1887

Abstract

Rifaximin is a rifampicin derivative, poorly absorbed by the gastro-intestinal tract. We studied the susceptibility to rifamixin of 1082 isolates; among these,184 isolates from a strain collection were tested by an in-house rifaximin disc (40 µg) diffusion test, by an in-house rifaximin broth microdilution test, by rifampicin Etest and by gene sequencing. In the absence of respective CLSI or EUCAST MIC breakpoints for rifaximin and rifampicin against we chose MIC ≥32 µg ml as criterion for reduced susceptibility. To further validate the disc diffusion test 898 consecutive clinical isolates were analysed using the disc diffusion test, the Etest and gene sequence analysis for all resistant strains. Rifaximin broth microdilution tests of the 184 reference strains yielded rifaximin MICs ranging from 0.001 ( = 1) to ≥1024 µg ml ( = 61); 62 isolates showed a reduced susceptibility (MIC ≥32 µg ml). All of these 62 strains showed gene mutations producing amino acid substitutions; the rifampicin- and rifaximin-susceptible strains showed either a wild-type sequence or silent amino acid substitutions (19 strains). For 11 arbitrarily chosen isolates with rifaximin MICs of >1024 µg ml, rifaximin end-point MICs were determined by broth dilution: 4096 µg ml ( = 2), 8192 µg ml ( = 6), 16 384 µg ml ( = 2) and 32 678 µg ml ( = 1). Rifampicin Etests on the 184 reference strains yielded MICs ranging from ≤0.002 ( = 117) to ≥32 µg ml ( = 59). Using a 38 mm inhibition zone as breakpoint for reduced susceptibility the use of rifaximin disc diffusion yielded 59 results correlating with those obtained by use of rifaximin broth microdilution in 98.4 % of the 184 strains tested. Rifampicin Etests performed on the 898 clinical isolates revealed that 67 isolates had MICs of ≥32 µg ml. There were no discordant results observed among these isolates with reduced susceptibility using an MIC of ≥32 µg ml as breakpoint for reduced rifampicin susceptibility and a <38 mm inhibition zone as breakpoint for reduced rifaximin susceptibility. The prevalence of reduced susceptibility was 7.5 % for all isolates tested. However, for PCR ribotype 027 the prevalence of reduced susceptibility was 26 %. Susceptibility testing in the microbiology laboratory therefore could have an impact on the care and outcome of patients with infection. Our results show that rifaximin – despite its water-insolubility – may be a suitable candidate for disc diffusion testing.

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.028571-0
2011-08-01
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/60/8/1206.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.028571-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2007 In Methods for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria approved standard , 7th edn. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute;
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Corazza G. R., Ventrucci M., Strocchi A., Sorge M., Pranzo L., Pezzilli R., Gasbarrini G. 1988; Treatment of small intestine bacterial overgrowth with rifaximin, a non-absorbable rifamycin. J Int Med Res 16:312–316[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Doern G. V., Vautour R., Gaudet M., Levy B. 1994; Clinical impact of rapid in vitro susceptibility testing and bacterial identification. J Clin Microbiol 32:1757–1762[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. EUCAST 2010; Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters, Version 1.1. http://www.srga.org/eucastwt/MICTAB/MICmiscellaneous.html
  5. Festi D., Mazzella G., Parini P., Ronchi M., Cipolla A., Orsini M., Sangermano A., Bazzoli F., Aldini R., Roda E. 1992; Treatment of hepatic encephalopathy with non-absorbable antibiotics. Ital J Gastroenterol 24:Suppl. 214–16[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Indra A., Huhulescu S., Schneeweis M., Hasenberger P., Kernbichler S., Fiedler A., Wewalka G., Allerberger F., Kuijper E. J. 2008; Characterization of Clostridium difficile isolates using capillary gel electrophoresis-based PCR ribotyping. J Med Microbiol 57:1377–1382 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jiang Z. D., Ke S., Palazzini E., Riopel L., Dupont H. 2000; In vitro activity and fecal concentration of rifaximin after oral administration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:2205–2206 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jiang Z. D., DuPont H. L., La Rocco M., Garey K. W. 2010; In vitro susceptibility of Clostridium difficile to rifaximin and rifampin in 359 consecutive isolates at a university hospital in Houston, Texas. J Clin Pathol 63:355–358 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnson S., Schriever C., Galang M., Kelly C. P., Gerding D. N. 2007; Interruption of recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea episodes by serial therapy with vancomycin and rifaximin. Clin Infect Dis 44:846–848 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kato N., Ou C. Y., Kato H., Bartley S. L., Brown V. K., Dowell V. R. J. Jr, Ueno K. 1991; Identification of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 29:33–37[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kato H., Kato N., Katow S., Maegawa T., Nakamura S., Lyerly D. M. 1999; Deletions in the repeating sequences of the toxin A gene of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile strains. FEMS Microbiol Lett 175:197–203 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. O’Connor J. R., Galang M. A., Sambol S. P., Hecht D. W., Vedantam G., Gerding D. N., Johnson S. 2008; Rifampin and rifaximin resistance in clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:2813–2817 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Parenti F., Lancini G. 2003; Rifamycins. In Antibiotic and Chemotherapy pp. 374–381 Edited by Finch R. G., Greenwood D., Norrby S. R., Whitley R. J. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Richter S. S., Ferraro J. A. 2007; Susceptibility testing instrumentation and computerized expert systems for data analysis and interpretation. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology pp. 245–256 Edited by Murray P. M., Baron E. J., Jorgensen J. H., Landry M. L., Pfaller M. A. Washington: American Society for Microbiology;
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ripa S., Mignini F., Prenna M., Falcioni E. 1987; In vitro antibacterial activity of rifaximin against Clostridium difficile, Campylobacter jejunii and Yersinia spp.. Drugs Exp Clin Res 13:483–488[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Spigaglia P., Mastrantonio P. 2002; Molecular analysis of the pathogenicity locus and polymorphism in the putative negative regulator of toxin production (TcdC) among Clostridium difficile clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol 40:3470–3475 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Struelens M. J. 2003; The problem of resistance. In Antibiotic and Chemotherapy pp. 25–47 Edited by Finch R. G., Greenwood D., Norrby S. R., Whitley R. J. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone;
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Stubbs S. L., Brazier J. S., Talbot P. R., Duerden B. I. 2000; PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of Bacteroides spp. and characterization of nitroimidazole resistance genes. J Clin Microbiol 38:3209–3213[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Turnidge J., Paterson D. L. 2007; Setting and revising antibacterial susceptibility breakpoints. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:391–408 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. van den Berg R. J., Claas E. C. J., Oyib D. H., Klaassen C. H. W., Dijkshoorn L., Brazier J. S., Kuijper E. J. 2004; Characterization of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile isolates from outbreaks in different countries by amplified fragment length polymorphism and PCR ribotyping. J Clin Microbiol 42:1035–1041 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Willerroider M. 2009; Colidimin in neuer Packungsgröße. Medical Tribune 41:17
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wiström J., Norrby S. R., Myhre E. B., Eriksson S., Granström G., Lagergren L., Englund G., Nord C. E., Svenungsson B. 2001; Frequency of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in 2462 antibiotic-treated hospitalized patients: a prospective study. J Antimicrob Chemother 47:43–50 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.028571-0
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.028571-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error