Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Stem Cell Procurement

Pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim for cytokine-alone mobilization of autologous haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells

Abstract

Haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) mobilization, using cytokine-alone, is a well-tolerated regimen with predictable mobilization kinetics. Single-dose pegfilgrastim mobilizes HSPC efficiently; however, there is surprisingly little comparative data on its use without chemotherapy for HSPC mobilization. Pegfilgrastim-alone and filgrastim-alone mobilization regimens were compared in 52 patients with haematological malignancy. Pegfilgrastim 12 mg (n=20) or 6 mg (n=2) was administered Day 1 (D1) in 22 patients (lymphoma n=17; myeloma n=5). Thirty historical controls (lymphoma n=18; myeloma n=12) received filgrastim 10 mcg/kg daily from D1. Peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ counts reached threshold (5 × 106/L) and apheresis commenced on D4(4–5) and D4(4–6). Median PB CD34+ cell count on D1 of apheresis was similar (26.0 × 106/L (2.5–125.0 × 106/L) and 16.2 × 106/L (2.6–50.7 × 106/L); P=0.06), for pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups, respectively. Target yield (2 × 106 per kg CD34+ cells) was collected in 20/22 (91%) pegfilgrastim patients and 24/30 (80%) in the filgrastim group (P=0.44), in a similar median number of aphereses (3(1–4) versus 3(2–6), respectively; P=0.85). A higher proportion of pegfilgrastim patients tended to yield 4 × 106 per kg CD34+ cells; 16/22 (73%) versus 14/30 (47%) filgrastim patients (P=0.09). One pegfilgrastim patient developed hyperleukocytosis that resolved without incident. Pegfilgrastim-alone is a simple, well-tolerated, and attractive option for outpatient-based HSPC mobilization with similar mobilization kinetics and efficacy to regular filgrastim.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harousseau JL, Attal M, Divine M, Milpied N, Marit G, Leblond V et al. Comparison of autologous bone marrow transplantation and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation after first remission induction treatment in multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 963–969.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. To LB, Roberts MM, Haylock DN, Dyson PG, Branford AL, Thorp D et al. Comparison of haematological recovery times and supportive care requirements of autologous recovery phase peripheral blood stem cell transplants, autologous bone marrow transplants and allogeneic bone marrow transplants. Bone Marrow Transplant 1992; 9: 277–284.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Demirer T, Buckner CD, Gooley T, Appelbaum FR, Rowley S, Chauncey T et al. Factors influencing collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 17: 937–941.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tomblyn M, Burns LJ, Blazar B, Wagner J, Lee C, Rogers T et al. Difficult stem cell mobilization despite adequate CD34+ cell dose predicts shortened progression free and overall survival after autologous HSCT for lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007; 40: 111–118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stadtmauer EA, Schneider CJ, Silberstein LE . Peripheral blood progenitor cell generation and harvesting. Semin Oncol 1995; 22: 291–300.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Winkler IG, Levesque JP . Mechanisms of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: when innate immunity assails the cells that make blood and bone. Exp Hematol 2006; 34: 996–1009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Levesque JP, Hendy J, Takamatsu Y, Williams B, Winkler IG, Simmons PJ . Mobilization by either cyclophosphamide or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor transforms the bone marrow into a highly proteolytic environment. Exp Hematol 2002; 30: 440–449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Levesque JP, Winkler IG, Larsen SR, Rasko JE . Mobilization of bone marrow-derived progenitors. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2007; 180: 3–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Levesque JP, Hendy J, Takamatsu Y, Simmons PJ, Bendall LJ . Disruption of the CXCR4/CXCL12 chemotactic interaction during hematopoietic stem cell mobilization induced by GCSF or cyclophosphamide. J Clin Invest 2003; 111: 187–196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Levesque JP, Hendy J, Winkler IG, Takamatsu Y, Simmons PJ . Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induces the release in the bone marrow of proteases that cleave c-KIT receptor (CD117) from the surface of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Exp Hematol 2003; 31: 109–117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Broxmeyer HE, Hangoc G, Cooper S et al. Interference of the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis in mice with AMD3100 induces rapid high level mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells, and AMD3100 acts synergistically with G-CSF and MIP-1alpha to mobilize progenitors. Blood 2001; 98: 811a.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Devine SM, Vij R, Rettig M, Todt L, McGlauchlen K, Fisher N et al. Rapid mobilization of functional donor hematopoietic cells without G-CSF using AMD3100, an antagonist of the CXCR4/SDF-1 interaction. Blood 2008; 112: 990–998.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cashen AF, Nervi B, DiPersio J . AMD3100: CXCR4 antagonist and rapid stem cell-mobilizing agent. Future Oncol 2007; 3: 19–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Molineux G, Kinstler O, Briddell B, Hartley C, McElroy P, Kerzic P et al. A new form of Filgrastim with sustained duration in vivo and enhanced ability to mobilize PBPC in both mice and humans. Exp Hematol 1999; 27: 1724–1734.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Molineux G . Pegfilgrastim: using pegylation technology to improve neutropenia support in cancer patients. Anticancer Drugs 2003; 14: 259–264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Biganzoli L, Untch M, Skacel T, Pico JL . Neulasta (pegfilgrastim): a once-per-cycle option for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Semin Oncol 2004; 31 (3 Suppl 8): 27–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Crawford J . Once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Semin Oncol 2003; 30 (4 Suppl 13): 24–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Steidl U, Fenk R, Bruns I, Neumann F, Kondakci M, Hoyer B et al. Successful transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells mobilized by chemotherapy and a single dose of pegylated G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 35: 33–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruns I, Steidl U, Kronenwett R, Fenk R, Graef T, Rohr UP et al. A single dose of 6 or 12 mg of pegfilgrastim for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization results in similar yields of CD34+ progenitors in patients with multiple myeloma. Transfusion 2006; 46: 180–185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Russell N, Mesters R, Schubert J, Boogaerts M, Johnsen HE, Canizo CD et al. A phase 2 pilot study of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim for mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving chemotherapy. Haematologica 2008; 93: 405–412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kroschinsky F, Holig K, Platzbecker U, Poppe-Thiede K, Ordemann R, Blechschmidt M et al. Efficacy of single-dose pegfilgrastim after chemotherapy for the mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem cells in patients with malignant lymphoma or multiple myeloma. Transfusion 2006; 46: 1417–1423.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tricot G, Barlogie B, Zangari M, van Rhee F, Hoering A, Szymonifka J et al. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in myeloma with either pegfilgrastim or filgrastim following chemotherapy. Haematologica 2008; 93: 1739–1742.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Simona B, Cristina R, Luca N, Sara S, Aleksandra B, Paola B et al. A single dose of Pegfilgrastim versus daily Filgrastim to evaluate the mobilization and the engraftment of autologous peripheral hematopoietic progenitors in malignant lymphoma patients candidate for high-dose chemotherapy. Transfus Apher Sci 2010; 43: 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Watring NJ, Wagner TW, Stark JJ . Spontaneous splenic rupture secondary to pegfilgrastim to prevent neutropenia in a patient with non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Am J Emerg Med 2007; 25: 247–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hatzimichael E, Benetatos L, Stebbing J, Kapsali E, Panayiotopoulou S, Bourantas KL . Spontaneous splenic haematoma in a multiple myeloma patient receiving pegfilgrastim support. Clin Lab Haematol 2006; 28: 416–418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuendgen A, Fenk R, Bruns I, Dommach M, Schutte A, Engers R et al. Splenic rupture following administration of pegfilgrastim in a patient with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 38: 69–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Arshad M, Seiter K, Bilaniuk J, Qureshi A, Patil A, Ramaswamy G et al. Side effects related to cancer treatment: CASE 2. Splenic rupture following pegfilgrastim. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 8533–8534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fruehauf S, Klaus J, Huesing J, Veldwijk MR, Buss EC, Topaly J et al. Efficient mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following CAD chemotherapy and a single dose of pegylated G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007; 39: 743–750.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kroschinsky F, Holig K, Poppe-Thiede K, Zimmer K, Ordemann R, Blechschmidt M et al. Single-dose pegfilgrastim for the mobilization of allogeneic CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells in healthy family and unrelated donors. Haematologica 2005; 90: 1665–1671.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hill GR, Morris ES, Fuery M, Hutchins C, Butler J, Grigg A et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation with peripheral blood stem cells mobilized by pegylated G-CSF. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12: 603–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hosing C, Qazilbash MH, Kebriaei P, Giralt S, Davis MS, Popat U et al. Fixed-dose single agent pegfilgrastim for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilisation in patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2006; 133: 533–537.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Willis F, Woll P, Theti D, Jamali H, Bacon P, Baker N et al. Pegfilgrastim for peripheral CD34+ mobilization in patients with solid tumours. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 43: 927–934.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Merlin E, Zohar S, Jerome C, Veyrat-Masson R, Marceau G, Paillard C et al. Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization and harvesting in children with malignancies: do the advantages of pegfilgrastim really translate into clinical benefit? Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 43: 919–925.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Visani G, Lemoli RM, Tosi P, Martinelli G, Testoni N, Ricci P et al. Fludarabine-containing regimens severely impair peripheral blood stem cells mobilization and collection in acute myeloid leukaemia patients. Br J Haematol 1999; 105: 775–779.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Laszlo D, Galieni P, Raspadori D, Scalia G, Bigazzi C, Bocchia M et al. Fludarabine containing-regimens may adversely affect peripheral blood stem cell collection in low-grade non Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Leuk Lymphoma 2000; 37: 157–161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Morgan S, Seymour JF, Grigg A, Matthews JP, Prince HM, Wolf MM, Januszewicz EH . Predictive factors for successful stem cell mobilization in patients with indolent lymphoproliferative disorders previously treated with fludarabine. Leukemia 2004; 18: 1034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Isidori A, Tani M, Bonifazi F, Zinzani P, Curti A, Motta MR et al. Phase II study of a single pegfilgrastim injection as an adjunct to chemotherapy to mobilize stem cells into the peripheral blood of pretreated lymphoma patients. Haematologica 2005; 90: 225–231.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Putkonen M, Rauhala A, Pelliniemi TT, Remes K . Single-dose pegfilgrastim is comparable to daily filgrastim in mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells: a case-matched study in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies. Ann Hematol. 2009; 88: 673–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

KEH is supported by Cancer Council of Victoria Early Career Clinician Researcher Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K E Herbert.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

KEH is a recipient of a Cancer Council of Victoria Early Career Clinician Researcher Fellowship. Professor Prince has received lecture fees and research funding from Amgen Inc. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herbert, K., Gambell, P., Link, E. et al. Pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim for cytokine-alone mobilization of autologous haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Bone Marrow Transplant 48, 351–356 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.145

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.145

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links