Diagnostik und endovaskuläre Therapie intrakranieller arterieller Stenosen

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Intrakranielle arterielle Stenosen (IAS) sind abhängig von der ethnischen Herkunft für etwa 6 – 50 % aller ischämischen Schlaganfälle verantwortlich. Patienten mit einer symptomatischen IAS haben trotz medikamentöser Sekundärprophylaxe innerhalb eines Jahres ein hohes Reinsultrisiko (12 %) in dem zugehörigen Gefäßterritorium, bei einem Stenosegrad ≥ 70 % sogar 19 %. Nach wie vor ist die digitale Subtraktionsangiografie der Goldstandard in der Diagnostik einer IAS. Zunehmend werden aber in der initialen Diagnostik nicht invasive Verfahren (MRA und CTA sowie die Doppler/Duplex-Sonografie) eingesetzt. MRA und CTA sind relativ sensitive Methoden, können aber aufgrund der technischen Gegebenheiten zu Fehleinschätzungen des Stenosegrads führen. Andererseits geben diese Verfahren in der klinischen Routine aber auch Zusatzinformationen zum zerebralen Befund. Aktuell wird bei symptomatischen IAS zunächst eine medikamentöse Sekundärprophylaxe mit Acetylsalicylsäure empfohlen. Bei einem unter Thrombozytenfunktionshemmern auftretenden erneuten ischämischen Schlaganfall/TIA im Gefäßterritorium der symptomatischen IAS wird insbesondere bei Stenosen ≥ 70 % eine interventionelle (stentgestützte) Angioplastie in einem spezialisierten Zentrum empfohlen. Die verschiedenen Möglichkeiten der Angioplastie und Stentimplantation werden in diesem Artikel diskutiert. Aktuell liegt die periprozedurale Komplikationsrate zwischen 2 und 7 %, die Re-Stenoseraten zwischen 10 und 40 %, abhängig sowohl von Lokalisation als auch Alter des Patienten. Randomisierte Studien, die die medikamentöse Therapie mit der interventionellen Therapie vergleichen, werden derzeit durchgeführt. Mit Weiterentwicklung der endovaskulären Methodik und Verminderung der Komplikationsraten ist aktuell insbesondere für den hinteren Kreislauf eine Ausweitung der Indikation zur endovaskulären Therapie gegeben.

Abstract

Approximately 6 – 50 % of all ischemic strokes are caused by intracranial arterial stenosis (IAS). Despite medical prevention, patients with symptomatic IAS have a high annual risk for recurrent ischemic stroke of about 12 %, and up to 19 % in the case of high-grade IAS (≥ 70 %). Digital subtraction angiography remains the gold standard for the diagnosis and grading of IAS. However, noninvasive imaging techniques including CT angiography, MR angiography, or transcranial Doppler and duplex ultrasound examinations are used in the clinical routine to provide additional information about the brain structure and hemodynamic. However, for technical reasons, the grading of stenoses is sometimes difficult and inaccurate. To date, aspirin is recommended as the treatment of choice in the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with IAS. IAS patients who suffer a recurrent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack while taking aspirin can be treated with endovascular stenting or angioplasty in specialized centers. The periprocedural complication rate of these endovascular techniques is about 2 – 7 % at experienced neuro-interventional centers. The rate of re-stenosis is reported between 10 and 40 % depending on patient age and stenosis location. Further randomized studies comparing medical secondary prevention and endovascular therapy are currently being performed. With regard to the improvement of endovascular methods and lower complication rates, the indication for endovascular therapy in IAS could be broadened especially for stenosis in the posterior circulation.

Literatur

• 1 Caplan L R, Hennerici M. Impaired clearance of emboli (washout) is an important link between hypoperfusion, embolism, and ischemic stroke.  Arch Neurol. 1998;  55 1475-1482
  Google Scholar
• 2 Gorelick P B, Wong K S, Bae H J et al. Large artery intracranial occlusive disease: a large worldwide burden but a relatively neglected frontier.  Stroke. 2008;  39 2396-2399
  Google Scholar
• 3 McTaggart R A, Jayaraman M V, Haas R A et al. Intracranial atherosclerotic disease: epidemiology, imaging and treatment.  Med Health R I. 2009;  92 412-414
  Google Scholar
• 4 Shin D H, Lee P H, Bang O Y. Mechanisms of recurrence in subtypes of ischemic stroke: a hospital-based follow-up study.  Arch Neurol. 2005;  62 1232-1237
  Google Scholar
• 5 Weimar C, Goertler M, Harms L et al. Distribution and outcome of symptomatic stenoses and occlusions in patients with acute cerebral ischemia.  Arch Neurol. 2006;  63 1287-1291
  Google Scholar
• 6 Chimowitz M I, Lynn M J, Howlett-Smith H et al. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.  N Engl J Med. 2005;  352 1305-1316
  Google Scholar
• 7 Chaturvedi S, Turan T N, Lynn M J et al. Risk factor status and vascular events in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis.  Neurology. 2007;  69 2063-2068
  Google Scholar
• 8 Kasner S E, Chimowitz M I, Lynn M J et al. Predictors of ischemic stroke in the territory of a symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.  Circulation. 2006;  113 555-563
  Google Scholar
• 9 Mazighi M, Tanasescu R, Ducrocq X et al. Prospective study of symptomatic atherothrombotic intracranial stenoses: the GESICA study.  Neurology. 2006;  66 1187-1191
  Google Scholar
• 10 Wong K S, Ng P W, Tang A et al. Prevalence of asymptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis in high-risk patients.  Neurology. 2007;  68 2035-2038
  Google Scholar
• 11 Dorfler A, Struffert T, Engelhorn T et al. Rotational flat-panel computed tomography in diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2008;  180 891-898
  Google Scholar
• 12 Kaufmann T J, Huston 3 rd J, Mandrekar J N et al. Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients.  Radiology. 2007;  243 812-819
  Google Scholar
• 13 Droste D W, Junker K, Hansberg T et al. Circulating microemboli in 33 patients with intracranial arterial stenosis.  Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002;  13 26-30
  Google Scholar
• 14 Allendoerfer J, Goertler M, Reutern G M. Prognostic relevance of ultra-early doppler sonography in acute ischaemic stroke: a prospective multicentre study.  Lancet Neurol. 2006;  5 835-840
  Google Scholar
• 15 Kaps von M, Stolz E, Allendoerfer J. Prognostic value of transcranial sonography in acute stroke patients.  Eur Neurol. 2008;  59 9-16
  Google Scholar
• 16 Feldmann E, Wilterdink J L, Kosinski A et al. The Stroke Outcomes and Neuroimaging of Intracranial Atherosclerosis (SONIA) trial.  Neurology. 2007;  68 2099-2106
  Google Scholar
• 17 Baumgartner R W, Mattle H P, Schroth G. Assessment of ≥ 50 % and < 50 % intracranial stenoses by transcranial color-coded duplex sonography.  Stroke. 1999;  30 87-92
  Google Scholar
• 18 Postert T, Federlein J, Przuntek H et al. Insufficient and absent acoustic temporal bone window: potential and limitations of transcranial contrast-enhanced color-coded sonography and contrast-enhanced power-based sonography.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997;  23 857-862
  Google Scholar
• 19 Choi C G, Lee D H, Lee J H et al. Detection of intracranial atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease with 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with sensitivity encoding at 3 T.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;  28 439-446
  Google Scholar
• 20 Gizewski E R, Ladd M E, Paul A et al. Water Excitation: A Possible Pitfall in Cerebral Time-of-Flight Angiography.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;  26 152-155
  Google Scholar
• 21 Anzalone N. Contrast-enhanced MRA of intracranial vessels.  Eur Radiol. 2005;  15 E3-E10
  Google Scholar
• 22 Nael K, Ruehm S G, Michaely H J et al. High spatial-resolution CE-MRA of the carotid circulation with parallel imaging: comparison of image quality between 2 different acceleration factors at 3.0 Tesla.  Invest Radiol. 2006;  41 391-399
  Google Scholar
• 23 Nguyen-Huynh M N, Wintermark M, English J et al. How accurate is CT angiography in evaluating intracranial atherosclerotic disease?.  Stroke. 2008;  39 1184-1188
  Google Scholar
• 24 Bash S, Villablanca J P, Jahan R et al. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;  26 1012-1021
  Google Scholar
• 25 Sadikin C, Teng M M, Chen T Y et al. The current role of 1.5 T non-contrast 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography to detect intracranial steno-occlusive disease.  J Formos Med Assoc. 2007;  106 691-699
  Google Scholar
• 26 Weber W, Mayer T E, Henkes H et al. Efficacy of stent angioplasty for symptomatic stenoses of the proximal vertebral artery.  Eur J Radiol. 2005;  56 240-247
  Google Scholar
• 27 Fiorella D, Chow M M, Anderson M et al. A 7-year experience with balloon-mounted coronary stents for the treatment of symptomatic vertebrobasilar intracranial atheromatous disease.  Neurosurgery. 2007;  61 236-242 ; discussion 242 – 233
  Google Scholar
• 28 Bose A, Hartmann M, Henkes H et al. A novel, self-expanding, nitinol stent in medically refractory intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses: the Wingspan study.  Stroke. 2007;  38 1531-1537
  Google Scholar
• 29 Turk A S, Niemann D B, Ahmed A et al. Use of self-expanding stents in distal small cerebral vessels.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;  28 533-536
  Google Scholar
• 30 Mazighi M, Yadav J S, Abou-Chebl A. Durability of endovascular therapy for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis.  Stroke. 2008;  39 1766-1769
  Google Scholar
• 31 Wittkugel O, Rosenkranz M, Burckhardt D et al. Long-term outcome after endovascular treatment of high-risk patients with recurrently symptomatic intracranial stenoses of the posterior circulation.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2009;  181 782-791
  Google Scholar
• 32 Rezende M T, Spelle L, Mounayer C et al. Hyperperfusion syndrome after stenting for intracranial vertebral stenosis.  Stroke. 2006;  37 e12-e14
  Google Scholar
• 33 Choo K S, Lee T H, Choi C H et al. Assessment of the Intracranial Stents Patency and Re-Stenosis by 16-Slice CT Angiography with Optimized Sharp Kernel: Preliminary Study.  J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009;  45 284-288
  Google Scholar
• 34 Benesch C G, Chimowitz M I. Best treatment for intracranial arterial stenosis? 50 years of uncertainty. The WASID Investigators.  Neurology. 2000;  55 465-466
  Google Scholar
• 35 Diener H C, Aichner F, Bode C. Primär- und Sekundärprophylaxe der zerebralen Ischämie. in Diener H C, Puzki N, (eds) Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie.. vol 1. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2008: 261-287
  Google Scholar
• 36 Kharbanda R K, Walton B, Allen M et al. Prevention of inflammation-induced endothelial dysfunction: a novel vasculo-protective action of aspirin.  Circulation. 2002;  105 2600-2604
  Google Scholar
• 37 Campbell C L, Smyth S, Montalescot G et al. Aspirin dose for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.  Jama. 2007;  297 2018-2024
  Google Scholar
• 38 Kwon S U, Cho Y J, Koo J S et al. Cilostazol prevents the progression of the symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: the multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled trial of cilostazol in symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.  Stroke. 2005;  36 782-786
  Google Scholar
• 39 Sundt T M, Smith H C, Campbell J K et al. Transluminal angioplasty for basilar artery stenosis.  Mayo Clin Proc. 1980;  55 673-680
  Google Scholar
• 40 SSYCVIA Study Investigators . Stenting of Symptomatic Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Vertebral or Intracranial Arteries (SSYLVIA): study results.  Stroke. 2004;  35 1388-1392
  Google Scholar
• 41 Derdeyn C P, Chimowitz M I. Angioplasty and stenting for atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis: rationale for a randomized clinical trial.  Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2007;  17 355-363, viii-ix
  Google Scholar
• 42 Marks M P, Wojak J C, Al-Ali Jr F et al. Angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: clinical outcome.  Stroke. 2006;  37 1016-1020
  Google Scholar
• 43 Wojak J C, Dunlap D C, Hargrave K R et al. Intracranial angioplasty and stenting: long-term results from a single center.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;  27 1882-1892
  Google Scholar
• 44 Lylyk P, Vila J F, Miranda C et al. Endovascular reconstruction by means of stent placement in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.  Neurol Res. 2005;  27 S84-S88
  Google Scholar
• 45 Cruz-Flores S, Diamond A L. Angioplasty for intracranial artery stenosis.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;  3 CD004133
  Google Scholar
• 46 Groschel K, Schnaudigel S, Pilgram S M et al. A systematic review on outcome after stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis.  Stroke. 2009;  40 e340-e347
  Google Scholar
• 47 Zaidat O O, Klucznik R, Alexander M J et al. The NIH registry on use of the Wingspan stent for symptomatic 70 – 99 % intracranial arterial stenosis.  Neurology. 2008;  70 1518-1524
  Google Scholar
• 48 Kurre W, Berkefeld J, Brassel F et al. In-Hospital Complication Rates After Stent Treatment of 388 Symptomatic Intracranial Stenoses. Results From the INTRASTENT Multicentric Registry.  Stroke. 2010;  41 494-498
  Google Scholar
• 49 Siddiq F, Vazquez G, Memon M Z et al. Comparison of primary angioplasty with stent placement for treating symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic diseases: a multicenter study.  Stroke. 2008;  39 2505-2510
  Google Scholar
• 50 Turk A S, Levy E I, Albuquerque F C et al. Influence of patient age and stenosis location on wingspan in-stent restenosis.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;  29 23-27
  Google Scholar
• 51 Boy S, Isenhardt K, Gardill K et al. [Interventional endovascular therapy (stenting) for residual stenosis after lysis of the basilar artery].  Nervenarzt. 2005;  76 1488, 1490-1482, 1494
  Google Scholar

Elke Ruth Gizewski

Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen

Hufelandstr. 55

45122 Essen

Phone: ++ 49/2 01/7 23 15 09

Fax: ++ 49/2 01/7 23 15 48

Email: elke.gizewski@uni-due.de