A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared to the Open Procedure in Patients with Gallbladder Disease

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Conflicting evidence regarding the laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy outcomes in scientific literature impacts the medical decision-making for patients with gallbladder disease. This study aimed to compare a range of primary and secondary outcomes between patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy and those with open intervention.

Methods Articles published from 1993 to 2023 were explored by utilizing advanced filters of PubMed Central/Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, JSTOR, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and EBSCO. The gallbladder disease was determined by the presence of one or more of the following conditions: 1) Gangrenous cholecystitis, 2) acute cholecystitis, 3) chronic gallbladder diseases, and 4) cholelithiasis. The primary end-point was mortality, while the secondary outcome included (1) bile leakage, 2) common bile duct injury, 3) gangrene, 4) hospital stay (days), 5) major complications, 6) median hospital stay (days), (7) pneumonia, 8) sick leaves (days), and 9) wound infection.

Results Statistically significant reductions were observed in mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30, 0.45, p < 0.00001), mean hospital stay duration (mean difference: –2.68, 95% CI: –3.66, –1.70, p < 0.00001), major complications (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.64, p = 0.0005), post/intraoperative wound infection (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.51, p < 0.0001), and sick leaves (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.80, p = 0.01) in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with those with the open intervention. No statistically significant differences were recorded between the study groups for bile leakage, common bile duct injury, gangrene, median hospital stay days, and pneumonia (p > 0.05).

Conclusions The pooled outcomes favored the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy over the open procedure in patients with gallbladder disease. The consolidated findings indicate the higher impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in improving patient outcomes, including safety episodes, compared with open cholecystectomy.

Publication History

Article published online:
01 February 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

• References

• 1 Yasuda H, Takada T, Kawarada Y. et al. Unusual cases of acute cholecystitis and cholangitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007; 14 (01) 98-113
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Jones MW, Genova R, O'Rourke MC. Acute Cholecystitis. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls ; 2023
  Google Scholar
• 3 Tanaja J, Lopez RA, Meer JM. Cholelithiasis. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls ; 2023
  Google Scholar
• 4 Kashyap S, Mathew G, King KC. Gallbladder Empyema. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls ; 2023
  Google Scholar
• 5 Önder A, Kapan M, Ülger BV, Oğuz A, Türkoğlu A, Uslukaya Ö. Gangrenous cholecystitis: mortality and risk factors. Int Surg 2015; 100 (02) 254-260
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Rawla P, Samant H. Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls ; 2023
  Google Scholar
• 7 Balmadrid B. Recent advances in management of acalculous cholecystitis. F1000 Res 2018; 7: 7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Yu MH, Kim YJ, Park HS, Jung SI. Benign gallbladder diseases: imaging techniques and tips for differentiating with malignant gallbladder diseases. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26 (22) 2967-2986
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Hudgi A, Cartelle AL, Ahmed A. et al. Tokyo Guidelines (TG18) for acute cholangitis provide improved specificity and accuracy compared to fellow assessment. Cureus 2022; 14 (07) e27527
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Doherty G, Manktelow M, Skelly B, Gillespie P, Bjourson AJ, Watterson S. The need for standardizing diagnosis, treatment and clinical care of cholecystitis and biliary colic in gallbladder disease. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022; 58 (03) 58
  Google Scholar
• 11 Gutt C, Schläfer S, Lammert F. The treatment of gallstone disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020; 117 (09) 148-158
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (04) CD006231
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy in elderly patients. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20 (46) 17626-17634
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Coccolini F, Catena F, Pisano M. et al. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2015; 18: 196-204
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Jones MW, Guay E, Deppen JG. Open Cholecystectomy. Treasure Island (FL); StatPearls ; 2023
  Google Scholar
• 16 Oymaci E, Ucar AD, Aydogan S, Sari E, Erkan N, Yildirim M. Evaluation of affecting factors for conversion to open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Prz Gastroenterol 2014; 9 (06) 336-341
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Griniatsos J. Factors predisposing to conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2018; 3: 12
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 18 Igelström E, Campbell M, Craig P, Katikireddi SV. Cochrane's risk of bias tool for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) is frequently misapplied: a methodological systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 140: 22-32
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ. et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019; 366: l4898
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Taylor DM, Hodkinson PW, Khan AS, Simon EL. Research skills and the data spreadsheet: a research primer for low- and middle-income countries. Afr J Emerg Med 2020; 10 (Suppl. 02) S140-S144
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Cochrane Training. . RevMan 5.4.1 2020
  PubMed
• 22 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes. The odds ratio. BMJ 2000; 320 (7247) 1468-1468
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Ren Y, Lin L, Lian Q, Zou H, Chu H. Real-world performance of meta-analysis methods for double-zero-event studies with dichotomous outcomes using the Cochrane database of systematic reviews. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34 (06) 960-968
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 von Hippel PT. The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analyses. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015; 15: 35
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J. et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: b2700-b2700
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Araujo-Teixeira JP, Rocha-Reis J, Costa-Cabral A, Barros H, Saraiva AC, Araujo-Teixeira AM. Laparoscopy or laparotomy in acute cholecystitis (200 cases). Comparison of the results and factors predictive of conversion. Chirurgie 1999; 124 (05) 529-535
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Feldman MG, Russell JC, Lynch JT, Mattie A. Comparison of mortality rates for open and closed cholecystectomy in the elderly: Connecticut statewide survey. J Laparoendosc Surg 1994; 4 (03) 165-172
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Glavić Z, Begić L, Šimleša D, Rukavina A. Treatment of acute cholecystitis. A comparison of open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2001; 15 (04) 398-401
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Stiernstam M, Westman B, Lundell L. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 2005; 92 (01) 44-49
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Karim T, Kadyal A. A comparative study of laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy in a suburban teaching hospital. J Gastrointest Digest System 2015; 5 (06) 317
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 31 Kiviluoto T, Sirén J, Luukkonen P, Kivilaakso E. Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet 1998; 351 (9099) 321-325
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Krähenbühl L, Büchler MW. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Dig Surg 1996; 13: 332-337
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 33 Maxwell JG, Tyler BA, Rutledge R, Brinker CC, Maxwell BG, Covington DL. Cholecystectomy in patients aged 80 and older. Am J Surg 1998; 176 (06) 627-631
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Pessaux P, Regenet N, Tuech J-J, Rouge C, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud J-P. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective comparative study in the elderly with acute cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2001; 11 (04) 252-255
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Tucker JJ, Yanagawa F, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe but underused in the elderly. Am Surg 2011; 77 (08) 1014-1020
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Unger SW, Rosenbaum G, Unger HM, Edelman DS. A comparison of laparoscopic and open treatment of acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 1993; 7 (05) 408-411
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Catena F, Ansaloni L, Bianchi E. et al. The ACTIVE (Acute Cholecystitis Trial Invasive Versus Endoscopic) Study: multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology 2013; 60 (127) 1552-1556
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E, Abrahamson J, Matter I. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1997; 7 (05) 407-414
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Lujan JA, Parrilla P, Robles R, Marin P, Torralba JA, Garcia-Ayllon J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs open cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: a prospective study. Arch Surg 1998; 133 (02) 173-175
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Boo YJ, Kim WB, Kim J. et al. Systemic immune response after open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized study. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2007; 67 (02) 207-214
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Chau CH, Tang CN, Siu WT, Ha JP, Li MK. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis: retrospective study. Hong Kong Med J 2002; 8 (06) 394-399
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Singh P, Gupta SK, Kumar M. A comparative study of open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cholelithiasis. Int Surg J 2018; 5 (01) 253-256
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 43 Zacks SL, Sandler RS, Rutledge R, Brown Jr RS. A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97 (02) 334-340
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Agarwal PK, Golmei J, Goyal R, Maurya AP. Comparison between closed and open methods for creating pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cureus 2023; 15 (03) e35991
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Khalid A, Khalil K, Mehmood Qadri H. et al. Comparison of postoperative complications of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy according to the modified Clavien-Dindo Classification system. Cureus 2023; 15 (08) e43642
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Massie MT, Massie LB, Marrangoni AG, D'Amico FJ, Sell Jr HW. Advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly and in patients with high ASA classifications. J Laparoendosc Surg 1993; 3 (05) 467-476
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Wu X, Li B, Zheng C, Liu W, Hong T, He X. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for gallbladder carcinoma: safety, feasibility, and oncological outcomes. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25 (12) 3437-3446
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Pandey G, Karlatif SS. A prospective study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy in patients with cholecystitis. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2019; 8: 1491-1493
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 49 Baruah A, Topno N, Ghosh S. et al. A study of the safety and morbidity profile of closed versus open technique of laparoscopic primary peritoneal access port in patients undergoing routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a tertiary care hospital in northeastern India. Minim Invasive Surg 2022; 2022: 1017551
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 de Goede B, Klitsie PJ, Hagen SM. et al. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with liver cirrhosis and symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Br J Surg 2013; 100 (02) 209-216
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Song J, Chen J, Lin C, Xi X. Therapeutic effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patients with cholecystolithiasis complicated with chronic cholecystitis and postoperative quality of life. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2022; 2022: 6813756
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material