Validation of diagnostic characteristics of needle based confocal laser endomicroscopy in differentiation of pancreatic cystic lesions

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided needle-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (nCLE) characteristics of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have been identified in studies where the gold standard surgical histopathology was available in a minority of patients. There are diverging reports of interobserver agreement (IOA) and paucity of intraobserver reliability (IOR). Thus, we sought to validate current EUS-nCLE criteria of PCLs in a larger consecutive series of surgical patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent EUS-nCLE at a single center was performed. For calculation of IOA (Fleiss’ kappa) and IOR (Cohen’s kappa), blinded nCLE-naïve observers (n = 6) reviewed nCLE videos of PCLs in two phases separated by a 2-week washout period.

Results: EUS-nCLE was performed in 49 subjects, and a definitive diagnosis was available in 26 patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosing a mucinous PCL were 94 %, 82 %, and 89 %, respectively. The IOA for differentiating mucinous vs. non-mucinous PCL was “substantial” (κ = 0.67, 95 %CI 0.57, 0.77). The mean (± standard deviation) IOR was “substantial” (κ = 0.78 ± 0.13) for diagnosing mucinous PCLs. Both the IOAs and mean IORs were “substantial” for detection of known nCLE image patterns of papillae/epithelial bands of mucinous PCLs (IOA κ = 0.63; IOR κ = 0.76 ± 0.11), bright particles on a dark background of pseudocysts (IOA κ = 0.71; IOR κ = 0.78 ± 0.12), and fern-pattern or superficial vascular network of serous cystadenomas (IOA κ = 0.62; IOR κ = 0.68 ± 0.20). Three (6.1 % of 49) patients developed post-fine needle aspiration (FNA) pancreatitis.

Conclusion: Characteristic EUS-nCLE patterns can be consistently identified and improve the diagnostic accuracy of PCLs. These results support further investigations to optimize EUS-nCLE while minimizing adverse events.

Study registration: NCT02516488

• References

• 1 de Jong K, Nio CY, Hermans JJ et al. High prevalence of pancreatic cysts detected by screening magnetic resonance imaging examinations. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 806-811
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Laffan TA, Horton KM, Klein AP et al. Prevalence of unsuspected pancreatic cysts on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 802-807
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Tanaka M, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Adsay V et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2012; 12: 183-197
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Valsangkar NP, Morales-Oyarvide V, Thayer SP et al. 851 resected cystic tumors of the pancreas: a 33-year experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Surgery 2012; 152: 4-12
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Gaujoux S, Brennan MF, Gonen M et al. Cystic lesions of the pancreas: changes in the presentation and management of 1,424 patients at a single institution over a 15-year time period. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212: 590-600 ; discussion 600–593
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Krishna SG, Lee JH. Appraisal of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 1701-1710
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Nakai Y, Iwashita T, Park do H et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cysts: EUS-guided, through-the-needle confocal laser-induced endomicroscopy and cystoscopy trial: DETECT study. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 1204-1214
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Napoleon B, Lemaistre AI, Pujol B et al. In vivo characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions by needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE): proposition of a comprehensive nCLE classification confirmed by an external retrospective evaluation. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 2603-2612
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Napoleon B, Lemaistre AI, Pujol B et al. A novel approach to the diagnosis of pancreatic serous cystadenoma: needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 26-32
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Krishna SG, Swanson B, Conwell DL et al. In vivo and ex vivo needle-based confocal endomicroscopy of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 571-572
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Konda VJ, Meining A, Jamil LH et al. A pilot study of in vivo identification of pancreatic cystic neoplasms with needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy under endosonographic guidance. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 1006-1013
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Karia K, Waxman I, Konda VJ et al. Needle-based confocal endomicroscopy for pancreatic cysts: the current agreement in interpretation. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 924-927
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Modi RM, Swanson B, Muscarella 2nd P et al. Novel techniques for diagnosis of serous cystadenoma: fern pattern of vascularity confirmed by in vivo and ex vivo confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.07.015.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Thiberville L, Salaun M, Lachkar S et al. Confocal fluorescence endomicroscopy of the human airways. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2009; 6: 444-449
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Landis JR, Koch GG. A one-way components of variance model for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 671-679
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Volkan Adsay N. Cystic lesions of the pancreas. Mod Pathol 2007; 20: 71-93
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 de Jong K, Poley JW, van Hooft JE et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cystic lesions provides inadequate material for cytology and laboratory analysis: initial results from a prospective study. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 585-590
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Ramesh J, Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S et al. Randomized trial comparing the flexible 19G and 25G needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Pancreas 2015; 44: 128-133
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Song TJ, Kim JH, Lee SS et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1739-1745
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar