Clean intermittent catheterization: Single use vs. reuse

Authors

  • Seyed Hossein Saadat Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Shaun Shepherd Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Brandon Van Asseldonk Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Dean S. Elterman Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.5357

Keywords:

catheters

Abstract

Introduction: Intermittent catheterization (IC) is one of the fundamental aspects of managing patients with chronic urinary retention. Although reuse of catheters has been allowed to be chosen as the first option for IC, the optimal method of IC and the type of catheter has been a long-standing debate. We conducted a literature review regarding risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) and the costs associated with different methods and catheters.

Methods: A MEDLINE search via PubMed, EMBASE, and EBSCO host was conducted in March 2018. The date of publication was limited to 2014 to present/current.

Results: Single use of catheters (hydrophilic-coated [HC] or uncoated [UC]) was considered to impose a lower risk of UTI in all studies, except in one study that included children, but did not test their dexterity to handle HC catheters. Cost-effectiveness of single-use catheters was confirmed by all studies during this period.

Conclusions: Reuse of catheters exposes the patient to a plethora of possible cleaning techniques and duration of catheter use. Patient adherence to cleaning method cannot be predicted and this further amplifies the risk of complications and their burden on the healthcare system. We recommend a patient-centred approach to consider HC catheters as the first option, while considering the patient’s/caregiver’s ability to accommodate the usage technique. Single-use UC catheters, and finally reuse of catheters are considered as next options if HC catheters are found difficult to handle (especially in children doing self-catheterization). Larger trials investigating this matter are required.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-30

How to Cite

Saadat, S. H., Shepherd, S., Van Asseldonk, B., & Elterman, D. S. (2018). Clean intermittent catheterization: Single use vs. reuse. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.5357

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2019): CUAJ February

Section

Review

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

  • Post the Article on any Web site
  • Translate or authorize a translation of the Article
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so
  • Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

  • That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party;
  • That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged;
  • That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and
  • That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.