Horm Metab Res 2013; 45(07): 513-517
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1337987
Original Basic
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Impact of Different Methodologies on the Detection of Point Mutations in Routine Air-dried Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) Smears

C. Rehfeld*
1   Division of Endocrinology and Nephrology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
,
S. Münz*
1   Division of Endocrinology and Nephrology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
,
A. Krogdahl
2   Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
E.M. P. Jensen
2   Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
U. Siebolts
3   Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
,
C. Ferraz
1   Division of Endocrinology and Nephrology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
,
E. Bösenberg
1   Division of Endocrinology and Nephrology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
,
L. Hegedüs
4   Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
R. Paschke
1   Division of Endocrinology and Nephrology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
,
M. Eszlinger
1   Division of Endocrinology and Nephrology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 27 October 2012

accepted 18 February 2013

Publication Date:
18 March 2013 (online)

Abstract

Currently the best method to select suspicious thyroid nodules for surgery is fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. However, FNA cytology has some inherent limitations, which can partly be overcome by molecular analysis. Therefore, molecular testing for somatic mutations has emerged as the most promising approach for molecular FNA diagnostics. The objective of this methodological study was to evaluate the feasibility of detecting BRAF, NRAS, HRAS, and KRAS mutations from routine air-dried thyroid FNA smears, and to find an optimal method for detecting these mutations in FNA samples. DNA was extracted from 110 routine air-dried FNA smears and the corresponding surgically obtained formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. The presence of BRAF, NRAS, HRAS, and KRAS mutations was assessed by real-time PCRs and high resolution melting analysis, and/or pyrosequencing in comparison to real-time PCRs using hybridization probes and fluorescence melting curve analysis. The high-resolution melting-PCRs revealed a significantly lower number of PCR failures and questionable results, and detected more mutations than the PCRs using hybridization probes. The number of PCR failures ranging from 14–16% by high-resolution melting-PCRs could be further reduced to 5–14% by adding pyrosequencing assays. Moreover, pyrosequencing increased the specificity of the assays, up to 98–100%, while the sensitivity ranged between 32–63%. In summary, the mutation detection, especially in air-dried FNA samples, improves when using PCR assays in combination with high resolution melting analysis. Additional improvement can be obtained by subsequent pyrosequencing in comparison to previously described real-time PCRs using hybridization probes and fluorescence melting curve analysis.

*

* These authors contributed equally to this work.


 
  • References

  • 1 Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69-90
  • 2 Hegedus L. Clinical practice. The thyroid nodule. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1764-1771
  • 3 Paschke R, Hegedus L, Alexander E, Valcavi R, Papini E, Gharib H. Thyroid nodule guidelines: agreement, disagreement and need for future research. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2011; 7: 354-361
  • 4 Kondo T, Ezzat S, Asa SL. Pathogenetic mechanisms in thyroid follicular-cell neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer 2006; 6: 292-306
  • 5 Eszlinger M, Paschke R. Molecular fine-needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of thyroid nodules by tumor specific mutations and gene expression patterns. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2010; 322: 29-37
  • 6 Moses W, Weng J, Sansano I, Peng M, Khanafshar E, Ljung BM, Duh QY, Clark OH, Kebebew E. Molecular testing for somatic mutations improves the accuracy of thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy. World J Surg 2010; 34: 2589-2594
  • 7 Nikiforova MN, Nikiforov YE. Molecular diagnostics and predictors in thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2009; 19: 1351-1361
  • 8 Ferraz C, Eszlinger M, Paschke R. Current state and future perspective of molecular diagnosis of fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96: 2016-2026
  • 9 Cantara S, Capezzone M, Marchisotta S, Capuano S, Busonero G, Toti P, Di SA, Caruso G, Carli AF, Brilli L, Montanaro A, Pacini F. Impact of proto-oncogene mutation detection in cytological specimens from thyroid nodules improves the diagnostic accuracy of cytology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95: 1365-1369
  • 10 Hayashida N, Namba H, Kumagai A, Hayashi T, Ohtsuru A, Ito M, Saenko VA, Maeda S, Kanematsu T, Yamashita S. A rapid and simple detection method for the BRAF(T1796A) mutation in fine-needle aspirated thyroid carcinoma cells. Thyroid 2004; 14: 910-915
  • 11 Jin L, Sebo TJ, Nakamura N, Qian X, Oliveira A, Majerus JA, Johnson MR, Lloyd RV. BRAF mutation analysis in fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of the thyroid. Diagn Mol Pathol 2006; 15: 136-143
  • 12 Kimura ET, Nikiforova MN, Zhu Z, Knauf JA, Nikiforov YE, Fagin JA. High prevalence of BRAF mutations in thyroid cancer: genetic evidence for constitutive activation of the RET/PTC-RAS-BRAF signaling pathway in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 1454-1457
  • 13 Nikiforova MN, Kimura ET, Gandhi M, Biddinger PW, Knauf JA, Basolo F, Zhu Z, Giannini R, Salvatore G, Fusco A, Santoro M, Fagin JA, Nikiforov YE. BRAF mutations in thyroid tumors are restricted to papillary carcinomas and anaplastic or poorly differentiated carcinomas arising from papillary carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88: 5399-5404
  • 14 Rowe LM, Bentz BM, Bentz JM. Utility of BRAF V600E mutation detection in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. Cytojournal 2006; 3: 10
  • 15 Sapio MR, Posca D, Troncone G, Pettinato G, Palombini L, Rossi G, Fenzi G, Vitale M. Detection of BRAF mutation in thyroid papillary carcinomas by mutant allele-specific PCR amplification (MASA). Eur J Endocrinol 2006; 154: 341-348
  • 16 Nikiforov YE, Steward DL, Robinson-Smith TM, Haugen BR, Klopper JP, Zhu Z, Fagin JA, Falciglia M, Weber K, Nikiforova MN. Molecular Testing for Mutations in Improving the Fine Needle Aspiration Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94: 2092-2098
  • 17 Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, Mazzaferri EL, McIver B, Sherman SI, Tuttle RM. Management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2006; 16: 109-142
  • 18 Ferraz C, Rehfeld C, Krogdahl A, Precht Jensen EM, Bosenberg E, Narz F, Hegedus L, Paschke R, Eszlinger M. Detection of PAX8/PPARG and RET/PTC Rearrangements Is Feasible in Routine Air-Dried Fine Needle Aspiration Smears. Thyroid 2012; 22: 1025-1030
  • 19 Guerra A, Sapio MR, Marotta V, Campanile E, Rossi S, Forno I, Fugazzola L, Budillon A, Moccia T, Fenzi G, Vitale M. The primary occurrence of BRAF(V600E) is a rare clonal event in papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97: 517-524
  • 20 Unger K, Zitzelsberger H, Salvatore G, Santoro M, Bogdanova T, Braselmann H, Kastner P, Zurnadzhy L, Tronko N, Hutzler P, Thomas G. Heterogeneity in the distribution of RET/PTC rearrangements within individual post-Chernobyl papillary thyroid carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89: 4272-4279
  • 21 Zhu Z, Ciampi R, Nikiforova MN, Gandhi M, Nikiforov YE. Prevalence of RET/PTC rearrangements in thyroid papillary carcinomas: effects of the detection methods and genetic heterogeneity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91: 3603-3610