Diagnosis of Neuropathic Components in Patients with Back Pain Before and After Surgery

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background: The perception of back pain subjective is hard for physicians to measure. For this reason, questionnaires are an important instrument to evaluate the pain [1]. The main point of this study was to verify differentiation of pain symptoms in patients with different pain mechanisms. The most important parameter was the PainDetect questionnaire, which can differentiate between nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Additional parameters were measured before and after surgery to characterise pain symptoms in detail.

Material and Methods: We selected patients with diagnosed vertebral compression fracture, herniated disc or with spinal cord compression. To characterise the preoperative condition on admittance, we collected the data from the physical examination, as well as clinical data, including X-ray, CT and MRI. To characterise the pain, we used the painDetect questionnaire, the Oswestry Index questionnaire (ODI) and the visual analogue scale (VAS). Depending on the diagnosis, patients were treated by surgery (radiofrequency kyphoplasty, nucleotomy, spondylodesis). At 2 to 3 days and 6 months after surgery, we repeated the questionnaire and compared the results with those before the operation. Data on patient satisfaction and adverse events were also collected.

Results: This study included 62 patients with vertebral compression fracture (group 1: VBF, 89 % female, mean age 71 years) and 77 patients with herniated disc or spinal cord compression (group 2: non-VBF, 55 % female, mean age 53 years). There was no difference between both groups in preoperative pain intensity (acute, maximum, average): median ordinal scale 0 to 10; group 1: 6, 8, 7; group 2: 6, 9, 7. The total score in the painDetect questionnaire differed significantly between the two groups (median group 1 = 9, group 2 = 17; effect size r = 0.5; p = 0.000). The existence of neuropathic pain was presumed (> 90 %) in 3 % of the patients in group 1 and in 13 % of patients it was not excluded. In contrast, in group 2 it was presumed (> 90 %) in 43 % of patients and in 30 % of patients it could not be excluded. Patients with vertebral compression fracture had greater pain intensity (VAS 71) than patients from group 2 (VAS 53). There was no difference in the total score of the Oswestry questionnaire between the two groups (56 % vs. 58 %). Pain intensity was significantly reduced in both groups after the operations. Six months postoperatively, pain intensity (median ordinal scale 0 to 10; acute, maximum, average) was 2, 5, 3 in group 1 and 2, 4, 2 in group 2. Moreover, the final scores of the painDetect questionnaires were significantly lower in both groups after the operations (4 in both groups). The median score of the ODI was reduced in both groups, with an effect size of 0.6. 98 % of the patients in group 1 and 94 % in group 2 were satisfied with the outcome of the operation.

Conclusion: The preoperative pain characteristics of patients with vertebral compression fracture is different from those of patients with herniated disc or with spinal cord compression. 43 % of patients in group 2 exhibited a neuropathic pain component and in 30 % this could not be excluded. In contrast, in group 1 only 3 % of the patients exhibited a neuropathic pain component. Postoperatively, pain symptoms were significant reduced in both groups, so that the risk of chronic pain was considerably less.

• References/Literatur

• 1 Schmidt CO, Raspe H, Pfingsten M. et al. Back pain in the German adult population: prevalence, severity, and sociodemographic correlates in a multiregional survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 2005-2011
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Wenig CM, Schmidt CO, Kohlmann T. et al. Costs of back pain in Germany. Eur J Pain 2009; 13: 280-286
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Kreuzschmerz – Kurzfassung. 1. Aufl. Version 5. 2010 zuletzt verändert: Oktober 2015.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Baron R, Binder A, Wasner G. Neuropathic pain: diagnosis, pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 807-819
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Freynhagen R, Baron R, Tolle T. et al. Screening of neuropathic pain components in patients with chronic back pain associated with nerve root compression: a prospective observational pilot study (MIPORT). Curr Med Res Opin 2006; 22: 529-537
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Treede RD. Physiologische Grundlagen der Schmerzentstehung. In: Zenz M, Jurna I. Hrsg. Lehrbuch der Schmerztherapie: Grundlagen, Theorie und Praxis für Aus- und Weiterbildung. 2. Aufl.. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 2001: 39-63
  Google Scholar
• 7 Freynhagen R, Wirz S, Rolke R. Diagnostik bei neuropathischen Schmerzen. Ther Umsch 2011; 68: 495-500
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 2940-2952
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Gerbershagen HU, Lindena G, Korb J. et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with chronic pain. Schmerz 2002; 16: 271-284
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Junker U, Nolte T. Grundlagen der speziellen Schmerztherapie. 1. Aufl.. München: Urban und Vogel; 2005
  Google Scholar
• 11 Geber C, Speck V. Neuropathische Schmerzen: Neuigkeiten in Diagnostik und Pathophysiologie. Tellmed ch Psychiatrie und Neurologie 2014; 3: 23-28
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Pflugmacher R, Bornemann R, Koch EMW. Verfahren zur Behandlung vertebraler Frakturen: Ein Überblick unterschiedlicher Systeme und Philosophien zur Wirbelkörper-Augmentation mit Zement. Osteologie 2012; 21: 151-162
  PubMedGoogle Scholar