Gastroenterology

Gastroenterology

Volume 139, Issue 5, November 2010, Pages 1593-1601
Gastroenterology

Clinical Advances in Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
A Sustained Virologic Response Is Durable in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Treated With Peginterferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2010.07.009Get rights and content

Background & Aims

A sustained virologic response (SVR) to therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is defined as the inability to detect HCV RNA 24 weeks after completion of treatment. Although small studies have reported that the SVR is durable and lasts for long periods, it has not been conclusively shown.

Methods

The durability of treatment responses was examined in patients originally enrolled in one of 9 randomized multicenter trials (n = 1343). The study included patients who received pegylated interferon (peginterferon) alfa-2a alone (n = 166) or in combination with ribavirin (n = 1077, including 79 patients with normal alanine aminotransferase levels and 100 patients who were coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and HCV) and whose serum samples were negative for HCV RNA (<50 IU/mL) at their final assessment. Patients were assessed annually, from the date of last treatment, for a mean of 3.9 years (range, 0.8–7.1 years).

Results

Most patients (99.1%) who achieved an SVR had undetectable levels of HCV RNA in serum samples throughout the follow-up period. Serum samples from 0.9% of the patients contained HCV RNA a mean of 1.8 years (range, 1.1–2.9 years) after treatment ended. It is not clear if these patients were reinfected or experienced a relapse.

Conclusions

In a large cohort of patients monitored for the durability of an SVR, the SVR was maintained for almost 4 years after treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a alone or in combination with ribavirin. In patients with chronic hepatitis C infection, the SVR is durable and these patients should be considered as cured.

Section snippets

Patients and Methods

Patients were eligible for the long-term follow-up study if they were previously enrolled in one of 10 clinical trials.16, 17, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30

Patients were not eligible for inclusion in the long-term follow-up study if they had been treated with anti-HCV therapy other than those medications assigned in the original protocol since enrolling in the original trials; were unable or unwilling to provide informed consent or abide by the requirements of the study; and had a history or

Results

This long-term follow-up study recruited 1753 patients from 198 centers in 19 countries. The first patient was enrolled in May 2000, and the last patient's final visit was in February 2008.

Discussion

The present study represents the largest prospective cohort of patients followed up for the durability of SVR among patients previously treated for hepatitis C infection. The main finding of this long-term follow-up study in more than 1300 patients is that an SVR achieved with peginterferon alfa-2a, alone or in combination with ribavirin, is durable over the long-term and recurrence of HCV RNA is extremely rare. Overall, 99.1% of patients who achieved an SVR after treatment remained HCV RNA

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Health Interactions for editorial support.

References (48)

  • S.A. Coverdale et al.

    Effects of interferon treatment response on liver complications of chronic hepatitis C: 9-year follow-up study

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2004)
  • S. George et al.

    Clinical, virologic, histologic, and biochemical outcomes after successful HCV therapy: a 5-year follow-up of 150 patients

    Hepatology

    (2009)
  • C.H. Hung et al.

    Long-term effect of interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin therapy on incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis

    J Viral Hepat

    (2006)
  • A. Kasahara et al.

    Interferon treatment improves survival in chronic hepatitis C patients showing biochemical as well as virological responses by preventing liver-related death

    J Viral Hepat

    (2004)
  • P. Marcellin et al.

    Long-term histologic improvement and loss of detectable intrahepatic HCV RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C and sustained response to interferon-alpha therapy

    Ann Intern Med

    (1997)
  • B.J. Veldt et al.

    Long term clinical outcome of chronic hepatitis C patients with sustained virological response to interferon monotherapy

    Gut

    (2004)
  • A.A. John-Baptiste et al.

    Sustained responders have better quality of life and productivity compared with treatment failures long after antiviral therapy for hepatitis C

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2009)
  • M.G. Ghany et al.

    Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: an update

    Hepatology

    (2009)
  • National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: management of hepatitis C: 2002–June 10-12, 2002

    Hepatology

    (2002)
  • D.B. Strader et al.

    Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C

    Hepatology

    (2004)
  • M.W. Fried et al.

    Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • S.J. Hadziyannis et al.

    Peginterferon-alpha2a and ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C: a randomized study of treatment duration and ribavirin dose

    Ann Intern Med

    (2004)
  • M. Nunez et al.

    Role of weight-based ribavirin dosing and extended duration of therapy in chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients: the PRESCO trial

    AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses

    (2007)
  • F.J. Torriani et al.

    Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected patients

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • Cited by (270)

    • Hepatitis C: treatment

      2023, Comprehensive Guide to Hepatitis Advances
    • Risk of hepatitis C reinfection following successful therapy among people living with HIV: a global systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

      2022, The Lancet HIV
      Citation Excerpt :

      In studies using end of treatment to indicate the beginning of the time at risk of HCV reinfection, HCV RNA recurrence was considered to be reinfection if HCV sequencing or genotype data were used to confirm detection of infection with an HCV strain, subtype, or genotype distinct from the virus before treatment. In the studies using sustained virological response to indicate the beginning of the time at risk of HCV reinfection, any HCV RNA recurrence was considered to be reinfection, given the low likelihood of viral relapse after sustained virological response.9,10 For each included study, the incidence of HCV reinfection was calculated using the reported number of reinfection cases and person-years of follow-up.

    • EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C: Final update of the series<sup>☆</sup>

      2020, Journal of Hepatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In settings where sensitive HCV RNA assays are not available and/or not affordable, a qualitative assay with a lower limit of detection ≤1,000 IU/ml (3.0 Log10 IU/ml) can be used to assess SVR12 or SVR24. Long-term follow-up studies have shown that an SVR corresponds to a definitive cure of HCV infection in the vast majority of cases.5,93 In patients with advanced fibrosis (METAVIR score F3) and cirrhosis (F4), an SVR reduces the rate of decompensation and will also reduce, but not abolish, the risk of HCC.12

    • Hepatitis C reinfection after successful antiviral treatment among people who inject drugs: A meta-analysis

      2020, Journal of Hepatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In most studies, all cases of recurrent viraemia following SVR were considered as reinfection. Although post-SVR HCV relapse is rare,17,18 without using HCV sequencing it is not possible to fully distinguish reinfection from late relapse. In several studies, reinfection was diagnosed on the basis of detection of recurrent viraemia with different HCV genotype/subtype.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflicts of interest The authors disclose the following: Prof Swain has served on advisory boards for Roche and Gilead and received research or grant support from Roche, Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Merck, Schering-Plough, Intercept Pharma, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Prof Shiffman has served on advisory committees or review panels for Gilead, Schering-Plough, Anadys, Vertex, Biolex, Human Genome Sciences, Novartis, and ZymoGenetics; served as a consultant for Roche and Pfizer; received research grant support from Roche, Schering-Plough, Vertex, Biolex, GlaxoSmithKline, GlobeImmune, Human Genome Sciences, Idenix, Tibotec, ZymoGenetics, and Gilead; and served on the speaker's bureau for Roche and Schering-Plough. Prof Cooksley has served on the speaker's bureau for Roche. Prof Zeuzem has served as a consultant for Roche and Novartis/Human Genome Sciences, on advisory boards for Roche and Novartis/Human Genome Sciences, and on the speaker's bureau for Roche and Schering-Plough. Prof Dieterich has served on advisory boards, on the speaker's bureau, and as a consultant for Roche, Gilead, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Prof Abergel's research is supported by Roche. Prof Pessôa has served as a consultant for Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novartis; served on advisory boards for Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novartis; served on the speaker's bureau for Roche and Bristol-Myers Squibb; and received research and travel grants from Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novartis. Dr Lin, Dr Tietz, and Dr Connell are employees of Roche. Prof Lai and Prof Diago disclose no conflicts.

    Funding Supported by Roche (Basel, Switzerland).

    Deceased.

    View full text