An endoscopically implantable device stimulates the lower esophageal sphincter on demand by remote control: a study using a canine model

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aims: Implantable microstimulators (IMS) have been used in a variety of medical conditions. Selective stimulation to increase lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure may be useful in the control of gastroesophageal reflux disease. We evaluated on-demand stimulation of the LES with an endoscopically implanted microstimulator. Materials and methods: We performed acute experiments in three 30-kg dogs. After LES manometry, a 3.3 mm × 28 mm microstimulator (the Bion®) was implanted into the LES. Manometry was repeated with and without IMS stimulation to record the changes in LES pressure. Stimulation amplitude was varied from 3 mA to 10 mA, with a fixed frequency of 20 Hz and a pulse width of 200 µsec. Results: The mean LES pressures prior to IMS implantation in the three dogs were 13.0 mm Hg, 5.0 mm Hg, and 14.9 mm Hg. The mean pressures were not significantly changed by IMS placement. There were no documented changes in LES pressure when the amplitude of stimulation was less than 8 mA. After stimulation of the IMS at a setting of 10 mA in dogs 1 and 2 and at 8mA in dog 3, however, the resultant LES pressures were 62.1 mm Hg, 35.1 mm Hg, and 26.8 mm Hg respectively, more than three times higher than post-implantation baseline levels (P < 0.02). Conclusions: The LES pressure can be increased using an on-demand microstimulator. The implantation procedure is minimally invasive, represents a novel therapeutic approach to gastroesophageal reflux disease, and may have therapeutic potential for other gastrointestinal motility disorders.

References

• 1 Loeb G E, Zamin C J, Schulman J H, Troyk P R. Injectable microstimulator for functional electrical stimulation.  Med Biol Eng Comput. 1991;  29 NS13-NS19
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Baker L L, Palmer E, Waters R L, Chun S N. Rehabilitation of the arm and hand following stroke: a clinical trial with Bions.  Proc IEEE EMBS. 2004;  2 4186-4188
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Richmond F J, Loeb G E, Dupot A C. et al . Clinical trials of Bions for therapeutic electrical stimulation.  Proc IEEE EMBS. 2001;  2 1301-1304
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Carbunaru R, Whitehurst T, Jaax K. et al . Rechargeable battery-powered Bion microstimulators for neuromodulation.  Proc IEEE EMBS. 2004;  2 4193-4196
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Tran W H, Loeb G E, Richmond F J. et al . First subject evaluated with simulated Bion treatment in posterior genioglossus to prevent obstructive sleep apnea.  Proc IEEE EMBS. 2004;  2 4287-4289
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Baker L L, Waters R L, Winstein C. et al . Neural interface and control proceedings. Clinical applications of Bion microstimulators.  Proc IEEE EMBS. 2005;  2 185-188
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 McCallum R W, Chen J D, Lin Z. et al . Gastric pacing improves emptying and symptoms in patients with gastroparesis.  Gastroenterology. 1998;  114 456-461
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Forster J, Sarosiek I, Delcore R. et al . Gastric pacing is a new surgical treatment for gastroparesis.  Am J Surg. 2001;  182 676-681
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Miller K, Hoeller E, Aigner F. The implantable gastric stimulator for obesity: an update of the European experience in the LOSS (Laparoscopic Obesity Stimulation Survey) study.  Treat Endocrinol. 2006;  5 53-58
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Cigaina V. Long-term follow-up of gastric stimulation for obesity: the Mestre 8-year experience.  Obes Surg. 2004;  14 S14-S22
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Bagger J P, Jensen B S, Johannsen G. Long-term outcome of spinal cord electrical stimulation in patients with refractory chest pain.  Clin Cardiol. 1998;  21 286-288
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Ganio E, Luc A R, Clerico G, Trompetto M. Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of fecal incontinence: a novel approach for intractable fecal incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 619-629
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 DiMarco A F, Onders R P, Ignagni A R, Mortimer J T. Phrenic nerve pacing via intramuscular diaphragm electrodes in tetraplegic subjects.  Chest. 2005;  127 671-678
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Elefteriades J A, Quin J A, Hogan J F. et al . Long-term follow-up of pacing of the conditioned diaphragm in quadriplegia.  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002;  25 897-906
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Payne B R, Tiel R L, Payne M S, Fisch B. Vagus nerve stimulation for chronic intractable hiccups.  J Neurosurg. 2005;  102 935-937
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Finlayson S R, Laycock W S, Birkmeyer J D. National trends in utilization and outcomes of antireflux surgery.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 864-867
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Iqbal A, Awad Z, Simkins J. et al . Repair of 104 failed anti-reflux operations.  Ann Surg. 2006;  244 42-51
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Martin C, Dodds W, Liem H. et al . Diaphragmatic contribution to gastroesophageal competence and reflux in dogs.  Am J Physiol. 1992;  263 G551-G557
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Dent J, Holloway R H, Toouli J. et al . Mechanisms of lower esophageal sphincter incompetence in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux.  Gut. 1988;  29 1020-1028
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

S. V. Kantsevoy, MD, PhD

Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University

Room 423, 1830 E. Monument Street

Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA

Fax: +1-410-614-7707

Email: svkan@jhmi.edu