Elsevier

Annals of Oncology

Volume 26, Issue 5, May 2015, Pages 992-997
Annals of Oncology

original articles
epidemiology
Drug–drug interactions in patients treated for cancer: a prospective study on clinical interventions

https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv029Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

ABSTRACT

Drug interactions are of major concern, since cancer patients take many medications and may have serious consequences. Therefore, a study was designed to identify interactions leading to interventions. It was revealed that the consultancy of the clinical pharmacologist led to a doubling in interventions. To improve the safe use of drugs in oncology, an assessment of prescribed drugs is needed.

Background

Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) are of major concern in oncology, since cancer patients typically take many concomitant medications. Retrospective studies have been conducted to determine the prevalence of DDIs. However, prospective studies on DDIs needing interventions in cancer patients have not yet been carried out. Therefore, a prospective study was designed to identify DDIs leading to interventions among ambulatory cancer patients receiving anticancer treatment.

Patients and methods

Patients starting with a new treatment regimen with i.v. or oral anticancer medication were asked to participate. The patients’ medication was checked for DDIs by using drug interaction software. An expert team of clinical pharmacologists evaluated the relevance of these identified DDIs. If a DDI was qualified as potentially clinically relevant, an intervention was proposed to the treating (hemato)oncologist. Several variables were studied as determinants for performing an intervention. Descriptive statistics and uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out.

Results

In this study, 302 patients were included. A total of 603 DDIs were identified by the drug interaction software and judged by the expert team. Of all 603 DDIs, 120 DDIs were considered potentially clinically relevant. These 120 DDIs, present in a total of 81 patients, resulted in a clinical intervention already executed by the (hemato)oncologist in 39 patients (13%), while an additional intervention was proposed by a clinical pharmacologist in 42 patients (14%). The number of comorbidities and the number of ‘over-the-counter’ drugs were identified as determinants.

Conclusions

Clinical interventions on DDIs are frequently required among patients starting with anticancer therapy. Structured screening for these potentially clinically relevant DDIs, by (hemato)oncologists in close collaborations with clinical pharmacologists, should take place before the start and during anticancer treatment.

Clinical Trials number

This study was registered at the Dutch Trial Registry under number NTR3760.

Key words

drug–drug interactions
cancer
pharmacology
pharmacokinetics
pharmacodynamics
medication review

Cited by (0)

This study was presented at the ESMO 2014 Congress (26–30 September 2014), Madrid, Spain (abstract #7310).