Download PDF
Nervenheilkunde 2015; 34(04): 235-239
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1627580
Peer-Begleitung
Schattauer GmbH

Bedeutung und Wirksamkeit von Peer-Arbeit in der psychiatrischen Versorgung

Übersicht des internationalen ForschungsstandesRelevance and evidence of peer support work in psychiatric servicesAn overview of recent international research
C. Mahlke
1   Uniklinik Hamburg Eppendorf
,
U. Krämer
2   King’s College London
,
R. Kilian
3   Universität Ulm, Abteilung Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie II
,
T. Becker
4   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie II der Universität Ulm, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingegangen am: 09 January 2015

angenommen am: 13 January 2015

Publication Date:
22 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Gegenstand und Ziel:Dieser Artikel befasst sich mit der aktuellen internationalen Forschung zur klinischen Peer-Arbeit. Material und Methoden: Es werden zunächst einige Überblicksarbeiten zur Evidenz von Peer-Arbeit bei schweren psychischen Störungen vorgestellt, relevante Entwicklungen und Erkenntnisse und die sich daraus ergebenden Problemstellungen werden dann im Licht aktueller betroffenengeleiteter oder partnerschaftlicher Forschungsprojekte diskutiert. Schlussfolgerungen: Peer-Arbeit ist ein vielversprechender Ansatz für die betroffenen Nutzer, der zudem das Potenzial hat, die psychiatrische Versorgung im Sinne der Recovery-Orientierung zu verbessern. Klinische Relevanz: Peer-Arbeit sollte auch in der deutschen psychiatrischen Versorgung regelhaft eingesetzt werden, die Kostendeckung für Träger von Versorgungseinrichtungen wird empfohlen.

Summary

Objective: This article focuses on recent international literature on peer support work in formal mental health services. Material and methods: Recent reviews, meta analyses and a meta synthesis of the effectiveness of peer support for severe mental disorders are introduced. New developments and suggestions will be discussed against the background of peer-led research projects. Conclusions:Peer support is a promising intervention for service users, but also contribute to enhance the recovery-orientation of psychiatric services. Clinical relevance: Formal mental health services in Germany should implement peersupport on a broader level and the acknowledgement of peer-services as reimbursable should be sought.

Schlüsselwörter

Peer-Arbeit - Peer-Support - Betroffenenforschung - Psychiatrie - Nutzerbeteiligung

Keywords

Peer support - Peer led research - psychiatric services - user involvement
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Louis BrownD. Consumer-Run Mental Health: Framework for Recovery. Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Faulkner A. et al. Mental health peer support in England: Piecing together the jigsaw. 2013 http://www.mind.org.uk/media/418953/Peer-Sup port-Report-Peerfest-2013.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Shepherd G, Boardman J, Slade M. Making recovery a reality. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health London. 2008 http://www.centreformental health.org.uk/pdfs/Making_recovery_a_reality_policy_paper.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Davidson L. et al. Peer support among persons with severe mental illnesses: a review of evidence and experience. World Psychiatry 2012; 11 (02) 123.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Daniels AS. et al. Pillars of peer support: advancing the role of peer support specialists in promoting recovery. Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice 2012; 02: 60-69.
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Repper J. ImROC briefing paper 7. Peer support workers: a practical guide to implementation. London: Centre for Mental Health; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Bock T. Priebe S. Psychosis-seminars, an unconventional appoach for how users, carers and propfessionals can learn from each other. Psychiatric Services 2005; 11: 1441-1443.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Utschakowski J. Training programme for people with experience in mental health crisis to work as trainer and peer supporter. Ex-In Curriculum. 2007. http://www.adam-europe.eu/prj/1871/prd/ 3/1/Curriculum_english%20i.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Tse S. et al. Recovery in Hong Kong: Service user participation in mental health services. International Review of Psychiatry 2012; 24 (01) 40-47.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mead S, Hilton D, Curtis L. Peer support: A theoretical perspective. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 2001; 25 (02) 134-141.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Repper J, Carter T. A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. J Ment Health 2011; 20: 392-411.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Doughty C, Tse S. Can consumer-led mental health services be equally effective? An integrative review of CLMH services in high-income countries. Community Mental Health J 2011; 47: 252-266.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gillard S. et al. New ways of working in mental health services: a qualitative, comparative case study assessing and informing the emergence of new peer worker roles in mental health services in England. Full Report. London: Health Services Delivery & Research; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Byrne L. A Grounded theory study of lived experience mental health practitioners within the wider workforce. Central Queensland University. PhD thesis. 2013 http://www.cqu.edu.au/ data/assets/ pdf_file/0008/100052/PhD_Thesis_Louise_Byrne_LivedExperinceMHroles.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pitt V. et al. Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013; 3.
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Loyd-Evans B. et al. A systematic review and metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials of peer support for people with severe mental illness. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 14. (39).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rogers ES. et al. Effects of participation in consumer-operated service programs on both personal and organizationally mediated empowerment: results of multisite study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2007; 47 (06) 785-99.
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Sledge WH. et al. Effectiveness of peer support in reducing readmissions among people with multiple psychiatric hospitalizations. Psychiatr Serv 2011; 62: 541-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hardiman ER. Comment on: No difference in psychosocial and mental health outcomes for clients receiving statutory mental health services from consumer-providers compared to professionals. Evidence Based Mental Health 2013; 16: 80.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Walker G, Bryant W. Peer support in adult mental health services: A metasynthesis of qualitative findings. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 2013; 36 (01) 28-34.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Chinman M. et al. Peer support services for individuals with serious mental illnesses: Assessing the evidence. Psychiatric Services 2014; 65: 4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mahlke CI, Krämer UM, Becker T, Bock T. Peer support in mental health services. Current opinion in psychiatry 2014; 27 (04) 276-281.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Chamberlin J. On our own: Patient-controlled alternatives to the mental health system. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1979
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Stastny P, Lehmann P. Statt Psychiatrie 2. Berlin: Antipsychiatrieverlag. 2007
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rose D. Users’ voices: The perspectives of mental health service users on community and hospital care. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health 2001
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Faulkner A. Layzell S. Strategies for living: a report of user-led research into people’s strategies for living with mental distress. London: Mental Health Foundation; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Faulkner A. Kalathil K. The freedom to be, the chance to dream: Preserving user-led peer support in mental health. London: Together; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Kalathil J. Dancing to our own tunes: Reassessing black and minority ethnic mental health service user involvement. London, UK: National Survivor User Network in collaboration with Catch-a-Fiya; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Faulkner A. Basset T. A helping hand: taking peer support into the 21st century. Mental Health and Social Inclusion 2012; 16 (01) 41-47.
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Byrne L. et al. Things you can’t learn from books: Teaching recovery from a lived experience perspective. International journal of mental health nursing 2013; 22 (03) 195-204.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Rose D. et al. How do managers and leaders in the National Health Service and social care respond to service user involvement in mental health services in both its traditional and emergent forms? The ENSUE study. Health Services and Delivery Research 2014; 02: 10.
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Hamilton AB. et al. Implementation of consumer providers into mental health intensive case management teams. The journal of behavioral health services & research. 2013; 1-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Russo J, Rose D. But what if nobody’s going to sit down and have a real conversation with you? Service user/survivor perspectives on human rights. Journal of Public Mental Health 2013; 04: 184-192.
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Repper J, Perkins R. The team recovery implementation plan: A framework for creating recovery-focused services. Implementing Recovery Through Organisational Change, London. 2013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Slade M. et al. Uses and abuses of recovery: implementing recovery oriented practices in mental health systems. World Psychiatry 2014; 01: 12-20.
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Pluye P, Hong QN. Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health 2014; 35: 29-45.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Robert W. et al. Evaluation of systems-oriented public health interventions: Alternative Research Designs. Annu Rev Public Health 2014; 35.
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Haro et al. Roadmap for mental health research in Europe. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2014; 23 (01) 1-14.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar