Skip to main content
Download PDF

Sex differences in survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis

Critical Care volume 24, Article number: 613 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a leading cause of sudden cardiac death worldwide. Researchers have found significant pathophysiological differences between females and males and clinically significant sex differences related to medical services. However, conflicting results exist and there is no uniform agreement regarding sex differences in survival and prognosis after OHCA. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between the prognosis of OHCA and sex factors.

Methods

We comprehensively searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases and obtained a total of 1042 articles, from which 33 studies were selected for inclusion. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects model.

Results

The meta-analysis included 1,268,664 patients. Compared with males, females were older (69.7 years vs. 65.4 years, p < 0.05) and more frequently suffered OHCA without witnesses (58.39% vs 62.70%, p < 0.05). Females were less likely to receive in-hospital interventions than males. There was no significant difference between females and males in the survival from OHCA to hospital admission (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.89–1.1). However, females had lower chances for survival from hospital admission to discharge (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.48–0.73), overall survival to hospital discharge (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62–0.86), and favorable neurological outcomes (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47–0.83) compared with males.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that the overall discharge survival rate of females is lower than that of males, and females face a poor prognosis of the nervous system. This is likely related to the pathophysiological characteristics of females, more conservative treatment measures compared with males, and different post-resuscitation care. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the presence of several confounding factors.

Background

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) refers to the sudden loss of heart function outside of the hospital, which leads to complete cessation of systemic circulation. Cardiogenic factors, such as coronary heart disease and cardiomyopathy, are the main cause of OHCA. At present, OHCA is a leading cause of sudden cardiac death worldwide. It is reported that for every 100,000 people in Europe, 1753 people have experienced OHCA that was subsequently treated and registered by the emergency medical service (EMS) [1]. In the USA, approximately 55 out of every 100,000 people have OHCA [2]. Moreover, a considerable number of patients suffering from OHCA do not receive timely treatment from EMS, so they are not recorded. The mortality rate of OHCA remains high. Globally, the discharge survival rate of OHCA is low: approximately 3.0% in Asia, 6.8% in North America, 7.9% in the UK, 7.6% in Europe, and 9.7% in Australia [3]. It is estimated that 275,000 people receive EMS treatment each year in Europe, and only 29,000 people are discharged alive [4]. Previous studies have shown that the prognosis of OHCA is related to factors such as age, primary disease, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and initial heart rhythm.

Recently, an increasing number of studies have focused on the differences in the prognosis of various diseases between males and females. Studies have shown that there are significant differences in pathophysiology between men and women, and there may be different clinical symptoms and prognoses [5, 6]. Compounding this, research has identified differences in the medical services received by males and females after admission [7, 8]. The medical services include post-resuscitation care and nursing measures. Cardiovascular disease is the most well-studied topic related to studies on sex differences. Various studies have shown that there is a significant correlation between sex and the pathophysiology and prognosis of cardiovascular disease. For example, for coronary heart disease, females are more likely to have non-obstructive microvascular disease and endothelial dysfunction, while males are mainly characterized by the formation of obstructive macrovascular plaques [9]. Females, especially young females, also fare worse than men after acute myocardial infarction [10].

However, it is not clear whether sex differences in heart-related diseases affect the prognosis of OHCA. Multiple studies have addressed possible sex differences associated with OHCA prognosis, but the findings are inconsistent: some studies report no difference between males and females in survival after OHCA [7, 11]; others have reported better survival for males or better survival for females [12, 13]. A meta-analysis published in 2015 showed that the discharge survival rate of female OHCA patients was 10% higher than that of male, but the results of the latest large clinical studies show conflicting trends [14].

Therefore, to address these issues, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between prognosis and sex after OHCA from a multidimensional perspective. Prognostic factors are divided into three categories: baseline characteristics, pre-hospital care, and hospital care. Our findings provide guidance related to narrowing the difference in prognosis between males and females after OHCA.

Materials and methods

Study design and database search

The study was designed following the PECOS principle, where P (participant): OHCA patients; E (exposure): female; C (comparison): male; O (outcome): the survival from OHCA to hospital admission, the survival from hospital admission to discharge, overall survival after hospital discharge, and favorable neurological outcomes. We did not limit the search to the type of research or language of the publication.

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for related publications between 1980 and October 2019. We searched studies on the relationship between sex and prognosis after OHCA. All published studies prior to October 2019 were considered. Details of the search terms are provided in Additional file 1.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All available retrospective cohort studies that compared females and males in the prognosis after OHCA and that had at least one of the following outcomes mentioned in this paper were included. The primary outcome was the survival from OHCA to discharge; the secondary outcomes were the survival from OHCA to hospital admission, the survival from admission to discharge, and favorable neurological outcome. In-hospital cardiac arrest-related research, animal research, basic research, letters, meta-analyses, case reports, reviews, abstracts, and studies without original data were excluded. For studies without raw data, we contacted the corresponding authors; if no response was received from the corresponding authors, the study was excluded.

Study selection

A total of 1042 studies were initially obtained, and after exclusion of repeated citations using Endnote, 949 studies remained. Two reviewers independently screened all titles and abstracts to identify potentially eligible studies. The full text of these potentially eligible studies was then screened to determine the eligibility of the study for our meta-analysis. All differences were arbitrated by the corresponding author. Agreement between the two reviewers independently rating the articles was assessed using the kappa statistic at each step of selection. Finally, 33 studies were included in downstream analyses.

Quality evaluation and data extraction

Study quality was estimated according to the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) because the included studies primarily consisted of retrospective cohort studies. Each study was scored using the “star” rating system of NOS based on three aspects: the selection of the research population, the comparability of the study group, and the evaluation of the results. The scoring ranged from 0 to 9 stars. A study with a score ≥ 7 was considered to be high-quality research. Overall, the quality of the included studies based on the NOS was high (see Additional file 2).

Data were extracted in duplicate independently by two reviewers using an Excel form. Any differences were arbitrated by the corresponding author. The studies were characterized by the name of the authors, the year of publication, the location of the study, the period of the study, the total number of patients included, and the percentage of females. The baseline data included the average age of males and females, the location of where a patient suffered OHCA, whether there were witnesses to the OHCA, the proportion of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (bystander CPR), shockable rhythm, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), in-hospital intervention, and the existence of cardiogenic factors. The primary outcome was the survival from OHCA to discharge. The survival from OHCA to discharge is also generally considered the overall survival rate. In this meta-analysis, the overall survival rate was divided into two stages, namely the survival from OHCA to admission and the survival from admission to discharge. The secondary outcomes were the survival from OHCA to hospital admission, the survival from admission to discharge, and favorable neurological outcome. Favorable neurological outcome was evaluated by attending physicians and categorized according to the Glasgow–Pittsburgh cerebral performance categories (CPCs) 1 month after discharge. The outcomes were dichotomized as good (CPC 1, 2) and poor (CPC 3–5).

Data analysis

The meta-analysis followed the guidelines outlined by the PRISMA 2009 checklist (see Additional file 3). The meta-analysis was performed using Stata software v. 15.0. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects model. A Chi-squared test was used to evaluate the statistical heterogeneity between studies. Statistical heterogeneity across the studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic to quantify inconsistencies among studies that are not attributable to chance. Because of the characteristics of this retrospective cohort study, there is heterogeneity among the studies due to the influence of the baseline; therefore, the random-effect model was used. We analyzed the source of heterogeneity using a meta-regression analysis, where the dependent variable was the log odds ratio of survival and the independent variables were the above-mentioned baseline data.

Peters’ test was used to test potential publication biases. We also determined the quality of the original research using a sensitivity analysis. A T test was used for a baseline analysis.

Results

Among the 1042 studies obtained in our initial search, 33 qualified articles (Fig. 1) were included in this meta-analysis. All 33 articles were full-text publications, from 34 countries and regions, with a total of 1,268,664 patients. All of the studies were retrospective cohort studies, and most of the data were obtained from local and national official databases. Agreement between the two reviewers was 94% for study selection and 91% for quality evaluation. No secondary analysis or additional publications were found related to the above-mentioned articles.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The process of study selection

Full size image

Fundamental characteristics of research

The studies included were conducted between 1980 and 2018, and the study locations included four continents: 11 from America, 12 from Europe, nine from Asia, and two from Oceania. There were five studies with a small sample size (number < 1000) and 17 studies with a large sample size (number > 10,000). Among the 33 studies, 28 studies included non-traumatic OHCA and likely cardiac origin patients only, three studies lacked clear information on the aetiology of OHCA (see Additional file 4).

Table 1 shows the baseline level of this meta-analysis. Compared with males, females were older (69.7 years vs. 65.4 years, p < 0.05), suffered OHCA more often at home (73.44% vs 63.84%, p < 0.05), and were less likely to have witnesses to their OHCA (58.39% vs 62.70%, p < 0.05). In addition, the frequency of shockable rhythm in females was lower (25.74% vs 39.62%, p < 0.05). There were no differences in bystander resuscitation based on sex (38.82% vs 41.89%, p > 0.05) and ROSC (26.97% vs 26.10%, p > 0.05). However, females were less likely to receive in-hospital interventions such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (27.63% vs 34.78%, p < 0.05), coronary angiography (CAG) (37.84% vs 42.7%, p < 0.05), and target body temperature management (TTM) ( 25.05% vs 40.49%, p < 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 1 Studies included in the meta-analysis and baseline characteristics
Full size table
Table 2 The sex difference in post-resuscitation care
Full size table

Among the 33 studies, 15 studies had data on admission survival rate between the sexes, nine studies had data on survival from admission to discharge, 27 studies had data on survival to discharge, and 15 studies included data on nervous system prognosis between the sexes.

Meta-analysis

Sex differences in survival after OHCA

Fifteen of the 33 studies were used to analyze the differences in survival from OHCA to admission, and we found no significant difference in survival from OHCA to admission between males and females (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.89–1.1) (Fig. 2). Heterogeneity analysis showed there was heterogeneity among 15 studies (χ2 = 247.82, df = 14, p < 0.001; I2 = 94.4%).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot and meta-analysis of the sex differences in survival from OHCA to admission

Full size image

A total of nine studies were analyzed to determine the difference in sex related to the survival from admission to discharge. The results showed that the survival from admission to discharge was significantly lower for females than for males (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.48–0.73) (Fig. 3). Heterogeneity analysis showed there was heterogeneity among nine studies (χ2 = 79.14, df = 8, p < 0.001; I2 = 89.9%).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Forest plot and meta-analysis of the sex differences in survival from admission to discharge

Full size image

A total of 27 studies were analyzed to determine the differences in survival from OHCA to discharge. The results showed that the survival to discharge was significantly lower for females than for males (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62–0.86) (Fig. 4). Heterogeneity analysis showed there was heterogeneity among 27 studies (χ2 = 1607.1, df = 26, p < 0.001; I2 = 98.4%).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot and meta-analysis of the sex differences in survival from OHCA to discharge

Full size image

Sex differences in neurological prognosis

Based on the comprehensive analysis of the neurological prognosis of 11 studies related to OHCA, a CPC score of 1–2 was regarded as a good prognosis. The results showed that the neurological prognosis of females after OHCA was not as optimistic as that of males; specifically, females had a lower probability of good neurological prognosis than males (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47–0.83) (Fig. 5). Heterogeneity analysis showed there was heterogeneity among 11 studies (χ2 = 1029.79, df = 10, p < 0.001; I2 = 99%).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Forest plot and meta-analysis of the sex differences in neurological prognosis

Full size image

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

Sensitivity analyses of the above four outcomes did not suggest that missing studies affected any conclusions appreciably (see Additional file 5).

To avoid Type I error, we assessed publication bias by Peters’ test. The p value of Peter’s test was 0.867, 0.831, 0.959, and 0.967. There was no evidence of publication bias.

Meta-regression

Considering the significant heterogeneity of above four outcomes, we conducted a meta-regression analysis to explore the source of heterogeneity. Table 3 shows the result of meta-regression. There was no significant association between rates of OHCA at home, of bystander-witnessed, of bystander CPR, and survival (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant correlation between the rate of initial shockable rhythm and prognosis (p < 0.05). Additionally, there is also a significant correlation between the rate of ROSC and survival from OHCA to discharge.

Table 3 The p value of meta-regression
Full size table

Discussion

In our baseline statistical analysis of OHCA patients, we found that females are older, which may be associated with coronary artery disease occurring 10–15 years later in females than in males; it may also be related to the longer life expectancy of females than males [5]. At the same time, females are more likely to have cardiac arrest at home than in public, which may be because females spend more time at home than males. As a result, females are less likely to be witnessed by bystanders during OHCA. Previous studies have shown that even when both males and females experience cardiac arrest with bystander witnesses, females are less likely to receive CPR because of conservative attitudes and privacy concerns [15]. However, our findings were not in agreement; we found no statistically significant difference in the proportion of females and males who received bystander CPR. This might be related to regional and temporal differences of the studies included in this meta-analysis. In two clinical studies in Japan, for example, data from 1998 to 2007 showed that the proportion of females and males receiving bystander CPR after OHCA was 28% and 34% [16], while data from 2013 to 2016 showed that the proportion of bystander CPR increased significantly, and the proportion of females receiving bystander CPR was even higher than males (56.4% vs 49.6%). We speculate that with the development of society, the comprehensive popularization of CPR-related knowledge, and the change of stereotypes, an increasing number of bystanders can perform CPR, which not only increase the proportion of bystander CPR, but also make up for the corresponding sex differences.

Previous meta-analyses have shown that factors, such as age, bystander witnesses, bystander CPR, and shockable rhythm, are all associated with the outcome of OHCA [17]. Our baseline statistics also showed some differences between females and males, but our analysis showed that there was no significant difference in survival between females and males after OHCA until admission. Even though the treatment measures were different from OHCA to admission, they had little effect on the survival at admission. Therefore, we speculate that some pre-hospital baseline factors (age, bystander witness, bystander CPR, and shockable rhythm) do not have an obvious immediate impact on the differences in survival from OHCA to admission between the sexes. Moreover, there may be corresponding long-term effects, such as affecting survival after discharge and nervous system prognosis of patients.

Our meta-analysis showed that after cardiac arrest, the survival of females from admission to discharge was significantly lower than that of males even considering no significant sex difference in survival at admission. The overall discharge survival rate for females remains much lower than that for males, and the neurological prognosis for females is also poor. Our fundamental analysis showed that females generally received less post-admission interventions, such as PCI, CAG, and TTM, than males. Previous studies have shown that women are significantly less likely to receive PCI after OHCA than men, although the prognosis after PCI is not significantly related to sex [7]. Therefore, the survival of females after OHCA is lower than males, which may be related to the differences in medical services received after admission.

In contrast, some studies have suggested that female hormones are the dominant factor in OHCA because estrogen can resist apoptosis and inflammation. Estrogen has a protective effect on heart and nerves, but this has not been widely confirmed in clinical practice [18]. We believe that although females have estrogen as a favorable prognostic factor, there are also corresponding unfavorable factors, such as age, pathophysiology, acceptance of medical services, and willingness to express opinion. First, females are older at onset and more likely to have various complications, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), tumor, and psychiatric history. Secondly, female pathophysiological differences make them more prone to complications such as bleeding [19] and acute renal failure [20]. Females have a lower acceptance of corresponding medical services, drug treatment, and invasive procedures. Additionally, females generally receive less corresponding nursing measures. For example, during OHCA, females were less likely than males to receive intravenous access and intraosseous access [8]. This may be related to the fact that nurses perceived intravenous access as more difficult in females than in males, although there was no difference in success rate. Finally, females are more willing to express their intentions and participate in the discussion about their death [21]. To a certain extent, these factors will affect the choice of resuscitation measures.

Combined with factors, such as education level, religious belief, and economic level, females are more likely to issue the instruction of "Do not attempt resuscitation" at the early stage of OHCA, thus adopting more conservative treatment [12]. Overall, this leads to a poor prognosis of OHCA in females.

Our meta-analysis also had some limitations. We have only searched three major databases, and there may be studies that are not included. Specifically, it was limited by the type of study; therefore, we could only analyze the correlation of various factors, but could not directly analyze the causal relationship. Moreover, the types of studies included were all observational studies, so it was difficult to control the corresponding confounding factors. For example, the time and location of studies were uncontrollable confounding factors. As mentioned above, the studies included were conducted between 1980 and 2018. However, post-resuscitation care guidelines have changed over the years these studies were conducted, especially in terms of TTM. On the other hand, the included studies were distributed in different emergency medical systems, and these emergency medical systems have different medical levels and different termination of resuscitation rule, which may affect the survival rate of OHCA. Based on the above factors, the heterogeneity of our meta-analysis is relatively high. However, we conducted meta-regression and sensitivity analysis to find the main source of heterogeneity and to ensure the reliability of the results. Finally, post-resuscitation care research is all affected by immortal time bias. Immortal time bias likely results in apparent lower mortality rates and thus overestimates of the potential benefits on survival.

Conclusions

Our results showed that after OHCA, the overall discharge survival rate of females was much lower than males and the prognosis of the nervous system was poor. We speculate that this may be related to different medical services and nursing measures; however, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the presence of several confounding factors. Many of these adverse conditions for females can be changed with education, so our results also provide new insights and directions for how to narrow the difference in prognosis between males and females after OHCA.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

OHCA:

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

EMS:

Emergency medical service

ROSC:

Return of spontaneous circulation

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

CAG:

Coronary angiography

TTM:

Target body temperature management

References

  1. Gräsner JT, Herlitz J, Koster RW, Rosell-Ortiz F, Stamatakis L, Bossaert L. Quality management in resuscitation—towards a European cardiac arrest registry (EuReCa). Resuscitation. 2011;82(8):989–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.02.047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rea TD, Eisenberg MS, Sinibaldi G, White RD. Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States. Resuscitation. 2004;63(1):17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berdowski J, Berg RA, Tijssen JGP, Koster RW. Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation. 2010;81(11):1479–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Atwood C, Eisenberg MS, Herlitz J, Rea TD. Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe. Resuscitation. 2005;67(1):75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Orth-Gomér K, Deter H-C. Sex and gender issues in cardiovascular research. Psychosom Med. 2015;77(9):1067–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Appelman Y, van Rijn BB, Ten Haaf ME, Boersma E, Peters SAE. Sex differences in cardiovascular risk factors and disease prevention. Atherosclerosis. 2015;241(1):211–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.01.027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeong JS, Kong SY, Shin SD, Ro YS, Song KJ, Hong KJ, Park JH, Kim TH. Gender disparities in percutaneous coronary intervention in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(4):632–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.06.068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mumma BE, Umarov T. Sex differences in the prehospital management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;105:161–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.05.029.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Safdar B, Nagurney JT, Anise A, DeVon HA, D’Onofrio G, Hess EP, Hollander JE, Legato MJ, McGregor AJ, Scott J, et al. Gender-specific research for emergency diagnosis and management of ischemic heart disease: proceedings from the 2014 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference Cardiovascular Research Workgroup. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(12):1350–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Vaccarino V, Krumholz HM, Yarzebski J, Gore JM, Goldberg RJ. Sex differences in 2-year mortality after hospital discharge for myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(3):173–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dicker B, Conaglen K, Howie G. Gender and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a New Zealand registry study. Emerg Med J. 2018;35(6):367–71. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Perman SM, Siry BJ, Ginde AA, Grossestreuer AV, Abella BS, Daugherty SL, Havranek EP. Sex differences in “do not attempt resuscitation” orders after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and the relationship to critical hospital interventions. Clin Ther. 2019;41(6):1029–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.03.017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Goto Y, Funada A, Maeda T, Okada H, Goto Y. Sex-specific differences in survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide, population-based observational study. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):263. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2547-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bougouin W, Mustafic H, Marijon E, Murad H, Dumas F, Barbouttis A, Jabre P, Beganton F, Empana JP, Cariou A, et al. Effect of gender on hospital discharge survival after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2014;94:55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blom MT, Oving I, Berdowski J, van Valkengoed IGM, Bardai A, Tan HL. Women have lower chances than men to be resuscitated and survive out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Eur Heart J. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kitamura T, Iwami T, Nichol G, Nishiuchi T, Hayashi Y, Nishiyama C, Sakai T, Kajino K, Hiraide A, Ikeuchi H, et al. Reduction in incidence and fatality of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in females of the reproductive age. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(11):1365–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sasson C, Rogers MAM, Dahl J, Kellermann AL. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3(1):63–81. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.889576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Iorga A, Cunningham CM, Moazeni S, Ruffenach G, Umar S, Eghbali M. The protective role of estrogen and estrogen receptors in cardiovascular disease and the controversial use of estrogen therapy. Biol Sex Differ. 2017;8(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-017-0152-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Karlsson V, Dankiewicz J, Nielsen N, Kern KB, Mooney MR, Riker RR, Rubertsson S, Seder DB, Stammet P, Sunde K, et al. Association of gender to outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—a report from the International Cardiac Arrest Registry. Crit Care. 2015a;19:182. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0904-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Geri G, Guillemet L, Dumas F, Charpentier J, Antona M, Lemiale V, Bougouin W, Lamhaut L, Mira J-P, Vinsonneau C, et al. Acute kidney injury after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: risk factors and prognosis in a large cohort. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(7):1273–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-3848-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Skulason B, Hauksdottir A, Ahcic K, Helgason AR. Death talk: gender differences in talking about one’s own impending death. BMC Palliat Care. 2014;13(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-13-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Okabayashi S, Matsuyama T, Kitamura T, Kiyohara K, Kiguchi T, Nishiyama C, Kobayashi D, Shimamoto T, Sado J, Kawamura T, et al. Outcomes of patients 65 years or older after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest based on location of cardiac arrest in Japan. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Winther-Jensen M, Hassager C, Kjaergaard J, Bro-Jeppesen J, Thomsen JH, Lippert FK, Køber L, Wanscher M, Søholm H. Women have a worse prognosis and undergo fewer coronary angiographies after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest than men. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018;7(5):414–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872617696368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. May S, Zhang L, Foley D, Brennan E, O’Neil B, Bork E, Levy P, Dunne R. Improvement in non-traumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival in Detroit from 2014 to 2016. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.118.009831.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Masterson S, Strömsöe A, Cullinan J, Deasy C, Vellinga A. Apples to apples: can differences in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcomes between Sweden and Ireland be explained by core Utstein variables? Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0505-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hansen CM, Kragholm K, Dupre ME, Pearson DA, Tyson C, Monk L, Rea TD, Starks MA, Nelson D, Jollis JG, et al. Association of bystander and first-responder efforts and outcomes according to sex: results from the North Carolina heart rescue statewide quality improvement initiative. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.118.009873.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Oh SH, Park KN, Lim J, Choi SP, Oh JS, Cho IS, Lee BK, Kim YH, Kim YM, Kim HJ, et al. The impact of sex and age on neurological outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with targeted temperature management. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):272. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1860-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hagihara A, Onozuka D, Ono J, Nagata T, Hasegawa M. Age × gender interaction effect on resuscitation outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120(3):387–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bougouin W, Dumas F, Marijon E, Geri G, Champigneulle B, Chiche JD, Varenne O, Spaulding C, Mira JP, Jouven X, et al. Gender differences in early invasive strategy after cardiac arrest: insights from the PROCAT registry. Resuscitation. 2017;114:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.02.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang J, Zhou X, Xing Q, Li Y, Zhang L, Zhou Q, Lu Y, Fan Y, Lizi A, Yan W, et al. Epidemiological investigation of sudden cardiac death in multiethnic Xinjiang Uyghur autonomous region in Northwest China. BMC Public Health. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6435-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Morrison LJ, Schmicker RH, Weisfeldt ML, Bigham BL, Berg RA, Topjian AA, Abramson BL, Atkins DL, Egan D, Sopko G, et al. Effect of gender on outcome of out of hospital cardiac arrest in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. Resuscitation. 2016;100:76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bosson N, Kaji AH, Fang A, Thomas JL, French WJ, Shavelle D, Niemann JT. Sex differences in survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the era of regionalized systems and advanced post-resuscitation care. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.116.004131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Karlsson V, Dankiewicz J, Nielsen N, Kern KB, Mooney MR, Riker RR, Rubertsson S, Seder DB, Stammet P, Sunde K, et al. Association of gender to outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—a report from the International Cardiac Arrest Registry. Crit Care. 2015b. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0904-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wissenberg M, Hansen CM, Folke F, Lippert FK, Weeke P, Karlsson L, Rajan S, Sondergaard KB, Kragholm K, Christensen EF, et al. Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in relation to sex: a nationwide registry-based study. Resuscitation. 2014;85(9):1212–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.06.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Safdar B, Stolz U, Stiell IG, Cone DC, Bobrow BJ, deBoehr M, Dreyer J, Maloney J, Spaite DW. Differential survival for men and women from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest varies by age: results from the OPALS study. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(12):1503–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Johnson MA, Haukoos JS, Larabee TM, Daugherty S, Chan PS, McNally B, Sasson C. Females of childbearing age have a survival benefit after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.09.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bray JE, Stub D, Bernard S, Smith K. Exploring gender differences and the “oestrogen effect” in an Australian out-of-hospital cardiac arrest population. Resuscitation. 2013;84(7):957–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Teodorescu C, Reinier K, Uy-Evanado A, Ayala J, Mariani R, Wittwer L, Gunson K, Jui J, Chugh SS. Survival advantage from ventricular fibrillation and pulseless electrical activity in women compared to men: the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012;34(3):219–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-012-9669-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ahn KO, Shin SD, Hwang SS. Sex disparity in resuscitation efforts and outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(9):1810–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2012.02.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Akahane M, Ogawa T, Koike S, Tanabe S, Horiguchi H, Mizoguchi T, Yasunaga H, Imamura T. The effects of sex on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes. Am J Med. 2011;124(4):325–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Adielsson A, Hollenberg J, Karlsson T, Lindqvist J, Lundin S, Silfverstolpe J, Svensson L, Herlitz J. Increase in survival and bystander CPR in out-of-hospital shockable arrhythmia: bystander CPR and female gender are predictors of improved outcome. Experiences from Sweden in an 18-year perspective. Heart. 2011;97(17):1391–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2011.222711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Arrich J, Sterz F, Fleischhackl R, Uray T, Losert H, Kliegel A, Wandaller C, Kohler K, Laggner AN. Gender modifies the influence of age on outcome after successfully resuscitated cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study. Medicine. 2006;85(5):288–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.md.0000236954.72342.20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mahapatra S, Bunch TJ, White RD, Hodge DO, Packer DL. Sex differences in outcome after ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2005;65(2):197–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.10.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cline SL, von Der Lohe E, Newman MM, Groh WJ. Factors associated with poor survival in women experiencing cardiac arrest in a rural setting. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2(5):492–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.01.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Herlitz J, Engdahl J, Svensson L, Young M, Angquist KA, Holmberg S. Is female sex associated with increased survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Resuscitation. 2004;60(2):197–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.09.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim C, Fahrenbruch CE, Cobb LA, Eisenberg MS. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in men and women. Circulation. 2001;104(22):2699–703. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4701.099784.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pell JP, Sirel J, Marsden AK, Cobbe SM. Sex differences in outcome following community-based cardiopulmonary arrest. Eur Heart J. 2000;21(3):239–44. https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.1999.1629.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Perers E, Abrahamsson P, Bang A, Engdahl J, Lindqvist J, Karlson BW, Waagstein L, Herlitz J. There is a difference in characteristics and outcome between women and men who suffer out of hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 1999;40(3):133–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Nature Scientific Funding of China (Nos. 81672264, 81871858).

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China

    Hao Lei, Jiahui Hu, Leiling Liu & Danyan Xu

Authors
  1. Hao Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiahui Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leiling Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Danyan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HL, JH, and DX initiated this article, conducted data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. LL revised our first draft and provided valuable comments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danyan Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1

. Search strategy.

Additional file 2

. Quality evaluation.

Additional file 3

. PRISMA checklist.

Additional file 4

. The aetiology of OHCA in the population included in the study.

Additional file 5

. Sensitivity analyses.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lei, H., Hu, J., Liu, L. et al. Sex differences in survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis. Crit Care 24, 613 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03331-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03331-5

Keyword

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535