Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with independent comparison to a diagnostic reference standard, doppler echocardiography.
SETTING: Urban university hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive hospital inpatients (n=124) who had been referred for echocardiography.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Participants were examined by a third-year general internal medicine resident and a staff general internist. We hypothesized in advance that absence of a murmur over the right clavicle would rule out aortic stenosis, while the presence of three or four associated findings (slow carotid artery upstroke, reduced carotid artery volume, maximal murmur intensity at the second right intercostal space, and reduced intensity of the second heart sound) would rule in aortic stenosis. Study physicians were unaware of echocardiographic findings. The outcome was echocardiographic moderate or severe aortic stenosis, defined as a valve area of 1.2 cm2 or less, or a peak instantaneous gradient of 25 mm Hg or greater. Absence of a murmur over the right clavicle ruled out aortic stenosis (likelihood ratio [LR] 0.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01, 0.44). The presence of three or four associated findings ruled in aortic stenosis (LR 40; 95% CI 6.6, 240). If a murmur was present over the right clavicle, but no more than two associated findings were present, then the examination was indeterminate (LR 1.8; 95% CI 0.93, 2.9).
CONCLUSION: A clinical prediction rule, using simple bedside maneuvers, accurately ruled in and ruled out aortic stenosis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Detsky AS, Abrams HB, McLaughlin JR, et al. Predicting cardiac complications in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:211–9.
Roldan CA, Shively BK, Crawford MH. Value of the cardiovascular physical examination for detecting valvular heart disease in asymptomatic subjects. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:1327–31.
Etchells EE, Bell C, Robb KV. Does this patient have an abnormal systolic murmur? JAMA. 1997;277:564–71.
Hoagland PM, Cook EF, Wynne J, Goldman L. Value of noninvasive testing in adults with aortic stenosis. Am J Med. 1986;80:1041–50.
Paauw DS, Wenrich MD, Curtis JR, Carline JD, Ramsey PG. Ability of primary care physicians to recognize physical findings associated with HIV infection. JAMA. 1995;274:1380–2.
McKillop GM, Stewart DA, Burns JMA, Ballantyne D. Doppler echocardiography in elderly patients with ejection systolic murmurs. Postgrad Med J. 1991;61:1059–61.
Feinstein AR, Kramer MS. Clinical biostatistics, LIII: the architecture of observer/method variability and other types of process research. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1980;28:551–63.
Spodick DH, Kerrigan AT, de la Paz LR, Shahamatpour A, Kino M. Clavicular auscultation. Preferential clavicular transmission and amplification of aortic murmurs. Chest. 1976;70:337–40.
Aronow WS, Kronzon I. Prevalence and severity of valvular aortic stenosis determined by Doppler echochardiography and its association with echocardiographic and electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and physical signs of aortic stenosis in elderly persons. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67:776–7.
Constant J. Bedside Cardiology. 3rd ed. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown and Company; 1985:38–9.
Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. Toronto, Ont: John Wiley and Sons; 1981:225–32.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.
Centor RM. Estimating confidence intervals of likelihood ratios. Med Decis Making. 1992;12:229–33.
Leisenring W, Pepe MS, Longton G. A marginal regression modeling framework for evaluating medical diagnostic data. Stat Med. 1997;16:1263–81.
Simel DL, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:763–70.
Taranta A, Spagnuolo M, Snyder R, Gerbarg DS, Hofler JJ. Auscultation of the heart by physicians and by computer. In: Data Acquisition and Processing in Biology and Medicine. New York, NY: McMillan Co; 1964;3:23–52.
Raftery EB, Holland WW. Examination of the heart: an investigation into variation. Am J Epidemiol. 1967;85:438–44.
Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett DL. Users’ Guide to the Medical Literature, III: How to use an article about a diagnostic test, A: Are the results of the study valid? JAMA. 1994;271:389–91.
Lindroos M, Kupari M, Heikkila J, Tilvis R. Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:1220–5.
Knight PV, Martin BJ, Ballantyne D. Echocardiographic diagnoses in elderly patients with systolic murmurs and cardiac disease. Age Ageing. 1986;15:169–73.
Xu M, McHaffie DJ. Nonspecific systolic murmurs: an audit of the clinical value of echocardiography. N Z Med J. 1993;106:54–6.
Forssell G, Jonasson R, Orinius E. Identifying severe aortic valvular stenosis by bedside examination. Acta Med Scand. 1985;218:397–400.
Chun PKC, Dunn BE. Clinical clue of severe aortic stenosis. Simultaneous palpation of the carotid and apical impulses. Arch Intern Med. 1982;142:2284–8.
Rothman A, Goldberger AL. Aids to cardiac auscultation. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:346–53.
Lembo NJ, Dell’Italia LJ, Crawford MH, O’Rourke RA. Bedside diagnosis of systolic murmurs. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1572–8.
Eddleman EE, Frommeyer WB Jr, Lyle DP, Bancroft WH Jr, Turner ME Jr. Critical analysis of clinical factors in estimating severity of aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1973;31:687–95.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Etchells, E., Glenns, V., Shadowitz, S. et al. A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis. J GEN INTERN MED 13, 699–704 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00207.x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00207.x