Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) in the Era of Imatinib: Organ Preservation and Improved Oncologic Outcome

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Approximately 5% of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) originate in the rectum, and historically, radical resection was commonly performed. Little is known about the outcome for rectal GIST in the era of imatinib.

Methods

Using a prospectively maintained database, this study retrospectively analyzed 47 localized primary rectal GISTs treated at our center from 1982 to 2016, stratified by when imatinib became available in 2000. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

Rectal GISTs represented 7.1% of 663 primary GISTs. The findings showed 17 patients in the pre-imatinib era and 30 patients in the imatinib era. The two groups had similar follow-up evaluation, age, gender, Miettinen risk, and distance to the anal verge. In the imatinib era, tumors were smaller at diagnosis (median 4 vs. 5 cm; p = 0.029), and 24 of the 30 patients received perioperative imatinib. In the high-risk patients, organ preservation and negative margins were more common among the 13 patients treated with neoadjuvant imatinib than among the 21 patients treated directly with surgery. High-risk patients who received perioperative imatinib (n = 15) had greater (or nearly significantly greater) 5-year OS, DSS, local RFS, and distant RFS than those who did not (n = 19) (91, 100, 100, and 71% vs. 47, 65, 74, and 41%; p = 0.049, 0.052, 0.077, 0.051, respectively). In the imatinib era, no patient has had a local recurrence or death due to GIST.

Conclusions

The use of imatinib is associated with organ preservation and improved oncologic outcome for patients with rectal GIST.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ducimetiere F, Lurkin A, Ranchere-Vince D, et al. Incidence of sarcoma histotypes and molecular subtypes in a prospective epidemiological study with central pathology review and molecular testing. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e20294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ma GL, Murphy JD, Martinez ME, Sicklick JK. Epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of histology codes: results of a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2015;24:298–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kawanowa K, Sakuma Y, Sakurai S, et al. High incidence of microscopic gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the stomach. Hum Pathol. 2006;37:1527–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Joensuu H, DeMatteo RP. The management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a model for targeted and multidisciplinary therapy of malignancy. Annu Rev Med. 2012;63:247–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mucciarini C, Rossi G, Bertolini F, et al. Incidence and clinicopathologic features of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a population-based study. BMC Cancer 2007;7:230.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Nilsson B, Bumming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era: a population-based study in western Sweden. Cancer 2005;103:821–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tran T, Davila JA, El-Serag HB. The epidemiology of malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an analysis of 1458 cases from 1992 to 2000. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:162–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tryggvason G, Gislason HG, Magnusson MK, Jonasson JG. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Iceland, 1990–2003: the Icelandic GIST study, a population-based incidence and pathologic risk stratification study. Int J Cancer 2005;117:289–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dematteo RP, Ballman KV, Antonescu CR, et al. Adjuvant imatinib mesylate after resection of localised, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2009;373:1097–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al. Adjuvant imatinib for high-risk gi stromal tumor: analysis of a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:244–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rutkowski P, Gronchi A, Hohenberger P, et al. Neoadjuvant imatinib in locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): the EORTC STBSG experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2937–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujimoto Y, Akiyoshi T, Konishi T, Nagayama S, Fukunaga Y, Ueno M. Laparoscopic sphincter-preserving surgery (intersphincteric resection) after neoadjuvant imatinib treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:111–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huynh TK, Meeus P, Cassier P, et al. Primary localized rectal/pararectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: results of surgical and multimodal therapy from the French Sarcoma Group. BMC Cancer 2014;14:156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu H, Yan Z, Liao G, Yin H. Treatment strategy of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). J Surg Oncol. 2014;109:708–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilkinson MJ, Fitzgerald JE, Strauss DC, et al. Surgical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumour of the rectum in the era of imatinib. Br J Surg. 2015;102:965–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130:1466–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2006;23:70–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jakob J, Mussi C, Ronellenfitsch U, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the rectum: results of surgical and multimodality therapy in the era of imatinib. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:586–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pai VD, Demenezes JL, Patil PS, Saklani AP. Multimodality therapy of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of imatinib: an Indian series. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016;7:262–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tielen R, Verhoef C, van Coevorden F, et al. Surgical management of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107:320–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eisenberg BL, Harris J, Blanke CD, et al. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant/adjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM) for advanced primary and metastatic/recurrent operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): early results of RTOG 0132/ACRIN 6665. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:42–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Benjamin RS, Choi H, Macapinlac HA, et al. We should desist using RECIST, at least in GIST. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1760–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fong Y, Coit DG, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Lymph node metastasis from soft tissue sarcoma in adults: analysis of data from a prospective database of 1772 sarcoma patients. Ann Surg. 1993;217:72–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Changchien CR, Wu MC, Tasi WS, et al. Evaluation of prognosis for malignant rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor by clinical parameters and immunohistochemical staining. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1922–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Agaimy A, Vassos N, Markl B, et al. Anorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective multicenter analysis of 15 cases emphasizing their high local recurrence rate and the need for standardized therapeutic approach. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:1057–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Centonze D, Pulvirenti E, Pulvirenti D’Urso A, Franco S, Cinardi N, Giannone G. Local excision with adjuvant imatinib therapy for anorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Tech Coloproctol. 2013. doi:10.1007/s10151-013-0976-0.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hara M, Takayama S, Arakawa A, Sato M, Nagasaki T, Takeyama H. Transvaginal resection of a rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Surg Today 2012;42:909–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Hatrmann J, et al. Twelve versus 36 months of adjuvant imatinib (IM) as treatment of operable GIST with a high risk of recurrence: final results of a randomized trial (SSGXVIII/AIO). J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(18 Suppl):LBA1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McCarter MD, Antonescu CR, Ballman KV, et al. Microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: analysis of risk factors and tumor recurrence. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:53–9; discussion 59–60.

  30. Cohen NA, Kim TS, DeMatteo RP. Principles of kinase inhibitor therapy for solid tumors. Ann Surg. 2017;265:311–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Corless CL, Ballman KV, Antonescu CR, et al. Pathologic and molecular features correlate with long-term outcome after adjuvant therapy of resected primary GI stromal tumor: the ACOSOG Z9001 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1563–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Heidi Trenholm and Christina Curtin from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center sarcoma database for their efforts extracting data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip B. Paty MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cavnar, M.J., Wang, L., Balachandran, V.P. et al. Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) in the Era of Imatinib: Organ Preservation and Improved Oncologic Outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 3972–3980 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6087-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6087-9

Keywords

Navigation