Endoscopic banding without resection (BWR) technique for treatment of diminutive neuroendocrine tumors in the duodenum

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Endoscopic treatment of diminutive (less than 10 mm) duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is recommended because of the risk of metastatic potential. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection are alternatives to surgical management but have significant adverse event rates. We evaluated the effectiveness, feasibility, and safety of the ‘banding without resection’ (BWR) technique and assessed outcomes for the treatment of diminutive duodenal NETs. Our study included eight patients referred for endoscopic treatment of incidentally discovered, biopsy proven, diminutive duodenal bulb NETs. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in all patients showed duodenal bulb NETs located in the deep mucosa and submucosal layers without any nodal metastasis. The BWR technique was successfully performed in all patients with technical feasibility, with the assistance of submucosal saline lift in three patients when the lesion was smaller than 5 mm in size, without any immediate or delayed adverse events. Complete resection with no residual lesion was confirmed at short-term (median 2.3 months) and long-term (median 4.2 years) follow-up intervals by repeat endoscopy, biopsy, and EUS exam. The BWR technique appears to be a safe, feasible, and effective therapy for endoscopic treatment of diminutive duodenal bulb NETs in the absence of local and distant metastasis.

• References

• 1 Burke AP, Sobin LH, Federspiel BH. et al. Carcinoid tumors of the duodenum. A clinicopathologic study of 99 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990; 114: 700-704
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Delle Fave G, Kwekkeboom DJ, Van Cutsem E. et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with gastroduodenal neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 2012; 95: 74-87
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Ahmad NA, Kochman ML, Long WB. et al. Efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection: a study of 101 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 390-396
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Min BH, Kim ER, Lee JH. et al. Management strategy for small duodenal carcinoid tumors: does conservative management with close follow-up represent an alternative to endoscopic treatment?. Digestion 2013; 87: 247-253
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Gincul R, Ponchon T, Napoleon B. et al. Endoscopic treatment of sporadic small duodenal and ampullary neuroendocrine tumors. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 979-986
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Matsumoto S, Miyatani H, Yoshida Y. et al. Duodenal carcinoid tumors: 5 cases treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1152-1156
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Diaz-Cervantes E, De-la-Torre-Bravo A, Spechler SJ. et al. Banding without resection (endoscopic mucosal ligation) as a novel approach for the ablation of short-segment Barrett’s epithelium: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1640-1645
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Sun S, Ge N, Wang C. et al. Endoscopic band ligation of small gastric stromal tumors and follow-up by endoscopic ultrasonography. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 574-578
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Sun S, Ge N, Wang S. et al. EUS-assisted band ligation of small duodenal stromal tumors and follow-up by EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 492-496
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Lee SH, Hong YS, Lee JM. et al. Duodenal gastrinoma treated with endoscopic band ligation. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 964-967
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Sun S, Jin Y, Chang G. et al. Endoscopic band ligation without electrosurgery: a new technique for excision of small upper-GI leiomyoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 218-222
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Ibáñez-Sanz G, Gornals JB, Rivas L. et al. Endoscopic band ligation without resection in selected patients for small and superficial upper gastrointestinal tract lesions. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2016; 108: 250-256
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Rindi G, Arnold R, Bosman FT. et al. Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. In: Bosman TF, Carneiro F, Hruban RH. et al., eds. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th edn. Lyon: International Agency for Research on cancer (IARC); 2010: 13
  Google Scholar
• 14 Gress DM, Edge SB, Gershenwald JE. et al. Principles of cancer staging. In: Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL. et al., eds. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th edn. New York: Springer; 2017: 3-30
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 15 Soga J. Endocrinocarcinomas (carcinoids and their variants) of the duodenum. An evaluation of 927 cases. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2003; 22: 349-363
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Yoshikane H, Tsukamoto Y, Niwa Y. et al. Carcinoid tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: evaluation with endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 375-383
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Siyu S, Sheng W, Guoxin W. et al. Gastric perforations after ligation of GI stromal tumors in the gastric fundus. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 615-616
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar