CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2017; 05(10): E999-E1004
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-117956
Original article
Eigentümer und Copyright ©Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017

Comparative analysis of avascular areas in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas using in vivo and ex vivo magnifying endoscopy

Taichi Ogo
1   Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital – Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
,
Kenro Kawada
1   Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital – Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yasuaki Nakajima
1   Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital – Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yutaka Tokairin
1   Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital – Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
,
Takashi Ito
2   Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Division of Pathology, Tokyo, Japan
,
Tatsuyuki Kawano
1   Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital – Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted06 February 2017

accepted after revision30 June 2017

Publication Date:
09 October 2017 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aims An avascular area (AVA), one of the microvasculature changes in superficial esophageal cancers, appears when a tumor demonstrates a bulky growth pattern. We aimed to compare endoscopic and histopathological findings by observing formalin-fixed AVA specimens using magnifying endoscopy.

Patients and methods A prospective analysis was conducted on 16 patients with superficial esophageal cancer, including AVA, who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Magnifying endoscopy and blue laser imaging were used to identify AVAs. After the ESD, the AVA width was measured on formalin-fixed specimens using magnifying endoscopy, and AVA thickness and depth were determined after hematoxylin and eosin staining using microscopy.

Results Mean AVA widths of M1, M2, and M3/SM-lesions were 0.434, 0.578, and 0.835 mm, respectively (M1 vs. M2, P = 0.16; M2 vs. M3/SM-, P = 0.07). Mean AVA thicknesses of M1, M2, and M3/SM-lesions were significantly different (0.176, 0.518, and 0.800 mm; M1 vs. M2, P < 0.01; M2 vs. M3/SM-, P < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between AVA width and thickness.

Conclusions AVA size can be measured accurately on formalin-fixed specimens with magnifying endoscopy. AVA thickness can be useful for determining tumor depth.

 
  • References

  • 1 Inoue H, Honda T, Yoshida T. et al. Ultra-high magnification endoscopy of the normal esophageal mucosa. Dig Endosc 1996; 8: 134-138
  • 2 Inoue H, Honda T, Nagai K. et al. Ultra-high magnification endoscopic observation of carcinoma in situ. Dig Endosc 1997; 1: 16-18
  • 3 Kumagai Y, Inoue H, Nagai K. et al. Magnifying endoscopy, stereoscopic microscopy and the microvascular architecture of the superficial esophageal carcinoma. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 369-375
  • 4 Arima M, Arima H, Tada M. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of tumor staging and treatment outcomes in patients with superficial esophageal cancer. Esophagus 2007; 4: 145-153
  • 5 Ishihara R, Inoue T, Uedo N. et al. Significance of each narrow-band image finding in diagnosing squamous mucosal high grade neoplasia of the esophagus. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 25: 1410-1415
  • 6 Kumagai Y, Toi M, Inoue H. Dynamism of tumour vasculature in the early phase of cancer progression: outcomes from oesophageal cancer research. Lancet Oncol 2002; 10: 604-610
  • 7 Arima M, Tada M, Arima H. Evaluation of microvascular patterns of superficial esophageal cancers by magnifying endoscopy. Esophagus 2005; 2: 191-197
  • 8 Ebi M, Shimura T, Murakami K. et al. Comparison of staging diagnosis by two magnifying endoscopy classification for superficial oesophageal cancer. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44: 940-944
  • 9 Oyama T. Magnified endoscopic classification for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: classification of the Japan Esophageal Society. Stomach Intestine 2014; 49: 148-152
  • 10 Inoue M, Miyake Y, Odaka T. et al. Objective evaluation of visibility in virtual chromoendoscopy for esophageal squamous carcinoma using a color difference formula. J Biomed Opt 2010; 15: 056019
  • 11 Osawa H, Yamamoto H, Miura Y. et al. Blue laser imaging provides excellent endoscopic images of upper gastrointestinal lesions. Video J Encyclopedia GI Endosc 2014; 1: 607-610
  • 12 Kaneko K, Oono Y, Yano T. et al. Effect of novel bright image enhanced endoscopy using blue laser imaging (BLI). Endosc Int Open 2014; 02: E212-E219
  • 13 Ishihara R, Aoi K, Matsuura N. Significance of AVA for prediction of infiltration depth of esophageal cancer. Stomach Intestine 2014; 49: 204-211
  • 14 Folkman J. Clinical applications of research on angiogenesis. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1757-1763
  • 15 Ohashi K, Momma K, Yamada Y. et al. Vertical and horizontal growth features of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas: histopathological evaluation of endoscopically resected specimens. Virchows Arch 2002; 441: 350-357