Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy and Tolerability of a Fixed Combination of Cinnarizine and Dimenhydrinate in Treatment of Vertigo

Analysis of Data from Five Randomised, Double-Blind Clinical Studies

  • Clinical Use
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the present analysis of a series of controlled clinical studies was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the fixed-combination preparation Arlevert® (ARL; cinnarizine 20mg/dimenhydrinate 40mg) in the treatment of central, peripheral or combined central/peripheral vestibular vertigo.

Participants: Six hundred and thirty-five patients participated in five randomised, double-blind, active-and/or placebo-controlled clinical studies carried out in nine European clinics.

Interventions: The patients received one of the following treatments three times daily for 4 weeks, according to randomisation: ARL, cinnarizine 20mg (CZ 20), cinnarizine 50mg (CZ 50), dimenhydrinate 40mg (DH 40), dimenhydrinate 100mg (DH 100), betahistine 12mg (BH) or placebo.

Results: After 4 weeks’ treatment, the fixed-combination ARL led to statistically significantly better improvements in vertigo symptoms (the primary efficacy variable) than monotherapy with its active constituents at the same dosage (p = 0.021 vs CZ 20; p = 0.018 vs DH 40) or at 2.5-fold higher dosage (p < 0.001 vs both CZ 50 and DH 100); ARL was also significantly more effective than BH and placebo (p < 0.001 vs both). Vestibulospinal testing by craniocorpography showed that ARL produced significantly greater decreases in lateral sway (Unterberger test) than CZ 50, DH 100, placebo (p < 0.001 vs all), DH 40 (p = 0.027) and BH (p = 0.039). ARL also markedly reduced vegetative concomitant symptoms. Across treatment groups, 70 to 98% of the patients judged the tolerability as ‘good’ or ‘very good’ (ARL = 90.3%). The rate of adverse events with ARL was similar to or lower than that with the standard treatments. Reported adverse events corresponded to those already recognised for each drug. No serious adverse events were observed.

Conclusion: The analysis demonstrates that the fixed combination of cinnarizine 20mg and dimenhydrinate 40mg given three times daily is an effective and well tolerated treatment for central, peripheral and combined central/peripheral vertigo. Because of a significantly superior efficacy in comparison with its active constituents given alone, as well as compared with the standard monotherapies using CZ 50, DH 100 and BH, the fixed-combination ARL can be considered as a first-line treatment option for vertigo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Honrubia V, Bell TS, Harris MR, et al. Quantitative evaluation of dizziness characteristics and impact on quality of life. Am J Otol 1996; 17: 595–602

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aschoff JC. Diagnostic problems in dizziness or vertigo [in German]. HNO 1978; 26: 149–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bird JC, Beynon GJ, Prevost AT, et al. An analysis of referral patterns for dizziness in the primary care setting. Br J Gen Pract 1998; 48: 1828–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Overstall PW. Rehabilitation of elderly patients with disorders of balance. In: Hinchcliffe R, editor. Hearing and balance in the elderly. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oosterveld WJ. Vertigo. Current concepts in management. Drugs 1985; 30: 275–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Godfraind T, Towse G, van Nueten JM. Cinnarizine —a selective calcium entry blocker. Drugs Today 1982; 18: 27–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oosterveld WJ. Cinnarizine in the vertiginous syndrome. In: Towse G, editor. Cinnarizine and the vertiginous syndrome. International Congress and Symposium Series No. 33. London: Royal Society of Medicine and Academic Press Inc., 1979: 29–37

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jaju BP, Wang SC. Effects of diphenhydramine and dimenhydrinate on vestibular neuronal activity of cat: a search for the locus of their antimotion sickness action. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1971; 176: 718–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kukwa L. Selektive pharmakotherapeutische Stammhirndämpfung. 2nd ed. Hamburg, Neu-Isenburg: edition m + p dr. werner rudat, 1981: 9-14

  10. Ben-David J, Podoshin L, Fradis M. A comparative craniocorpography study on the findings in the Romberg standing test versus the Unterberger/Fukuda stepping test in vertigo patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1985; 39(6): 924–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jongkees LBW. Which is the preferable method of performing the caloric test? Arch Otolaryngol 1949; 49: 594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stoll, W, Matz DR, Most, E, et.al. Schwindel und Gleichgewichtsstörungen. 3. überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  13. McClure JA, Lycett P. Vestibular asymmetry. Some theoretical and practical considerations. Arch Otolaryngol 1983; 109: 682–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Aust G. Vestibular disturbances in the elderly [in German]. HNO 1991; 39: 460–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Luxon L. Comparison of assessment of caloric nystagmus by observation of duration and by electronystagmographic measurement of slow-phase velocity. Br J Audiol 1995; 29: 107–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nilles R. A direct effect of calcium antagonists in the inner ear: blockade of abnormal calcium increase in outer hair cells of the guinea pig [in German]. HNO 1995; 43: 716–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Martinez DM. The effect of Serc (betahistine hydrochloride) on the circulation of the inner ear in experimental animals. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. (Stockh) 1972; 305: 29–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Snow JB, Suga F. Control of the microcirculation of the inner ear. Otolaringol. Clin North Am 1975; 8: 455–66

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fischer AJEM. Histamine in the treatment of vertigo. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. (Stockh) 1991; 479: 24–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kostriza R, Novotný M, Skutil J, et al. The influence of the vasoactive drugs on the blood flow in cochleovestibular diseases. In: Claussen CF, Virtane MV, Constantinescu L, et al., editors. Giddiness & vestibulo-spinal investigations. Combined audio-vestibular investigations. Experimental neurootology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1996: 149–52

    Google Scholar 

  21. Luxon LM. Disturbances of balance in the elderly. Br J Hosp Med 1991; 45: 22–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Keßler L. Treatment of vertigo with a combination of cinnarizine and dimenhydrinate [abstract]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1998; 255: 80

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dollery C, editor. Therapeutic drugs. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1991; 1: D164–68

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Baumann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schremmer, D., Bognar-Steinberg, I., Baumann, W. et al. Efficacy and Tolerability of a Fixed Combination of Cinnarizine and Dimenhydrinate in Treatment of Vertigo. Clin. Drug Investig. 18, 355–368 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199918050-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199918050-00003

Keywords

Navigation