Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation on Operative Mortality and Morbidity for Pancreaticoduodenectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT) is being used with increasing frequency for periampullary tumors, but how it alters the complication rate of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is unclear.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 79 patients with periampullary malignancies who received 5-fluorouracil–based neo-CRT followed by PD.

Results

There was no difference in mortality between PD after neo-CRT (3.8%) and conventional PD for either malignant (4.5%) or benign (2.2%) disease. Focusing only on patients with malignancy, the neo-CRT group had a significantly lower pancreatic leak rate than the conventional group (10% vs. 43%; P < .001). Intra-abdominal abscesses were less common in the neo-CRT group (8.8% vs. 21%; P = .019), and there was one (1.2%) amylase-rich abscess in neo-CRT group, compared with eight (12%) in the conventional group. In addition, two patients in the conventional group died of leak-associated sepsis, compared with none in the neo-CRT group. Multivariate analysis revealed that neoadjuvant chemoradiation (odds ratio, .15) was the most significant factor associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic leak.

Conclusions

Neo-CRT does not increase the mortality or morbidity of PD. In contrast, neo-CRT was associated with a marked reduction in the incidence of pancreatic leak, as well as leak-associated morbidity and mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Breslin TM, Hess KR, Harbison DB, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: treatment variables and survival duration. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:123–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. White RR, Hurwitz HI, Morse MA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:758–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Spitz F, Abruzzese J, Lee J, et al. Preoperative and postoperative chemoradiation strategies in patients treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:928–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas—616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:567–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ishikawa O, Ohhigashi H, Teshima T, et al. Clinical and histopathological appraisal of preoperative irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatoduodenal region. J Surg Oncol 1989;40:143–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowy AM, Lee JE, Pisters PWT, et al. Prospective randomized trial of octreotide to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant disease. Ann Surg 1997;226:632–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn T, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 1997;226:248–57; discussion 257–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Neoptolemos JP, Russell RC, Bramhall S, Theis B. Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients. Br J Surg 1997;84:1370–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Balcom JH, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Castillo CF. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 2001;136:391–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chou FF, Sheen-Chen SM, Chen YS, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer. Eur J Surg 1996;162:477–81

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreatico-gastrostomy and pancreatico-jejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 1995;222:580–8; discussion 588–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Montorsi M, Zago M, Mosca F, et al. Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic resections—a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial. Surgery 1995;117:26–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Friess H, Beger HG, Sulkowski U, et al. Randomized controlled multicentre study of the prevention of complications by octreotide for patients undergoing surgery for chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1995;82:1270–3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 2000;232:419–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Mokadam NA, et al. Prospective trial of a blood supply-based technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: effect on anastomotic failure in the Whipple procedure. J Am Coll Surg 2002;194:746–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fernandez-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg 1995;130:295–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Howard JM. Pancreatojejunostomy: leakage is a preventable complication of the Whipple resection. J Am Coll Surg 1997;184:454–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, et al. Risk analysis of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Arch Surg 1998;133:1094–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rios G, Conrad A, Cole D, et al. Trends in indications and outcomes in the Whipple procedure over a 40-year period. Am Surg 1999;65:889–93

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bottger TC, Junginger T. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: critical analysis of 221 resections. World J Surg 1999;23:164–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brooks AD, Marcus SG, Gradek C, et al. Decreasing length of stay after pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 2000;135:823–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Grobmyer SR, Rivadeneira DE, Goodman CA, et al. Pancreatic anastomotic failure after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 2000;180:117–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Buchler MW, Friess H, Wagner M, et al. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 2000;87:883–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, et al. Rate of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 2000;232:786–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ohwada S, Ogawa T, Kawate S, et al. Results of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy Billroth I type reconstruction in 100 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 2001;193:29–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cullen JJ, Sarr MG, Ilstrup DM. Pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, significance, and management. Am J Surg 1994; 168:295–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hashimoto N, Yasuda C, Ohyanagi H. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection; incidence, significance and management. Hepatogastroenterology 2003; 50:1658–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoshal VL Jr, Benedict MB, David LR, Kulick J. Personal experience with the Whipple operation: outcomes and lessons learned. Am Surg 2004; 70:121–5; discussion 126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Reissman P, Perry Y, Cuenca A, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus controlled pancreaticocutaneous fistula in pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma. Am J Surg 1995; 169:585–8

    Google Scholar 

  30. Suzuki Y, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y, et al. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic dissector or conventional division in distal pancreatectomy for non-fibrotic pancreas. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 608–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sutton CD, Garcea G, White SA, et al. Isolated Roux-loop pancreaticojejunostomy: a series of 61 patients with zero postoperative pancreaticoenteric leaks. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8:701–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Duffy JP, Hines OJ, Liu JH, et al. Improved survival for adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater, fifty-five consecutive resections. Arch Surg 2003;138:941–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Talamini MA, Moesinger RC, Pitt HA, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: a 28-year experience. Ann Surg 1997;225:590–600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Enker WE, Merchant N, Cohen AM, et al. Safety and efficacy of low anterior resection for rectal cancer—681 consecutive cases from a specialty service. Ann Surg 1999;230:544–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas S. Tyler MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, TY., Sheth, K., White, R.R. et al. Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation on Operative Mortality and Morbidity for Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 13, 66–74 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.02.003

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.02.003

Keywords

Navigation