Incisional Reinforcement in High-Risk Patients

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Hernia formation after surgical procedures continues to be an important cause of surgical morbidity. Incisional reinforcement at the time of the initial operation has been used in some patient populations to reduce the risk of subsequent hernia formation. In this article, reinforcement techniques in different surgical wounds are examined to identify situations in which hernia formation may be prevented. Mesh use for midline closure, pelvic floor reconstruction, and stoma site reinforcement is discussed. Additionally, the use of retention sutures, closure of the open abdomen, and reinforcement after component separation are examined using current literature. Although existing studies do not support the routine use of mesh reinforcement for all surgical incisions, certain patient populations appear to benefit from reinforcement with lower rates of subsequent hernia formation. The identification and characterization of these groups will guide the future use of mesh reinforcement in surgical incisions.

• References

• 1 Basile F, Biondi A, Donati M. Surgical approach to abdominal wall defects: history and new trends. Int J Surg 2013; 11 (Suppl. 01) S20-S23
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Jacob BP, Ramshaw B. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. The SAGES manual of hernia repair. Springer; 2013
  Google Scholar
• 3 Poole Jr GV. Mechanical factors in abdominal wound closure: the prevention of fascial dehiscence. Surgery 1985; 97 (6) 631-640
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 O'Dwyer PJ, Courtney CA. Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surgeon 2003; 1 (1) 17-22
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Naraynsingh V, Maharaj R, Dan D, Hariharan S. Strong linea alba: myth or reality?. Med Hypotheses 2012; 78 (2) 291-292
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Burger JW, Lange JF, Halm JA, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel H. Incisional hernia: early complication of abdominal surgery. World J Surg 2005; 29 (12) 1608-1613
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Mudge M, Hughes LE. Incisional hernia: a 10.  year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 1985; 72 (1) 70-71
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Caro-Tarrago A, Olona Casas C, Jimenez Salido A, Duque Guilera E, Moreno Fernandez F, Vicente Guillen V. Prevention of incisional hernia in midline laparotomy with an onlay mesh: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg 2014; 38 (9) 2223-2230
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Weiland DE, Bay RC, Del Sordi S. Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis. Am J Surg 1998; 176 (6) 666-670
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K, Büchler MW, Seiler CM. Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2010; 251 (5) 843-856
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Llaguna OH, Avgerinos DV, Nagda P, Elfant D, Leitman IM, Goodman E. Does prophylactic biologic mesh placement protect against the development of incisional hernia in high-risk patients?. World J Surg 2011; 35 (7) 1651-1655
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Gutiérrez de la Peña C, Medina Achirica C, Domínguez-Adame E, Medina Díez J. Primary closure of laparotomies with high risk of incisional hernia using prosthetic material: analysis of usefulness. Hernia 2003; 7 (3) 134-136
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Strzelczyk JM, Szymański D, Nowicki ME, Wilczyński W, Gaszynski T, Czupryniak L. Randomized clinical trial of postoperative hernia prophylaxis in open bariatric surgery. Br J Surg 2006; 93 (11) 1347-1350
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 El-Khadrawy OH, Moussa G, Mansour O, Hashish MS. Prophylactic prosthetic reinforcement of midline abdominal incisions in high-risk patients. Hernia 2009; 13 (3) 267-274
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Bevis PM, Windhaber RA, Lear PA, Poskitt KR, Earnshaw JJ, Mitchell DC. Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus sutured wound closure after open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg 2010; 97 (10) 1497-1502
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Bhangu A, Fitzgerald JE, Singh P, Battersby N, Marriott P, Pinkney T. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of incisional hernia following midline laparotomy. Hernia 2013; 17 (4) 445-455
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Strzelczyk J, Czupryniak L, Loba J, Wasiak J. The use of polypropylene mesh in midline incision closure following gastric by-pass surgery reduces the risk of postoperative hernia. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2002; 387 (7-8) 294-297
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP , et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 2000; 343 (6) 392-398
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 2004; 240 (4) 578-583 , discussion 583–585
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S , et al; Ventral Hernia Working Group. Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 2010; 148 (3) 544-558
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Darehzereshki A, Goldfarb M, Zehetner J , et al. Biologic versus nonbiologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 2014; 38 (1) 40-50
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Souza JM, Dumanian GA. Routine use of bioprosthetic mesh is not necessary: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive cases of intra-abdominal midweight polypropylene mesh for ventral hernia repair. Surgery 2013; 153 (3) 393-399
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Reynolds D, Davenport DL, Korosec RL, Roth JS. Financial implications of ventral hernia repair: a hospital cost analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17 (1) 159-166 , discussion 166–167
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Riou JP, Cohen JR, Johnson Jr H. Factors influencing wound dehiscence. Am J Surg 1992; 163 (3) 324-330
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Ramneesh G, Sheerin S, Surinder S, Bir S. A prospective study of predictors for post laparotomy abdominal wound dehiscence. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8 (1) 80-83
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Gislason H, Grønbech JE, Søreide O. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations—comparison of three closure techniques. Eur J Surg 1995; 161 (5) 349-354
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Khorgami Z, Shoar S, Laghaie B, Aminian A, Hosseini Araghi N, Soroush A. Prophylactic retention sutures in midline laparotomy in high-risk patients for wound dehiscence: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res 2013; 180 (2) 238-243
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Veljkovic R, Protic M, Gluhovic A, Potic Z, Milosevic Z, Stojadinovic A. Prospective clinical trial of factors predicting the early development of incisional hernia after midline laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210 (2) 210-219
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Perry WB, Connaughton JC. Abdominoperineal resection: how is it done and what are the results?. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2007; 20 (3) 213-220
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Shukla HS, Tewari M. An evolution of clinical application of inferior pedicle based rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for repair of perineal defects after radical surgery for cancer. J Surg Oncol 2010; 102 (3) 287-294
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Chessin DB, Hartley J, Cohen AM , et al. Rectus flap reconstruction decreases perineal wound complications after pelvic chemoradiation and surgery: a cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12 (2) 104-110
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Shukla HS, Hughes LE. The rectus abdominis flap for perineal wounds. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1984; 66 (5) 337-339
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Shibata D, Hyland W, Busse P , et al. Immediate reconstruction of the perineal wound with gracilis muscle flaps following abdominoperineal resection and intraoperative radiation therapy for recurrent carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg Oncol 1999; 6 (1) 33-37
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Persichetti P, Cogliandro A, Marangi GF , et al. Pelvic and perineal reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection: the role of gracilis flap. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59 (2) 168-172
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Tan BK, Terence G, Wong CH, Sim R. Lower gluteal muscle flap and buttock fascio-cutaneous rotation flap for reconstruction of perineal defects after abdomino-perineal resections. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (12) 1678-1683
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Bullard KM, Trudel JL, Baxter NN, Rothenberger DA. Primary perineal wound closure after preoperative radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection has a high incidence of wound failure. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48 (3) 438-443
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Chadwick MA, Vieten D, Pettitt E, Dixon AR, Roe AM. Short course preoperative radiotherapy is the single most important risk factor for perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8 (9) 756-761
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Khoo AK, Skibber JM, Nabawi AS , et al. Indications for immediate tissue transfer for soft tissue reconstruction in visceral pelvic surgery. Surgery 2001; 130 (3) 463-469
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Howell AM, Jarral OA, Faiz O, Ziprin P, Darzi A, Zacharakis E. How should perineal wounds be closed following abdominoperineal resection in patients post radiotherapy—primary closure or flap repair? Best evidence topic (BET). Int J Surg 2013; 11 (7) 514-517
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Peacock O, Simpson JA, Tou SI , et al. Outcomes after biological mesh reconstruction of the pelvic floor following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER). Tech Coloproctol 2014; 18 (6) 571-577
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Christensen HK, Nerstrøm P, Tei T, Laurberg S. Perineal repair after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (6) 711-717
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Mauvais F, Sabbagh C, Brehant O , et al. The current abdominoperineal resection: oncological problems and surgical modifications for low rectal cancer. J Vis Surg 2011; 148 (2) e85-e93
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Marshall MJ, Smart NJ, Daniels IR. Biologic meshes in perineal reconstruction following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (elAPE). Colorectal Dis 2012; 14 (Suppl. 03) 12-18
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Cui J, Ma JP, Xiang J , et al. Prospective study of reconstructing pelvic floor with GORE-TEX Dual Mesh in abdominoperineal resection. Chin Med J (Engl) 2009; 122 (18) 2138-2141
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Foster JD, Pathak S, Smart NJ , et al. Reconstruction of the perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14 (9) 1052-1059
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Quyn AJ, Johnston C, Hall D , et al. The open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure systems—historical evolution and systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14 (8) e429-e438
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Jannasch O, Tautenhahn J, Lippert H, Meyer F. [Temporary abdominal closure and early and late pathophysiological consequences of treating an open abdomen]. Zentralbl Chir 2011; 136 (6) 575-584
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Bee TK, Croce MA, Magnotti LJ , et al. Temporary abdominal closure techniques: a prospective randomized trial comparing polyglactin 910 mesh and vacuum-assisted closure. J Trauma 2008; 65 (2) 337-342 , discussion 342–344
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Nagy KK, Fildes JJ, Mahr C , et al. Experience with three prosthetic materials in temporary abdominal wall closure. Am Surg 1996; 62 (5) 331-335
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Fansler RF, Taheri P, Cullinane C, Sabates B, Flint LM. Polypropylene mesh closure of the complicated abdominal wound. Am J Surg 1995; 170 (1) 15-18
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Boele van Hensbroek P, Wind J, Dijkgraaf MG, Busch OR, Goslings JC. Temporary closure of the open abdomen: a systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg 2009; 33 (2) 199-207
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Shankaran V, Weber DJ, Reed II RL, Luchette FA. A review of available prosthetics for ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg 2011; 253 (1) 16-26
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT. Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias. Surg Clin North Am 2005; 85 (1) 91-103 , ix
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Jin J, Rosen MJ. Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 2008; 88 (5) 1083-1100 , viii
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Cassar K, Munro A. Surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Br J Surg 2002; 89 (5) 534-545
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Paul A, Korenkov M, Peters S, Köhler L, Fischer S, Troidl H. Unacceptable results of the Mayo procedure for repair of abdominal incisional hernias. Eur J Surg 1998; 164 (5) 361-367
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T. Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg 2003; 237 (1) 129-135
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Koller R, Miholic J, Jakl RJ. Repair of incisional hernias with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. Eur J Surg 1997; 163 (4) 261-266
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 de Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Charbon JA , et al. Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: “components separation technique” versus prosthetic repair : interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 2007; 31 (4) 756-763
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (3) 519-526
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Hultman CS, Tong WM, Kittinger BJ, Cairns B, Overby DW, Rich PB. Management of recurrent hernia after components separation: 10-year experience with abdominal wall reconstruction at an academic medical center. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66 (5) 504-507
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Ko JH, Wang EC, Salvay DM, Paul BC, Dumanian GA. Abdominal wall reconstruction: lessons learned from 200 “components separation” procedures. Arch Surg 2009; 144 (11) 1047-1055
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Patel KM, Nahabedian MY, Gatti M, Bhanot P. Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69 (4) 394-398
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Lowe III JB, Lowe JB, Baty JD, Garza JR. Risks associated with “components separation” for closure of complex abdominal wall defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (3) 1276-1283 , quiz 1284–1285, discussion 1286–1288
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Sailes FC, Walls J, Guelig D , et al. Synthetic and biological mesh in component separation: a 10-year single institution review. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 64 (5) 696-698
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Hood K, Millikan K, Pittman T , et al. Abdominal wall reconstruction: a case series of ventral hernia repair using the component separation technique with biologic mesh. Am J Surg 2013; 205 (3) 322-327 , discussion 327–328
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Koltz PF, Frey JD, Bell DE, Girotto JA, Christiano JG, Langstein HN. Evolution of abdominal wall reconstruction: development of a unified algorithm with improved outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (5) 554-560
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Pauli EM, Rosen MJ. Open ventral hernia repair with component separation. Surg Clin North Am 2013; 93 (5) 1111-1133
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Alicuben ET, Demeester SR. Onlay ventral hernia repairs using porcine non-cross-linked dermal biologic mesh. Hernia 2014; 18 (5) 705-712
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 70 Bhangu A, Nepogodiev D, Futaba K. West Midlands Research Collaborative. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure. World J Surg 2012; 36 (5) 973-983
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 71 Slater NJ, van der Kolk M, Hendriks T, van Goor H, Bleichrodt RP. Biologic grafts for ventral hernia repair: a systematic review. Am J Surg 2013; 205 (2) 220-230
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 72 Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Jorgensen LN, Bisgaard T. Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216 (2) 217-228
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 73 Helgstrand F, Gögenur I, Rosenberg J. Prevention of parastomal hernia by the placement of a mesh at the primary operation. Hernia 2008; 12 (6) 577-582
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 74 Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 2004; 91 (3) 280-282
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 Liu DS, Banham E, Yellapu S. Prophylactic mesh reinforcement reduces stomal site incisional hernia after ileostomy closure. World J Surg 2013; 37 (9) 2039-2045
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 76 van Barneveld KW, Vogels RR, Beets GL , et al. Prophylactic intraperitoneal mesh placement to prevent incisional hernia after stoma reversal: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc 2014; 28 (5) 1522-1527
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar