Elsevier

Human Pathology

Volume 33, Issue 5, May 2002, Pages 484-495
Human Pathology

GIST Symposium
Biology and genetic aspects of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: KIT activation and cytogenetic alterations*

https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2002.124124Get rights and content

Abstract

Recent studies have done much to reveal the biological and genetic underpinnings of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Constitutive activation of the KIT receptor tyrosine kinase is a central pathogenetic event in most GISTs and generally results from oncogenic point mutations which can involve either extracellular or cytoplasmic domains of the receptor. Oncogenic mutations enable the KIT receptor to phosphorylate various substrate proteins, leading to activation of signal transduction cascades which regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis, chemotaxis, and adhesion. KIT mutations can be broadly assigned to 2 groups, those that involve the “regulatory” regions responsible for modulating KIT enzymatic activity and those that involve the enzymatic region itself. In vitro studies suggest that GISTs with regulatory-region KIT mutations are more likely to respond to STI-571 than are GISTs with enzymatic-region mutations. A minority of GISTs lack demonstrable KIT mutations, but KIT is nonetheless strongly activated. Such GISTs might contain KIT mutations which are not readily detected by conventional screening methods, or alternately, KIT might be activated by nonmutational mechanisms. Most GISTs have noncomplex cytogenetic profiles, often featuring deletions of chromosomes 14 and 22. Additional chromosomal aberrations are acquired as the GISTs progress to higher histologic grade. These cytogenetic aberrations are undoubtedly important in GIST pathogenesis, but currently they do not play a key role as diagnostic adjuncts. HUM PATHOL 33:484-495. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Section snippets

KIT activation: A central tumorigenic event in GISTs

Many GISTs express constitutively activated KIT oncoproteins. The oncogenic activation of these KIT proteins does not depend on binding of KIT ligand; rather, KIT oncoproteins in GISTs often have structural changes which favor receptor oligomerization and cross-phosphorylation, even in the absence of ligand binding (Fig 3).13, 14, 15

. Oncogenic mutations of the KIT juxtamembrane domain result in ligand-independent KIT dimerization and activation of the kinase enzymatic domain. KIT activation is

Mechanisms of KIT regulation and dysregulation

As is the case with most RTKs, KIT kinase activity has multiple levels of control. Disruption of any of several control mechanisms may lead to aberrant kinase activation and oncogenesis. KIT kinase activity is controlled first and foremost by developmentally specific expression of the KIT protein. (If there is no protein expression, then there is no kinase activity). In the absence of ligand, normal KIT exists as a monomer in which enzymatic activity is inhibited by intrinsic structural

Biological consequences of KIT activation in GISTs

KIT activation normally occurs when the receptor is bound by its cognate ligand, stem-cell factor. Ligand-mediated KIT activation triggers various cell-signaling cascades that regulate cell behavior.45, 46 Examples of critical downstream signaling mechanisms include activation of cell survival (antiapoptotic) proteins, such as AKT, and cell proliferation–related proteins, such as MAPK p42/p44.45, 46 An intriguing aspect of KIT oncoproteins in hematologic neoplasms is that the exact signaling

Alternate KIT activation mechanisms in GISTs

KIT signaling pathways are activated in virtually all GISTs, and most GISTs have oncogenic mutations within the coding sequence of the KIT gene. However, even those tumors that lack such mutations can have biochemical features of high-level KIT kinase activation.15 As discussed later, KIT might be activated oncogenically by several alternate, nonmutational mechanisms, but to our knowledge, none of these mechanisms has been tested rigorously. It is important to consider alternative (i.e.,

Cytogenetic mechanisms in the progression from low-grade to high-grade GIST

Most GISTs have 1 or more chromosomal deletions, and the cytogenetic profile in GISTs is quite different from that in histologic mimics such as leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma (Table 1).

. Characteristic cytogenetic and molecular events in GISTs and in mesenchymal tumors that can masquerade as GISTs

Tumor TypeCharacteristic Cytogenetic EventsMolecular Events
Gastrointestinal stromal tumorMonosomies 14 and 22
Deletion of 1p
KIT mutation
DesmoidDeletion of 5qAPC mutation
Trisomies 8 and 20
Endometrial stromal

Summary

This review has outlined the considerable recent progress in our understanding of biological and genetic mechanisms in GISTs. Our intention has been to emphasize aspects of GIST “basic science” that are germane to the intriguing clinicopathologic features of GISTs. Our focus has been primarily on science and biological mechanisms rather than on clinical correlates. The relevance and application of these scientific advances, in the pathology and clinical fields, is discussed in several companion

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Nora Joseph and Dr. Anette Duensing, who provided figures for this review.

References (68)

  • Q Tian et al.

    Activating c-kit gene mutations in human germ cell tumors

    Am J Pathol

    (1999)
  • J Lasota et al.

    Mutations in exon 11 of c-Kit occur preferentially in malignant versus benign gastrointestinal stromal tumors and do not occur in leiomyomas or leiomyosarcomas

    Am J Pathol

    (1999)
  • ML Lux et al.

    KIT extracellular and kinase domain mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

    Am J Pathol

    (2000)
  • Y Ma et al.

    Inhibition of spontaneous receptor phosphorylation by residues in a putative alpha-helix in the KIT intracellular juxtamembrane region

    J Biol Chem

    (1999)
  • BJ Longley et al.

    Classes of c-KIT activating mutations: proposed mechanisms of action and implications for disease classification and therapy

    Leuk Res

    (2001)
  • Y Ma et al.

    The c-kit mutation causing human mastocytosis is resistant to STI-571 and other KIT kinase inhibitors: Kinases with enzymatic site mutations show different inhibitor sensitivity profiles than wild-type kinases and those with regulatory-type mutations

    Blood

    (2002)
  • Y Ma et al.

    Indolinone derivatives inhibit constitutively activated KIT mutants and kill neoplastic mast cells

    J Invest Dermatol

    (2000)
  • LE Wybenga-Groot et al.

    Structural basis for autoinhibition of the Ephb2 receptor tyrosine kinase by the unphosphorylated juxtamembrane region

    Cell

    (2001)
  • Y Ma et al.

    Clustering of activating mutations in c-KIT's juxtamembrane coding region in canine mast cell neoplasms

    J Invest Dermatol

    (1999)
  • J Lasota et al.

    Mutations in exons 9 and 13 of KIT gene are rare events in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A study of 200 cases

    Am J Pathol

    (2000)
  • D Linnekin

    Early signaling pathways activated by c-Kit in hematopoietic cells

    Int J Biochem Cell Biol

    (1999)
  • ML Taylor et al.

    Kit signal transduction

    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am

    (2000)
  • R Chian et al.

    Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase contributes to the transformation of hematopoietic cells by the D816V c-Kit mutant

    Blood

    (2001)
  • M Lopez-Ilasaca et al.

    Requirement of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase for activation of JNK/SAPKs by PDGF

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

    (1997)
  • F Colucci et al.

    The receptor tyrosine kinase c-kit provides a critical signal for survival, expansion, and maturation of mouse natural killer cells

    Blood

    (2000)
  • R Kapur et al.

    A novel mechanism of cooperation between c-Kit and erythropoietin peceptor. Stem cell factor induces the expression of STAT5 and erythropoietin receptor, resulting in efficient proliferation and survival by erythropoietin

    J Biol Chem

    (2001)
  • PS Crosier et al.

    Expression of isoforms of the human receptor tyrosine kinase c-kit in leukemic cell lines and acute myeloid leukemia

    Blood

    (1993)
  • LK Ashman

    The biology of stem cell factor and its receptor C-kit

    Int J Biochem Cell Biol

    (1999)
  • L Boghosian et al.

    Three possible cytogenetic subgroups of leiomyosarcoma

    Cancer Genet Cytogenet

    (1989)
  • G Bardi et al.

    Recurrent chromosome aberrations in abdominal smooth muscle tumors

    Cancer Genet Cytogenet

    (1992)
  • AL Saunders et al.

    Two cases of low-grade gastric leiomyosarcoma with monosomy 14 as the only change

    Cancer Genet Cytogenet

    (1996)
  • S Majumder et al.

    c-kit protein, a transmembrane kinase: Identification in tissues and characterization

    Mol Cell Biol

    (1988)
  • P Blume-Jensen et al.

    Activation of the human c-kit product by ligand-induced dimerization mediates circular actin reorganization and chemotaxis

    EMBO J

    (1991)
  • JM Blechman et al.

    Structure-function analyses of the KIT receptor for the Steel factor

    Stem Cells

    (1993)
  • Cited by (421)

    • Genomic Characterization of Prostatic Basal Cell Carcinoma

      2023, American Journal of Pathology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Genomic alterations of KIT are commonly found in gastrointestinal stroma tumors, seminoma, and acute myeloid leukemia.30–32 Activating missense mutations in the kinase domain are the most common somatic alteration in cancer, but recurrent splice site changes have also been described.33,34 Although the significance of this mutation in this case is unclear, its enrichment in gastrointestinal stroma tumors, which are known to be driven by genomic alterations in KIT, suggests a potential driver function.

    • Recognition of distinct chemical molecules as inhibitors for KIT receptor mutants D816H/Y/V: A simulation approach

      2021, Journal of Molecular Liquids
      Citation Excerpt :

      The KIT is a receptor protein encoded by the c-kit proto-oncogene present on chromosome 4 [8,9]. The stem cell factor (SCF) is responsible for its activation under normal circumstances, acting as the initiator of the downstream signaling cascades [3,6,10,11]. The architecture of the KIT receptor is similar to the other members of the type III RTK family, which consists of an SCF binding extracellular domain (ECD), an intracellular domain (ICD), and a transmembrane domain (TMD) [11-13].

    • Targeted Therapies in Veterinary Oncology

      2019, Veterinary Clinics of North America - Small Animal Practice
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jonathan A. Fletcher, MD, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115.

    View full text