Next Article in Journal
Factors Associated with Referral to Medical Oncology and Subsequent Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Study
Previous Article in Journal
Do Current Cancer Follow-Up Care Practices Meet the Needs of Young Adult Cancer Survivors in Canada? A Aualitative Inquiry
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical Outcomes of Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Nab-Paclitaxel: Experience from a Single Academic Cancer Centre

1
Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
2
Consultant Biostatistician, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2013, 20(1), 24-29; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1202
Submission received: 7 January 2013 / Revised: 9 January 2013 / Accepted: 13 January 2013 / Published: 1 February 2013

Abstract

Background: Nab-paclitaxel is a solvent-free, taxane-based chemotherapy approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (mbc). This study reports clinical benefit and toxicities experienced by women with mbc treated with nab-paclitaxel at the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre. Methods: Women with mbc treated with single-agent nab-paclitaxel between June 2006 and December 2010 were included in this analysis. Retrospective data obtained included demographics, disease characteristics, prior chemotherapy, nab-paclitaxel treatment, toxicity, and survival. Clinical benefit was defined as partial or complete response or stable disease (by clinical or radiologic evaluation, or both) at 6 months or more. Results: Of 43 women (mean age: 57.0 years; range: 34–74 years), most had disease positive for estrogen or progesterone receptor (72.1%, 58.1%), or both. Nab-paclitaxel was administered weekly (qw: 44.2%), every 3 weeks (q3w: 46.5%), q3w switched to qw (7.0%), or qw switched to q3w (2.3%). Median duration of therapy was 5.1 months (qw) and 3.0 months (q3w). Sensory neuropathy was the primary toxicity (45.4% qw, 38.1% q3w; p = 0.62). Clinical benefit was observed in most women (76.2% qw, 57.1% q3w; p = 0.20). Women receiving nab-paclitaxel had a median overall survival of 13.6 months qw (range: 8.1–28.3 months) and 10.8 months q3w (range: 5.9–17.9 months; p = 0.03). Regardless of dosing schedule, women experiencing clinical benefit lived significantly longer than those not experiencing a benefit (17.3 months vs. 7.7 months; hazard ratio: 0.14; 95% confidence interval: 0.06 to 0.33). Conclusions: Our clinical experience demonstrates that most women treated with nab-paclitaxel experienced some clinical benefit. Patients achieving clinical benefit lived significantly longer than those who did not. Nab-paclitaxel was well tolerated, with the primary toxicity being mild sensory neuropathy. Nab-paclitaxel represents another treatment option, with a favourable toxicity profile, for women with mbc.
Keywords: nab-paclitaxel; taxane; mbc; Abraxane nab-paclitaxel; taxane; mbc; Abraxane

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dent, S.; Fraser, J.; Graham, N.; Campbell, M.; Hopkins, S.; Dranitsaris, G. Clinical Outcomes of Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Nab-Paclitaxel: Experience from a Single Academic Cancer Centre. Curr. Oncol. 2013, 20, 24-29. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1202

AMA Style

Dent S, Fraser J, Graham N, Campbell M, Hopkins S, Dranitsaris G. Clinical Outcomes of Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Nab-Paclitaxel: Experience from a Single Academic Cancer Centre. Current Oncology. 2013; 20(1):24-29. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1202

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dent, S., J. Fraser, N. Graham, M. Campbell, S. Hopkins, and G. Dranitsaris. 2013. "Clinical Outcomes of Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Nab-Paclitaxel: Experience from a Single Academic Cancer Centre" Current Oncology 20, no. 1: 24-29. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1202

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop