Skip to main content
Log in

The Consequence of Multiple Re-Excisions to Obtain Clear Lumpectomy Margins in Breast Cancer Patients

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Microscopically clear lumpectomy margins are critical for optimizing local control with breast conservation for cancer. Re-excisions are often necessary to achieve clear surgical margins. Factors that contribute to nonnegative margins and necessitate re-excision may increase the risk of local recurrence.

Methods

Patients who were treated with breast conservation for breast cancers were identified from a prospective database maintained by one of the authors. Factors associated with local recurrence were evaluated in 459 consecutive patients with attention to the number of re-excisions required to obtain clear margins.

Results

Twenty-eight patients (5%) developed local recurrences at a mean follow-up of 78 months. In multivariate analysis, local recurrence was most significantly associated with the omission of radiotherapy (19% vs. 5%; relative risk [RR], 3.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–8.2), followed by young age (52 vs. 58; 95% confidence interval, −.83 to −10.6 years) and the number of re-excisions required to obtain clear margins (none, 4%; one, 7% [RR, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, .86–4.89]; two or more, 17% [RR, 5.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.44–18.8]). Tumor size, the number of involved nodes, pathology, and adjuvant chemotherapy were not significantly related to local recurrence.

Conclusions

The risk of local recurrence after breast conservation for breast cancer increases progressively with the number of re-excisions needed to achieve clear margins. Patients in whom the cancer is fully excised with clear margins in the first excision will have less of a chance of local recurrence compared with patients who need further re-excision to achieve clear margins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, et al. Lumpectomy margins, re-excision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg 1999;179:81–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Smitt MC, Nowels KW, Zdeblick MJ, et al. The importance of lumpectomy surgical margin status in long term results of breast conservation. Cancer 1995;76:259–67

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anscher MS, Jones P, Prosnitz LR, et al. Local failure and margin status in early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy. Ann Surg 1993;218:22–8

    Google Scholar 

  4. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Favourable and unfavourable effects on long-term survival of radiotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 2000;355:1739–40

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, Bodian C, Brower ST. Stage 0 to stage III breast cancer in young women. J Am Coll Surg 2000;190:509–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim SH, Simkovich-Heerdt A, Tran KN, et al. Women 35 years of age or younger have higher locoregional relapse rates after undergoing breast conservation therapy. J Am Coll Surg 1998;187:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kollias J, Elston CW, Ellis IO, et al. Early-onset breast cancer—histopathological and prognostic considerations. Br J Cancer 1997;75:1318–23

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gibson GR, Lesnikoski B, Yoo J, Mott LA, Cady B, Barth J Jr. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:693–704

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carter D. Margins of “lumpectomy” for breast cancer. Hum Pathol 1986;17:330–2

    Google Scholar 

  10. Graham RA, Homer MJ, Katz J, et al. The pancake phenomenon contributes to the inaccuracy of margin assessment in patients with breast cancer. Am J Surg 2002;184:89–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Schmid CH, et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;38:291–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Neuschatz AC, DiPetrillo T, Steinhoff M, et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 2002;94:1917–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Supported by The Martin Feuer Education Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Ian Tartter MD, FACS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menes, T.S., Tartter, P.I., Bleiweiss, I. et al. The Consequence of Multiple Re-Excisions to Obtain Clear Lumpectomy Margins in Breast Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 12, 881–885 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.03.021

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.03.021

Keywords

Navigation