Coup and contrecoup head injuries: Predictors of outcome

 

PDF Download Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Coup and contrecoup contusions comprise a group of focal brain injuries. The pathogenesis of the two are different, the outcome in the two would therefore be expected to be different. However there are no studies in literature comparing outcome in coup-contrecoup injuries. At NIMHANS, Bangalore, two hundred and ninety eight consecutive cases presenting with coup and contrecoup injuries over a 2-year period were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into three groups: Coup injuries with intraparenchymal injury (n = 129), contrecoup injuries (n = 84) and coup-contrecoup injuries (n = 85). The groups were comparable with respect to age and GCS. Site of primary impact was determined by clinical and CT scan criteria. The mortality rates in each group were compared with respect to age, GCS and CT pattern. Significance was calculated using the chi-square test. There was a statistically significant difference in mortality between patients with coup injuries and patients with contrecoup (p < 0.005) and coup-contrecoup injuries (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in mortality between contrecoup and coup-contrecoup injuries (p = 0.1). Mortality in patients aged less that 60 years and patients with GCS > 8 was significantly higher in patients with contrecoup and coup-contrecoup injuries. Presence of a contrecoup component on CT scan may portend a worse outcome in head injuries and may warrant closer monitoring and more aggressive management of these patients.

• References

• 1 Adams JH, Gennarelli TA, Graham DI. Brain damage in nonmissile head injury: observations in man and subhuman primates. In, Smith WT, Cavangh JB. (eds): Recent advances in Neuropathology, No. 2. 1982. Churchill Livingstone; Edinburgh: 165-190
  Google Scholar
• 2 Gennarelli TA, Spielman GM, Langfitt TW. et al Influence of the type of intracranial lesion on outcome from severe head injury. A multicentre study using a new classification system. J Neurosurg 56 1982; 26-32
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Gennarelli TA. Head injury in man and experimental animals: clinical aspects. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 32 Suppl 1983; 1-13
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Gennarelli TA, Meaney DF. Mechanisms of primary head injury. In, Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS. (eds). Neurosurgery. 2nd . edition 1996. Mc Graw-Hill; 2611-2621
  Google Scholar
• 5 Servadei F. Prognostic factors in severely head injured adult patients with epidural haematomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139 1997; 273-278
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Servadei F. Prognostic factors in severely head injured adult patients with acute subdural hamatomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139 1997; 279-285
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Marshall LF, Marshall SB. Outcome prediction in severe head injury. In, Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS. (eds). Neurosurgery. 2nd . edition 1996. Mc Graw-Hill; 2611-2621
  Google Scholar
• 8 Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR. et al A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 75 Suppl 1991; 14-S20
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Lobato RD, Cordobes F, Rivas JJ. et al Outcome from severe head injury related to the type of intracranial lesion. A computerized tomographic study. J Neurosurg 59 1983; 762-774
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Kotwica Z, Braezinskin J. Acute subdural haematomas in adults an analysis of outcome in comatose patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 121 1993; 95-99
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Seelig JM, Becker DP, Miller JD. et al Traumatic acute subdural haematoma. Major mortality reduction in patients treated within four hours. New Eng J Med 304 1981; 1511-1518
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Jayakumar PN, Kolluri Sastry VR, Basavakumar DG. et al Prognosis in contrecoup intracranial haematomas a clinical and radiological study of 63 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 108 1991; 30-33
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar