Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Die Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) wurde 2003 konzipiert, um das Konstrukt der Resilienz zu messen. In dieser Studie wurden die ersten deutschsprachigen Übersetzungen der 10- und 25 Item-Version der CD-RISC untersucht. Der Frage nach der faktoriellen Struktur des Selbstratingfragebogens im Original und in Übersetzungen wurde bereits in internationalen Studien nachgegangen, wobei unterschiedliche Faktorenstrukturen gefunden wurden. Fragestellung: Was sind die faktoriellen und psychometrischen Eigenschaften der deutschsprachigen CD-RISC Fassung? Methoden: An einer Stichprobe von 201 gesunden Probanden wurde mit einer Hauptkomponentenanalyse untersucht, welche Komponenten die Datenstruktur am besten beschreiben. Konvergente Validität wurde mit der deutschen Version der Resilienzskala (RS-25) von Wagnild und Young (1993), Test-Retest-Reliabilität wurde mit erneuter Messung der CD-RISC nach sechs Monaten überprüft. Zusätzlich wurden Korrelationen zu Persönlichkeitsfacetten mittels dem NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI: Borkenau & Ostendorf, 1993) zur Überprüfung der diskriminanten Validität berechnet. Ergebnisse: Die Exploration der Komponentenstruktur ergab eine eindimensionale Struktur für beide Versionen der deutschensprachigen CD-RISC. Test-Retest-Reliabilität, konvergente und diskriminante Validität waren zufriedenstellend. Die CD-RSIC kann als valides and reliables Messinstrument zur Erfassung des Konstrukts der Resilienz betrachtet werden.
Abstract. The Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) is a self-rating instrument that was designed in 2003 to measure resilience. This study assessed the first German translation of the 10- and 25-item version of the CD-RISC. The factorial structure of the original CD-RISC and its translations were previously investigated in international studies and resulted in varying factorial solutions. This study aimed to examine how reliable and valid the factorial and psychometric properties of the German CD-RISC are. Exploratory principal axis analyses were performed in a healthy sample of 201 adults. The Resilience Scale (RS-25) by Wagnild and Young (1993) was used to conduct convergent validity testing, and test–retest reliability was evaluated after 6 months. In addition, correlations among personality traits measured via the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI; Borkenau & Ostendorf, 1993) were calculated to test discriminant validity. Exploratory analyses indicated the presence of one component for both versions. Test–retest reliability as well as convergent and discriminant validity were satisfying. The CD-RSIC may be used as a valid and reliable measurement to assess resilience in nonclinical populations.
Literatur
2006). A review of instruments measuring resilience. Issues in comprehensive Pediatric nursing, 29, 103 – 125.
(2005). Resilience, hardiness, sense of coherence, and posttraumatic growth: All paths leading to ‚light at the end of the tunnel? Journal of Loss and Trauma, 10, 253 – 65.
(1997). Salutogenese. Zur Entmystifizierung der Gesundheit. Tübingen: dgvt.
(1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV. 4th ed. Washington (DC). Retrieved December 08, 2014 from http://www.psychiatryonline.com/DSMPDF/dsm-iv.pdf
(1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae (Handanweisung). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2004). SPSS 12. Bonn: mitp-Verlag.
(2011). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion. München: Pearson.
(2010). The Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Testing the invariance of a uni-dimensional resilience measure that is independent of positive and negative affect. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 527 – 531.
(2006). Relationship of resilience to personality, coping, and psychiatric symptoms in young adults. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 585 – 599.
(2007). Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20, 1019 – 1028.
(2013). Psychometric Properties of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 Among Low-Income, African American Men. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1349 – 1354.
(2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 152, 76 – 82.
(2010). Resilience and mental health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 479 – 495.
(1997). Lehrbuch zur psychologischen Diagnostik: mit Hinweisen zur Intervention (2., überarbeitete und erweiterte Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2013). Psychological resilience: A review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. European Psychologist, 18, 12 – 23.
(2014). Disentangling sense of coherence and resilience in case of multiple traumas. Journal of Affective Disorders, 160, 21 – 26.
(2002). SCL-90-R. Die Symptom-Checkliste von Derogatis, Deutsche Version (Manual). Göttingen: Beltz.
(2005). Resilience in relation to personality and intelligence. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 14, 29 – 42.
(2003). A new rating scale for adult resilience: What are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 12, 65 – 76.
(1997). SKID-II. Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV. Achse II: Persönlichkeitsstörungen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2013). Psychometric properties of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale with older American Indians: The Native Elder Care Study. Research on Aging, 35, 123 – 143.
(2007). Teachers resilience: A necessary condition for effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1302 – 1316.
(1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179 – 185.
(2012). The Korean Version of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale: An extended validation. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 28, 319 – 326.
(2010). Establishing the psychometric qualities of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in a trauma survivor sample. Psychiatry Research, 179, 350 – 356.
(2009). Psychometric evaluation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) using Iranian students. International Journal of Testing, 9, 60 – 66.
(2008). Measurement and predictors of resilience among community-dwelling older women. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43, 148 – 154.
(2009). Resilience: A conceptual bridge between coping and development. European Psychologist, 14, 40 – 50.
(2014). Resilience as a mediator between extraversion, neuroticism and happiness, PA and NA. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 128 – 133.
(1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130 – 149.
(2013). Psychometric properties of Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale in a Spanish sample of entrepreneurs. Psicothema, 25, 245 – 251.
(2006). Correlations for Adolescent Resilience Scale with Big Five Personality Traits.. Psychological Reports, 98, 927 – 930.
(2008). Resilienz: Funktionale Adaptation an widrige Umgebungsbedingungen. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 56, 255 – 263.
(2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 32, 396 – 402.
(2002). The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 307 – 321.
(2002). Resilience in the face of catastrophe: Optimism, personality and coping in the Kosovo crisis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1604 – 1627.
(2013). Resilience in mental health: Linking psychological and neurobiological perspectives. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 128, 3 – 20.
(1985). Resilience in the face of adversity: Protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 598 – 611.
(2007). Richtlinien zur Übersetzung fremdsprachlicher Messinstrumente. Diagnostica, 53, 1 – 2.
(2005). Die Resilienzskala–Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der psychischen Widerstandsfähigkeit als Personmerkmal. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 53, 16 – 39.
(2010). Measuring resilience in women experiencing infertility using the CD-RISC: Examining infertility-related stress, general distress, and coping styles. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 44, 236 – 241.
(2008). The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of behavioral medicine, 15, 194 – 200.
(2007). An abbreviated version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the CD-RISC2: Psychometric properties and applications in psychopharmacological trials. Psychiatry Research,152, 293 – 297.
(1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321 – 327.
(2013). Resilienz–Positive Entwicklung trotz belastender Lebensumstände. Psychotherapie im Dialog, 14, 16 – 20.
(1993). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1, 165 – 178.
(2010). Psychometric properties of the 10-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale in Chinese earthquake victims. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 64, 499 – 504.
(2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 1 – 18.
(1997). Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV. Achse I: Psychische Störungen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2007). Factor analysis and psychometric evaluation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) with Chinese people. Social Behavior and Personality, 35, 19 – 30.
(