kim M J, Park S I. et al . MR cholangiography in symptomatic gallstones: diagnostic accuracy according to clinical risk group.  Radiology. 2002;  224 410-416
    Google Scholar
  • 366 Taylor A C, Little A F, Hennessy O F. et al . Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 17-22
    Google Scholar
  • 367 Urban M, Holzer B, Sebesta C. et al . Efficacy of diagnosis of mechanical cholestasis by magnetic resonance cholangiography.  World J Surg. 2002;  26 353-358
    Google Scholar
  • 368 Griffin N, Wastle M L, Dunn W K. et al . Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;  15 809-813
    Google Scholar
  • 369 Kats J, Kraai M, Dijkstra A J. et al . Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography as a diagnostic tool for common bile duct stones: a comparison with ERCP and clinical follow-up.  Dig Surg. 2003;  20 32-37
    Google Scholar
  • 370 Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E. et al . Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease.  Ann Intern Med. 2003;  139 547-557
    Google Scholar
  • 371 Kaltenthaler E, Vergel Y B, Chilcott J. et al . A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Health Technol Assess. 2004;  8 1-89
    Google Scholar
  • 372 Verma D, Kapedia A, Eisen G M. et al . EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 248-254
    Google Scholar
  • 373 Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi M A, Wilcox C M. et al . Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?.  Surg Endosc. 2006;  20 801-805
    Google Scholar
  • 374 Ludwig K, Bernhardt J, Lorenz D. Value and consequences of routine intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy.  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;  12 154-159
    Google Scholar
  • 375 Ludwig K, Wilhelm L, Prinz C. et al . Die intraoperative laparoskopische Cholangiografie - Wann ist sie sinnvoll?.  Zentralbl Chir. 2004;  129 185-190
    Google Scholar
  • 376 Sauerbruch T, Stellaard F, Soehendra N. et al . Cholesteringehalt von Gallengangsteinen.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1983;  108 1099-1102
    Google Scholar
  • 377 Cahalane M J, Neubrand M W, Carey M C. Physical-chemical pathogenesis of pigment gallstones.  Semin Liver Dis. 1988;  8 317-328
    Google Scholar
  • 378 Thistle J L. Pathophysiology of bile duct stones.  World J Surg. 1998;  22 1114-1118
    Google Scholar
  • 379 Neubrand M, Sauerbruch T. Pathogenese der Choledocholithiasis.  Chir Gastroenterol. 2001;  17 119-122
    Google Scholar
  • 380 Lacaine F, Corlette M B, Bismuth H. Preoperative evaluation of the risk of common bile duct stones.  Arch Surg. 1980;  115 1114-1116
    Google Scholar
  • 381 Saltzstein E C, Peacock J B, Thomas M D. Preoperative bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and amylase levels as predictors of common duct stones.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;  154 381-384
    Google Scholar
  • 382 Neuhaus H, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A. et al . Prospective evaluation of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Endoscopy. 1992;  24 745-749
    Google Scholar
  • 383 Houdart R, Perniceni T, Darne B. et al . Predicting common bile duct lithiasis: determination and prospective validation of a model predicting low risk.  Am J Surg. 1995;  170 38-43
    Google Scholar
  • 384 Welbourn C R, Mehta D, Armstrong C P. et al . Selective preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with sphincterotomy avoids bile duct exploration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Gut. 1995;  37 576-579
    Google Scholar
  • 385 Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A. et al . A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.  Ann Surg. 2004;  239 28-33
    Google Scholar
  • 386 Millbourn E. Klinische Studien über die Choledocholithiasis unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Ikterus, des Verhaltens der Diastasurie des spontanen Steinabgangs, sowie der Früh- und Spätergebnisse nach konservativer und operativer Therapie.  Acta Chir Scand. 1941;  86 1-310
    Google Scholar
  • 387 Frossard J L, Hadengue A, Amouyal G. et al . Choledocholithiasis: a prospective study of spontaneous common bile duct stone migration.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 175-179
    Google Scholar
  • 388 Caddy G R, Kirby J, Kirk S J. et al . Natural history of asymptomatic bile duct stones at time of cholecystectomy.  Ulster Med J. 2005;  74 108-112
    Google Scholar
  • 389 Acosta M J, Rossi R, Ledesma C L. The usefulness of stool screening for diagnosing cholelithiasis in acute pancreatitis. A description of the technique.  Am J Dig Dis. 1977;  22 168-172
    Google Scholar
  • 390 Greiner L, Münks C, Heil W. et al . Gallbladder stone fragments in feces after biliary extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.  Gastroenterology. 1990;  98 1620-1624
    Google Scholar
  • 391 Classen M, Demling L. Endoskopische Sphinkterotomie der Papilla Vateri und Steinextraktion aus dem Ductus choledochus.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1974;  99 469-467
    Google Scholar
  • 392 Cotton P B. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones (apples and oranges).  Gut. 1984;  25 587-597
    Google Scholar
  • 393 Miller B M, Kozarek R A, Ryan J A. et al . Surgical versus endoscopic management of common bile duct stones.  Ann Surg. 1988;  207 135-141
    Google Scholar
  • 394 Targarona E M, Ayuso R M, Bordas J M. et al . Randomised trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with gallbladder left in situ versus open surgery for common bileduct calculi in high-risk patients.  Lancet. 1996;  347 926-929
    Google Scholar
  • 395 Kautz G. Indikationen, Befunde und Komplikationen der ERCP in der Pädiatrie.  Z Gastroenterol. 1993;  31 742-750
    Google Scholar
  • 396 Deenitchin G P, Konomi H, Kimura H. et al . Reappraisal of safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones in the elderly.  Am J Surg. 1995;  170 51-54
    Google Scholar
  • 397 Deans G T, Sedman P, Martin D F. et al . Are complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy age related?.  Gut. 1997;  41 545-548
    Google Scholar
  • 398 Tham T C, Carr-Locke D L, Collins J S. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in the young patient: is there cause for concern?.  Gut. 1997;  40 697-700
    Google Scholar
  • 399 Shuchleib S, Chousleb A, Mondragon A. et al . Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.  World J Surg. 1999;  23 698-701
    Google Scholar
  • 400 Daradkeh S, Shennak M, Abu-Khalaf M. Selective use of perioperative ERCP in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;  47 1213-1215
    Google Scholar
  • 401 Biffl W L, Moore E E, Offner P J. et al . Routine intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography with selective cholangiography reduces bile duct complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  J Am Coll Surg. 2001;  193 272-280
    Google Scholar
  • 402 Iodice G, Giardiello C, Francica G. et al . Single-step treatment of gallbladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 336-338
    Google Scholar
  • 403 Lauschke H, Kaminski M, Verfurth B. et al . Die Choledochusrevision im Zeitalter der endoskopischen Papillotomie. Indikationen und Ergebnisse.  Zentralbl Chir. 2001;  126 364-368
    Google Scholar
  • 404 Leibl B J, Ulrich M, Scheuritzel U. et al . Selektive prä-, intra- und postoperative Gallengangdiagnostik - Ein effizientes und komplikationsarmes Regime im Rahmen der laparoskopischen Cholecystektomie. Früh- und Spätergebnisse einer prospektiven Studie.  Chirurg. 2001;  72 812-817
    Google Scholar
  • 405 Urbach D R, Khajanchee Y S, Jobe B A. et al . Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 4-13
    Google Scholar
  • 406 Meyer C, Le J V, Rohr S. et al . Management of common bile duct stones in a single operation combining laparoscopic cholecystectomy and perioperative endoscopic sphincterotomy.  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 874-877
    Google Scholar
  • 407 Thielemann H, Laun C, Naveke R. et al . Das diagnostische und therapeutische Management bei symptomatischer Cholezystolithiasis und präoperativ bestehendem Verdacht auf eine Choledocholithiasis.  Zentralbl Chir. 2002;  127 987-991
    Google Scholar
  • 408 Williams G L, Vellacott K D. Selective operative cholangiography and perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a viable option for choledocholithiasis.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 465-467
    Google Scholar
  • 409 Hamy A, Hennekinne S, Pessaux P. et al . Endoscopic sphincterotomy prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the treatment of cholelithiasis.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 872-875
    Google Scholar
  • 410 Enochsson L, Lindberg B, Swahn F. et al . Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization: a 2-year experience.  Surg Endosc. 2004;  18 367-371
    Google Scholar
  • 411 Hüttl T P, Hrdina C, Geiger T K. et al . Management der Choledocholithiasis. Umfrageergebnisse und Analyse von 8433 Gallengangsrevisionen.  Zentralbl Chir. 2002;  127 282-288
    Google Scholar
  • 412 Martin D J, Vernon D R, Toouli J. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;  CD003327
    Google Scholar
  • 413 Clayton E S, Connor S, Alexakis N. et al . Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ.  Br J Surg. 2006;  93 1185-1191
    Google Scholar
  • 414 Neoptolemos J P, Carr-Locke D L, Fossard D P. Prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones.  Br Med J. 1987;  294 470-474
    Google Scholar
  • 415 Stain S C, Cohen H, Tsuishoysha M. et al . Choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration.  Ann Surg. 1991;  213 627-633
    Google Scholar
  • 416 Stiegmann G V, Goff J S, Mansour A. et al . Precholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal is not superior to cholecystectomy, cholangiography, and common duct exploration.  Am J Surg. 1992;  163 227-230
    Google Scholar
  • 417 Hammarström L E, Holmin T, Stridbeck H. et al . Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized study of endoscopic versus surgical treatment of bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 1516-1521
    Google Scholar
  • 418 Kapoor R, Kaushik S P, Saraswat V A. et al . Prospective randomized trial comparing endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by surgery with surgery alone in good risk patients with choledocholithiasis.  HPB Surg. 1996;  9 145-148
    Google Scholar
  • 419 Suc B, Escat J, Cherqui D. et al . Surgery vs endoscopy as primary treatment in symptomatic patients with suspected common bile duct stones: a multicenter randomized trial.  Arch Surg. 1998;  133 702-708
    Google Scholar
  • 420 Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M. et al . E. A. E. S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi.  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 952-957
    Google Scholar
  • 421 Sgourakis G, Karaliotas K. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis. A prospective randomized study.  Minerva Chir. 2002;  57 467-474
    Google Scholar
  • 422 Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L. et al . Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones.  Lancet. 1998;  351 159-161
    Google Scholar
  • 423 Nathanson L K, O’Rourke N A, Martin I J. et al . Postoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic choledochotomy for clearance of selected bile duct calculi: a randomized trial.  Ann Surg. 2005;  242 188-192
    Google Scholar
  • 424 Poulose B K, Arbogast P G, Holzman M D. National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores.  Surg Endosc. 2006;  20 186-190
    Google Scholar
  • 425 Ammori B J, Birbas K, Davides D. et al . Routine vs „on demand” postoperative ERCP for small bile duct calculi detected at intraoperative cholangiography. Clinical evaluation and cost analysis.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 1123-1126
    Google Scholar
  • 426 Basso N, Pizzuto G, Surgo D. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 532-535
    Google Scholar
  • 427 Meyer C, Le J V, Rohr S. et al . Management of common bile duct stones in a single operation combining laparoscopic cholecystectomy and peroperative endoscopic sphincterotomy.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;  9 196-200
    Google Scholar
  • 428 Wei Q, Wang J G, Li L B. et al . Management of choledocholithiasis: comparison between laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy.  World J Gastroenterol. 2003;  9 2856-2858
    Google Scholar
  • 429 Lella F, Bagnolo F, Rebuffat C. et al . Use of the laparoscopic-endoscopic approach, the so-called „rendezvous” technique, in cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a valid method in cases with patient-related risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis.  Surg Endosc. 2006;  20 419-423
    Google Scholar
  • 430 Rabago L R, Vicente C, Soler F. et al . Two-stage treatment with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) compared with single-stage treatment with intraoperative ERCP for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis with possible choledocholithiasis.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 779-786
    Google Scholar
  • 431 Metcalfe M S, Ong T, Bruening M H. et al . Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram a matter of routine?.  Am J Surg. 2004;  187 475-481
    Google Scholar
  • 432 Järhult J. Is preoperative evaluation of the biliary tree necessary in uncomplicated gallstone disease? Results of a randomized trial.  Scand J Surg. 2005;  94 31-33
    Google Scholar
  • 433 Hawasli A, Lloyd L, Pozios V. et al . The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreaticrogram in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Am Surg. 1993;  59 285-288
    Google Scholar
  • 434 Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reiertsen O. et al . Selection criteria for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) in patients with gallstone disease.  World J Surg. 1995;  19 852-856
    Google Scholar
  • 435 Menezes N, Marson L P, Debeaux A C. et al . Prospective analysis of a scoring system to predict choledocholithiasis.  Br J Surg. 2000;  87 1176-1181
    Google Scholar
  • 436 Katz D, Nikfarjam M, Sfakiotaki A. et al . Selective endoscopic cholangiography for the detection of common bile duct stones in patients with cholelithiasis.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 1045-1049
    Google Scholar
  • 437 Bachar G N, Cohen M, Belenky A. et al . Effect of aging on the adult extrahepatic bile duct: a sonographic study.  J Ultrasound Med. 2003;  22 879-882
    Google Scholar
  • 438 Cotton P B. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Am J Surg. 1993;  165 474-478
    Google Scholar
  • 439 Van der Velden J J, Berger M Y, Bonjer H J. et al . Percutaneous treatment of bile duct stones in patients treated unsuccessfully with endoscopic retrograde procedures.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 418-422
    Google Scholar
  • 440 Garcia-Vila J H, Redondo-Ibanez M, Diaz-Ramon C. Balloon sphincteroplasty and transpapillary elimination of bile duct stones: 10 years’ experience.  Am J Roentgenol. 2004;  182 1451-1458
    Google Scholar
  • 441 Chespak L W, Ring E J, Shapiro H A. et al . Multidisciplinary approach to complex endoscopic biliary intervention.  Radiology. 1989;  170 995-997
    Google Scholar
  • 442 Navarrete C G, Castillo C T, Castillo P Y. Choledocholithiasis: percutaneous treatment.  World J Surg. 1998;  22 1151-1154
    Google Scholar
  • 443 Stage J G, Moesgaard F, Gronvall S. et al . Percutaneous transhepatic cholelithotripsy for difficult common bile duct stones.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 289-292
    Google Scholar
  • 444 Picus D, Weyman P J, Marx M V. Role of percutaneous intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy in the treatment of biliary tract calculi. Work in progress.  Radiology. 1989;  170 989-993
    Google Scholar
  • 445 Bonnel D H, Liguory C E, Cornud F E. et al . Common bile duct and intrahepatic stones: results of transhepatic electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 50 patients.  Radiology. 1991;  180 345-348
    Google Scholar
  • 446 Hayashi N, Sakai T, Yamamoto T. et al . Percutaneous transhepatic lithotripsy using a choledochoscope: long-term follow-up in 14 patients.  Am J Roentgenol. 1998;  171 1387-1389
    Google Scholar
  • 447 Demling L, Ermert H, Riemann J F. et al . Lithotripsy in the common bile duct using ultrasound. Preliminary in vitro experiments.  Endoscopy. 1984;  16 226-228
    Google Scholar
  • 448 Garg P K, Tandon R K, Ahuja V. et al . Predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy and endoscopic clearance of large bile duct stones.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 601-605
    Google Scholar
  • 449 Chang W H, Chu C H, Wang T E. et al . Outcome of simple use of mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile duct stones.  World J Gastroenterol. 2005;  11 593-596
    Google Scholar
  • 450 Jakobs R, Adamek H E, Maier M. et al . Fluoroscopically guided laser lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for retained bile duct stones: a prospective randomised study.  Gut. 1997;  40 678-682
    Google Scholar
  • 451 Neuhaus H, Zillinger C, Born P. et al . Randomized study of intracorporeal laser lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 327-334
    Google Scholar
  • 452 Sauerbruch T, Stern M. Fragmentation of bile duct stones by extracorporeal shock waves. A new approach to biliary calculi after failure of routine endoscopic measures.  Gastroenterology. 1989;  96 146-152
    Google Scholar
  • 453 Sauerbruch T, Holl J, Sackmann M. et al . Fragmentation of bile duct stones by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: a five-year experience.  Hepatology. 1992;  15 208-214
    Google Scholar
  • 454 Adamek H E, Buttmann A, Wessbecher R. et al . Clinical comparison of extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy (EPL) and intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) in difficult bile duct stones. A prospective randomized trial.  Dig Dis Sci. 1995;  40 1185-1192
    Google Scholar
  • 455 Adamek H E, Maier M, Jakobs R. et al . Management of retained bile duct stones: a prospective open trial comparing extracorporeal and intracorporeal lithotripsy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 40-47
    Google Scholar
  • 456 Ellis R D, Jenkins A P, Thompson R P. et al . Clearance of refractory bile duct stones with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.  Gut. 2000;  47 728-731
    Google Scholar
  • 457 Sackmann M, Holl J, Sauter G H. et al . Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for clearance of bile duct stones resistant to endoscopic extraction.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 27-32
    Google Scholar
  • 458 Adamek H E, Kudis V, Jakobs R. et al . Impact of gallbladder status on the outcome in patients with retained bile duct stones treated with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 624-627
    Google Scholar
  • 459 Riemann J F, Lux G, Forster P. et al . Long-term results after endoscopic papillotomy.  Endoscopy. 1983;  15 (Suppl 1) 165-168
    Google Scholar
  • 460 Binmoeller K F, Brückner M, Thonke F. et al . Treatment of difficult bile duct stones using mechanical, electrohydraulic and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.  Endoscopy. 1993;  25 201-206
    Google Scholar
  • 461 Ell C, Lux G, Hochberger J. et al . Laserlithotripsy of common bile duct stones.  Gut. 1988;  29 746-751
    Google Scholar
  • 462 Behjou B, Prat F, Fritsch J. et al . Intra-corporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of complex lithiasis of the bile ducts. Comparison of endoscopic techniques and long-term results.  Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1997;  21 648-654
    Google Scholar
  • 463 Hochberger J, Bayer J, May A. et al . Laser lithotripsy of difficult bile duct stones: results in 60 patients using a rhodamine 6G dye laser with optical stone tissue detection system.  Gut. 1998;  43 823-829
    Google Scholar
  • 464 Palmer K, Hofmann A. Intraductal mono-octanoin for the direct dissolution of bile duct stones: experience in 343 patients.  Gut. 1986;  27 196-202
    Google Scholar
  • 465 Leuschner U. Topical treatment of calcified and pigment stones.  Semin Liver Dis. 1990;  10 191-196
    Google Scholar
  • 466 Minami A, Nakatsu T, Uchida N. et al . Papillary dilation vs sphincterotomy in endoscopic removal of bile duct stones. A randomized trial with manometric function.  Dig Dis Sci. 1995;  40 2550-2554
    Google Scholar
  • 467 Bergman J J, Rauws E A, Fockens P. et al . Randomised trial of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bileduct stones.  Lancet. 1997;  349 1124-1129
    Google Scholar
  • 468 Ochi Y, Mukawa K, Kiyosawa K. et al . Comparing the treatment outcomes of endoscopic papillary dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;  14 90-96
    Google Scholar
  • 469 Arnold J C, Benz C, Martin W R. et al . Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation vs. sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized pilot study.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 563-567
    Google Scholar
  • 470 Bergman J J, Berkel A M, Bruno M J. et al . A randomized trial of endoscopic balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones in patients with a prior Billroth II gastrectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 19-26
    Google Scholar
  • 471 Yasuda van I, Tomita E, Enya M. et al . Can endoscopic papillary balloon dilation really preserve sphincter of Oddi function?.  Gut. 2001;  49 686-691
    Google Scholar
  • 472 Natsui M, Narisawa R, Motoyama H. et al . What is an appropriate indication for endoscopic papillary balloon dilation?.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;  14 635-640
    Google Scholar
  • 473 Fujita N, Maguchi H, Komatsu Y. et al . Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones: A prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 151-155
    Google Scholar
  • 474 Vlavianos P, Chopra K, Mandalia S. et al . Endoscopic balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for the removal of bile duct stones: a prospective randomised trial.  Gut. 2003;  52 1165-1169
    Google Scholar
  • 475 DiSario J A, Freeman M L, Bjorkman D J. et al . Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  127 1291-1299
    Google Scholar
  • 476 Lin C K, Lai K H, Chan H H. et al . Endoscopic balloon dilatation is a safe method in the management of common bile duct stones.  Dig Liver Dis. 2004;  36 68-72
    Google Scholar
  • 477 Tanaka S, Sawayama T, Yoshioka T. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: long-term outcomes in a prospective randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 614-618
    Google Scholar
  • 478 Weinberg B M, Shindy W, Lo S. Endoscopic balloon sphincter dilation (sphincteroplasty) versus sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;  CD004890
    Google Scholar
  • 479 Baron T H, Harewood G C. Endoscopic balloon dilation of the biliary sphincter compared to endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones during ERCP: a metaanalysis of randomized, controlled trials.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 1455-1460
    Google Scholar
  • 480 Chopra K B, Peters R A, PA O T. et al . Randomised study of endoscopic biliary endoprosthesis versus duct clearance for bileduct stones in high-risk patients.  Lancet. 1996;  348 791-793
    Google Scholar
  • 481 Soomers A J, Nagengast F M, Yap S H. Endoscopic placement of biliary endoprostheses in patients with endoscopically unextractable common bile duct stones. A long-term follow up study of 26 patients.  Endoscopy. 1990;  22 24-26
    Google Scholar
  • 482 Peters R, Macmathuna P, Lombard M. et al . Management of common bile duct stones with a biliary endoprosthesis. Report on 40 cases.  Gut. 1992;  33 1412-1415
    Google Scholar
  • 483 Johnson G K, Geenen J E, Venu R P. et al . Treatment of non-extractable common bile duct stones with combination ursodeoxycholic acid plus endoprostheses.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 528-531
    Google Scholar
  • 484 Bergman J J, Rauws E A, Tijssen J G. et al . Biliary endoprostheses in elderly patients with endoscopically irretrievable common bile duct stones: report on 117 patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 195-201
    Google Scholar
  • 485 Dalton H R, Chapman R W. Role of biliary stenting in the management of bile duct stones in the elderly.  Gut. 1995;  36 485-487
    Google Scholar
  • 486 Maxton D G, Tweedle D E, Martin D F. Retained common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy: temporary and longterm treatment with biliary stenting.  Gut. 1995;  36 446-449
    Google Scholar
  • 487 Bowrey D J, Fligelstone L J, Solomon A. et al . Common bile duct stenting for choledocholithiasis: a district general hospital experience.  Postgrad Med J. 1998;  74 358-360
    Google Scholar
  • 488 Jain S K, Stein R, Bhuva M. et al . Pigtail stents: an alternative in the treatment of difficult bile duct stones.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 490-493
    Google Scholar
  • 489 Cotton P B. Stents for stones: short-term good, long-term uncertain.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 272-273
    Google Scholar
  • 490 Hui C K, Lai K C, Ng M. et al . Retained common bile duct stones: a comparison between biliary stenting and complete clearance of stones by electrohydraulic lithotripsy.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;  17 289-296
    Google Scholar
  • 491 Boerma D, Rauws E A, Keulemans Y C. et al . Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial.  Lancet. 2002;  360 761-765
    Google Scholar
  • 492 Lau J Y, Leow C K, Fung T M. et al . Cholecystectomy or gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy and bile duct stone removal in Chinese patients.  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 96-103
    Google Scholar
  • 493 Ando T, Tsuyuguchi T, Okugawa T. et al . Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy.  Gut. 2003;  52 116-121
    Google Scholar
  • 494 Lee D W, Chan A C, Lam Y H. et al . Biliary decompression by nasobiliary catheter or biliary stent in acute suppurative cholangitis: a prospective randomized trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 361-365
    Google Scholar
  • 495 Sharma B C, Kumar R, Agarwal N. et al . Endoscopic biliary drainage by nasobiliary drain or by stent placement in patients with acute cholangitis.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 439-443
    Google Scholar
  • 496 Sauter G, Ruckdeschel G, Sauerbruch T. Antibiotische Prophylaxe und Therapie infektiöser Komplikationen bei der ERCP.  Leber Magen Darm. 1992;  22 173-176
    Google Scholar
  • 497 Niederau C, Pohlmann U, Lübke H. et al . Prophylactic antibiotic treatment in therapeutic or complicated diagnostic ERCP: results of a randomized controlled clinical study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 533-537
    Google Scholar
  • 498 Thompson B F, Arguedas M R, Wilcox C M. Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with obstructive jaundice: is it worth the cost?.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;  16 727-734
    Google Scholar
  • 499 Neoptolemos J P, Carr-Locke D L, London N J. et al . Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones.  Lancet. 1988;  2 979-983
    Google Scholar
  • 500 Fan S T, Lai E C, Mok F P. et al . Early treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotomy.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  328 228-232
    Google Scholar
  • 501 Fölsch U R, Nitsche R, Lüdtke R. et al . Early ERCP and papillotomy compared with conservative treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis.  N Engl J Med. 1997;  336 237-242
    Google Scholar
  • 502 Ayub K, Imada R, Slavin J. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;  CD003630
    Google Scholar
  • 503 Oria A, Cimmino D, Ocampo C. et al . Early endoscopic intervention versus early conservative management in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis and biliopancreatic obstruction. A randomized clinical trial.  Ann Surg. 2007;  245 10-17
    Google Scholar
  • 504 Acosta J M, Katkhouda N, Debian K A. et al . Early ductal decompression versus conservative management for gallstone pancreatitis with ampullary obstruction: a prospective randomized clinical trial.  Ann Surg. 2006;  243 33-40
    Google Scholar
  • 505 Bradley E L. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13, 1992.  Arch Surg. 1993;  128 586-590
    Google Scholar
  • 506 Whitcomb D C. Acute Pancreatitis.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  354 2142-2150
    Google Scholar
  • 507 Hammarström L E, Andersson R, Stridbeck H. et al . Influence of bile duct stones on patient features and effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy on early outcome of edematous gallstone pancreatitis.  World J Surg. 1999;  23 12-17
    Google Scholar
  • 508 De Waele B, Peterson T, Smekens L. et al . Common bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis: an endoscopic study.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997;  7 248-250
    Google Scholar
  • 509 Arbuckle J, Isla A. Acute pancreatitis - update 2006. Neugebauer EA, Sauerland S, Fingerhut A, Millat B, Buess G EAES Guidelines for Endoscopic Surgery. Twelve Years of Evidence-based Surgery in Europe Berlin, Heidelberg; Springer 2006: 377-386
    Google Scholar
  • 510 Banks P A, Freeman M L. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2379-2400
    Google Scholar
  • 511 Prat F, Edery J, Meduri B. et al . Early EUS of the bile duct before endoscopic sphincterotomy for acute biliary pancreatitis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 724-729
    Google Scholar
  • 512 Hallal A H, Amortegui J D, Jeroukhimov I M. et al . Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately detects common bile duct stones in resolving gallstone pancreatitis.  J Am Coll Surg. 2005;  200 869-875
    Google Scholar
  • 513 Liu C L, Fan S T, Lo C M. et al . Comparison of early endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis: a prospective randomized study.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  3 1238-1244
    Google Scholar
  • 514 Makary M A, Duncan M D, Harmon J W. et al . The role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of patients with gallstone pancreatitis.  Ann Surg. 2005;  241 119-124
    Google Scholar
  • 515 Kelly T R, Wagner D S. Gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial of the timing of surgery.  Surgery. 1988;  104 600-605
    Google Scholar
  • 516 Nealon W H, Bawduniak J, Walser E M. Appropriate timing of cholecystectomy in patients who present with moderate to severe gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis with peripancreatic fluid collections.  Ann Surg. 2004;  239 741-749
    Google Scholar
  • 517 Tate J J, Lau W Y, Li A K. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary pancreatitis.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 720-722
    Google Scholar
  • 518 Uhl W, Müller C A, Krähenbühl L. et al . Acute gallstone pancreatitis: timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in mild and severe disease.  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 1070-1076
    Google Scholar
  • 519 Schachter P, Peleg T, Cohen O. Interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis.  HPB Surg. 2000;  11 319-322
    Google Scholar
  • 520 Schietroma M, Carlei F, Lezoche E. et al . Acute biliary pancreatitis: staging and management.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;  48 988-993
    Google Scholar
  • 521 Taylor E, Wong C. The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in mild gallstone pancreatitis.  Am Surg. 2004;  70 971-975
    Google Scholar
  • 522 Cameron D R, Goodman A J. Delayed cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis: re-admissions and outcomes.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2004;  86 358-362
    Google Scholar
  • 523 Hernandez V, Pascual I, Almela P. et al . Recurrence of acute gallstone pancreatitis and relationship with cholecystectomy or endoscopic sphincterotomy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 2417-2423
    Google Scholar
  • 524 Gislason H, Vetrhus M, Horn A. et al . Endoscopic sphincterotomy in acute gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective study of the late outcome.  Eur J Surg. 2001;  167 204-208
    Google Scholar
  • 525 Kaw M, Al-Antably Y, Kaw P. Management of gallstone pancreatitis: cholecystectomy or ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 61-65
    Google Scholar
  • 526 Hui C K, Lai K C, Yuen M F. et al . The role of cholecystectomy in reducing recurrent gallstone pancreatitis.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 206-211
    Google Scholar
  • 527 Ros E, Navarro S, Bru C. et al . Occult microlithiasis in ‘idiopathic’ acute pancreatitis: prevention of relapses by cholecystectomy or ursodeoxycholic acid therapy.  Gastroenterology. 1991;  101 1701-1709
    Google Scholar
  • 528 Evans W B, Draganov P. Is empiric cholecystectomy a reasonable treatment option for idiopathic acute pancreatitis?.  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;  3 356-357
    Google Scholar
  • 529 Garg P K, Tandon R K, Madan K. Is biliary microlithiasis a significant cause of idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis? A long-term follow-up study.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  5 75-79
    Google Scholar
  • 530 Testoni P A, Caporuscio S, Bagnolo F. et al . Idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis: long-term results after ERCP, endoscopic sphincterotomy, or ursodeoxycholic acid treatment.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 1702-1707
    Google Scholar
  • 531 Venneman N G, Renooij W, Rehfeld J F. et al . Small gallstones, preserved gallbladder motility, and fast crystallization are associated with pancreatitis.  Hepatology. 2005;  41 738-746
    Google Scholar
  • 532 Venneman N G, Buskens E, Besselink M G. et al . Small gallstones are associated with increased risk of acute pancreatitis: potential benefits of prophylactic cholecystectomy?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 2540-2550
    Google Scholar
  • 533 Park D H, Kim M H, Lee S S. et al . Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for locating hepatolithiasis and detecting accompanying biliary strictures.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 987-992
    Google Scholar
  • 534 Mori T, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Gallstone disease: management of intrahepatic stones.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;  20 1117-1137
    Google Scholar
  • 535 Kusano T, Isa T, Ohtsubo M. et al . Natural progression of untreated hepatolithiasis that shows no clinical signs at its initial presentation.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;  33 114-117
    Google Scholar
  • 536 Neuhaus H. Intrahepatic stones: the percutaneous approach.  Can J Gastroenterol. 1999;  13 467-472
    Google Scholar
  • 537 Di Carlo I, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J. Intrahepatic lithiasis: a Western experience.  Surg Today. 2000;  30 319-322
    Google Scholar
  • 538 Kim K H, Sung C K, Park B G. et al . Clinical significance of intrahepatic biliary stricture in efficacy of hepatic resection for intrahepatic stones.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1998;  5 303-308
    Google Scholar
  • 539 Adamek H E, Schneider A R, Adamek M U. et al . Treatment of difficult intrahepatic stones by using extracorporeal and intracorporeal lithotripsy techniques: 10 years’ experience in 55 patients.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;  34 1157-1161
    Google Scholar
  • 540 Maetani I, Ishiguro J, Ogawa S. et al . Percutaneous choledochoscopic treatment of intrahepatic stones, including management of associated biliary stenoses.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 456-459
    Google Scholar
  • 541 Jeng K S, Sheen I S, Yang F S. Are modified procedures significantly better than conventional procedures in percutaneous transhepatic treatment for complicated right hepatolithiasis with intrahepatic biliary strictures?.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;  37 597-601
    Google Scholar
  • 542 Wu Y W, Jian Y P, Liang J S. et al . The treatment of intrahepatic calculosis by applying helix hydro-jet lithotripsy under video choledochoscope: a report of 30 cases.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006;  391 355-358
    Google Scholar
  • 543 Axelrad A M, Fleischer D E, Strack L L. et al . Performance of ERCP for symptomatic choledocholithiasis during pregnancy: techniques to increase safety and improve patient management.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 109-112
    Google Scholar
  • 544 Jamidar P A, Beck G J, Hoffman B J. et al . Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in pregnancy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 1263-1267
    Google Scholar
  • 545 Sungler P, Heinerman P M, Steiner H. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and interventional endoscopy for gallstone complications during pregnancy.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 267-271
    Google Scholar
  • 546 Tham T C, Vandervoort J, Wong R C. et al . Safety of ERCP during pregnancy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 308-311
    Google Scholar
  • 547 Kahaleh M, Hartwell G D, Arseneau K O. et al . Safety and efficacy of ERCP in pregnancy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 287-292
    Google Scholar
  • 548 Freistühler M, Braess A, Petrides A S. Ultraschallgeleitete endoskopische Papillotomie in der Schwangerschaft bei schwerer biliärer Pankreatitis.  Z Gastroenterol. 1999;  37 27-30
    Google Scholar
  • 549 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medizinische Physik, Deutsche Röntgengesellschaft .Pränatale Strahlenexposition aus medizinischer Indikation. Dosisermittlung, Folgerungen für Arzt und Schwangere. Berlin; DGMP 2002: 1-48
    Google Scholar
  • 550 Testoni P A, Tittobello A. Long-term efficacy of endoscopic papillo-sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones and benign papillary stenosis.  Surg Endosc. 1991;  5 135-139
    Google Scholar
  • 551 Bergman J J, Mey van der S, Rauws E A. et al . Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients younger than 60 years of age.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 643-649
    Google Scholar
  • 552 Lai K H, Peng N J, Lo G H. et al . Prediction of recurrent choledocholithiasis by quantitative cholescintigraphy in patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy.  Gut. 1997;  41 399-403
    Google Scholar
  • 553 Kratzer W, Mason R A, Grammer S. et al . Difficult bile duct stone recurrence after endoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;  45 910-916
    Google Scholar
  • 554 Tanaka M, Takahata S, Konomi H. et al . Long-term consequence of endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 465-469
    Google Scholar
  • 555 Sugiyama M, Suzuki Y, Abe N. et al . Endoscopic retreatment of recurrent choledocholithiasis after sphincterotomy.  Gut. 2004;  53 1856-1859
    Google Scholar
  • 556 Swobodnik W, Janowitz P, Kratzer W. et al . Rezidivprophylaxe von Choledochuskonkrementen nach endoskopischer Papillotomie mit Ursodeoxycholsäure.  Z Gastroenterol. 1990;  28 621-625
    Google Scholar
  • 557 Paolucci V, Neckell M, Götze T. Das „okkulte” Gallenblasenkarzinom - CAE-S/CAMIC -Zentralregister.  Zentralbl Chir. 2003;  128 309-312
    Google Scholar
  • 558 Baron T H, Petersen B T, Mergener K. et al . Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 892-897
    Google Scholar
  • 559 Freeman M L, Nelson D B, Sherman S. et al . Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 909-918
    Google Scholar
  • 560 Zinsser E, Hoffmann A, Will U. et al . Erfolgs- und Komplikationsraten der diagnostischen und der therapeutischen endoskopischen retrograden Cholangiopankreatikografie - eine prospektive Studie.  Z Gastroenterol. 1999;  37 707-713
    Google Scholar
  • 561 Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G. et al . Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 1-10
    Google Scholar
  • 562 Freeman M L, DiSario J A, Nelson D B. et al . Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 425-434
    Google Scholar
  • 563 Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A. et al . Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 417-423
    Google Scholar
  • 564 Enns R, Eloubeidi M A, Mergener K. et al . ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 293-298
    Google Scholar
  • 565 Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S. et al . Complications of ERCP: a prospective study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 721-731
    Google Scholar
  • 566 Washington M, Ghazi A. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Scott-Conner CE The SAGES Manual. Fundamentals of Laparoscopy, Thoracoscopy, and GI Endoscopy New York; Springer 2006: 685-690
    Google Scholar
  • 567 Vaira D, Dowsett J F, Hatfield A R. et al . Is duodenal diverticulum a risk factor for sphincterotomy?.  Gut. 1989;  30 939-942
    Google Scholar
  • 568 Mehta S N, Pavone E, Barkun J S. et al . Predictors of post-ERCP complications in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 457-463
    Google Scholar
  • 569 Rabenstein T, Schneider H T, Bulling D. et al . Analysis of the risk factors associated with endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques: preliminary results of a prospective study, with emphasis on the reduced risk of acute pancreatitis with low-dose anticoagulation treatment.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 10-19
    Google Scholar
  • 570 Elfant A B, Bourke M J, Alhalel R. et al . A prospective study of the safety of endoscopic therapy for choledocholithiasis in an outpatient population.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 1499-1502
    Google Scholar
  • 571 Freeman M L, Nelson D B, Sherman S. et al . Same-day discharge after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: observations from a prospective multicenter complication study. The Multicenter Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (MESH) Study Group.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 580-586
    Google Scholar
  • 572 Bittner R, Ulrich M. Gallenblasensteinleiden - immer eine Operationsindikation?.  Internist. 2004;  45 8-15
    Google Scholar
  • 573 Eypasch E, Williams J I, Wood-Dauphinee S. et al . Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 216-222
    Google Scholar
  • 574 Eypasch E, Troidl H, Wood-Dauphinée S. et al . Immediate improval in quality of life after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 1993;  2 139-146
    Google Scholar
  • 575 Sanabria J R, Clavien P A, Cywes R. et al . Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a matched study.  Can J Surg. 1993;  36 330-336
    Google Scholar
  • 576 Kane R L, Lurie N, Borbas C. et al . The outcomes of elective laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies.  J Am Coll Surg. 1995;  180 136-145
    Google Scholar
  • 577 Plaisier P W. Incidence of persistent symptoms after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Gut. 1997;  41 579
    Google Scholar
  • 578 Mentes B B, Akin M, Irkorucu O. et al . Gastrointestinal quality of life in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic cholelithiasis before and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 1267-1272
    Google Scholar
  • 579 Ludwig K, Patel K, Wilhelm L. et al . Prospektive Analyse zur Outcomebewertung nach laparoskopischer versus konventioneller Cholecystektomie.  Zentralbl Chir. 2002;  127 41-46
    Google Scholar
  • 580 Topcu O, Karakayali F, Kuzu M A. et al . Comparison of long-term quality of life after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 291-295
    Google Scholar
  • 581 Quintana J M, Arostegui I, Cabriada J. et al . Predictors of improvement in health-related quality of life in patients undergoing cholecystectomy.  Br J Surg. 2003;  90 1549-1555
    Google Scholar
  • 582 Curet M J, Contreras M, Weber D M. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 453-457
    Google Scholar
  • 583 Keulemans Y, Eshuis J, Haes de H. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: day-care versus clinical observation.  Ann Surg. 1998;  228 734-740
    Google Scholar
  • 584 Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L. et al . Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Br J Surg. 2006;  93 40-45
    Google Scholar
  • 585 Lau H, Brooks D C. Transitions in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the impact of ambulatory surgery.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 323-326
    Google Scholar
  • 586 Richardson W S, Fuhrman G S, Burch E. et al . Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Outcomes of 847 planned procedures.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 193-195
    Google Scholar
  • 587 Rosen M J, Malm J A, Tarnoff M. et al . Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001;  11 182-184
    Google Scholar
  • 588 Maggiore D. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a reality.  JSLS. 2002;  6 369-371
    Google Scholar
  • 589 Feussner H. Laparoskopische Eingriffe. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der ambulanten und kurzstationären Chirurgie.  Chirurg. 2004;  75 248-256
    Google Scholar
  • 590 Lillemoe K D, Lin J W, Talamini M A. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a „true” outpatient procedure: initial experience in 130 consecutive patients.  J Gastrointest Surg. 1999;  3 44-49
    Google Scholar
  • 591 Blatt A, Chen S. Day-only laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a regional teaching hospital.  ANZ J Surg. 2003;  73 321-325
    Google Scholar

Prof. Dr. Frank Lammert
Prof. Dr. Tilman Sauerbruch

Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn

Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25

53105 Bonn

Phone: ++ 49/2 28/28 71 52 16

Fax: ++ 49/2 28/28 71 46 98

Email: frank.lammert@ukb.uni-bonn.de

      >