Planta Med 2019; 85(07): 528-534
DOI: 10.1055/a-0873-1494
Biological and Pharmacological Activity
Reviews
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Plant Allergen-Induced Contact Dermatitis

Philipp R. Esser
1   Allergy Research Group, Department of Dermatology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
,
Sabine Mueller
2   Clinical Allergology, Department of Dermatology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
,
Stefan F. Martin
1   Allergy Research Group, Department of Dermatology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 23 November 2018
revised 07 March 2019

accepted 08 March 2019

Publication Date:
15 March 2019 (online)

Abstract

Although manifold beneficial effects of plant compounds for the treatment of skin disorders are known, cutaneous exposure to plants can also result in various types of incompatibility reactions such as contact dermatitis. In this mini-review, we briefly describe the different clinical forms of contact dermatitis (photoinduced, irritative, and allergic form) and highlight recent publications in the field of contact dermatitis. Major topics are recent recommendations regarding testing for plant contact dermatitis, advances in understanding the immunological mechanisms of plant contact dermatitis, and case reports for plant contact dermatitis. Unfortunately, most people still associate the terms “healthy and safe to use” with plant compounds due to their natural origin, leading to an increased utilization, be it for home-made remedies or as cosmetics. Therefore, it is on the one hand important to raise awareness in a broad audience that plants may cause contact dermatitis and on the other hand to indicate to clinicians that plants should be included in a patch test if a history of plant exposure exists.

 
  • References

  • 1 Mortimer S, Reeder M. Botanicals in dermatology: essential oils, botanical allergens, and current regulatory practices. Dermatitis 2016; 27: 317-324
  • 2 Corazza M, Borghi A, Gallo R, Schena D, Pigatto P, Lauriola MM, Guarneri F, Stingeni L, Vincenzi C, Foti C, Virgili A. Topical botanically derived products: use, skin reactions, and usefulness of patch tests. A multicentre Italian study. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70: 90-97
  • 3 Hausen BM, Reichling J, Harkenthal M. Degradation products of monoterpenes are the sensitizing agents in tea tree oil. Am J Contact Dermat 1999; 10: 68-77
  • 4 Matura M, Goossens A, Bordalo O, Garcia-Bravo B, Magnusson K, Wrangsjö K, Karlberg AT. Oxidized citrus oil (R-limonene): a frequent skin sensitizer in Europe. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 47: 709-714
  • 5 European Commission, Directorate General for Health & Consumers. Opinion on fragrance allergens in cosmetic products. Brussels: European Commission; 2012. Accessed January 15, 2018
  • 6 Rudbäck J, Bergström MA, Börje A, Nilsson U, Karlberg AT. α-Terpinene, an antioxidant in tea tree oil, autoxidizes rapidly to skin allergens on air exposure. Chem Res Toxicol 2012; 25: 713-721
  • 7 Kern S, Granier T, Dkhil H, Haupt T, Ellis G, Natsch A. Stability of limonene and monitoring of a hydroperoxide in fragranced products. Flavour Fragr J 2014; 29: 277-286
  • 8 Gilissen L, Huygens S, Goossens A. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by topical herbal remedies: importance of patch testing with the patientsʼ own products. Contact Dermatitis 2018; 78: 177-184
  • 9 Aberer W. Contact allergy and medicinal herbs. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges J Ger Soc Dermatol JDDG 2008; 6: 15-24
  • 10 Mitchell JP, Rook A. Botanical Dermatology: Plants and Plant Products injurous to the Skin. Vancouver: Greengrass Ltd.; 1979
  • 11 Mahler V, Geier J, Schnuch A. Current trends in patch testing – new data from the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG) and the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK). JDDG J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2014; 12: 583-592
  • 12 Paulsen E, El-Houri RB, Andersen KE, Christensen LP. Parthenolide in Danish biodynamic and organic milk: a new source of exposure to an allergenic sesquiterpene lactone. Contact Dermatitis 2018; 79: 208-212
  • 13 Warshaw EM, Maibach HI, Taylor JS, Sasseville D, DeKoven JG, Zirwas MJ, Fransway AF, Mathias CGT, Zug KA, DeLeo VA, Fowler JF, Marks JG, Pratt MD, Storrs FJ, Belsito DV. North American contact dermatitis group patch test results: 2011–2012. Dermatitis 2015; 26: 49-59
  • 14 DeKoven JG, Warshaw EM, Belsito DV, Sasseville D, Maibach HI, Taylor JS, Marks JG, Fowler JF, Mathias CGT, DeLeo VA, Pratt MD, Zirwas MJ, Zug KA. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results 2013–2014. Dermatitis 2017; 28: 33-46
  • 15 de Groot AC, Schmidt E. Essential oils, part IV: contact allergy. Dermatitis 2016; 27: 170-175
  • 16 Sanvido O, Schmid K, FitzGerald RE, Roth N, Wilks MF, Bormann P, Hopf NB. A quantitative risk assessment for skin sensitizing plant protection products: linking derived no-effect levels (DNELs) with agricultural exposure models. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2018; 98: 171-183
  • 17 Paulsen E, Thormann H, Vestergaard L. Eucalyptus species as a cause of airborne allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2018; 78: 301-303
  • 18 Guo S, Jiang JF, Tan C. Lichenoid contact dermatitis induced by Semen Sinapis albae. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2018; 28: 350-352
  • 19 Alinaghi F, Bennike NH, Egeberg A, Thyssen JP, Johansen JD. Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Contact Dermatitis 2019; 80: 77-85
  • 20 Statescu L, Branisteanu D, Dobre C, Solovastru LG, Vasilca A, Petrescu Z, Azoicai D. Contact dermatitis – epidemiological study. Maedica (Buchar) 2011; 6: 277-281
  • 21 Spek FB de W der. Darsow U, Mortz CG, Orton D, Worm M, Muraro A, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Grimalt R, Spiewak R, Rudzeviciene O, Flohr C, Halken S, Fiocchi A, Borrego LM, Oranje AP. EAACI position paper for practical patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis in children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2015; 26: 598-606
  • 22 von der Werth JM, Ratcliffe J, English JS. Compositae mix is a more sensitive test for Compositae dermatitis than the sesquiterpene lactone mix. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 40: 273-276
  • 23 Jacob M, Brinkmann J, Schmidt TJ. Sesquiterpene lactone mix as a diagnostic tool for Asteraceae allergic contact dermatitis: chemical explanation for its poor performance and Sesquiterpene lactone mix II as a proposed improvement. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 66: 233-240
  • 24 Rozas-Muñoz E, Lepoittevin JP, Pujol RM, Giménez-Arnau A. Allergic contact dermatitis to plants: understanding the chemistry will help our diagnostic approach. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2012; 103: 456-477
  • 25 Martin SF, Rustemeyer T, Thyssen JP. Recent advances in understanding and managing contact dermatitis. F1000Res 2018; 7: 810
  • 26 Esser PR, Martin SF. Pathomechanisms of contact sensitization. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2017; 17: 83
  • 27 Guenther F, Maus D, Hedtrich S, Melzig MF. Serine protease Mauritanicain from Euphorbia mauritanica and phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate modulate the IL-8 release in fibroblasts and HaCaT keratinocytes. Planta Med 2018; DOI: 10.1055/a-0735-9911.
  • 28 Domsalla A, Melzig MF. Enhancement of protease-induced IL-6 release in monocytic U-937 cells by phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate. Inflamm Res 2012; 61: 1125-1129
  • 29 Haque MA, Jantan I, Harikrishnan H, Wahab SMA. Magnoflorine enhances LPS-activated pro-inflammatory responses via MyD88-dependent pathways in U937 macrophages. Planta Med 2018; 84: 1255-1264
  • 30 Ahmad W, Jantan I, Kumolosasi E, Bukhari SNA. Immunostimulatory effects of the standardized extract of Tinospora crispa on innate immune responses in Wistar Kyoto rats. Drug Des Devel Ther 2015; 9: 2961-2973
  • 31 Ahmad W, Jantan I, Bukhari SNA. Tinospora crispa (L.) Hook. f. & Thomson: a review of its ethnobotanical, phytochemical, and pharmacological aspects. Front Pharmacol 2016; 7: 59
  • 32 Weber FC, Németh T, Csepregi JZ, Dudeck A, Roers A, Ozsvári B, Oswald E, Puskás LG, Jakob T, Mócsai A, Martin SF. Neutrophils are required for both the sensitization and elicitation phase of contact hypersensitivity. J Exp Med 2015; 212: 15-22
  • 33 Dudeck A, Dudeck J, Scholten J, Petzold A, Surianarayanan S, Köhler A, Peschke K, Vöhringer D, Waskow C, Krieg T, Müller W, Waisman A, Hartmann K, Gunzer M, Roers A. Mast cells are key promoters of contact allergy that mediate the adjuvant effects of haptens. Immunity 2011; 34: 973-984
  • 34 Schmidt M, Raghavan B, Müller V, Vogl T, Fejer G, Tchaptchet S, Keck S, Kalis C, Nielsen PJ, Galanos C, Roth J, Skerra A, Martin SF, Freudenberg MA, Goebeler M. Crucial role for human toll-like receptor 4 in the development of contact allergy to nickel. Nat Immunol 2010; 11: 814-819
  • 35 Esser PR, Wolfle U, Durr C, von Loewenich FD, Schempp CM, Freudenberg MA, Jakob T, Martin SF. Contact sensitizers induce skin inflammation via ROS production and hyaluronic acid degradation. PLoS One 2012; 7: e41340
  • 36 Hassan I, Rasool F, Akhtar S, Kamili A, Rather P, Kanth R, Bhat Y, Rather S, Mubashir S, Yaseen A, Bashir S. Contact dermatitis caused by tulips: identification of contact sensitizers in tulip workers of Kashmir Valley in North India. Contact Dermatitis 2018; 78: 64-69
  • 37 Hausen BM. Airborne contact dermatitis caused by tulip bulbs. J Am Acad Dermatol 1982; 7: 500-503
  • 38 Waton J, Brault F, Laveine E. A putative case of allergic contact dermatitis caused by a jagua tattoo. Contact Dermatitis 2017; 76: 296-297
  • 39 Bircher AJ, Sigg R, Hofmeier KS, Schlegel U, Hauri U. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by a new temporary blue-black tattoo dye – sensitization to genipin from jagua (Genipa americana L.) fruit extract. Contact Dermatitis 2017; 77: 374-378
  • 40 Brauch JE, Zapata-Porras SP, Buchweitz M, Aschoff JK, Carle R. Jagua blue derived from Genipa americana L. fruit: a natural alternative to commonly used blue food colorants?. Food Res Int 2016; 89: 391-398
  • 41 Diepgen T l. Ofenloch R f. Bruze M, Bertuccio P, Cazzaniga S, Coenraads PJ, Elsner P, Goncalo M, Svensson Å, Naldi L. Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions. Br J Dermatol 2016; 174: 319-329
  • 42 Lee YB, Park SM, Kim JW, Yu DS. Combination treatment of low-fluence Q-switched Nd : YAG laser and oral tranexamic acid for post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation due to allergic contact dermatitis to henna hair dye. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2016; 18: 95-97
  • 43 Echaiz CF, Ali AA, Cao AQ, Sasseville D. Simultaneous contact dermatitis caused by Asteraceae and Verbascum thapsus . Contact Dermatitis 2017; 76: 316-318
  • 44 Schloemer JA, Zirwas MJ, Burkhart CG. Airborne contact dermatitis: common causes in the USA. Int J Dermatol 2015; 54: 271-274
  • 45 Pietkiewicz P, Gornowicz-Porowska J, Bowszyc-Dmochowska M, Dmochowski M. Human dermatitis after skin exposure to Jacobaea vulgaris and spectrum of health hazards induced by this plant to humans and livestock. J Agromedicine 2015; 20: 237-241
  • 46 Paulsen E, Andersen KE. Clinical patterns of Compositae dermatitis in Danish monosensitized patients. Contact Dermatitis 2018; 78: 185-193