Work Engagement von Krankenhausärzten: Welche Rolle spielen Sozialkapital und Persönlichkeitseigenschaften?

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Work Engagement gilt als wichtiger Indikator für arbeitsbezogenes physisches und psychisches Wohlbefinden. Forschungsergebnisse zeigen, dass Engagement sowohl durch organisationale als auch durch individuelle Faktoren beeinflusst werden kann. Ziel der Untersuchung ist die Überprüfung der hypothetisierten Wirkungszusammenhänge zwischen Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen (Big-5), Sozialkapital und Engagement am Beispiel von Krankenhausärzten (n=387) aus 35 Krankenhäusern in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Anhand eines Strukturgleichungsmodells (SGM) wurden die Methoden einer konfirmatorischen Faktorenanalyse (KFA) und einer Pfadanalyse kombiniert. Im SGM ergaben sich signifikante Effekte von Sozialkapital und Neurotizismus auf Engagement. Das Persönlichkeitsmerkmal Verträglichkeit zeigte eine indirekte Beziehung zu Engagement über den Mediator Sozialkapital. Die Ergebnisse weisen auf eine Schlüsselrolle von Sozialkapital zur Förderung des Work Engagement von Ärzten hin.

Abstract

Work engagement has been proven to be a viable indicator of physical and mental well-being at work. Research findings have shown a link between work engagement and both individual and organizational resources. The aim of the present study is to test the hypothesized relationships between personal traits (Big-5), the quality of the social work environment (social capital) and work engagement among hospital (n=35) physicians (n=387) in North-Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Structural equation modeling (SEM), combining confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and path analysis, was employed to conduct the statistical analyses. The results of the SEM indicated that social capital and neuroticism were significantly associated with work engagement. The relationship between agreeableness and work engagement was fully mediated by social capital. Findings suggest that social capital plays a key role in promoting work engagement of physicians.

• Literatur

• 1 Seligman M, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: an introduction. Am Psychol 2000; 55: 5-14
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Maslach C, Leiter MP. Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. J Appl Psychol 2008; 93: 498-512
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas 2006; 66: 701-716
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Shirom A, Toker S, Berliner S et al. The effects of physical fitness and feeling vigorous on self-rated health. Health Psychol 2008; 27: 567-575
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Hakanen J, Schaufeli WB. Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven-year prospective study. J Affect Disord 2012; 141: 415-424
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Halbesleben JRB, Wheeler AR. The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave. Work Stress 2008; 22: 242-256
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Halbesleben JR. A meta-analysis of work engagement: relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In: Bakker AB, Leiter MP. Hrsg. Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research. New York: Psychology Press; 2010: 102-117
  Google Scholar
• 8 Shirom A, Nirel N, Vinokur AD. Overload, autonomy, and burnout as predictors of physicians’ quality of care. J Occup Health Psychol 2006; 11: 328-342
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Linzer M, Manwell LB, Williams ES et al. Working conditions in primary care: physician reactions and care quality. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 28-36
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Williams ES, Manwell LB, Konrad TR et al. The relationship of organizational culture, stress, satisfaction and burnout with physician-reported error and suboptimal patient care: results from the MEMO study. Health Care Manage Rev 2007; 32: 203-212
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Langelaan S, Bakker AB, van Doornen LJP et al. Burnout and work engagement: do individual differences make a difference?. Pers Individ Dif 2006; 40: 521-532
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Kim HJ, Shin KH, Swanger N. Burnout and engagement: a comparative analysis using the Big Five personality dimensions. Int J Hosp Manage 2009; 28: 96-104
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Inceoglu I, Warr P.. Personality and job engagement. J Pers Psychol 2011; 10: 177-181
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Dikkers JSE, Jansen PGW, de Lange AH et al. Proactivity, job characteristics, and engagement: a longitudinal study. Career Dev Int 2010; 15: 59-77
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Xanthopoulou D, Bakker AB, Demerouti E et al. Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. J Vocat Behav 2009; 74: 235-244
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Kawachi I, Berkman Lisa F. Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In: Berkman Lisa F, Kawachi I. Hrsg Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000: 174-190
  Google Scholar
• 17 Suzuki E, Takao S, Subramanian SV et al. Does low workplace social capital have detrimental effect on workers’ health?. Soc Sci Med 2010; 70: 1367-1372
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Kowalski C, Ommen O, Driller E et al. Burnout in nurses – the relationship between social capital in hospitals and emotional exhaustion. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19: 1654-1663
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Oksanen T, Kouvonen A, Kivimäki M et al. Social capital at work as a predictor of employee health: multilevel evidence from work units in Finland. Soc Sci Med 2008; 66: 637-649
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Coleman JS. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 1988; 94: S95-S120
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Lin N. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Univ. Press; 2011
  Google Scholar
• 22 Oksanen T, Kivimäki M, Kawachi I et al. Workplace social capital and all-cause mortality: a prospective cohort study of 28043 public-sector employees in Finland. Am J Public Health 2011; 101: 1742-1748
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Driller E, Ommen O, Kowalski C et al. The relationship between social capital in hospitals and emotional exhaustion in clinicians: a study in four German hospitals. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2011; 57: 604-609
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Ommen O, Driller E, Köhler T et al. The relationship between social capital in hospitals and physician job satisfaction. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9: 81
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Costa PT, McCrae RR. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1992
  Google Scholar
• 26 Lang FR, Lüdtke O. Der Big Five-Ansatz der Persönlichkeitsforschung: Instrumente und Vorgehen. In: Schumann S. Hrsg Persönlichkeit. Eine vergessene Größe der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag; 2005: 29-39
  Google Scholar
• 27 Dehne M, Schupp J. Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im Sozio-oekonomischen Panel (SOEP): Konzepte. Umsetzung und empirische Eigenschaften. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung DIW; 2007
  Google Scholar
• 28 Hurtz GM, Donovan JJ. Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited. J Appl Psychol 2000; 85: 869-879
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Hülsheger UR, Maier GW. Persönlichkeitseigenschaften, Intelligenz und Erfolg im Beruf: Eine Bestandsaufnahme internationaler und nationaler Forschung. Psychol Rundsch 2008; 59: 108-122
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Costa Jr PT, McCrae RR. Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980; 38: 668-678
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Bakker AB, Boyd CM, Dollard MF et al. The role of personality in the job demands-resources model: a study of Australian academic staff. Career Dev Int 2010; 15: 622-636
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Lang FR, Lüdtke O, Asendorpf J. Testgüte und psychometrische Äquivalenz der deutschen Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI) bei jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen. Diagnostica 2001; 47: 111-121
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Nezlek JB, Schütz A, Schröder-Abé M et al. A cross-cultural study of relationships between daily social interaction and the Five-Factor model of personality. J Pers 2011; 79: 811-840
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 White JK, Hendrick SS, Hendrick C. Big five personality variables and relationship constructs. Pers Individ Dif 2004; 37: 1519-1530
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Costa Jr PT, McCrae RR. Domains and facets: hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. J Pers Assess 1995; 64: 21-50
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Kashdan TB, Roberts JE. Affective outcomes in superficial and intimate interactions: roles of social anxiety and curiosity. J Res Pers 2006; 40: 140-167
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Costa Jr PT, McCrae RR. From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five-factor model. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988; 55: 258-265
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Ostendorf F. Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur. Zur Validität des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit. Regensburg: Roderer; 1990
  Google Scholar
• 39 Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method – 2007 Update with New Internet, Visual, and Mixed-mode Guide. New Jersey: Wiley; 2007.
  Google Scholar
• 40 Pfaff H, Pühlhofer F, Brinkmann A et al. Forschungsbericht 4-2004: Der Mitarbeiterkennzahlenbogen (MIKE): Kompendium valider Kennzahlen. Köln: Klinikum der Univ. zu Köln, Inst. und Poliklinik für Arbeitsmedizin, Sozialmedizin und Sozialhygiene; 2004
  Google Scholar
• 41 Coleman JS. Foundations of Social Theory. 3^rd ed. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press; 2000
  Google Scholar
• 42 Gerlitz J-Y, Schupp J. Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP: Dokumentation der Instrumentenentwicklung BFI-S auf Basis des SOEP-Pretests 2005. Berlin: 2005;
  Google Scholar
• 43 Arbuckle JL. Amos 16.0 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: Amos Development Corporation; 2007
  Google Scholar
• 44 Howell DC. Statistical Methods for Psychology. 4^th ed. Belmont: Thomson; 1997
  Google Scholar
• 45 Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equitation Modeling. 3^rd ed. New York: Guilford; 2011
  Google Scholar
• 46 Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural modeling in practice: a review and recommended two step approach. Psychol Bull 1988; 103: 411-423
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL et al. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6^th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2006
  Google Scholar
• 48 Katz MH. Multivariable Analysis: A practical Guide for Clinicians. 2^nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 49 Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 1981; 18: 39-50
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Method Psychol Res Online 2003; 8: 23-74
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Bagozzi RP, Baumgartner H. The evaluation of structural equation models and hypothesis testing. In: Bagozzi RP. Hrsg. Principles of Marketing Research. Cambridge: Blackwell; 1994: 386-422
  Google Scholar
• 52 Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: Leinhardt S. Hrsg. Sociological Methodology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1982: 290-312
  Google Scholar
• 53 Snell AJ, Briscoe D, Dickson G. From the inside out: the engagement of physicians as leaders in health care settings. Qual Health Res 2011; 21: 952-967
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Zwack J, Abel C, Schweitzer J. Resilienz im Arztberuf – salutogenetische Praktiken und Einstellungsmuster erfahrener Ärzte. Psychother Psych Med 2011; 61: 495-502
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Bakker AB, van Emmerik H, Euwema MC. Crossover of burnout and engagement in work teams. Work Occup 2006; 33: 464-489
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Bühler K-E, Land T. Burnout and personality in intensive care: an empirical study. Hosp Top 2003; 81: 5-12
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 2003; 88: 879-903
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Körner A, Geyer M, Brähler E. Das NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI). Validierung anhand einer deutschen Bevölkerungsstichprobe. Diagnostica 2002; 48: 19-27
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Moosbrugger H, Kelava A. Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. 2. Auflage. Heidelberg: Springer; 2012
  Google Scholar
• 60 Greenberger E, Chen C, Dimitrieva J et al. Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: do they matter?. Pers Individ Dif 2003; 35: 1241-1254
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Borkenau P, Egloff B, Eid M et al. Stand und Perspektiven. Psychol Rundsch 2005; 56: 271-290
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Herzberg PY, Brähler E. Assessing the Big-Five personality domains via short forms: a cautionary note and a proposal. Eur J Psychol Assess 2006; 22: 139-148
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Furnham A. Relationship among four Big Five measures of different length. Psychol Rep 2008; 102: 312-316
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Badura B, Steinke M. Die erschöpfte Arbeitswelt. Durch eine Kultur der Achtsamkeit zu mehr Energie, Kreativität, Wohlbefinden und Erfolg!. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann-Stiftung; 2011
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Prins JT, van der Heijden FM, Hoekstra-Weebers JE et al. Burnout, engagement and resident physicians’ self-reported errors. Psychol Health Med 2009; 14: 654-666
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 McManus IC, Jonvik H, Richards P et al. Vocation and avocation: leisure activities correlate with professional engagement, but not burnout, in a cross-sectional survey of UK doctors. BMC Medicine 2011; 9: 100
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Hawe P, Shiell A. Social capital and health promotion: a review. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 871-885
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material