Download PDF
Endoscopy 2005; 37(6): 552-558
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-861351
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Objective Benefit of a 1-day Training Course in Endoscopic Hemostasis Using the “compactEASIE” Endoscopy Simulator

J.  Maiss1 , J.  Wiesnet1 , A.  Proeschel1 , K.  Matthes1 , F.  Prat2 , J.  Cohen3 , S.  Chaussade2 , D.  Sautereau2 , A.  Naegel1 , N.  Krauss1 , A.  Peters4 , E.  G.  Hahn1 , J.  Hochberger5
  • 1Dept. of Medicine I, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • 2French Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (SFED), Paris, France
  • 3New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA
  • 4Dept. of Medical Computing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • 5Dept. of Medicine III/Gastroenterology, St. Bernward Hospital, Hildesheim, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 1 June 2004

Accepted after Revision 16 November 2004

Publication Date:
03 June 2005 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Background and Study Aims: The Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy (EASIE) was introduced in 1997 as a training model for interventional endoscopy. Objective evidence of the benefits of training with this model has not previously been published. As part of two long-term projects, the benefits of a 1-day training course with the “compactEASIE” simulator were evaluated.
Materials and Methods: Fourteen American and 18 French gastroenterology fellows were enrolled. These fellows were participants in the intensive groups performing training in endoscopic hemostasis, with a total number of 28 fellows in New York and 36 in France. Gastrointestinal endoscopy faculty members in New York and France evaluated and timed the fellows in four disciplines to establish baseline skills (manual skills; injection and coagulation; Hemoclip application; and variceal ligation) with the compactEASIE simulator. The trainees were reevaluated after an intensive 1-day course (with two or three fellows and one instructor per station), also including preparation and assistance for each procedure. The assessment (overall and parts) was done by expert tutors using an ordinal scale ranging from 1 to 10 (1 = poorest, 10 = best), recording also mistakes and performance time. The compactEASIE simulator, equipped with an upper gastrointestinal organ package and an artificial blood perfusion system, was used as the training tool.
Results: A highly significant improvement (P ≤ 0.001) was observed in the performance of all endoscopic techniques. A significant reduction in performance time was also observed with three of the four endoscopic techniques. Successful hemostasis was significantly improved in two out of three techniques.
Conclusions: A 1-day training course on endoscopic hemostasis using the compactEASIE simulator is capable of improving the performance of hemostasis procedures. Long-term effects of repeated training sessions are currently subject of collaborative studies in New York and France.

References

  • 1 Hochberger J, Maiss J, Magdeburg B. et al . Training simulators and education in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current status in 2001 and perspectives.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 541-549
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hochberger J, Maiss J, Hahn E G. The use of simulators for training in GI endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 727-729
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hochberger J, Neumann M, Hohenberger W, Hahn E G. Neuer Endoskopie-Trainer für die therapeutische flexible Endoskopie.  Z Gastroenterol. 1997;  35 722-723
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hochberger J, Neumann M, Maiss J. et al . EASIE: Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy - a new bio-simulation-model. First experiences gained in training workshops.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 AB116
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Maiss J, Hahn E G, Hochberger J. A prospective evaluation of 14 EASIE team training workshops on endoscopic hemostasis.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 (Suppl 1) E23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 American Society for  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Endoscopy simulators.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 935-937
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bar-Meir S. Endoscopy simulators: the state of the art, 2000.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 201-203
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hochberger J, Matthes K, Maiss J. et al . Training with the compactEASIE biologic endoscopy simulator significantly improves hemostatic technical skill of gastroenterology fellows: a randomized controlled comparison with clinical endoscopy training alone.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 204-215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hochberger J, Maiss J, Prat F. et al . Prospective evaluation of intensive hands-on training in hemostasis using the EASIE endoscopy simulator compared to standard endoscopy education - national French training project.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 AB109 (abstract S1494)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hochberger J, Euler K, Nägel A. et al . The compactEASIE simulator (compact Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy): a prospective comparison in structured team-training courses on “endoscopic hemostasis” for doctors and nurses to the “Endo-Trainer” model.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;  39 895-902
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Williams C B, Saunders B P, Bladen J S. Development of colonoscopy teaching simulation.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 901-905
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Grund K E, Bräutigam D, Zindel C. et al . Interventionsfähiges Tübinger Simulationsmodell Interphant für die flexible Endoskopie.  Endosk Heute. 1998;  11 134
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bar-Meir S. A new endoscopic simulator.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 898-900
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sedlack R E, Kolars J C. Colonoscopy curriculum development and performance-based assessment criteria on a computer-based endoscopy simulator.  Acad Med. 2002;  77 750-751
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Adamsen S. Simulators and gastrointestinal endoscopy training.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 895-897
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Williams C B, Baillie J, Gillies D F. et al . Teaching gastrointestinal endoscopy by computer simulation: a prototype for colonoscopy and ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;  36 49-54
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Aabakken L, Adamsen S, Kruse A. Performance of a colonoscopy simulator: experience from a hands-on endoscopy course.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 911-913
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ferlitsch A, Glauninger P, Gupper A. et al . Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 698-702
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Cohen J, Cohen S, Vora K C. et al . Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy (DDW 2003).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 AB 108 (abstract S1492)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hochberger J, Maiss J, Naegel A. et al . Polypectomy/vital endoscopic staining/mucosectomy: a new structured team training in a close to reality endoscopy simulator (EASIE).  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 (Suppl) E23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Maiss J, Naegel A, Tex S. et al . EASIE team training ERCP: experiences with a new training concept for interventional ERCP.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 (Suppl 1) E65
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Matsumoto E D, Hamstra S J, Radomski S B. et al . A novel approach to endourological training: training at the Surgical Skills Centre.  J Urol. 2001;  166 1261-1266
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Matsumoto E D, Hamstra S J, Radomski S B, Cusimano M D. The effect of bench model fidelity on endourological skills: a randomized controlled study.  J Urol. 2002;  167 1243-1247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

J. Maiss, M. D.

Dept. of Medicine I · University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

Ulmenweg 18 · 91054 Erlangen · Germany

Fax: + 49-9133-602618

Email: juergen.maiss@med1.imed.uni-erlangen.de

      >