LABOR AND DELIVERY FOLLOWING SUCCESSFUL EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study is to determine if successful external cephalic version is followed by an increased likelihood of prolonged labor or operative delivery. Women having a successful external cephalic version of a normal singleton fetus ≥37 weeks' gestation between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 1998 were included. Each case was matched for gestational age at delivery (±1 week), labor onset (spontaneous or induced), prior vaginal delivery (yes or no), and cervical dilation on admission for delivery (±1 cm) to the next three patients delivering a spontaneously vertex term singleton. Maternal demographics, intrapartum variables, neonatal outcomes, and route of delivery were examined. Statistical comparisons were performed by the Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test. The 38 cases and 114 controls were similar by maternal age, race, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and insurer. There were no differences in the frequency of epidural or oxytocin use, maternal genital tract lacerations, or blood loss at delivery. Neonatal outcomes, assessed by 1- and 5-min Apgar score <7, or neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission did not differ between cases and controls. The labor length of patients undergoing successful version was similar to that of women laboring with spontaneously vertex fetuses (10.8 ± 8.9 vs. 10.1 ± 10.1 hr, p = 0.4). The frequencies of operative vaginal and cesarean delivery in cases did not differ from those of controls (3/38 vs. 1/114, p = 0.56 and 4/38 vs. 8/114, p = 0.51, respectively.) Labor duration and delivery route following successful external cephalic version do not differ from women with spontaneously vertex fetuses.

REFERENCES

• 1 Ben-Arie A, Kogan S, Schachter M, Hagay Z J, Insler V. The impact of external cephalic version on the rate of vaginal and cesarean breech deliveries: a 3-year cumulative experience.  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol . 1995;  63 125-129
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Laros R K, Flanagan T A, Kilpatrick S J. Management of term breech presentation: a protocol of external cephalic version and selective trial of labor.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1995;  172 1916-1925
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Gifford D S, Keeler E, Kahn K L. Reductions in cost and cesarean rate by routine use of external cephalic version: a decision analysis.  Obstet Gynecol . 1995;  85 930-936
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Lau T Z, Lo K WK, Rogers M. Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1997;  176 218-223
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Egge T, Schauberger C, Schaper A. Dysfunctional labor after external cephalic version.  Obstet Gynecol . 1994;  83 771-773
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Siddiqui D, Stiller R J, Collins J, Laifer S A. Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1999;  181 1092-1095
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Williams M C, Krammer J, O'Brien W F. The value of the cervical score in predicting successful outcome of labor induction.  Obstet Gynecol . 1997;  90 784-789
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Hanss J W. The efficacy of external cephalic version and its impact on the breech experience.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1990;  162 1459-1464
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Cook H A. Experience with external cephalic version and selective vaginal breech delivery in private practice.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1993;  168 1886-1890
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar