Clinical Assessment and Management of the Endometrium in Recurrent Early Pregnancy Loss

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Unexplained and recurrent loss of pregnancies is a heartbreaking and frustrating condition. The routine diagnostic workup for pregnancy loss includes hormonal evaluation, screening for genetic or chromosomal defects, immunologic and thrombophilic testing, and evaluation of congenital or acquired Müllerian defects. In cases of idiopathic pregnancy loss, defects in endometrial receptivity are increasingly being investigated. The role of the endometrium in pregnancy loss has historical roots but remains controversial. Exciting new directions based on microRNAs, proteomics, and epigenetics promises to keep this area of investigation both interesting and complex. With each new diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker identified comes a greater potential for diagnosis and treatment of women. The clinical assessment of the endometrium remains an important part of the investigation of couples with unexplained pregnancy loss.

REFERENCES

• 1 Gilchrist D M, Livingston J E, Hurlburt J A, Wilson R D. Recurrent spontaneous pregnancy loss. Investigation and reproductive follow-up.  J Reprod Med. 1991;  36 (3) 184-188
  Google Scholar
• 2 Katz V L, Kuller J A. Recurrent miscarriage.  Am J Perinatol. 1994;  11 (6) 386-397
  Google Scholar
• 3 Stephenson M, Kutteh W. Evaluation and management of recurrent early pregnancy loss.  Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  50 (1) 132-145
  Google Scholar
• 4 Stephenson M D, Awartani K A, Robinson W P. Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case-control study.  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17 (2) 446-451
  Google Scholar
• 5 Vercammen E E, D'Hooghe T M. Endometriosis and recurrent pregnancy loss.  Semin Reprod Med. 2000;  18 (4) 363-368
  Google Scholar
• 6 Donaghay M, Lessey B A. Uterine receptivity: alterations associated with benign gynecological disease.  Semin Reprod Med. 2007;  25 (6) 461-475
  Google Scholar
• 7 Brenner R M, West N B. Hormonal regulation of the reproductive tract in female mammals.  Annu Rev Physiol. 1975;  37 273-302
  Google Scholar
• 8 Strauss III J F, Lessey B A. The structure, function, and evaluation of the female reproductive tract. In: Strauss J F, Barbieri R L, eds. Reproductive Endocrinology: Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Management. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2009: 191-233
  Google Scholar
• 9 Ekblom P, Ekblom M, Fecker L et al.. Role of mesenchymal nidogen for epithelial morphogenesis in vitro.  Development. 1994;  120 (7) 2003-2014
  Google Scholar
• 10 Garry R, Hart R, Karthigasu K A, Burke C. A re-appraisal of the morphological changes within the endometrium during menstruation: a hysteroscopic, histological and scanning electron microscopic study.  Hum Reprod. 2009;  24 (6) 1393-1401
  Google Scholar
• 11 Kamei M, Carman C V. New observations on the trafficking and diapedesis of monocytes.  Curr Opin Hematol. 2010;  17 (1) 43-52
  Google Scholar
• 12 Taylor H S. Endometrial cells derived from donor stem cells in bone marrow transplant recipients.  JAMA. 2004;  292 (1) 81-85
  Google Scholar
• 13 Du H, Taylor H S. Contribution of bone marrow-derived stem cells to endometrium and endometriosis.  Stem Cells. 2007;  25 (8) 2082-2086
  Google Scholar
• 14 Halis G, Arici A. Endometriosis and inflammation in infertility.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;  1034 300-315
  Google Scholar
• 15 Halme J. Role of peritoneal inflammation in endometriosis-associated infertility.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;  622 266-274
  Google Scholar
• 16 Bukulmez O, Hardy D B, Carr B R, Word R A, Mendelson C R. Inflammatory status influences aromatase and steroid receptor expression in endometriosis.  Endocrinology. 2008;  149 (3) 1190-1204
  Google Scholar
• 17 Laird S M, Tuckerman E M, Cork B A, Linjawi S, Blakemore A I, Li T C. A review of immune cells and molecules in women with recurrent miscarriage.  Hum Reprod Update. 2003;  9 (2) 163-174
  Google Scholar
• 18 van Mourik M S, Macklon N S, Heijnen C J. Embryonic implantation: cytokines, adhesion molecules, and immune cells in establishing an implantation environment.  J Leukoc Biol. 2009;  85 (1) 4-19
  Google Scholar
• 19 Noyes R W, Hertig A I, Rock J. Dating the endometrial biopsy.  Fertil Steril. 1950;  1 3-25
  Google Scholar
• 20 Jones G E. Some newer aspects of the management of infertility.  J Am Med Assoc. 1949;  141 (16) 1123-1129, illust
  Google Scholar
• 21 Castelbaum A J, Lessey B A. Insights into the evaluation of the luteal phase. In: Diamond M P, ed. Infertility and Reproductive Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1995: 199-213
  Google Scholar
• 22 Usadi R S, Groll J M, Lessey B A et al.. Endometrial development and function in experimentally induced luteal phase deficiency.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;  93 (10) 4058-4064
  Google Scholar
• 23 Murray M J, Meyer W R, Zaino R J et al.. A critical analysis of the accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility of histologic endometrial dating in fertile women.  Fertil Steril. 2004;  81 (5) 1333-1343
  Google Scholar
• 24 Coutifaris C, Myers E R, Guzick D S NICHD National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network et al. Histological dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status.  Fertil Steril. 2004;  82 (5) 1264-1272
  Google Scholar
• 25 Dey S K, Lim H, Das S K et al.. Molecular cues to implantation.  Endocr Rev. 2004;  25 (3) 341-373
  Google Scholar
• 26 Tapia A, Gangi L M, Zegers-Hochschild F et al.. Differences in the endometrial transcript profile during the receptive period between women who were refractory to implantation and those who achieved pregnancy.  Hum Reprod. 2008;  23 (2) 340-351
  Google Scholar
• 27 de los Santos M J, Mercader A, Galán A, Albert C, Romero J L, Pellicer A. Implantation rates after two, three, or five days of embryo culture.  Placenta. 2003;  24 (Suppl B) S13-S19
  Google Scholar
• 28 Pope W F. Uterine asynchrony: a cause of embryonic loss.  Biol Reprod. 1988;  39 (5) 999-1003
  Google Scholar
• 29 Wilcox A J, Baird D D, Weinberg C R. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy.  N Engl J Med. 1999;  340 (23) 1796-1799
  Google Scholar
• 30 Enders A C. Current topic: structural responses of the primate endometrium to implantation.  Placenta. 1991;  12 (4) 309-325
  Google Scholar
• 31 Enders A C. Implantation (Embryology). Encyclopedia of Human Biology. Vol 4. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall; 1991: 423-435
  Google Scholar
• 32 Aplin J D. Embryo implantation: the molecular mechanism remains elusive.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;  13 (6) 833-839
  Google Scholar
• 33 Aplin J D, Kimber S J. Trophoblast-uterine interactions at implantation.  Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004;  2 48
  Google Scholar
• 34 Talbi S, Hamilton A E, Vo K C et al.. Molecular phenotyping of human endometrium distinguishes menstrual cycle phases and underlying biological processes in normo-ovulatory women.  Endocrinology. 2006;  147 (3) 1097-1121
  Google Scholar
• 35 Carson D D, Bagchi I, Dey S K et al.. Embryo implantation.  Dev Biol. 2000;  223 (2) 217-237
  Google Scholar
• 36 Yoshinaga K, Yoshinaga K, Mori T. Receptor concept in implantation research. In: Yoshinaga K, Mori T, eds. Development of Preimplantation Embryos and Their Environment. New York, NY: Alan Liss; 1989: 379-387
  Google Scholar
• 37 Rogers P AW, Murphy C R, Yoshinaga K. Uterine receptivity for implantation: human studies. In: Yoshinaga K, ed. Blastocyst Implantation. Boston, MA: Serono Symposia USA; 1989: 231-238
  Google Scholar
• 38 Yoshinaga K. Uterine receptivity for blastocyst implantation.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;  541 424-431
  Google Scholar
• 39 Sutherland A. Mechanisms of implantation in the mouse: differentiation and functional importance of trophoblast giant cell behavior.  Dev Biol. 2003;  258 (2) 241-251
  Google Scholar
• 40 Murphy C R, Rogers P A, Hosie M J, Leeton J, Beaton L. Tight junctions of human uterine epithelial cells change during the menstrual cycle: a morphometric study.  Acta Anat (Basel). 1992;  144 (1) 36-38
  Google Scholar
• 41 Rogers P A, Murphy C R. Morphometric and freeze fracture studies of human endometrium during the peri-implantation period.  Reprod Fertil Dev. 1992;  4 (3) 265-269
  Google Scholar
• 42 Daya S. Endometriosis and spontaneous abortion. In: Ginsberg K A, ed. Infertility and Reproductive Medicine Clinics of North America. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1996: 759-773
  Google Scholar
• 43 Strathy J H, Molgaard C A, Coulam C B, Melton III L J. Endometriosis and infertility: a laparoscopic study of endometriosis among fertile and infertile women.  Fertil Steril. 1982;  38 (6) 667-672
  Google Scholar
• 44 Verkauf B S. Incidence, symptoms, and signs of endometriosis in fertile and infertile women.  J Fla Med Assoc. 1987;  74 (9) 671-675
  Google Scholar
• 45 Lessey B A, Palomino W A, Apparao K B, Young S L, Lininger R A. Estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha) and defects in uterine receptivity in women.  Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;  4 (Suppl 1) S9
  Google Scholar
• 46 Young S L, Lessey B A. Progesterone function in human endometrium: clinical perspectives.  Semin Reprod Med. 2010;  28 (1) 5-16
  Google Scholar
• 47 Jackson K S, Brudney A, Hastings J M, Mavrogianis P A, Kim J J, Fazleabas A T. The altered distribution of the steroid hormone receptors and the chaperone immunophilin FKBP52 in a baboon model of endometriosis is associated with progesterone resistance during the window of uterine receptivity.  Reprod Sci. 2007;  14 (2) 137-150
  Google Scholar
• 48 Kao L C, Germeyer A, Tulac S et al.. Expression profiling of endometrium from women with endometriosis reveals candidate genes for disease-based implantation failure and infertility.  Endocrinology. 2003;  144 (7) 2870-2881
  Google Scholar
• 49 Burney R O, Talbi S, Hamilton A E et al.. Gene expression analysis of endometrium reveals progesterone resistance and candidate susceptibility genes in women with endometriosis.  Endocrinology. 2007;  148 (8) 3814-3826
  Google Scholar
• 50 Key J D, Kempers R D. Citation classics: most-cited articles from Fertility and Sterility .  Fertil Steril. 1987;  47 (6) 910-915
  Google Scholar
• 51 Dor J, Itzkowic D J, Mashiach S, Lunenfeld B, Serr D M. Cumulative conception rates following gonadotropin therapy.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;  136 (1) 102-105
  Google Scholar
• 52 MacLaughlan S D, Palomino W A, Mo B, Lewis T D, Lininger R A, Lessey B A. Endometrial expression of Cyr61: a marker of estrogenic activity in normal and abnormal endometrium.  Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  110 (1) 146-154
  Google Scholar
• 53 Cermik D, Selam B, Taylor H S. Regulation of HOXA-10 expression by testosterone in vitro and in the endometrium of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;  88 (1) 238-243
  Google Scholar
• 54 Avellaira C, Villavicencio A, Bacallao K et al.. Expression of molecules associated with tissue homeostasis in secretory endometria from untreated women with polycystic ovary syndrome.  Hum Reprod. 2006;  21 (12) 3116-3121
  Google Scholar
• 55 DuQuesnay R, Wright C, Aziz A A et al.. Infertile women with isolated polycystic ovaries are deficient in endometrial expression of osteopontin but not alphavbeta3 integrin during the implantation window.  Fertil Steril. 2009;  91 (2) 489-499
  Google Scholar
• 56 Apparao K B, Lovely L P, Gui Y, Lininger R A, Lessey B A. Elevated endometrial androgen receptor expression in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome.  Biol Reprod. 2002;  66 (2) 297-304
  Google Scholar
• 57 Gregory C W, Wilson E M, Apparao K B et al.. Steroid receptor coactivator expression throughout the menstrual cycle in normal and abnormal endometrium.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;  87 (6) 2960-2966
  Google Scholar
• 58 Baulieu E E. RU486: a compound that gets itself talked about.  Hum Reprod. 1994;  9 (Suppl 1) 1-6
  Google Scholar
• 59 Cumming D C, Honoré L H, Scott J Z, Williams K P. The late luteal phase in infertile women: comparison of simultaneous endometrial biopsy and progesterone levels.  Fertil Steril. 1985;  43 (5) 715-719
  Google Scholar
• 60 Daya S, Ward S, Burrows E. Progesterone profiles in luteal phase defect cycles and outcome of progesterone treatment in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;  158 (2) 225-232
  Google Scholar
• 61 Hecht B R, Bardawil W A, Khan-Dawood F S, Dawood M Y. Luteal insufficiency: correlation between endometrial dating and integrated progesterone output in clomiphene citrate-induced cycles.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;  163 (6 Pt 1) 1986-1991
  Google Scholar
• 62 Fritz M A, Lessey B A. Defective luteal function. In: Fraser I S, Jansen R PS, Lobo R A, Whitehead M I, eds. Estrogens and progestogens in clinical practice. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1998: 437-453
  Google Scholar
• 63 Strott C A, Cargille C M, Ross G T, Lipsett M B. The short luteal phase.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1970;  30 (2) 246-251
  Google Scholar
• 64 Groff T R, Raj H G, Talbert L M, Willis D L. Effects of neutralization of luteinizing hormone on corpus luteum function and cyclicity in Macaca fascicularis. .  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984;  59 (6) 1054-1057
  Google Scholar
• 65 Filicori M, Flamigni C. GnRH agonists and antagonists. Current clinical status.  Drugs. 1988;  35 (1) 63-82
  Google Scholar
• 66 Ellinwood W E, Norman R L, Spies H G. Changing frequency of pulsatile luteinizing hormone and progesterone secretion during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle of rhesus monkeys.  Biol Reprod. 1984;  31 (4) 714-722
  Google Scholar
• 67 Lessey B A, Castelbaum A J, Buck C A, Lei Y, Yowell C W, Sun J. Further characterization of endometrial integrins during the menstrual cycle and in pregnancy.  Fertil Steril. 1994;  62 (3) 497-506
  Google Scholar
• 68 Baulieu E E. Contragestion and other clinical applications of RU 486, an antiprogesterone at the receptor.  Science. 1989;  245 (4924) 1351-1357
  Google Scholar
• 69 Good R G, Moyer D L. Estrogen-progesterone relationships in the development of secretory endometrium.  Fertil Steril. 1968;  19 (1) 37-49
  Google Scholar
• 70 Joshi S G, Ebert K M, Smith R A. Properties of the progestagen-dependent protein of the human endometrium.  J Reprod Fertil. 1980;  59 (2) 287-296
  Google Scholar
• 71 Strinden S T, Shapiro S S. Progesterone-altered secretory proteins from cultured human endometrium.  Endocrinology. 1983;  112 (3) 862-870
  Google Scholar
• 72 Navot D, Bergh P. Preparation of the human endometrium for implantation.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;  622 212-219
  Google Scholar
• 73 Ilesanmi A O, Hawkins D A, Lessey B A. Immunohistochemical markers of uterine receptivity in the human endometrium.  Microsc Res Tech. 1993;  25 (3) 208-222
  Google Scholar
• 74 Ding Y Q, Zhu L J, Bagchi M K, Bagchi I C. Progesterone stimulates calcitonin gene expression in the uterus during implantation.  Endocrinology. 1994;  135 (5) 2265-2274
  Google Scholar
• 75 Lessey B A, Yeh I, Castelbaum A J et al.. Endometrial progesterone receptors and markers of uterine receptivity in the window of implantation.  Fertil Steril. 1996;  65 (3) 477-483
  Google Scholar
• 76 Aplin J D, Jones C JP, McGinlay P B, Croxatto H B, Fazleabas A T. Progesterone regulates glycosylation in endometrium.  Biochem Soc Trans. 1997;  25 (4) 1184-1187
  Google Scholar
• 77 Lalitkumar P GL, Sengupta J, Karande A A, Ghosh D. Placental protein 14 in endometrium during menstrual cycle and effect of early luteal phase mifepristone administration on its expression in implantation stage endometrium in the rhesus monkey.  Hum Reprod. 1998;  13 (12) 3478-3486
  Google Scholar
• 78 Lessey B A. Endometrial integrins and the establishment of uterine receptivity.  Hum Reprod. 1998;  13 (Suppl 3) 247-258; discussion 259–261
  Google Scholar
• 79 Giudice L C. Genes associated with embryonic attachment and implantation and the role of progesterone.  J Reprod Med. 1999;  44 (2, Suppl) 165-171
  Google Scholar
• 80 Domínguez F, Remohí J, Pellicer A, Simón C. Human endometrial receptivity: a genomic approach.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;  6 (3) 332-338
  Google Scholar
• 81 Lessey B A. Two pathways of progesterone action in the human endometrium: implications for implantation and contraception.  Steroids. 2003;  68 (10–13) 809-815
  Google Scholar
• 82 Bulun S E, Cheng Y H, Yin P et al.. Progesterone resistance in endometriosis: link to failure to metabolize estradiol.  Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006;  248 (1–2) 94-103
  Google Scholar
• 83 Kitawaki J, Kusuki I, Koshiba H, Tsukamoto K, Fushiki S, Honjo H. Detection of aromatase cytochrome P-450 in endometrial biopsy specimens as a diagnostic test for endometriosis.  Fertil Steril. 1999;  72 (6) 1100-1106
  Google Scholar
• 84 Klentzeris L D, Bulmer J N, Seppälä M, Li T C, Warren M A, Cooke I D. Placental protein 14 in cycles with normal and retarded endometrial differentiation.  Hum Reprod. 1994;  9 (3) 394-398
  Google Scholar
• 85 Young S L, Lessey B A, Balthazar U et al.. Defining the relationship between progesterone dose, endometrial histology and gene expression using an in vivo luteal phase defect model.  Reprod Sci. 2011;  18 272A
  Google Scholar
• 86 Enders A C, Nelson D M. Pinocytotic activity of the uterus of the rat.  Am J Anat. 1973;  138 (3) 277-299
  Google Scholar
• 87 Psychoyos A, Mandon P. [Study of the surface of the uterine epithelium by scanning electron microscope. Observations in the rat at the 4th and 5th day of pregnancy [in French].  CR Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D. 1971;  272 2723-2725
  Google Scholar
• 88 Ciocca D R, Asch R H, Adams D J, McGuire W L. Evidence for modulation of a 24K protein in human endometrium during the menstrual cycle.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;  57 (3) 496-499
  Google Scholar
• 89 Psychoyos A, Martel D. Embryo-endometrial interactions at implantation.  J Reprod Fertil. 1985;  41 195-209
  Google Scholar
• 90 Martel D, Frydman R, Glissant M, Maggioni C, Roche D, Psychoyos A. Scanning electron microscopy of postovulatory human endometrium in spontaneous cycles and cycles stimulated by hormone treatment.  J Endocrinol. 1987;  114 (2) 319-324
  Google Scholar
• 91 Martel D, Frydman R, Glissant M, Maggioni C, Roche D, Psychoyos A. Scanning electron microscopy of postovulatory human endometrium in spontaneous cycles and cycles stimulated by hormone treatment.  J Endocrinol. 1987;  114 (2) 319-324
  Google Scholar
• 92 Martel D, Frydman R, Sarantis L et al.. Scanning electron microscopy of the uterine luminal epithelium as a marker of the implantation window. In: Yoshinaga K, ed. Blastocyst Implantation. Boston, MA: Adams Publishing Group; 1993: 225
  Google Scholar
• 93 Psychoyos A, Nikas G. Uterine pinopodes as markers of uterine receptivity.  Assist Reprod Rev. 1994;  4 26-32
  Google Scholar
• 94 Nikas G, Drakakis P, Loutradis D et al.. Uterine pinopodes as markers of the ‘nidation window’ in cycling women receiving exogenous oestradiol and progesterone.  Hum Reprod. 1995;  10 (5) 1208-1213
  Google Scholar
• 95 Bentin-Ley U. Relevance of endometrial pinopodes for human blastocyst implantation.  Hum Reprod. 2000;  15 (Suppl 6) 67-73
  Google Scholar
• 96 Bulletti C, Flamigni C, de Ziegler D. Implantation markers and endometriosis.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;  11 (4) 464-468
  Google Scholar
• 97 Nardo L G, Nikas G, Makrigiannakis A, Sinatra F, Nardo F. Synchronous expression of pinopodes and alpha v beta 3 and alpha 4 beta 1 integrins in the endometrial surface epithelium of normally menstruating women during the implantation window.  J Reprod Med. 2003;  48 (5) 355-361
  Google Scholar
• 98 Nikas G. Cell-surface morphological events relevant to human implantation.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 (Suppl 2) 37-44
  Google Scholar
• 99 Nikas G. Pinopodes as markers of endometrial receptivity in clinical practice.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 (Suppl 2) 99-106
  Google Scholar
• 100 Nikas G, Psychoyos A. Uterine pinopodes in peri-implantation human endometrium. Clinical relevance.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997;  816 129-142
  Google Scholar
• 101 Stavreus-Evers A, Nikas G, Sahlin L, Eriksson H, Landgren B M. Formation of pinopodes in human endometrium is associated with the concentrations of progesterone and progesterone receptors.  Fertil Steril. 2001;  76 (4) 782-791
  Google Scholar
• 102 Martel D, Monier M N, Roche D, Psychoyos A. Hormonal dependence of pinopode formation at the uterine luminal surface.  Hum Reprod. 1991;  6 (4) 597-603
  Google Scholar
• 103 Adams S M, Gayer N, Hosie M J, Murphy C R. Human uterodomes (pinopods) do not display pinocytotic function.  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17 (8) 1980-1986
  Google Scholar
• 104 Bentin-Ley U, Pedersen B, Lindenberg S, Larsen J F, Hamberger L, Horn T. Isolation and culture of human endometrial cells in a three-dimensional culture system.  J Reprod Fertil. 1994;  101 (2) 327-332
  Google Scholar
• 105 Bentin-Ley U, Sjögren A, Nilsson L, Hamberger L, Larsen J F, Horn T. Presence of uterine pinopodes at the embryo-endometrial interface during human implantation in vitro.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 (2) 515-520
  Google Scholar
• 106 von Wolff M, Strowitzki T, Becker V, Zepf C, Tabibzadeh S, Thaler C J. Endometrial osteopontin, a ligand of β3-integrin, is maximally expressed around the time of the “implantation window.”  Fertil Steril. 2001;  76 (4) 775-781
  Google Scholar
• 107 Young S L, Lessey B A, Fritz M A et al.. In vivo and in vitro evidence suggest that HB-EGF regulates endometrial expression of human decay-accelerating factor.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;  87 (3) 1368-1375
  Google Scholar
• 108 Aghajanova L, Stavreus-Evers A, Nikas Y, Hovatta O, Landgren B M. Coexpression of pinopodes and leukemia inhibitory factor, as well as its receptor, in human endometrium.  Fertil Steril. 2003;  79 (Suppl 1) 808-814
  Google Scholar
• 109 Lai T H, Shih I eM, Vlahos N, Ho C L, Wallach E, Zhao Y. Differential expression of L-selectin ligand in the endometrium during the menstrual cycle.  Fertil Steril. 2005;  83 (Suppl 1) 1297-1302
  Google Scholar
• 110 Stavreus-Evers A, Mandelin E, Koistinen R, Aghajanova L, Hovatta O, Seppälä M. Glycodelin is present in pinopodes of receptive-phase human endometrium and is associated with down-regulation of progesterone receptor B.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  85 (6) 1803-1811
  Google Scholar
• 111 Foulk R A, Zdravkovic T, Genbacev O, Prakobphol A. Expression of L-selectin ligand MECA-79 as a predictive marker of human uterine receptivity.  J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;  24 (7) 316-321
  Google Scholar
• 112 Shimizu Y, Kabir-Salmani M, Azadbakht M, Sugihara K, Sakai K, Iwashita M. Expression and localization of galectin-9 in the human uterodome.  Endocr J. 2008;  55 (5) 879-887
  Google Scholar
• 113 Acosta A A, Elberger L, Borghi M et al.. Endometrial dating and determination of the window of implantation in healthy fertile women.  Fertil Steril. 2000;  73 (4) 788-798
  Google Scholar
• 114 Usadi R S, Murray M J, Bagnell R C et al.. Temporal and morphologic characteristics of pinopod expression across the secretory phase of the endometrial cycle in normally cycling women with proven fertility.  Fertil Steril. 2003;  79 (4) 970-974
  Google Scholar
• 115 Quinn C, Ryan E, Claessens E A et al.. The presence of pinopodes in the human endometrium does not delineate the implantation window.  Fertil Steril. 2007;  87 (5) 1015-1021
  Google Scholar
• 116 Alcázar J L. Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of endometrial receptivity: a review.  Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;  4 56
  Google Scholar
• 117 Dechaud H, Bessueille E, Bousquet P J, Reyftmann L, Hamamah S, Hedon B. Optimal timing of ultrasonographic and Doppler evaluation of uterine receptivity to implantation.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;  16 (3) 368-375
  Google Scholar
• 118 Smith P. Evaluation of endometrium with transvaginal ultrasound.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993;  72 (8) 686-687
  Google Scholar
• 119 Van Voorhis B J. Ultrasound assessment of the uterus and fallopian tube in infertile women.  Semin Reprod Med. 2008;  26 (3) 232-240
  Google Scholar
• 120 Abdalla H I, Brooks A A, Johnson M R, Kirkland A, Thomas A, Studd J W. Endometrial thickness: a predictor of implantation in ovum recipients?.  Hum Reprod. 1994;  9 (2) 363-365
  Google Scholar
• 121 El-Toukhy T, Coomarasamy A, Khairy M et al.. The relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of medicated frozen embryo replacement cycles.  Fertil Steril. 2008;  89 (4) 832-839
  Google Scholar
• 122 Isaacs Jr J D, Wells C S, Williams D B, Odem R R, Gast M J, Strickler R C. Endometrial thickness is a valid monitoring parameter in cycles of ovulation induction with menotropins alone.  Fertil Steril. 1996;  65 (2) 262-266
  Google Scholar
• 123 Oliveira J BA, Baruffi R LR, Mauri A L, Petersen C G, Borges M C, Franco Jr J G. Endometrial ultrasonography as a predictor of pregnancy in an in-vitro fertilization programme after ovarian stimulation and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone and gonadotrophins.  Hum Reprod. 1997;  12 (11) 2515-2518
  Google Scholar
• 124 Rabinowitz R, Laufer N, Lewin A et al.. The value of ultrasonographic endometrial measurement in the prediction of pregnancy following in vitro fertilization.  Fertil Steril. 1986;  45 (6) 824-828
  Google Scholar
• 125 Bassil S. Changes in endometrial thickness, width, length and pattern in predicting pregnancy outcome during ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  18 (3) 258-263
  Google Scholar
• 126 Coulam C B, Bustillo M, Soenksen D M, Britten S. Ultrasonographic predictors of implantation after assisted reproduction.  Fertil Steril. 1994;  62 (5) 1004-1010
  Google Scholar
• 127 De Geyter C, Schmitter M, De Geyter M, Nieschlag E, Holzgreve W, Schneider H P. Prospective evaluation of the ultrasound appearance of the endometrium in a cohort of 1,186 infertile women.  Fertil Steril. 2000;  73 (1) 106-113
  Google Scholar
• 128 Glissant A, de Mouzon J, Frydman R. Ultrasound study of the endometrium during in vitro fertilization cycles.  Fertil Steril. 1985;  44 (6) 786-790
  Google Scholar
• 129 Gonen Y, Casper R F, Jacobson W, Blankier J. Endometrial thickness and growth during ovarian stimulation: a possible predictor of implantation in in vitro fertilization.  Fertil Steril. 1989;  52 (3) 446-450
  Google Scholar
• 130 Noyes N, Liu H C, Sultan K, Schattman G, Rosenwaks Z. Endometrial thickness appears to be a significant factor in embryo implantation in in-vitro fertilization.  Hum Reprod. 1995;  10 (4) 919-922
  Google Scholar
• 131 Imoedemhe D A, Shaw R W, Kirkland A, Chan R. Ultrasound measurement of endometrial thickness on different ovarian stimulation regimens during in-vitro fertilization.  Hum Reprod. 1987;  2 545-547
  Google Scholar
• 132 Friedler S, Schenker J G, Herman A, Lewin A. The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review.  Hum Reprod Update. 1996;  2 (4) 323-335
  Google Scholar
• 133 Sterzik K, Grab D, Schneider V, Strehler E J, Gagsteiger F, Rosenbusch B E. Lack of correlation between ultrasonography and histologic staging of the endometrium in in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997;  23 (2) 165-170
  Google Scholar
• 134 Scholtes M C, Wladimiroff J W, van Rijen H J, Hop W C. Uterine and ovarian flow velocity waveforms in the normal menstrual cycle: a transvaginal Doppler study.  Fertil Steril. 1989;  52 (6) 981-985
  Google Scholar
• 135 Goswamy R K, Steptoe P C. Doppler ultrasound studies of the uterine artery in spontaneous ovarian cycles.  Hum Reprod. 1988;  3 (6) 721-726
  Google Scholar
• 136 Habara T, Nakatsuka M, Konishi H, Asagiri K, Noguchi S, Kudo T. Elevated blood flow resistance in uterine arteries of women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17 (1) 190-194
  Google Scholar
• 137 Sterzik K, Grab D, Sasse V, Hütter W, Rosenbusch B, Terinde R. Doppler sonographic findings and their correlation with implantation in an in vitro fertilization program.  Fertil Steril. 1989;  52 (5) 825-828
  Google Scholar
• 138 Steer C V, Tan S L, Mason B A, Campbell S. Midluteal-phase vaginal color Doppler assessment of uterine artery impedance in a subfertile population.  Fertil Steril. 1994;  61 (1) 53-58
  Google Scholar
• 139 Yaron Y, Botchan A, Amit A, Peyser M R, David M P, Lessing J B. Endometrial receptivity in the light of modern assisted reproductive technologies.  Fertil Steril. 1994;  62 (2) 225-232
  Google Scholar
• 140 Cacciatore B, Simberg N, Fusaro P, Tiitinen A. Transvaginal Doppler study of uterine artery blood flow in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles.  Fertil Steril. 1996;  66 (1) 130-134
  Google Scholar
• 141 Steer C V, Tan S L, Dillon D, Mason B A, Campbell S. Vaginal color Doppler assessment of uterine artery impedance correlates with immunohistochemical markers of endometrial receptivity required for the implantation of an embryo.  Fertil Steril. 1995;  63 (1) 101-108
  Google Scholar
• 142 Schild R L, Indefrei D, Eschweiler S, Van der Ven H, Fimmers R, Hansmann M. Three-dimensional endometrial volume calculation and pregnancy rate in an in-vitro fertilization programme.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 (5) 1255-1258
  Google Scholar
• 143 Alatas C, Aksoy E, Akarsu C, Yakin K, Aksoy S, Hayran M. Evaluation of intrauterine abnormalities in infertile patients by sonohysterography.  Hum Reprod. 1997;  12 (3) 487-490
  Google Scholar
• 144 Goldstein S R. Use of ultrasonohysterography for triage of perimenopausal patients with unexplained uterine bleeding.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;  170 (2) 565-570
  Google Scholar
• 145 Keltz M D, Olive D L, Kim A H, Arici A. Sonohysterography for screening in recurrent pregnancy loss.  Fertil Steril. 1997;  67 (4) 670-674
  Google Scholar
• 146 Parsons A K, Lense J J. Sonohysterography for endometrial abnormalities: preliminary results.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1993;  21 (2) 87-95
  Google Scholar
• 147 Burke C, Kelehan P, Wingfield M. Unsuspected endometrial pathology in the subfertile woman.  Ir Med J. 2007;  100 (5) 466-469
  Google Scholar
• 148 Goldberg J M, Falcone T, Attaran M. Sonohysterographic evaluation of uterine abnormalities noted on hysterosalpingography.  Hum Reprod. 1997;  12 (10) 2151-2153
  Google Scholar
• 149 Hamilton J A, Larson A J, Lower A M, Hasnain S, Grudzinskas J G. Routine use of saline hysterosonography in 500 consecutive, unselected, infertile women.  Hum Reprod. 1998;  13 (9) 2463-2473
  Google Scholar
• 150 Lessey B A, Castelbaum A J, Sawin S W et al.. Aberrant integrin expression in the endometrium of women with endometriosis.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;  79 (2) 643-649
  Google Scholar
• 151 Achache H, Revel A. Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation.  Hum Reprod Update. 2006;  12 (6) 731-746
  Google Scholar
• 152 Getzenberg R H, Pienta K J, Coffey D S. The tissue matrix: cell dynamics and hormone action.  Endocr Rev. 1990;  11 (3) 399-417
  Google Scholar
• 153 Aplin J D, Charlton A K, Ayad S. An immunohistochemical study of human endometrial extracellular matrix during the menstrual cycle and first trimester of pregnancy.  Cell Tissue Res. 1988;  253 (1) 231-240
  Google Scholar
• 154 Ruck P, Marzusch K, Kaiserling E et al.. Distribution of cell adhesion molecules in decidua of early human pregnancy. An immunohistochemical study.  Lab Invest. 1994;  71 (1) 94-101
  Google Scholar
• 155 Feinberg R F, Kliman H J. Tropho-uteronectin (TUN): A unique oncofetal fibronectin deposited in the extracellular matrix of the tropho-uterine junction and regulated in vitro by cultured human trophoblast cells.  Trophblast Res. 1993;  7 167-173
  Google Scholar
• 156 Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T, Feinberg R F, Kauppila A, Puistola U. Extracellular matrix interactions in early human embryos: implications for normal implantation events.  Fertil Steril. 1995;  64 (1) 132-138
  Google Scholar
• 157 Albelda S M, Buck C A. Integrins and other cell adhesion molecules.  FASEB J. 1990;  4 (11) 2868-2880
  Google Scholar
• 158 Lessey B A, Damjanovich L, Coutifaris C, Castelbaum A, Albelda S M, Buck C A. Integrin adhesion molecules in the human endometrium. Correlation with the normal and abnormal menstrual cycle.  J Clin Invest. 1992;  90 (1) 188-195
  Google Scholar
• 159 Tabibzadeh S. Patterns of expression of integrin molecules in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle.  Hum Reprod. 1992;  7 (6) 876-882
  Google Scholar
• 160 Damsky C, Sutherland A, Fisher S. Extracellular matrix 5: adhesive interactions in early mammalian embryogenesis, implantation, and placentation.  FASEB J. 1993;  7 (14) 1320-1329
  Google Scholar
• 161 Armant D R, Kaplan H A, Mover H, Lennarz W J. The effect of hexapeptides on attachment and outgrowth of mouse blastocysts cultured in vitro: evidence for the involvement of the cell recognition tripeptide Arg-Gly-Asp.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;  83 (18) 6751-6755
  Google Scholar
• 162 Illera M J, Cullinan E, Gui Y, Yuan L, Beyler S A, Lessey B A. Blockade of the alpha(v)beta(3) integrin adversely affects implantation in the mouse.  Biol Reprod. 2000;  62 (5) 1285-1290
  Google Scholar
• 163 Illera M J, Lorenzo P L, Gui Y T, Beyler S A, Apparao K B, Lessey B A. A role for alphavbeta3 integrin during implantation in the rabbit model.  Biol Reprod. 2003;  68 766-771
  Google Scholar
• 164 Bronson R A, Fusi F. Evidence that an Arg-Gly-Asp adhesion sequence plays a role in mammalian fertilization.  Biol Reprod. 1990;  43 (6) 1019-1025
  Google Scholar
• 165 Bronson R A, Fusi F M. Integrins and human reproduction.  Mol Hum Reprod. 1996;  2 (3) 153-168
  Google Scholar
• 166 Yelian F D, Yang Y, Hirata J D, Schultz J F, Armant D R. Molecular interactions between fibronectin and integrins during mouse blastocyst outgrowth.  Mol Reprod Dev. 1995;  41 (4) 435-448
  Google Scholar
• 167 Jones J I, Gockerman A, Busby Jr W H, Wright G, Clemmons D R. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 stimulates cell migration and binds to the alpha 5 beta 1 integrin by means of its Arg-Gly-Asp sequence.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;  90 (22) 10553-10557
  Google Scholar
• 168 Illera M J, Lorenzo P L, Gui Y T, Beyler S A, Apparao K B, Lessey B A. A role for alphavbeta3 integrin during implantation in the rabbit model.  Biol Reprod. 2003;  68 (3) 766-771
  Google Scholar
• 169 Sutherland A E, Calarco P G, Damsky C H. Developmental regulation of integrin expression at the time of implantation in the mouse embryo.  Development. 1993;  119 (4) 1175-1186
  Google Scholar
• 170 Tabibzadeh S, Sun X Z. Cytokine expression in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle.  Hum Reprod. 1992;  7 (9) 1214-1221
  Google Scholar
• 171 Daftary G S, Troy P J, Bagot C N, Young S L, Taylor H S. Direct regulation of beta3-integrin subunit gene expression by HOXA10 in endometrial cells.  Mol Endocrinol. 2002;  16 (3) 571-579
  Google Scholar
• 172 Matsuzaki S, Canis M, Darcha C, Pouly J L, Mage G. HOXA-10 expression in the mid-secretory endometrium of infertile patients with either endometriosis, uterine fibromas or unexplained infertility.  Hum Reprod. 2009;  24 (12) 3180-3187
  Google Scholar
• 173 Tuckerman E M, Laird S M, Prakash A, Li T C. Expression of integrins in the endometrium of women with recurrent miscarriage.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  86 (3) 755-757
  Google Scholar
• 174 Quenby S, Anim-Somuah M, Kalumbi C, Farquharson R, Aplin J D. Different types of recurrent miscarriage are associated with varying patterns of adhesion molecule expression in endometrium.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;  14 (2) 224-234
  Google Scholar
• 175 Ivanov P D, Komsa-Penkova R S, Konova E I et al.. Polymorphism A1/A2 in the cell surface integrin subunit β3 and disturbance of implantation and placentation in women with recurrent pregnancy loss.  Fertil Steril. 2010;  94 (7) 2843-2845
  Google Scholar
• 176 Fukuda M N, Sato T, Nakayama J et al.. Trophinin and tastin, a novel cell adhesion molecule complex with potential involvement in embryo implantation.  Genes Dev. 1995;  9 (10) 1199-1210
  Google Scholar
• 177 Paria B C, Zhao X M, Das S K, Dey S K, Yoshinaga K. Zonula occludens-1 and E-cadherin are coordinately expressed in the mouse uterus with the initiation of implantation and decidualization.  Dev Biol. 1999;  208 (2) 488-501
  Google Scholar
• 178 Apparao K B, Murray M J, Fritz M A et al.. Osteopontin and its receptor alphavbeta(3) integrin are coexpressed in the human endometrium during the menstrual cycle but regulated differentially.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;  86 (10) 4991-5000
  Google Scholar
• 179 Chobotova K, Spyropoulou I, Carver J et al.. Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor and its receptor ErbB4 mediate implantation of the human blastocyst.  Mech Dev. 2002;  119 (2) 137-144
  Google Scholar
• 180 Genbacev O D, Prakobphol A, Foulk R A et al.. Trophoblast L-selectin-mediated adhesion at the maternal-fetal interface.  Science. 2003;  299 (5605) 405-408
  Google Scholar
• 181 Lai T H, Zhao Y, Shih I eM, Ho C L, Bankowski B, Vlahos N. Expression of L-selectin ligands in human endometrium during the implantation window after controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte donation.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  85 (3) 761-763
  Google Scholar
• 182 Bhatt H, Brunet L J, Stewart C L. Uterine expression of leukemia inhibitory factor coincides with the onset of blastocyst implantation.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;  88 (24) 11408-11412
  Google Scholar
• 183 Stewart C L. Leukaemia inhibitory factor and the regulation of pre-implantation development of the mammalian embryo.  Mol Reprod Dev. 1994;  39 (2) 233-238
  Google Scholar
• 184 Stewart C L, Kaspar P, Brunet L J et al.. Blastocyst implantation depends on maternal expression of leukaemia inhibitory factor.  Nature. 1992;  359 (6390) 76-79
  Google Scholar
• 185 Cullinan E B, Abbondanzo S J, Anderson P S, Pollard J W, Lessey B A, Stewart C L. Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and LIF receptor expression in human endometrium suggests a potential autocrine/paracrine function in regulating embryo implantation.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;  93 (7) 3115-3120
  Google Scholar
• 186 Sherwin J R, Smith S K, Wilson A, Sharkey A M. Soluble gp130 is up-regulated in the implantation window and shows altered secretion in patients with primary unexplained infertility.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;  87 (8) 3953-3960
  Google Scholar
• 187 Mikolajczyk M, Wirstlein P, Skrzypczak J. Leukaemia inhibitory factor and interleukin 11 levels in uterine flushings of infertile patients with endometriosis.  Hum Reprod. 2006;  21 (12) 3054-3058
  Google Scholar
• 188 Dimitriadis E, Sharkey A M, Tan Y L, Salamonsen L A, Sherwin J R. Immunolocalisation of phosphorylated STAT3, interleukin 11 and leukaemia inhibitory factor in endometrium of women with unexplained infertility during the implantation window.  Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2007;  5 (1) 44
  Google Scholar
• 189 Aghajanova L, Altmäe S, Bjuresten K, Hovatta O, Landgren B M, Stavreus-Evers A. Disturbances in the LIF pathway in the endometrium among women with unexplained infertility.  Fertil Steril. 2009;  91 (6) 2602-2610
  Google Scholar
• 190 Savaris R F, Groll J M, Young S L et al.. Progesterone resistance in PCOS endometrium: a microarray analysis in clomiphene citrate-treated and artificial menstrual cycles.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;  96 (6) 1737-1746
  Google Scholar
• 191 Carson D D, Lagow E, Thathiah A et al.. Changes in gene expression during the early to mid-luteal (receptive phase) transition in human endometrium detected by high-density microarray screening.  Mol Hum Reprod. 2002;  8 (9) 871-879
  Google Scholar
• 192 Catalano R D, Critchley H O, Heikinheimo O et al.. Mifepristone induced progesterone withdrawal reveals novel regulatory pathways in human endometrium.  Mol Hum Reprod. 2007;  13 (9) 641-654
  Google Scholar
• 193 Eyster K M, Boles A L, Brannian J D, Hansen K A. DNA microarray analysis of gene expression markers of endometriosis.  Fertil Steril. 2002;  77 (1) 38-42
  Google Scholar
• 194 Haouzi D, Mahmoud K, Fourar M et al.. Identification of new biomarkers of human endometrial receptivity in the natural cycle.  Hum Reprod. 2009;  24 (1) 198-205
  Google Scholar
• 195 Horcajadas J A, Pellicer A, Simón C. Wide genomic analysis of human endometrial receptivity: new times, new opportunities.  Hum Reprod Update. 2007;  13 (1) 77-86
  Google Scholar
• 196 Kao L C, Yang J, Lessey B A, Giudice L C. Microarray expression profiling reveals candidate genes for human uterine receptivity.  Fertil Steril. 2001;  76 S59
  Google Scholar
• 197 Kao L C, Germeyer A, Tulac S et al.. Expression profiling of endometrium from women with endometriosis reveals candidate genes for disease-based implantation failure and infertility.  Endocrinology. 2003;  144 2870-2881
  Google Scholar
• 198 Kao L C, Tulac S, Lobo S et al.. Global gene profiling in human endometrium during the window of implantation.  Endocrinology. 2002;  143 2119-2138
  Google Scholar
• 199 Liu Y, Lee K F, Ng E H, Yeung W S, Ho P C. Gene expression profiling of human peri-implantation endometria between natural and stimulated cycles.  Fertil Steril. 2008;  90 (6) 2152-2164
  Google Scholar
• 200 Matsuzaki S, Canis M, Pouly J L, Botchorishvili R, Déchelotte P J, Mage G. Differential expression of genes in eutopic and ectopic endometrium from patients with ovarian endometriosis.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  86 (3) 548-553
  Google Scholar
• 201 Matsuzaki S, Canis M, Vaurs-Barrière C, Boespflug-Tanguy O, Dastugue B, Mage G. DNA microarray analysis of gene expression in eutopic endometrium from patients with deep endometriosis using laser capture microdissection.  Fertil Steril. 2005;  84 (Suppl 2) 1180-1190
  Google Scholar
• 202 Mettler L, Salmassi A, Schollmeyer T, Schmutzler A G, Püngel F, Jonat W. Comparison of c-DNA microarray analysis of gene expression between eutopic endometrium and ectopic endometrium (endometriosis).  J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;  24 (6) 249-258
  Google Scholar
• 203 Riesewijk A, Martín J, van Os R et al.. Gene expression profiling of human endometrial receptivity on days LH + 2 versus LH + 7 by microarray technology.  Mol Hum Reprod. 2003;  9 (5) 253-264
  Google Scholar
• 204 Schmidt A, Groth P, Haendler B et al.. Gene expression during the implantation window: microarray analysis of human endometrial samples.  Ernst Schering Res Found Workshop. 2005;  (52) 139-157
  Google Scholar
• 205 Wu Y, Kajdacsy-Balla A, Strawn E et al.. Transcriptional characterizations of differences between eutopic and ectopic endometrium.  Endocrinology. 2006;  147 (1) 232-246
  Google Scholar
• 206 Aghajanova L, Hamilton A E, Giudice L C. Uterine receptivity to human embryonic implantation: histology, biomarkers, and transcriptomics.  Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2008;  19 (2) 204-211
  Google Scholar
• 207 Bartel D P. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function.  Cell. 2004;  116 (2) 281-297
  Google Scholar
• 208 Cai X, Hagedorn C H, Cullen B R. Human microRNAs are processed from capped, polyadenylated transcripts that can also function as mRNAs.  RNA. 2004;  10 (12) 1957-1966
  Google Scholar
• 209 Cullen B R. Derivation and function of small interfering RNAs and microRNAs.  Virus Res. 2004;  102 (1) 3-9
  Google Scholar
• 210 Burney R O, Hamilton A E, Aghajanova L et al.. MicroRNA expression profiling of eutopic secretory endometrium in women with versus without endometriosis.  Mol Hum Reprod. 2009;  15 (10) 625-631
  Google Scholar
• 211 Toloubeydokhti T, Pan Q, Luo X, Bukulmez O, Chegini N. The expression and ovarian steroid regulation of endometrial micro-RNAs.  Reprod Sci. 2008;  15 (10) 993-1001
  Google Scholar
• 212 Pan X Y, Li X, Weng Z P, Wang B. Altered expression of claudin-3 and claudin-4 in ectopic endometrium of women with endometriosis.  Fertil Steril. 2009;  91 (5) 1692-1699
  Google Scholar
• 213 Pan Q, Luo X, Toloubeydokhti T, Chegini N. The expression profile of micro-RNA in endometrium and endometriosis and the influence of ovarian steroids on their expression.  Mol Hum Reprod. 2007;  13 (11) 797-806
  Google Scholar
• 214 Chung T K, Cheung T H, Huen N Y et al.. Dysregulated microRNAs and their predicted targets associated with endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma in Hong Kong women.  Int J Cancer. 2009;  124 (6) 1358-1365
  Google Scholar
• 215 Aluvihare V R, Kallikourdis M, Betz A G. Regulatory T cells mediate maternal tolerance to the fetus.  Nat Immunol. 2004;  5 (3) 266-271
  Google Scholar
• 216 Guerin L R, Prins J R, Robertson S A. Regulatory T-cells and immune tolerance in pregnancy: a new target for infertility treatment?.  Hum Reprod Update. 2009;  15 (5) 517-535
  Google Scholar
• 217 Jasper M J, Tremellen K P, Robertson S A. Primary unexplained infertility is associated with reduced expression of the T-regulatory cell transcription factor Foxp3 in endometrial tissue.  Mol Hum Reprod. 2006;  12 (5) 301-308
  Google Scholar
• 218 Robertson S A, Guerin L R, Moldenhauer L M, Hayball J D. Activating T regulatory cells for tolerance in early pregnancy—the contribution of seminal fluid.  J Reprod Immunol. 2009;  83 (1-2) 109-116
  Google Scholar
• 219 Saito S, Sasaki Y, Sakai M. CD4( + )CD25high regulatory T cells in human pregnancy.  J Reprod Immunol. 2005;  65 (2) 111-120
  Google Scholar
• 220 Zenclussen A C. CD4( + )CD25 + T regulatory cells in murine pregnancy.  J Reprod Immunol. 2005;  65 (2) 101-110
  Google Scholar
• 221 Quenby S, Farquharson R. Uterine natural killer cells, implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;  13 (1) 24-28
  Google Scholar
• 222 Quenby S, Nik H, Innes B et al.. Uterine natural killer cells and angiogenesis in recurrent reproductive failure.  Hum Reprod. 2009;  24 (1) 45-54
  Google Scholar
• 223 Lachapelle M H, Miron P, Hemmings R, Roy D C. Endometrial T, B, and NK cells in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Altered profile and pregnancy outcome.  J Immunol. 1996;  156 (10) 4027-4034
  Google Scholar
• 224 Tuckerman E, Laird S M, Stewart R, Wells M, Li T C. Markers of endometrial function in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: a comparison between morphologically normal and retarded endometrium.  Hum Reprod. 2004;  19 (1) 196-205
  Google Scholar
• 225 Fukui A, Fujii S, Yamaguchi E, Kimura H, Sato S, Saito Y. Natural killer cell subpopulations and cytotoxicity for infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization.  Am J Reprod Immunol. 1999;  41 (6) 413-422
  Google Scholar
• 226 Jasper M J, Care A S, Sullivan B, Ingman W V, Aplin J D, Robertson S A. Macrophage-derived LIF and IL1B regulate alpha(1,2)fucosyltransferase 2 (Fut2) expression in mouse uterine epithelial cells during early pregnancy.  Biol Reprod. 2011;  84 (1) 179-188
  Google Scholar
• 227 Quenby S, Tang A W. Uterine natural killer cells and reproduction. In: Farquharson R G, Stephenson M D, eds. Early Pregnancy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Press; 2010: 75-84
  Google Scholar
• 228 Homburg R, Pap H, Brandes M, Huirne J, Hompes P, Lambalk C B. Endometrial biopsy during induction of ovulation with clomiphene citrate in polycystic ovary syndrome.  Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006;  22 (9) 506-510
  Google Scholar
• 229 Legro R S. Pregnancy considerations in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.  Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  50 (1) 295-304
  Google Scholar
• 230 Palomba S, Falbo A, Orio Jr F, Russo T, Tolino A, Zullo F. Metformin hydrochloride and recurrent miscarriage in a woman with polycystic ovary syndrome.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  85 (5) 1511, e3-e5
  Google Scholar
• 231 Mitwally M F, Casper R F. Aromatase inhibition reduces the dose of gonadotropin required for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.  J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2004;  11 (6) 406-415
  Google Scholar
• 232 Bouchard P. Treatment of infertility in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.  Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2010;  71 (3) 225-227
  Google Scholar
• 233 Ott J, Kurz C, Nouri K et al.. Pregnancy outcome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome comparing the effects of laparoscopic ovarian drilling and clomiphene citrate stimulation in women pre-treated with metformin: a retrospective study.  Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;  8 45
  Google Scholar
• 234 Tang T, Lord J M, Norman R J, Yasmin E, Balen A H. Insulin-sensitising drugs (metformin, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, D-chiro-inositol) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome, oligo amenorrhoea and subfertility.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;  (1) CD003053
  Google Scholar
• 235 Begum M R, Ferdous J, Begum A, Quadir E. Comparison of efficacy of aromatase inhibitor and clomiphene citrate in induction of ovulation in polycystic ovarian syndrome.  Fertil Steril. 2009;  92 (3) 853-857
  Google Scholar
• 236 Abu Hashim H, Mashaly A M, Badawy A. Letrozole versus laparoscopic ovarian diathermy for ovulation induction in clomiphene-resistant women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;  282 (5) 567-571
  Google Scholar
• 237 Polyzos N P, Tzioras S, Badawy A M, Valachis A, Dritsas C, Mauri D. Aromatase inhibitors for female infertility: a systematic review of the literature.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;  19 (4) 456-471
  Google Scholar
• 238 Vitonis A F, Hankinson S E, Hornstein M D, Missmer S A. Adult physical activity and endometriosis risk.  Epidemiology. 2010;  21 (1) 16-23
  Google Scholar
• 239 Parazzini F, Ardovino I, Struzziero E et al.. Risk factors for pelvic endometriosis in women with pelvic pain or infertility. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dell' endometriosi.  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999;  83 (2) 195-199
  Google Scholar
• 240 Tomassetti C, Meuleman C, Pexsters A et al.. Endometriosis, recurrent miscarriage and implantation failure: is there an immunological link?.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;  13 (1) 58-64
  Google Scholar
• 241 Damewood M D. The association of endometriosis and repetitive (early) spontaneous abortions.  Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1989;  7 (2) 155-160
  Google Scholar
• 242 Lessey B A. Medical management of endometriosis and infertility.  Fertil Steril. 2000;  73 (6) 1089-1096
  Google Scholar
• 243 Daya S, Gunby J. Luteal phase support in assisted reproduction cycles.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;  (3) CD004830
  Google Scholar
• 244 Munro S K, Farquhar C M, Mitchell M D, Ponnampalam A P. Epigenetic regulation of endometrium during the menstrual cycle.  Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;  16 (5) 297-310
  Google Scholar

Bruce A. LesseyM.D. Ph.D. 

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Group, Greenville Hospital System

890 W. Faris Rd., Suite 470, Greenville, SC 29605

Email: blessey@ghs.org