Biopsy of Colorectal Polyps Is Not Adequate for Grading of Neoplasia

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and Study Aim: Valid tissue sampling of colorectal adenomas is crucial for their management in terms of treatment and follow-up. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of a cold biopsy sample as representative for the whole polypectomy specimen, with regard to histopathological features.
Patients and Methods: As part of the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention trial, 442 participants (60 % men) who fulfilled the criterion of colonoscopic recovery of adenoma that had been biopsied at flexible sigmoidoscopy, had their adenomas subsequently removed by polypectomy (snare resection) at colonoscopy. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine which variables contributed to the histopathological discrepancy between cold biopsy and polypectomy specimens.
Results: Among the 532 colorectal adenomas biopsied at flexible sigmoidoscopy and removed by colonoscopy, the assessment of intraepithelial neoplasia (dysplasia) status was changed in 51 adenomas (10 %), and 38 (7 %) of them had been underestimated at biopsy compared with polypectomy. Likewise, the assessment of villousness was changed in 45 adenomas (9 %), being upgraded in 26 (6 %) at polypectomy compared with biopsy. In a multivariate model, the diameter of neoplasia at polypectomy was positively associated with increased risk of the underestimation of intraepithelial neoplasia and/or villousness influencing a diagnosis of advanced colorectal neoplasia, when cold biopsy and polypectomy specimens were compared (P _trend = 0.01). Among 56 cases of advanced neoplasia, 35 (63 %) showed only low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia on biopsy.
Conclusions: Biopsy-based diagnosis underestimated histopathological diagnosis in about 10 % of colorectal adenomas detected by flexible sigmoidoscopy screening, but advanced neoplasia was underestimated in more than 60 %. Efforts must be made to obtain polypectomy specimens to secure precise diagnosis.

References

• 1 Pugliese V, Gatteschi B, Aste H. et al . Value of multiple forceps biopsies in assessing the malignant potential of colonic polyps.  Tumori. 1981;  67 57-62
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff G S, Sauar J. et al . Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;  34 414-20
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Bretthauer M, Gondal G, Larsen I K. et al . Design, organization and management of a controlled population screening study for detection of colorectal neoplasia.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;  37 568-573
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Gondal G, Grotmol T, Hofstad B. et al . The Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention (NORCCAP) screening study. Baseline finding and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50 - 64 years.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;  38 635-642
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Jass J, Sobin L H. Histologic typing of intestinal tumours. Berlin; Springer Verlag 1989
  Google Scholar
• 6 Rex D K, Culter C S, Lemmel G T, Rahmani E Y, Clark D W, Helper D J, Lehman G A, Mark D G. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 24-28
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Hixson L J, Fennerty M B, Sampliner R E, Garewal H S. Prospective blinded trail of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 125-127
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Rex D K, Alikhan M, Cummings O. et al . Accuracy of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps by general pathologists in community practice.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 468-474
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Costantini M, Sciallero S, Giannini A. et al . Interobserver agreement in the histologic diagnosis of colorectal polyps. The experience of the multicenter adenoma colorectal study (SMAC).  J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;  56 209-214
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Brown L JR, Smeeton N C, Dixon M F. Assessment of dysplasia in colorectal adenomas: an observer variation and morphometric study.  J Clin Pathol. 1985;  38 174-179
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Jensen P, Krogsgaard M R, Christiansen J. et al . Observer variability in the assessment of type and dysplasia of colorectal adenomas, analyzed using kappa statistics.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 195-198
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Fung C HK, Goldman H. The incidence and significance of villous change in adenomatous polyps.  Am J Clin Pathol. 1970;  53 21-25
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Lane N, Fenoglio C M. Observation on the adenoma as precursor to ordinary large bowel carcinoma.  Gastrointest Radiol. 1976;  1 111-119
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Silverberg S G. Focally malignant adenomatous polyps of the colon and rectum.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1970;  131 103-114
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

T. Grotmol, M. D., Ph. D.

The Cancer Registry of Norway

Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research · Montebello · N-0310 Oslo · Norway

Fax: +47-22-451370

Email: tom.grotmol@kreftregisteret.no