Download PDF
Endosc Int Open 2013; 1(01): 31-38
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1353686
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Evaluation of feasibility, efficiency and safety of a pure NOTES gastrojejunal bypass with gastric outlet obstruction, in an in vivo porcine model

J.-M. Gonzalez
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Public Assistance Hospitals of Marseille, North Hospital, Marseille, France
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
E. A. Bonin
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Public Assistance Hospitals of Marseille, North Hospital, Marseille, France
,
G. Vanbiervliet
3   Department of Endoscopy, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France
,
E. Garnier
4   Aix-Marseille University, CERC, Faculty of Medicine, Marseille, France
,
S. Berdah
5   Department of Digestive Surgery, Public Assistance Hospitals of Marseille, Marseille, France
,
K. Matthes
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
M. Barthet
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Public Assistance Hospitals of Marseille, North Hospital, Marseille, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 23 May 2013

accepted after revision 05 December 2013

Publication Date:
19 December 2013 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Introduction: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) is a less invasive surgery for bariatric procedures and gastric outlet obstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of a pure NOTES gastrojejunal bypass using an in vivo porcine model.

Material and methods: A prospective study was performed on nine swine. A double-channel scope was used. The intervention steps were: (i) gastric incision; (ii) peritoneal access; (iii) jejunal loop selection and mobilization into the stomach; (iv) stoma creation within the gastric wall and incision; (v) anastomosis suture and pylorus closure using a T-tag prototype. The animals were assessed clinically for 3 weeks including the weight gain. The patency of the GJA was assessed at necropsy and a histological analysis was performed.

Results: We successfully performed all the procedures with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) operative time of 108 (26) minutes. We used a mean of 5.55 (1.30) stitches. There were no intraprocedural adverse events. Five animals survived up till euthanasia at 3 weeks (65 %). These showed a significant difference in weight curves of a loss of 3.2 kg compared with gain of 5.2 kg in a control group. Four pigs died from anastomotic dehiscence complicated by peritonitis.

Conclusion: Gastrojejunal bypass with a pure NOTES approach is feasible. This procedure is effective, resulting in a patent anastomosis and a significant weight loss. However, the anastomotic dehiscence is a major concern because of its mortality rate, and further studies including improvement of the suturing device and the technique are needed.

 

  • References

  • 1 Dray X, Marteau P. [The future of gastrointestinal therapeutic endoscopy: NOTES]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2009; 33: 758-766
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Giday SA, Kantsevoy SV, Kalloo AN. Principle and history of Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2006; 15: 373-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ly J, O’Grady G, Mittal A et al. A systematic review of methods to palliate malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 290-297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bakkevold KE, Kambestad B. Morbidity and mortality after radical and palliative pancreatic cancer surgery. Risk factors influencing the short-term results. Ann Surg 1993; 217: 356-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jeurnink SM, Steyerberg EW, van Hooft JE et al. Surgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (SUSTENT study): a multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 490-499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Maetani I, Tada T, Ukita T et al. Comparison of duodenal stent placement with surgical gastrojejunostomy for palliation in patients with duodenal obstructions caused by pancreaticobiliary malignancies. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 73-78
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Brolin RE. Update: NIH consensus conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Nutrition 1996; 12: 403-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Salameh JR. Bariatric surgery: past and present. Am J Med Sci 2006; 331: 194-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2004; 292: 1724-1737
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Podnos YD, Jimenez JC, Wilson SE et al. Complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass: a review of 3464 cases. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 957-961
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bergström M, Ikeda K, Swain P et al. Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 307-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H et al. Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 287-292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 De Palma GD, Persico F, Masone S et al. Natural orifices transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): an overview of technical challenges and complications of transgastric procedures in anesthetized pigs. Minerva Chir 2008; 63: 261-268
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Simopoulos C, Kouklakis G, Zezos P et al. Peroral transgastric endoscopic procedures in pigs: feasibility, survival, questionings, and pitfalls. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 394-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chiu PW, Wai Ng EK, Teoh AY et al. Transgastric endoluminal gastrojejunostomy: technical development from bench to animal study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 390-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 von Renteln D, Vassiliou MC, McKenna D et al. Endoscopic vs. laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy for duodenal obstruction: a randomized study in a porcine model. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 161-168
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Mintz Y, Horgan S, Savu MK et al. Hybrid natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES) sleeve gastrectomy: a feasibility study using an animal model. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1798-1802
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ramos AC, Zundel N, Neto MG et al. Human hybrid NOTES transvaginal sleeve gastrectomy: initial experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2008; 4: 660-663
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Madan AK, Tichansky DS, Khan KA. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic gastric bypass performed in a cadaver. Obes Surg 2008; 18: 1192-1199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hagen ME, Wagner OJ, Swain P et al. Hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an experimental surgical study in human cadavers. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 918-924
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Romanelli JR, Desilets DJ, Chapman CN et al. Loop-anchor purse-string closure of gastrotomy in NOTES(R) procedures: survival studies in a porcine model. Surg Innov 2010; 17: 312-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Romanelli JR, Desilets DJ, Earle DB. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gastrotomy closure in porcine explants with the Padlock-G clip using the Lock-It system. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 306-310
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Park PO, Bergström M, Rothstein R et al. Endoscopic sutured closure of a gastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery access gastrotomy compared with open surgical closure in a porcine model. A randomized, multicenter controlled trial. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 311-317
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 von Renteln D, Schmidt A, Vassiliou MC et al. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gastrotomy closure with an over-the-endoscope clip: a randomized, controlled porcine study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 732-739
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Vegesna A, Korimilli A, Besetty R et al. Endoscopic pyloric suturing to facilitate weight loss: a canine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 427-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 von Delius S, Sager J, Feussner H et al. Carbon dioxide versus room air for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and comparison with standard laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 161-169 [e1-e2]
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lee SH, Kim SJ, Lee TH et al. Human applications of submucosal endoscopy under conscious sedation for pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 3016-3020 [Epub ahead of print]
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Schomisch SJ, Furlan JP, Andrews JM et al. Comparison of anterior transgastric access techniques for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3906-3911
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kantsevoy SV, Niiyama H, Jagannath SB et al. The endoscopic transilluminator: an endoscopic device for identification of the proximal jejunum for transgastric endoscopic gastrojejunostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 1055-1058
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 van Hooft JE, Vleggaar FP, Le Moine O et al. Endoscopic magnetic gastroenteric anastomosis for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 530-535
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sheridan CB, Zyromski N, Mattar S. How to always do a safe anastomosis. Contemp Surg 2008; 64: 68-74
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Dray X, Krishnamurty DM, Donatelli G et al. Gastric wall healing after NOTES procedures: closure with endoscopic clips provides superior histological outcome compared with threaded tags closure. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 343-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 van Hooft JE, Uitdehaag MJ, Bruno MJ et al. Efficacy and safety of the new WallFlex enteral stent in palliative treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (DUOFLEX study): a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1059-1066
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gainant A. [Prevention of anastomotic dehiscence in colorectal surgery]. J Chir (Paris) 2000; 137: 45-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar