Transorale Roboter-assistierte Chirurgie von Kopf-Hals-Tumoren: Eine Fallserie mit 17 Patienten

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund:

In der Kopf-Hals-Tumorchirurgie gewann in den letzten Jahren, insbesondere in Nordamerika, die transorale Roboter-assistierte Chirurgie (TORS) an Bedeutung. Demgegenüber beschäftigen sich in Deutschland bisher nur wenige Arbeitsgruppen mit der Anwendung dieses Systems. Aufgrund der zu erwartenden Weiterentwicklung von Robotersystemen halten wir es für sinnvoll sich dieser neuen Technik zu stellen.

Material und Methoden:

Im Zeitraum von Mai 2011 bis Juni 2012 wurden an unserer Klinik 17 Patienten mit Tumoren des Oropharynx, des Zungengrunds und der Supraglottis mit dem da Vinci SI HD® System operiert. In einer prospektiven Untersuchung überprüften wir das Verfahren in Hinblick auf Einstellbarkeit, Visualisierung, und Resektabilität des Tumors. Zusätzlich wurden die Vorbereitungs- und Operationszeiten erfasst und die Kosten des Systems evaluiert.

Ergebnisse:

Alle Tumore des Zungengrunds (n=5) und des Oropharynx (n=9) konnten gut eingestellt, visualisiert und reseziert werden. Im Bereich der Supraglottis (n=3) waren 2 Tumore nicht ausreichend einstellbar und die Operation wurde mit einer transoralen mikroskopischen Laserresektion zu Ende geführt. Das elektrische Messer und der Tm:Yag-Laser des da Vinci-Roboters schnitten mit einer breiten Koagulationszone bei guter Blutstillung. Die Kosten für den medizinischen Bedarf und die Leasinggebühren betrugen in unserer Klinik 6 280 € pro Fall.

Schlussfolgerung:

Im Bereich des Zungengrunds und des Oropharynx gelang eine gute Visualisierung des Tumors mit dem da Vinci-System. Im supraglottischen Bereich kann aufgrund der Anordnung der Roboterarme und der engen anatomischen Verhältnisse die Resektion der Tumore erschwert sein. Trotz der hohen Kosten stellt das da Vinci-System eine interessante Ergänzung der bestehenden chirurgischen Verfahren dar.

Abstract

Transoral Robotic Surgery for Head and Neck Tumors: A Series of 17 Patients

Background:

Within the last years transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has gained importance in the resection of head and neck tumors, especially in North America. In contrast only few groups in Germany have studied this system so far. In respect to potential future developments in surgical robotic systems it seems reasonable to deal with this system.

Material and Methods:

17 patients with tumors of the oropharynx, the base of tongue or the supraglottic area were treated with TORS in our clinic, between May 2011 and June 2012. In a prospective study we analyzed the exposure, visualization and resectability of these tumors using the da Vinci-system. In addition, set up and operation time, as well as costs were evaluated.

Results:

All neoplasms of the oropharynx (n=9) and the tongue base (n=5) could be well exposed, visualized and resected. In the supraglottic area (n=3) 2 tumors could not be properly exposed and therefore resection was converted to a transoral microscopic laser approach. Resection with the cautery spatula tip or the Tm:YAG-laser fibre caused wide coagulation zones, but resulted in good hemostasis. The costs for the medical equipment and the leasing rate were 6 280 € per case at our institution.

Conclusion:

Tumors of the tongue base and oropharynx could be easily visualized with help of the da Vinci-system. The resection of supraglottic tumors can be challenging, due to the arrangement of the robotic-arms and the narrow anatomic conditions. Despite its high costs, the da Vinci-system is a potentially interesting supplementation to existing surgical techniques.

• Literatur

• 1 Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accurancy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1988; 35: 153-160
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Paul HA, Bargar WL, Mittlestadt B, Musits B, Taylor RH, Kazanzides P, Zuhars J, Williamson B, Hanson W. Development of a surgical robot for cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; (Dec) 285: 57-66
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Satava RM. Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002; 12: 6-16
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Stephenson ER, Sankholkar S, Ducko CT, Damiano RJ. Robotically-assisted microsurgery for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 1064-1067
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Margossian H, Garcia Ruiz A, Falcone T, Goldberg J, Attaran M, Gagner M. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical uterine horn anastomosis. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 50-534
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Reichenspurner H, Damiano R, Mack M, Boehm DH, Gulbins H, Detter C, Meiser B, Ellgass R, Reichart B. Use of the voice-controlled and computer-assisted surgical system Zeus for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 118: 11-16
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB. Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc Aug 1998; 12 (08) 1091
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Abbou CC, Hoznec A, Salomon L, Lobontiu A, Saint F, Cicco A, Antiphon P, Chopin D. Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot: Report of a case. Prog Urol sep 2000; 10 (04) 520-523
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Chapman WH, Albrecht RJ, Kim VB, Young JA, Chitwood WR. Computer-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy with the da Vinci surgical robot. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2002; 12 (03) 155-159
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Haus BM, Kambham N, Le D, Moll FM, Gourin C, Terris DJ. Surgical robotic applications in otolaryngology. Laryngoscope Jul 2003; 113 (07) 1139-1144
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Hockstein NG, Nolan JP, O´Malley Jr BW, Woo YJ. Robotic microlaryngeal surgery: a technical feasibility study using the daVinci surgical robot and an airway mannequin. Laryngoscope May 2005; 115 (05) 780-785
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Hockstein NG, Nolan JP, O´Malley Jr BW, WooY J. Robot- Assisted Pharyngeal and Laryngeal Microsurgery: Results of Robotic Cadaver Dissections. Laryngoscope Jun 2005; 115 (06) 1003-1008
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Weinstein GS, O´Malley Jr BW, Hockstein NG. Transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic laryngectomy in a canine model. Laryngoscope Jul 2005; 115 (07) 1315-1319
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 McLeod IK, Brooks DB, Mair EA. Potential applications of the da Vinci minimally invasive surgical robotic system in otolaryngology. Ear Nose Throat J. 2005; 84 (08) 483-487
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 McLeod IK, Melder PC. Da Vinci robot-assisted excision of a vallecular cyst: a case report. Ear Nose Throat J. 2005; 84 (03) 170-172
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 O´Malley Jr BW, Weinstein GS, Snyder W, Hockstein NG. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (08) 1465-1472
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 O’Malley Jr BW, Weinstein GS, Hockstein NG. Transoral tobotic surgery (TORS): glottic microsurgery in a canine model. J Voice 2006; 20: 263-268
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Weinstein GS, O´Malley Jr BW, Snyder W, Hockstein NG. Transoral robotic surgery: Supraglottic partial laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2007; 116 (01) 19-23
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Solares CA, Strome M. Transoral robot-assisted CO₂ laser supraglottic laryngectomy. Experimental and clinical data Laryngoscope 2007; (May) 117: 817-820
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Desai S, Sung CK, Jang DW, Genden EM. Transoral robotic surgery using a carbon dioxide flexible laser for tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract. Laryngoscope 2008; (Dec) 118: 2187-2189
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Genden EM, Desai S, Sung CK. Transoral robotic surgery for the management of head and neck cancer: A preliminary experience. Head Neck 2009; 31: 283-289
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Remacle M, Matar N, Lawson G, Bachy V, Delos M, Nollevaux MC. Combining a new CO₂ laser wave guide with transoral robotic surgery: a feasibility study on four patients with malignant tumors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 269: 1833-1837
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Weinstein GS, O’Malley Jr BW, Snyder W, Sherman E, Quon H. Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy. Arch otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Dec 2007; 133 (12) 1220-1226
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 O’Malley Jr BW, Quon H, Leonhardt FD, Chalian AA, Weinstein GS. Transoral robotic surgery for parapharyngeal space tumors. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2010; 72 (06) 332-336
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Steiner W. Results of curative laser microsurgery of laryngeal carcinomas. Am J Otolaryngol 1993; 14 (02) 116-121
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Ambrosch P. The role of laser microsurgery in the treatment of laryngeal cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 15 (02) 82-88
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Silver CE, Beitler JB, Shaha AR, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. Current trends in initial management of laryngeal cancer: The declining use of open surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 266: 1333-1352
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Takes RP, Silver CE, Bradley PJ, Haigentz Jr M, Wolf GT, Shaha AR, Hartl DM, Olofsson J, Langendijk JA, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. International Head and Neck Scientific Group. Current trends in initial management of hypopharyngeal cancer: The declining use of open surgery. Head Neck 2012; 34 (02) 270-281
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Weinstein GS, O’Malley Jr BW, Cohen MA, Quon H. Transoral robotic surgery for advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136 (11) 1079-1085
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Leonhardt FD, Quon H, Abrahao M, O´Malley Jr BW, Weinstein GS. Transoral robotic surgery for oropharygeal carcinoma and its impact on patient-reported quality of life and function. Head Neck 2012; 34 (02) 146-154
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Blanco RG, Ha PK, Califano JA, Saunders JM. Transoral robotic surgery of the vocal cord. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011; 21 (02) 157-159
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Vergez S, Lallement B, Ceruse P, Moriniere S, Aubry K, Dee Mones E, Benlyazid A, Mallet Y. Initial multi-institutional experience with transoral robotic surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Apr 2012; Epub
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Zeitels SM, Burns JA, Akst LM, Hilman RE, Broadhurst MS, Anderson RR. Officed-based and microlaryngeal applications of a fiber-based thulium laser. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Dec 2006; 115 (12) 891-896
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Van Abel K, Moore EJ, Carlson ML, Davidson JA, Garcia JJ, Olsen SM, Olsen KD. Transoral robotic surgery using the Thulium:YAG Laser. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 138 (02) 158-166
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Lawson G, Matar N, Remacle M, Jamart J, Bachy V. Transoral robotic surgery for the management of head and neck tumors: learning curve. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 268: 1795-1801
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, Cuschieri A. Economic evaluation of a da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 598-606
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Weinstein GS, O’Malley Jr BW, Magnuson JS, Caroll WR, Olsen KD, Daio L, Moore EJ, Holsinger FC. Transoral robotic surgery: A multicenter study to access feasibility, safety and surgical margins. Laryngoscope. Aug 2012; Aug 122 (08) 1701-1707
  PubMedGoogle Scholar